<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fukushima Leaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>30 ans d&#039;accidents et de mensonges à la centrale nucléaire de Fukushima</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:53:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>fr</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Fukushima Leaks" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Fukushima Leaks : revue de presse</title>
		<link>http://fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/fukushima-leaks-revue-de-presse/</link>
		<comments>http://fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/fukushima-leaks-revue-de-presse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fukushimleaks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accident nucléaire de Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centrale nuclaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reacteurs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fukushima leaks 30 ans d&#8217;accidents et de mensonges à la centrale nucléaire de Fukushima Revue de presse (attention : pour usage personnel seulement. Les articles sont sous copyright) 5 novembre 1979 : le réacteur n°2 arrêté en raison d&#8217;une panne &#8230; <a href="http://fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/fukushima-leaks-revue-de-presse/">Lire la suite <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21364062&amp;post=14&amp;subd=fukushimaleaks&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="western" style="text-align:center;"><a name="__RefHeading__19_323964393"></a> <span style="font-size:large;"><strong>Fukushima leaks</strong></span></p>
<p class="western" style="text-align:center;"><a name="__RefHeading__21_323964393"></a> <span style="font-size:large;"><strong>30 ans d&#8217;accidents et de  mensonges à la centrale nucléaire de Fukushima<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;text-align:center;">Revue de presse (attention : pour usage personnel seulement.<br />
Les  articles sont sous copyright)</p>
<div id="Table des matières1" dir="ltr">
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__23_323964393">5    novembre 1979 : le réacteur n°2 arrêté en    raison d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__25_323964393">17    septembre 1980 : les centrales japonaises emploient des travailleurs    sans véritable formation</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__27_323964393">3    octobre 1985 : incendie sur le réacteur 1</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__29_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__29_323964393">27 août    1986 : arrêt du réacteur n°5 pour une panne de    l&#8217;alimentation en eau</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__31_323964393">4    décembre 1986 : arrêt du réacteur 1 en raison    d&#8217;une panne de l&#8217;air conditionné</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__33_323964393">23    avril 1987 : un tremblement de terre cause l&#8217;arrêt de trois    réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__35_323964393">22    juin 1987 : l&#8217;IAEA alerte sur les risques d&#8217;incendie</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__37_323964393">21    janvier 1988 : incendie dans le circuit d&#8217;air conditionné du    réacteur 1</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__39_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__39_323964393">16 août    1988 : les mouvements anti-nucléaires japonais alertent sur    les risques de vieillissement des réacteurs de Fukushima</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__41_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__41_323964393">12    décembre 1988 : arrêt du réacteur 2 pour une    panne d&#8217;une soupape de vapeur</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__43_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__43_323964393">2 janvier    1989 : TEPCO ne sait toujours pas pourquoi le tremblement de terre    du 22 avril 1987 a arrêté les réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__45_323964393">30    janvier 1989 : certains employés de la centrale présentent    des troubles chromosomiques</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__47_323964393">3    février 1989 : une panne sur un joint aurait pu entraîner    une fusion du coeur sur le réacteur n°2</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__49_323964393">9    février 1989 : des recherches pour comprendre les accidents    sur les joints des pompes</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__51_323964393">28    février 1989 : des débris de métal trouvés    dans les réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__53_323964393">20    avril 1989 : TEPCO présente des excuses publiques pour la    panne d&#8217;une pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__55_323964393">3    juin 1989 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur à la suite d&#8217;une    fuite d&#8217;eau</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__57_323964393">19    juin 1989 : une succession d&#8217;accidents dans les centrales japonaises</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__59_323964393">20    octobre 1989 : les mesures de sécurité dans les    centrales japonaises &laquo;&nbsp;sont à même de prévenir    un accident grave&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__61_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__61_323964393">26 octobre    1989 : alerte sur le vieillissement des centrales japonaises</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__63_323964393">30    novembre 1989 : l&#8217;AEC déclare que malgré les    accidents, le Japon n&#8217;abandonnera pas l&#8217;énergie nucléaire. </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__65_323964393">8    janvier 1990 : une accumulation d&#8217;accidents en 1989</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__67_323964393">23    février 1990 : arrêt du réacteur 2 en raison    d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__69_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__69_323964393">20 mars    1990 : la Haute-Cour de Sendai repousse une demande d&#8217;arrêt de    la centrale de Fukushima</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__71_323964393">29    mars 1990 : La Haute-Cour de Sendai déclare que les centrales    sont bien conçues et ne peuvent pas causer de catastrophes </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__73_323964393">14    avril 1990 : les accidents nucléaires font douter les    Japonais</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__75_323964393">28    juin 1990 : manifestation anti-nucléaire lors de l&#8217;assemblée    annuelle des actionnaires de TEPCO</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__77_323964393">12    juillet 1990 : le ministère japonais déclare que le    réacteur 3 est en état de marche</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__79_323964393">9    août 1990 : TEPCO attend la remise en marche du réacteur    3 en raison d&#8217;une forte demande d&#8217;électricité, </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__81_323964393">6    septembre 1990 : report du redémarrage du réacteur 3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__83_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__83_323964393">11 octobre    1990 : la NSC approuve le redémarrage du réacteur 3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__85_323964393">23    octobre 1990 : &laquo;&nbsp;les ingénieurs japonais estiment que    leurs centrales sont virtuellement à l&#8217;abri des tremblements    de terre&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__87_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__87_323964393">25 octobre    1990 : inquiétudes dans le voisinage pour le rédémarrage    du réacteur 3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__89_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__89_323964393">1 novembre    1990 : l&#8217;AEC plaide pour un développement du nucléaire</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__91_323964393">4    avril 1991 : poursuite judiciaire poru demander l&#8217;arrêt du    réacteur n°3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__93_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__93_323964393">23 mai    1991 : 23 accidents déclarés dans les centrales    japonaises en 1990</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__95_323964393">29    octobre 1991 : des blocs de construction française pour la    digue de Fukushima</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__97_323964393">8    juillet 1992 : arrêt du réacteur 1 à la suite    d&#8217;une hausse de pression</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__99_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__99_323964393">29    septembre 1992 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur à la suite    d&#8217;une panne sur une  pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__101_323964393">30    septembre 1992 : arrêt du réacteur 2 à la suite    d&#8217;une erreur humaine</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__103_323964393">30    septembre 1992 : plaintes contre TEPCO en raison de mauvaises    informations sur les accidents</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__105_323964393">1    octobre 1992 : le Japon s&#8217;interroge sur la sécurité de    ses centrales nucléaires</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__107_323964393">29    octobre 1992 : deux groupes d&#8217;anti-nucléaires déboutés    de leurs poursuites judiciaires </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__109_323964393">31    octobre 1992 : un réacteur arrêté en raison    d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__111_323964393">5    novembre 1992 : la Cour suprême décide que les    tribunaux ne peuvent pas juger les questions de sécurité    nucléaire</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__113_323964393">10    novembre 1992 : arrêt du réacteur 1à la suite    d&#8217;une panne sur le moteur d&#8217;une valve</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__115_323964393">7    avril 1993 : TEPCO projette de construire deux nouveaux réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__117_323964393">10    mai 1993 : poursuites judiciaires après la mort d&#8217;un    travailleur de la centrale</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__119_323964393">20    juin 1994 : l&#8217;ANRE demande une enquête sur l&#8217;accident de mai</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__121_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__121_323964393">1 août    1994 : reconnaissance d&#8217;irradiation pour deux travailleurs de la    centrale </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__123_323964393">22    août 1994 : TEPCO espère pouvoir construire deux    nouveaux réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__125_323964393">14    septembre 1995 : un tremblement de terre accélère la    réaction nucléaire sur trois réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__127_323964393">27    novembre 1995 : arrêt du réacteur 6 en raison de    pressions anormales</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__129_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__129_323964393">1 mai    1996 : une &laquo;&nbsp;pléthore d&#8217;accidents&nbsp;&raquo; à    Fukushima</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__131_323964393">30    septembre 1996 : construction du réacteur n°8</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__133_323964393">24    octobre 1996 : TEPCO achète des machines anglaises pour    réparer  ses enceintes de confinement</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__135_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__135_323964393">27    novembre 1996 : retard dans le redémarrage de réacteurs    à la suite de la découverte de fissures</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__137_323964393">12    décembre 1996 TEPCO demande l&#8217;autorisation de construire deux    nouveaux réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__139_323964393">20    décembre 1996 : des actionnaires de TEPCO déboutés    d&#8217;une demande d&#8217;arrêt de la centrale</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__141_323964393">17    janvier 1997 : petit incendie au réacteur n°2</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__143_323964393">21    janvier 1997 : délai dans le redémarrage d&#8217;un réacteur    après la découverte de fuites</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__145_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__145_323964393">29 avril    1997 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 à la suite    d&#8217;une fuite de gaz radioactif</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__147_323964393">30    avril 1997 : le réacteur n°2 restera arrêté    jusqu&#8217;à une date non précisée</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__149_323964393">7    mai 1997 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 en raison d&#8217;une    baisse du liquide réfrigérant</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__151_323964393">20    mai 1997 : redémarrage envisagé du réacteur n°2</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__153_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__153_323964393">9 juin    1997 : fuite radioactive sur le réacteur n°1</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__155_323964393">12    juin 1997 : forte augmentation des accidents dans les centrales    japonaises</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__157_323964393">14    octobre 1997 : fissure découverte sur une canalisation</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__159_323964393">5    décembre 1997 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur à la    suite d&#8217;une panne</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__161_323964393">20    janvier 1998 : TEPCO envisage de remplacer 144 barres de contrôle    en raison de malfaçons</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__163_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__163_323964393">24    janvier 1998 : les résidents vivant autour de la centrale    s&#8217;inquiètent de l&#8217;utilisation du plutonium</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__165_323964393">30    juillet 1998 : arrêt du réacteur n°6 à la    suite d&#8217;une fuite de vapeur </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__167_323964393">18    août 1998 : TEPCO demande aux autorités locales    l&#8217;autorisation d&#8217;utiliser du plutonium (MOX)</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__169_323964393">26    août 1998 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 à la    suite d&#8217;une panne</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__171_323964393">2    novembre 1998 : la préfecture de Fukushima accepte l&#8217;usage du    MOX</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__173_323964393">6    décembre 1998 : 75% des résidents de la centrale de    Kashiwazaki-Kariwa  sont opposés à l&#8217;usage du MOX</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__175_323964393">25    janvier 1999 : incendie sur le réacteur n°1</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__177_323964393">8    février 1999 : TEPCO déclare que son plus vieux    réacteur (28 ans) peut encore fonctionner 32 ans</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__179_323964393">27    avril 1999 : le Japon envisage de développer son nucléaire    civil</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__181_323964393">28    juin 1999 : des groupes anti-nucléaires demandent au Japon de    renoncer au traitement du plutonium</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__183_323964393">30    juin 1999 : La France va envoyer du MOX au Japon</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__185_323964393">16    juillet 1999 : deuxième chargement de MOX français    pour le Japon</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__187_323964393">10    septembre 1999 : arrivée attendue du MOX français à    Fukushima</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__189_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__189_323964393">28    septembre 1999 : manifestations au Japon contre l&#8217;arrivée du    MOX français</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__191_323964393">8    octobre 1999 : fuites radioactives dans un dépôt de    déchets de la centrale de Fukushima</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__193_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__193_323964393">1 janvier    2000 : le &laquo;&nbsp;bug de l&#8217;an 2000&#8243; frappe quelques équipements    dans les centrales japonaises</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__195_323964393">10    janvier 2000 : TEPCO repousse ses projets d&#8217;utilisation du MOX dans    le  réacteur n°3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__197_323964393">21    juillet 2000 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur après une    fuite consécutive à un tremblement de terre</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__199_323964393">24    juillet 2000 : fermeture du réacteur n°2 en raison d&#8217;une    fuite de pétrole dans une turbine</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__201_323964393">24    juillet 2000 : le gouvernement japonais reconnaît l&#8217;inquiétude    du public en raison des récents accidents nucléaires</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__203_323964393">25    juillet 2000 :  un troisième réacteur fermé en    raison d&#8217;une augmentation anormale de l&#8217;iode</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__205_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__205_323964393">2 août    2000 : arrêt du réacteur n°6 en raison de la    rupture d&#8217;une canalisation, abîmée lors du dernier    tremblement de terre</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__207_323964393">30    septembre 2000 : chronologie des principaux accidents nucléaires    au Japon</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__209_323964393">31    octobre 2000 : Fukushima devrait être la première    centrale à utiliser du MOX</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__211_323964393">9    février 2001 : TEPCO persiste à vouloir construire de    nouveaux réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__213_323964393">26    février 2001 : le gouverneur de Fukushima refuse d&#8217;autoriser    l&#8217;utilisation de MOX</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__215_323964393">26    février 2001 : TEPCO annonce un gel de ses constructions de    nouveaux réacteurs. Colère des collectivités    locales</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__217_323964393">26    mars 2001 : les anti-nuclaires déboutés de leurs    poursuites judiciaires visant à interdire l&#8217;usage du MOX</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__219_323964393">2    avril 2001 TEPCO reporte l&#8217;utilisation du MOX dans ses centrales</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__221_323964393">3    avril 2001 : un maire demande des comptes au gouverneur de Fukushima    qui a interdit l&#8217;usage du MOX</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__223_323964393">15    mai 2001 : arrêt planifié du réacteur n°6    après la découverte de fuites radioactives</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__225_323964393">24    août 2001 : le METI ordonne la vérification de 28    réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__227_323964393">30    août 2001 : installation de quatre barres de liaisons pour    réparer une fissure sur le réacteur 3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__229_323964393">1    novembre 2001 : arrêt automatique du réacteur n°2    pour des raisons inconnues</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__231_323964393">17    juin 2002 : la préfecture de Fukishima envisage d&#8217;augmenter    la taxe nucléaire à 13,5%</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__233_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__233_323964393">21 juin    2002 :  le ministre de l&#8217;Economie est opposé à    l&#8217;augmentation de la taxe nucléaire</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__235_323964393">4    juillet 2002 : accord de l&#8217;assemblée préfectorale pour    la hausse de la taxe nucléaire</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__237_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__237_323964393">10 août    2002 : inquiétudes sur la résistance des centrales en    cas de tremblement de terre</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__239_323964393">22    août 2002 : fissures découvertes dans certaines    canalisations</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__241_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__241_323964393">29 août    2002 : TEPCO a dissimulé plusieurs accidents nucléaires    depuis les années 80</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__243_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__243_323964393">30 août    2002 : les falsifications de TEPCO remettent en question la sécurité    nucléaire</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__245_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__245_323964393">31 août    2002 : certaines fuites ont été négligées    par des employés de TEPCO</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__247_323964393">2    septembre 2002 : nouvelles révélations sur les    falsifications de TEPCO</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__249_323964393">2    septembre 2002 : arrêt prévu de quatre réacteurs    utilisant des pièces endommagées</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__251_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__251_323964393">2    septembre 2002 : les réacteurs suspects continueront à    fonctionner</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__253_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__253_323964393">3    septembre 2002 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 en raison    d&#8217;une fuite radioactive. </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__255_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__255_323964393">4    septembre 2002 : fuite de gaz radioactif : cent fois la dose normale</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__257_323964393">4    septembre 2002 : TEPCO gèle la construction de quatre    nouveaux réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__259_323964393">6    septembre 2002 : TEPCO a camouflé des fissures importantes    pendant quatre ans</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__261_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__261_323964393">13    septembre 2002 : TEPCO a falsifié des enregistrements vidéo</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__263_323964393">16    septembre 2002 : TEPCO a utilisé des pièces non    autorisées dans un réacteur</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__265_323964393">26    septembre 2002 : nombreuses fissures découvertes sur le    réacteur n°3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__267_323964393">30    septembre 2002 : le gouverneur de Fukushima retire son accord pour    l&#8217;utilisation de plutonium</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__269_323964393">4    octobre 2002 : de nouvelles  fissures découvertes sur le    réacteur n°2</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__271_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__271_323964393">11    octobre 2002 : un cinquième réacteur va être    arrêté pour rechercher d&#8217;éventuelles fissures</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__273_323964393">14    octobre 2002 : découverte de nouvelles fuites sur le réacteur    n°4</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__275_323964393">25    octobre 2002 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur sur ordre des    autorités</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__277_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__277_323964393">25    octobre 2002 : de nouvelles falsifications découvertes à    Fukushima</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__279_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__279_323964393">1    novembre 2002 : TEPCO retarde la construction de nouveaux réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__281_323964393">11    novembre 2002 : la préfecture de Fukushima retarde    l&#8217;application de l&#8217;augmentation de sa taxe nucléaire</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__283_323964393">19    novembre 2002 : les Japonais doutent de leur industrie nucléaire</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__285_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__285_323964393">11    décembre 2002 : publication du rapport sur les falsifications    de TEPCO </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__287_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__287_323964393">26    décembre 2002 : le gouvernement accepte l&#8217;augmentation de la    taxe nucléaire dans la préféceture du Fukushima</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__289_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__289_323964393">15    janvier 2003 : la préfecture de Fukushima ne sait pas si    TEPCO va relancer ses réacteurs </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__291_323964393">16    janvier 2003 : de nouvelles fissures découvertes sur deux    réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__293_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__293_323964393">10    février 2003 : TEPCO envisage de redémarrer trois    réacteurs fin mars</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__295_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__295_323964393">14    février 2003 : TEPCO envisage d&#8217;arrêter tous ses    réacteurs en avril pour des vérifications de sécurité</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__297_323964393">18    février 2003 : TEPCO est incapable de préciser la date    de redémarrage de ses réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__299_323964393">24    février 2003 : le gouvernement impose à TEPCO    d&#8217;améliorer ses procédures de sécurité</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__301_323964393">6    mars 2003 : craintes de pénurie d&#8217;électricité    en raison de la fermeture de 17 réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__303_323964393">11    mars 2003 : le gouvernement autorise, sous conditions, le    rédémarrage des réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__305_323964393">12    mars 2003 : TEPCO publie son plan de remise en état de ses    réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__307_323964393">14    avril 2003 : l&#8217;arrêt de tous les réacteurs de TEPCO    fait craindre des coupures d&#8217;électricité</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__309_323964393"> </a><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__309_323964393">29 mai    2003 : TEPCO attend l&#8217;autorisation de redémarrer son réacteur    n°6</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__311_323964393">16    juin 2003 : découverte d&#8217;une pièce manquante sur le    réacteur n°3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__313_323964393">10    juillet 2003 : le gouverneur de Fukushima autorise le redémarrage    du réacteur n°6</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__315_323964393">18    août 2003 : redémarrage du réacteur n°3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__317_323964393">25    septembre 2003 : un travailleur de la centrale exposé à    des radiations</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__319_323964393">26    septembre 2003 : inquiétudes sur la résistance des    centrales nucléaires après un important tremblement de    terre</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__321_323964393">18    novembre 2003 : l&#8217;IEA recommande au Japon de restaurer la confiance    du public dans l&#8217;industrie nucléaire</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__323_323964393">27    janvier 2004 : fuite d&#8217;eau sur le réacteur n°6</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__325_323964393">4    mars 2004 : la méfiance du public retarde le redémarrage    des centrales nucléaires</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__327_323964393">17    mars 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°4</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__329_323964393">3    juin 2004 : le centre de stockage de déchets radioactifs    reprend ses activités</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__331_323964393">29    juin 2004 : TEPCO va redémarrer trois de ses réacteurs    et souhaite y utiliser du plutonium</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__333_323964393">5    août 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°3 en raison    de &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes techniques&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__335_323964393">6    août 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°2</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__337_323964393">9    août 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 à la    suite d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__339_323964393">17    août 2004 : explosion sur une conduite de vapeur </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__341_323964393">26    août 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°2</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__343_323964393">27    septembre 2004 : les centrales japonaises devront fermer en 2016 si    elles ne peuvent pas recycler leurs déchets</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__345_323964393">29    septembre 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 pour    &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes techniques&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__347_323964393">6    octobre 2004 : érosion anormale des conduites d&#8217;eau sur le    réacteur n°1</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__349_323964393">7    octobre 2004 : le gouvernement assure que l&#8217;érosion des    conduites d&#8217;eau ne pose pas de problèmes</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__351_323964393">14    octobre 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 à la    suite d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__353_323964393">18    octobre 2004 : report du redémarrage du réacteur n°4    en raison d&#8217;un problème sur le circuit de refroidissement</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__355_323964393">20    octobre 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°5</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__357_323964393">20    octobre 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°4 après    réparations</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__359_323964393">28    octobre 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°4 en raison de    la panne d&#8217;une valve</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__361_323964393">29    octobre 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°2</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__363_323964393">2    novembre 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°4</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__365_323964393">4    novembre 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°6</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__367_323964393">30    novembre 2004 : enquête du gouvernement de Fukushima sur le    réacteur n°1</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__369_323964393">8    décembre 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 en    raison d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__371_323964393">17    décembre 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°6 en    raison d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__373_323964393">17    décembre 2004 : TEPCO va arrêter tous ses réacteurs    pour chercher l&#8217;origine d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__375_323964393">7    janvier 2005 : arrêt de tous les réacteurs en raison    d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__377_323964393">9    février 2005 : redémarrage des six réacteurs</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__379_323964393">14    février 2005 :  le réacteur n°3 ne redémarrera    qu&#8217;en mars</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__381_323964393">22    février 2005 : redémarrage du réacteur n°2</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__383_323964393">17    mars 2005 : le réacteur n°3 ne peut être redémarré    en raison d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__385_323964393">18    mars 2005 : arrêt du réacteur N°3 en raison d&#8217;une    panne sur une pompe à eau</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__387_323964393">21    avril 2005 : redémarrage du réacteur n°1</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__389_323964393">26    mai 2005 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 en raison d&#8217;un    &laquo;&nbsp;problème technique&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__391_323964393">3    juin 2005 : redémarrage du réacteur n°1</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__393_323964393">11    août 2005 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 à la    suite d&#8217;une fuite radioactive</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__395_323964393">17    août 2005 : un tremblement de terre occasionne une fuite d&#8217;eau    radioactive</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__397_323964393">22    août 2005 : arrêt du réacteur n°5 à la    suite d&#8217;un problème sur le circuit de refroidissement</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__399_323964393">16    septembre 2005 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 pour réparer    une pompe </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__401_323964393">10    octobre 2005 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 en raison    d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__403_323964393">12    décembre 2005 : arrêt du réacteur n°4 en    raison d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__405_323964393">21    décembre 2005 : réduction de l&#8217;activité du    réacteur n°2 à la suite de &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes    techniques&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__407_323964393">19    janvier 2006 : découverte de fissures sur les barres de    contrôle du réacteur n°6</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__409_323964393">6    février 2006 : Toshiba a falsifié les données    d&#8217;un compteur du réacteur n°6</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__411_323964393">20    février 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°3 en    raison d&#8217;une fuite sur une pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__413_323964393">17    mars 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°4 en raison d&#8217;une    panne sur une pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__415_323964393">28    avril 2006 : les procédures de sécurité en cas    de tremblement de terre doivent être améliorées</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__417_323964393">15    mai 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°4 en raison d&#8217;une    fuite d&#8217;huile</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__419_323964393">18    mai 2006 : des informations confidentielles sur la sécurité    de la centrale ont été diffusées par erreur sur    Internet</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__421_323964393">22    mai 2006 : fuite radioactive sur le réacteur n°4</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__423_323964393">23    mai 2006 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur à la suite d&#8217;une    fuite de vapeur radioactive</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__425_323964393">30    mai 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°6 en raison d&#8217;une    fuite de vapeur radioactive</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__427_323964393">12    juin 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°3 pour réparation</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__429_323964393">22    juin 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 en raison d&#8217;une    fuite de vapeur radioactive</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__431_323964393">24    juillet 2006 : fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive sur le réacteur n°1</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__433_323964393">1    août 2006 : l&#8217;entreprise qui a construit la centrale n°2    poursuivie pour corruption</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__435_323964393">11    août 2006 : fuite de vapeur radioactive </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__437_323964393">29    septembre 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°4 pour    réparations </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__439_323964393">6    novembre 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°5 à la    suite d&#8217;une panne </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__441_323964393">5    décembre 2006 : TEPCO découvre de nouvelles    falsifications de données dans les rapports de ses centrales</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__443_323964393">17    janvier 2007 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 en raison de    &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__445_323964393">1    février 2007 : nouvelles révélations sur les    falsifications de données</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__447_323964393">18    février 2007 : arrêt du réacteur n°4 en    raison d&#8217;une radioactivité excessive</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__449_323964393">1    mars 2007 : découverte de nouvelles falsification dans les    centrales de TEPCO</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__451_323964393">1    mars 2007 : la découverte des falsifications de TEPCO ne    devraient pas gêner le fonctionnement de ses centrales</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__453_323964393">12    mars 2007 : TEPCO a dissimulé un arrêt d&#8217;urgence d&#8217;un    de ses réacteurs en 1998</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__455_323964393">20    mars 2007 : TEPCO a dissimulé que des barres de contrôle    sont tombées des réacteurs en 1993 et 2000</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__457_323964393">22    mars 2007 : les compagnies qui gèrent les centrales    nucléaires ne communiquent pas entre elles</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__459_323964393">22    mars 2007 : TEPCO a dissimulé des accidents critiques en 1978    et 1999</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__461_323964393">5    avril 2007 : les entreprises qui gèrent le nucléaire    japonais ont commis plus de 10 000 infractions</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__463_323964393">20    avril 2007 : le gouvernement demande des vérifications plus    strictes</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__465_323964393">27    avril 2007 : alerte sur l&#8217;air conditionné sur les réacteurs    n°2 et 4</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__467_323964393">14    juin 2007 : arrêt du réacteur n°3 en raison d&#8217;une    fuite d&#8217;eau</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__469_323964393">16    juillet 2007 : &nbsp;&raquo; Les centrales nucléaires japonaises    conçues pour résister aux pires séismes&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__471_323964393">19    août 2007 : craintes sur la résistance des centrales    japonaises en cas de tremblement de terre</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__473_323964393">21    août 2007 : le gouvernement autorise TEPCO a retarder les    vérifications de sécurité sur son réacteur    n°3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__475_323964393">20    septembre 2007 : fuites radioactives à la suite d&#8217;un    tremblement de terre de magnitude 6.8</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__477_323964393">4    octobre 2007 : TEPCO améliore sa communication à la    suite du tremblement de terre</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__479_323964393">12    octobre 2007 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 en raison    d&#8217;une panne sur l&#8217;échangeur </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__481_323964393">24    mars 2008 : TEPCO demande au gouvernement de prolonger de 10 ans    l&#8217;exploitation du réacteur n°4, qui fonctionne depuis 29    ans</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__483_323964393">31    mars 2008 : les centrales nucléaires doit être prêtes    à affronter des tremblements de terre plus importants</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__485_323964393">10    avril 2008 : TEPCO envisage une croissance de 1% annuel jusqu&#8217;en    2017. Projet de construction de deux nouveaux réacteurs à    Fukushima</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__487_323964393">25    mai 2008 : un travailleur de la centrale, atteint d&#8217;un cancer    consécutif à une irradiation, débouté de    sa demande d&#8217;indemnisation</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__489_323964393">4    juin 2008 : des mineurs employés pour effectuer des    inspections de centrales nucléaires</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__491_323964393">4    juin 2008 : redémarrage du réacteur n°5, arrêté    à la suite de &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes techniques&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__493_323964393">10    juin 2008 : arrêt du réacteur n°5 en raison d&#8217;une    panne de turbine</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__495_323964393">14    juin 2008 : fuite radioactive à la suite d&#8217;un tremblement de    terre</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__497_323964393">11    juillet 2008 : ralentissement du réacteur n°5 pour    réparation</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__499_323964393">18    juillet 2008 : le gouvernement autorise TEPCO à repousser les    opérations de maintenance sur le réacteur n°3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__501_323964393">20    juillet 2008 : une longue liste de procès contre les    centrales nucléaires au Japon</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__503_323964393">6    août 2008 : arrêt du réacteur n°3 pour    &laquo;&nbsp;réparations&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__505_323964393">21    octobre 2008 : des officiels français participent à un    exercice d&#8217;alerte sur le réacteur n°3</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__507_323964393">17    février 2009 :  création de 7 centres de crise à    proximité des centrales nucléaires</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__509_323964393">24    février 2009 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 à    la suite d&#8217;un &laquo;&nbsp;problème technique&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__511_323964393">10    mars 2009 : l&#8217;utilisation de plutonium pourrait enfin être    d&#8217;actualité</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__513_323964393">6    août 2009 : arrêt du réacteur n°3 à la    suite de la découverte d&#8217;une &laquo;&nbsp;anomalie&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__515_323964393">23    novembre 2009 : quel avenir pour le nucléaire au Japon ?</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__517_323964393">16    février 2010 : la préfecture de Fukushima est disposée    à accepter l&#8217;utilisation du plutonium </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__519_323964393">28    février 2010 : les centrales japonaises n&#8217;ont pas souffert du    tsunami</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__521_323964393">3    mars 2010 : arrêt du réacteur n°6 en raison d&#8217;une    canalisation défectueuse</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__523_323964393">2    juin 2010 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 à la suite    d&#8217;une panne du circuit de refroidissement</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__525_323964393">13    juin 2010 : le tremblement de terre n&#8217;a pas affecté la    centrale</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__527_323964393">17    juin 2010 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 à la suite    d&#8217;une &laquo;&nbsp;anomalie&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__529_323964393">9    août 2010 : introduction d&#8217;un recours judiciaire pour    interdire l&#8217;usage du plutonium</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__531_323964393">18    août 2010 : le réacteur n°1 doit être arrêté    à la suite de la découverte d&#8217;une fuite radioactive </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__533_323964393">23    août 2010 : l&#8217;énergie nucléaire est une    opportunité pour le Japon </a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__535_323964393">14    septembre 2010 : le réacteur n°3 va être redémarré    et utilisera du MOX pour le première fois</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__537_323964393">16    septembre 2010 : TEPCO souhaite augmenter la part du nucléaire    et des énergies renouvelables</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__539_323964393">18    septembre 2010 : démarrage de l&#8217;exploitation du MOX</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__541_323964393">25    octobre 2010 : Areva estime que l&#8217;utilisation de MOX ne présente    pas de danger pour les populations</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__543_323964393">5    novembre 2010 : arrêt d&#8217;urgence du réacteur n°5 en    raison de &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes&nbsp;&raquo;</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__545_323964393">13    décembre 2010 : projets et difficultés de TEPCO</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__547_323964393">24    décembre 2010  : redémarrage du réacteur n°5,    arrêté à la suite d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__549_323964393">12    janvier 2011 : TEPCO décide d&#8217;allonger de trois mois le délai    entre deux inspections du réacteur n°3, pour produire    davantage</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__551_323964393">7    février 2011 : la NISA autorise TEPCO à utiliser le    réacteur n°1 (40 ans) pendant 10 ans de plus</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__553_323964393">7    mars 2011 : les projets de TEPCO pour augmenter la production    nucléaire</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__555_323964393">9    mars 2011 : à suite du tremblement de terre, TEPCO &laquo;&nbsp;confirme&nbsp;&raquo;    que la centrale de Fukushima n&#8217;a pas été endommagée</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__557_323964393">11    mars 2011 : une &laquo;&nbsp;anomalie&nbsp;&raquo; signalée sur les    réacteurs 1 et 2</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__559_323964393">11    mars 2011 : l&#8217;IAEA déclare que les réacteurs ont été    arrêtés en toute sécurité lors du    tremblement de terre</a></p>
<p><a class="western" href="#__RefHeading__561_323964393">11    mars 2011 : état d&#8217;urgence déclaré à    Fukushima</a></p>
</div>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__23_323964393"></a> 5 novembre 1979 : le réacteur n°2  arrêté en raison d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>Trouble  with pump closes Japanese reactor quickly </strong></p>
<p>Associated  Press</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Globe and Mail</span></span></span></p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; Pump trouble  automatically shut down a Japanese nuclear power plant&#8217;s reactor  yesterday, less than 24 hours after a slow leak at another reactor  had released 80 tons of coolant water, Government and newspaper  reports said.</p>
<p>No threat of outside radioactivity  was reported at either plant.</p>
<p>The Japanese Atomic Energy Commission  scheduled a meeting today to investigate the water leak in the plant  at Takahama, about 300 miles west of Tokyo, to decide whether that  reactor can resume operations.</p>
<p>The new problem is at the  784,000-kilowatt reactor of the Tokyo Electric and Power Co.&#8217;s plant  at <strong>Fukushima</strong>, about 130 miles north of Tokyo.</p>
<p>Officials said the reactor  automatically stopped operating after developing trouble in the  condenser pump. They said there is no danger of radioactive leakage  and that the company is investigating the cause of the trouble.</p>
<p>Officials are taking seriously the  water leak at the No. 2 reactor of Kansai Electric and Power Co.&#8217;s  Takahama power plant because of its size, press reports said.</p>
<p>Company officials were not available  for comment during the weekend.</p>
<p>The newspaper Asahi said the Takahama  reactor was shut down after warnings sounded in the control room on  Saturday that the level of water in the reactor dropped and  radioactivity levels inside the core increased sharply.</p>
<p>It said no radioactive material was  detected outside the core unit.</p>
<p>The newspaper said 80 tons of the 180  tons of water in the primary cooling system were lost before  officials wearing protective suits could approach and close valves to  stop the water outflow. The contaminated water leaked on to the floor  of the core unit, it said.</p>
<p>The emergency core cooling system,  which pours tons of water into the reactor when core temperatures  reach dangerously high levels, was not needed because of the slowness  of the leak from a pipe in the primary cooling system, the report  added.</p>
<p>The Takahama No. 2 reactor resumed  operations last week after a six-month periodic shutdown for  inspection. It was scheduled to return to full capacity on Nov. 10.</p>
<p>Japan is second to the United States  in the use of nuclear power, with 20 reactors now supplying 10 per  cent of the country&#8217;s electricity needs.</p>
<p>The Takahama reactor was designed by  U.S. Westinghouse.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__25_323964393"></a>17  septembre 1980 : les centrales japonaises emploient des travailleurs  sans véritable formation</h2>
<p><strong>&#8216;Gypsies&#8217;  run A-plants in Japan, book claims </strong></p>
<p>Associated  Press</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Globe and Mail</span></span></span></p>
<p>P20</p>
<p>All  material copyright Thomson Canada Limited or its licensors. All  rights reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; Japan&#8217;s 11 nuclear power  plants are mostly maintained by ill-trained day laborers who violate  safety rules and under-report their exposure to radiation, says a  Japanese journalist who worked in the plants.</p>
<p>Freelance journalist Kunio Horie also  says the utility companies that own the plants ignore or tolerate  safety violations and use day laborers to avoid paying benefits or  higher wages.</p>
<p>Mr. Horie worked for seven months in  three different plants as a manual laborer, one of thousands who  drift from plant to plant under subcontracts. He has written a book  about his experiences, Nuclear Gypsies.</p>
<p>The title comes from the name given  to job-hungry day laborers who work at one plant one day and another  the next.</p>
<p>Mr. Horie said in an interview that  he and his colleagues at one plant in the state of Fukui were ordered  to use a towel to wipe radioactive water off reactor parts.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;It&#8217;s an anachronism for a  supposedly ultra-modern nuclear facility,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>In a plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> state,  Mr. Horie wrote, he told one of his colleagues that a monitoring  device showed he had higher than allowed radioactive contamination on  his boots.</p>
<p>The worker casually suggested Mr.  Horie try a different monitoring device, a &nbsp;&raquo;generous&nbsp;&raquo; one that  showed a lower level.</p>
<p>As the second monitor indicated a  safe level, the colleague smiled and said, &nbsp;&raquo;Now you know better.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Japanese Government statistics show  that 34,155 people were subcontracted to nuclear power plants in  1978.</p>
<p>Officials of Tokyo Electric Power Co.  and the Ministry of International Trade and Industry said it was  uneconomical to hire all full-time employees. ADDED TERMS:Atomic  power stations atomic energy</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__27_323964393"></a> 3 octobre 1985 : incendie sur le réacteur 1</h2>
<p><strong>REACTOR  NOTES PERTAINING TO THE GENERATING TABLE FOR AUGUST &#8212; Lisa Buono</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 13</p>
<p>Vol.26,  No. 40</p>
<p>Copyright 1985 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>Japan: Tokyo Electric Power Co. had  two problems, including a fire, at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-I-1 BWR in  August, the Agency of Natural Resources &amp; Energy (ANRE)  announced. Following a regular maintenance and refueling shutdown,  the plant restarted on Aug. 7 and was test-operated at capacity (460  MW) started Aug. 11. On Aug. 21 at 10:30 a.m., the plant scrammed on  a false signal that the main steam valve had closed. A worker, ANRE  found, dropped a bag of metal pieces while building a scaffold and it  hit piping connected with a steam pressure detector, leading to the  incorrect alarm. The BWR restarted Aug. 27 at 7:05 p.m. only to scram  at 11:34 p.m., again because of a signal indicating the same valve  closed. Before the cause was discovered and while the reactor  remained on a standby, a fire broke out in a power room on Aug. 31 at  about 6:42 a.m., burning cables. The fire was under control by 8:56  a.m. Located in the turbine house, the room supplies power to start  up the plant.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Japan Atomic Power Co.  suspended its Tokai-1 gas-cooled reactor Aug. 9-23. The plant was  being test-operated on Aug. 8 when a coolant gas safety valve in one  of the four heat exchangers opened. An estimated 1 curie of  radioactive gas was released to the atmosphere. (The plant must limit  to 16,000 curies its annual gas release.) Operators manually  suspended the plant on Aug. 9. Rings, used to stabilize gas-relieving  pressure, were replaced in all four heat exchanger valves before  restart on Aug. 23.</p>
<p>Five units remained closed throughout  August for maintenance and refueling: <strong>Fukushima</strong>-I-4 and I-6,  Hamaoka-2, Takahama-1 and Fugen. Mihama-3 was shut down Aug. 24 for  maintenance and refueling and three other reactors restarted after  planned shutdowns: Genkai-1 on Aug. 8, Ikata-1 on Aug. 19, and Ohi-1  on Aug. 26.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__29_323964393"></a> 27 août 1986 : arrêt du réacteur  n°5 pour une panne de l&#8217;alimentation en eau</h2>
<p><strong>A  malfunction of the water supply system at the Tokyo Elevtric Power  Co&#8217;s power station in Fukushima prefecture caused a shut down of the  nuclear reactor.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Textline  Multiple Source Collection (1980-1994)</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">TMSC</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 1986</p>
<p>Mr Yuichi Komakine, spokesman for the  company, said the accident occurred on Monday at the No 5 reactor of  a power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture, 114 kilometres  north-west of Tokyo.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__31_323964393"></a>4  décembre 1986 : arrêt du réacteur 1 en raison  d&#8217;une panne de l&#8217;air conditionné</h2>
<p><strong>NOTES  PERTAINING TO THE GENERATING TABLE FOR OCTOBER</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 11</p>
<p>Vol. 27,  No. 49</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> I-1, <strong>Fukushima</strong> I-4, Genkai-1, Hamaoka-2,  Ikata-1, Kashiwazaki-Kariwa-1, Ohi-1, and Sendai-2 were all down for  refueling and maintenance. Tokai-1 was test operated for 113 hours.  Takahama-1 and <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 resumed operation Oct. 1. <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-1 operation was manually suspended Oct. 14 due to  an abnormal noise in a duct that provides cooling air to a duct  through which electric current is sent from a generator to a  transformer. Blades, installed in the small duct to control the  cooling air flow, were found to have knocked into each other. The  whole air duct was replaced so that the plant could resume operation  Oct. 19.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__33_323964393"></a> 23 avril 1987 : un tremblement de terre cause  l&#8217;arrêt de trois réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>Strong  6.5 quake jolts Japan, shuts down nuclear plants </strong></p>
<p>Associated  Press</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Orange County Register</span></span></span></p>
<p>A strong earthquake shook northern  Japan early today, rocking buildings and triggering automatic  shutdowns at three nuclear power plants. But police said there were  no reports of casualties or major damage.</p>
<p>The quake registered 6.5 on the  Richter scale, indicating a tremor capable of causing widespread  damage if centered in a populated area. However, the quake was  centered about 25 miles under the sea bed off <strong>Fukushima</strong>.</p>
<p>It was felt in Shirakawa, 125 miles  northeast of Tokyo, and the surrounding area at 5:13 a.m., the  Central Meteorological Agency said.</p>
<p>The quake caused three of the five  functioning plants of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Nuclear Power Station to  shut down, said Makoto Sugihara, an official of the Energy Agency&#8217;s  nuclear power operation administration office. He said there were no  reports of radiation leaks or other trouble.</p>
<p>A sixth plant at the complex is out  of service.</p>
<p>Sugihara said today&#8217;s quake was on  the borderline where automatic shutdown is triggered, and three of  the plants reacted while two did not.</p>
<p>He said the three plants resumed  operations about 10 hours later after experts inspected and confirmed  the quake had not caused any problems.</p>
<p>It was the third time a quake shut  down nuclear plants. Two plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> were stopped in  July 1983 and one plant in Fukui, southwestern Japan, was shut down  in November 1985, Sugihara said.</p>
<p>High-speed trains in northeastern  Japan were temporarily halted because of the quake, according to  Japan Railways.</p>
<p>The Richter scale measures the  magnitude of a quake at its epicenter, based on the ground motion  recorded on seismographs. An earthquake of 5 on the Richter scale is  considered very strong and one measuring 6 is severe, capable of  widespread damage near the epicenter.</p>
<p>Every increase of one digit  represents a tenfold increase in magnitude.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__35_323964393"></a>22 juin  1987 : l&#8217;IAEA alerte sur les risques d&#8217;incendie</h2>
<p><strong>IAEA  SAFETY REPORT EMPHASIZES FIRES, FEEDWATER, AND POWER SUPPLY &#8212;  Gamini Seneviratne, Vienna</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Inside  N.R.C.</span></span></span></p>
<p>NRC</p>
<p>Pg. 8</p>
<p>Vol. 9,  No. 13</p>
<p>Copyright 1987 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>Fires, loss of electrical power,  feedwater systems failures, nuclear power plant aging, and increasing  industrial usage of tritium are objects of attention in the IAEA&#8217;s  Nuclear Safety Review for 1986, released at the agency&#8217;s June Board  of Governors meeting.</p>
<p>The review for 1986 is, not  surprisingly, dominated by the accident at the Chernobyl plant in the  Soviet Union. All other events reported to the agency in the year  were comparatively insignificant, but a number of them in three  selected categories&#8211;fires, loss of electrical power, and incidents  affecting the auxiliary feedwater system&#8211;are included to illustrate  patterns to which plant operators are paying particular attention.</p>
<p>Fires at nuclear plants were  highlighted in 1985 and assumed ever greater importance following  Chernobyl, the review says. &nbsp;&raquo;The accident sharply underlined the  need not only to prevent fires but to be prepared to fight any that  may occur under high radiation levels.&nbsp;&raquo; The IAEA incident reporting  system (IRS) data base had four fire-related accidents added to it in  1986. They occurred in a turbine of a Candu reactor at Douglas Point,  Canada; at a transformer station in the Finnish national electrical  grid; in an electrical cubicle at Japan&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-1; and  in cables in India&#8217;s Rajasthan-2 reactor building. None led to a  radioactive release. The Indian accident, which disabled the unit for  nearly seven weeks, illustrates the importance of safety systems to  protect a reactor in the event of fire, the review states.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__37_323964393"></a>21  janvier 1988 : incendie dans le circuit d&#8217;air conditionné du  réacteur 1</h2>
<p><strong>Briefly</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 14</p>
<p>Vol. 29,  No. 3</p>
<p>Copyright 1988 McGraw Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>JAPAN: Small fire reported at <strong>Fukushima</strong> I-1. A minor fire took place January 14 in the  air-conditioning room of the 1,100-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> I-1 BWR of  Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), but it was extinguished 46 minutes  later, officials reported. No radiation leak was reported, and the  fire caused no stoppage of power generation and transmission, they  said. The fire started near the filtering unit for the incoming air,  officials said, and was put out by plant workers. Fire authorities  Friday were investigating the mishap. Neither monetary damage nor  time required for repair was known immediately. (usui)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__39_323964393"></a> 16 août 1988 : les mouvements  anti-nucléaires japonais alertent sur les risques de  vieillissement des réacteurs de Fukushima</h2>
<p><strong>ANTI-NUCLEAR  PLANT MOVEMENT FINALLY GAINS GROUND IN JAPAN. BY</strong> By Nao  Nakanishi</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1988  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Aug 16, Reuter &#8211; They are the  only people to have been bombed by nuclear weapons, but only now has  a popular Japanese anti-nuclear power movement begun to gain ground.</p>
<p>The Japanese have, until recently,  shown an unreserved acceptance of the idea of nuclear plants as a  clean and safe source of power. But some experts say the growing  number of nuclear plants are not nearly as safe as the government  suggests.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Chernobyl finally made people  understand nuclear power plants can also endanger our life,&nbsp;&raquo;  said Jinzaburo Takagi, who has campaigned against nuclear power for  many years.</p>
<p>Radioactive fallout from a fire at  the Chernobyl plant in the Soviet Union in April, 1986, spread all  over the world, contaminated food in Europe, and turned large parts  of the local area into a wasteland.</p>
<p>Two recent bestselling books &#8212; &laquo;&nbsp;A  Dangerous Story: Chernobyl And The Fate Of Japan&nbsp;&raquo; by Takashi  Hirose, and Sumiko Kansha&#8217;s &laquo;&nbsp;If It Is Not Too Late&nbsp;&raquo; have  popularised the issue.</p>
<p>Kansha, a housewife with two children  in the southern city of Fukuoka, knew nothing about nuclear power.  She said she was shocked into finding out by the Chernobyl disaster.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The United States and the  Soviet Union, both countries with the technology to send people to  the moon, had nuclear accidents. How can we be so sure Japan is  absolutely safe?&nbsp;&raquo; she said in her book.</p>
<p>This year, the national press  reported that Michihiko Tanaka, a former designer of nuclear  reactors, told an anti-nuclear conference that one reactor vessel he  had worked on was repaired by the company Hitachi after flaws were  found in the structure.</p>
<p>Tanaka said that when the reactor  vessel in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, in the north, began to age it could break  suddenly due to metal stress.</p>
<p class="western">[…]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__41_323964393"></a> 12 décembre 1988 : arrêt du réacteur  2 pour une panne d&#8217;une soupape de vapeur</h2>
<p><strong>TOKYO  ELECTRIC TO SHUT DOWN NUCLEAR REACTOR.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 1988  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Dec 12, Reuter &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc will shut down a reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant in northern Japan from 1500 GMT, Ministry  of International Trade and Industry (MITI) officials said.</p>
<p>They said the company will shut down  indefinitely the 1.1 million kilowatt reactor to investigate  malfunctions in one of the four main steam valves on the pipes which  connect the reactor with turbines. Tokyo Electric resumed operating  the reactor on Friday after it stopped automatically on December 3.</p>
<p>The plant is the second nuclear plant  to shut down in Japan in recent weeks. The 1.17 million kw capacity  reactor at the Oi plant operated by Kansai Electric Power Co Ltd in  central Japan has been temporarily shut down since October 17.</p>
<p>MITI officials said the investigation  will take at least a week. &laquo;&nbsp;It is not clear whether this will  prompt direct burning of crude oil at Japanese utilities,&nbsp;&raquo; one  said. &laquo;&nbsp;They may boost purchases of low sulphur fuel oil if  that&#8217;s economical.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric is expected to ask  other power companies to help cover any shortages caused by the  reactor shutdown.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric started slowing down  the operation of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> reactor at 0400 GMT, MITI  officials said.</p>
<p>The reactor stopped automatically on  December 3 when abnormalities developed in its operation.</p>
<p>Japan has 35 operational nuclear  reactors at 15 power plants, a MITI official said.</p>
<p>Nuclear power supplies some 30 pct of  Japan&#8217;s total electricity needs, MITI figures show.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__43_323964393"></a> 2 janvier 1989 : TEPCO ne sait toujours pas  pourquoi le tremblement de terre du 22 avril 1987 a arrêté  les réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>TOKYO  ELECTRIC POWER CO. (TEPCO) IS STILL TRYING TO DETERMINE &#8212; Danialle  Weaver, Washington</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Inside  N.R.C.</span></span></span></p>
<p>NRC</p>
<p>Pg. 14</p>
<p>Vol. 11,  No. 1</p>
<p>Copyright 1989 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER CO. (TEPCO) IS  STILL TRYING TO DETERMINE the cause of a seismically induced high  flux trip experienced in April 1987 at TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> I  site, according to staffers with the Office of nuclear Reactor  Regulation (NRR) who recently met with key Japanese utility staffers,  government representatives, and <span style="font-weight:normal;">nuclear</span> researchers.</p>
<p>During an April 22, 1987 earthquake,  which U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) records indicate measured 6.6 on  the Richter scale, three of the site&#8217;s six reactors scrammed. The  three units were <strong>Fukushima</strong> I-1, a 460-MW General Electric BWR,  and <strong>Fukushima</strong> I-3 and I-5, which are 784-MW Toshiba BWRs. Two  other units&#8211;<strong>Fukushima</strong> I-4, a 784-MW Hitachi unit, and <strong>Fukushima</strong> I-6, an 1,100-MW GE BWR&#8211;did not trip during the  earthquake. The remaining unit, <strong>Fukushima</strong> I-2, a 784-MW GE  BWR, was down for refueling.</p>
<p>According to TEPCO data, however,  none of the reactors scrammed during an April 7, 1987 earthquake,  which, a USGS spokeswoman said, measured 6.4 on the Richter scale.  The USGS records show that the epicenter of the earlier earthquake  was located in the same place as the later one, the spokeswoman said.</p>
<p>According to a November 1988 staff  report of the October trip, TEPCO has ruled out core internal  effects, such as changes in the distance between fuel assemblies.  TEPCO believes that the scrams were caused by some type of rapid  electrical noise phenomenon, such as relay chatter or connector  vibration, the memorandum said. However, TEPCO has not been able to  determine the exact cause of the scrams and is continuing analytical  and experimental reviews. Also, the memo said, high-speed monitoring  devices were installed in the <strong>Fukushima</strong> units in order to  obtain more detailed plant data in future seismic events.</p>
<p>The Japanese also are known to be  interested in the recent earthquake in Soviet Armenia, which USGS  said measured 6.9 on the Richter scale. Soviet Prime Minister Nikolai  Ryzhkov announced that Armenia-1 and -2, which are two Soviet-design  VVER-440 Model V230 PWRs, were undamaged in the earthquake, but that  they would be shut down to &nbsp;&raquo;meet the wishes of the Armenian public&nbsp;&raquo;  (Nucleonics Week, 15 Dec. &#8217;88, 1).</p>
<p>According to DOE data on the Armenian  units, the site is located in one of the highest seismicity regions  in the Soviet Union that contain nuclear reactors. Prior to a  March 4, 1977 earthquake at Vrancea, Romania, which measured 7.2 on  the Richter scale, the Soviet Union did not specifically take into  account seismic design criteria or site-specific seismicity.  Following the Vrancea earthquake, the Soviets discovered that one of  the steam generators of the Bulgarian Kozloduy-1 reactor, a VVER-4400  Model V230 located 330 kilometers from the epicenter of the  earthquake, had been displaced by nearly five inches. Later-model  VVER 440s and VVER-1000s were designed to be &nbsp;&raquo;earthquake-proof.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Armenia-1 entered service in 1976,  shortly before the Vrancea earthquake. Because of the high seismicity  of Armenia, construction on Armenia-2&#8211;then under way&#8211;was halted  while the seismic adequacy of the design was studied. No specific  changes were made on Armenia-1, according to DOE. However, steel ties  were added to the exterior wall of unit 2&#8242;s turbine building; the  wall between the control and auxiliary equipment building and the  turbine building was changed from brick to reinforced concrete,  poured in-situ, and steel framing in the reactor bay was increased by  25%.</p>
<p>Other changes included doubling of  the reinforcement rods in the reactor building&#8217;s outer walls;  redesign and reinforcement of the foundation slab and the  downward-protruding reactor shaft; a compressible soil seam beneath  the bottom of the reactor shaft was removed and refilled with  concrete; hydraulic shock absorbers were added to protect flexible  piping systems. Also, ribs were added to the underside of the  foundation slab to increase the strength and stiffness of the  foundation slab. The downward-protruding reactor shaft was eliminated  in later-model VVERs.</p>
<p>A DOE staffer familiar with the  Armenian units and the events surrounding the earthquake said he did  not doubt the Soviets when they said both units were undamaged, even  though they also announced that the units would be shut down. Because  of the way two tectonic plates come together in Armenia, the stresses  and loadings produced at the Armenian site were twice as high as  those expected in the region&#8211;and one to two orders of magnitude  higher than the units are designed for, the DOE staffer said. &nbsp;&raquo;It  was a situation where you have an earthquake with that  (higher-than-expected) intensity that far (90 kilometers) away from  the quake&#8217;s epicenter,&nbsp;&raquo; he said. Although both units should have had  no problems withstanding the earthquake, the staffer said, &nbsp;&raquo;They&#8217;ve  got to be thinking, &#8216;We were wrong once, we could be wrong again.&nbsp;&raquo;&#8217;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__45_323964393"></a>30  janvier 1989 : certains employés de la centrale présentent  des troubles chromosomiques</h2>
<p><strong>N-PLANT  WORKERS SHOW CHROMOSOME DAMAGE. (</strong><span style="font-weight:normal;">NUCLEAR</span><strong> POWER PLANT)</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>890130016</p>
<p>Copyright Kyodo News International Inc. 1989</p>
<p>N-PLANT WORKERS SHOW CHROMOSOME  DAMAGE+</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, JAN. 30 KYODO</p>
<p>MALE WORKERS AT nuclear POWER  PLANTS HAVE TWICE AS MANY ABNORMAL CHROMOSOMES AS THEIR COUNTERPARTS  IN THE GENERAL POPULATION, ACCORDING TO A RECENT SURVEY BY A  PREFECTURAL-GOVERNMENT-RUN RESEARCH INSTITUTE.</p>
<p>DURING A FIVE-YEAR PERIOD BEGINNING  IN 1984, THE SURVEY ANALYZED 93,505 LYMPH CELL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM  115 ADULT MALE PLANT WORKERS AT THE TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER CO.&#8217;S NO. 1  AND NO. 2 PLANTS IN OKUMA, <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> AND FOUND THAT 0.22  PERCENT OF THE CELLS CONTAINED MALFORMED CHROMOSOMES.</p>
<p>THE SURVEY COMPARED THE SAMPLES WITH  THOSE TAKEN FROM 170 OTHER MALE WORKERS OF THE SAME AGE GROUP WHO  WERE NOT CONNECTED WITH THE PLANTS, AND FOUND THAT ONLY 0.12 PERCENT  OF THE LATTER SAMPLES SHOWED CHROMOSOME DEFECTS.</p>
<p>THE AUTHORS OF THE SURVEY SAID THAT  THEIR STUDIES DID NOT SHOW THAT THE DEFECTS COULD BE PASSED ON  GENETICALLY.</p>
<p>THE RESULTS WERE REPORTED TO THE <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> PREFECTURAL GOVERNMENT UPON COMPLETION AT THE END OF  LAST YEAR BUT THE PREFECTURAL AUTHORITIES DID NOT RELEASE THE REPORT,  SAYING, &laquo;&nbsp;THE CONTENTS ARE NOT SUCH AS TO BE VIEWED AS  PROBLEMATIC.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__47_323964393"></a> 3 février 1989 :  une panne sur un joint aurait pu entraîner une fusion du coeur  sur le réacteur n°2</h2>
<p><strong>BROKEN  PUMP POSED MELTDOWN RISK IN ATOMIC PLANT. </strong><strong>(IN  FUKUSHIMA PREFECTURE, JAPAN)</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>890203075</p>
<p>Copyright Kyodo News International Inc. 1989</p>
<p>BROKEN PUMP POSED POSSIBLE MELTDOWN  RISK IN ATOMIC PLANT+</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, FEB. 3 KYODO</p>
<p>A CRACKED RING RESULTED IN A COOLING  SYSTEM FAILURE AT AN ATOMIC POWER PLANT IN <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> PREFECTURE A DAY BEFORE SCHEDULED REPLACEMENT OF THE PART LAST MONTH,  PLANT AUTHORITIES SAID FRIDAY.</p>
<p>EXPERTS SAY THE FAILURE COULD HAVE  LEAD TO A CORE MELTDOWN IF LEFT UNCHECKED.</p>
<p>A MID-TERM INSPECTION REPORT RELEASED  FRIDAY INDICATED THAT FRAGMENTS OF A WATER PUMP CAUSED THE FAILURE AT  THE ATOMIC POWER PLANT.</p>
<p>AUTHORITIES AT TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER  CO.&#8217;S <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> NO. 2 <span style="font-weight:normal;">NUCLEAR</span> POWER PLANT SHUT THE NO. 3 REACTOR DOWN ON JANUARY 6 AFTER  DISCOVERING AN IRREGULARITY IN THE CIRCULATING PUMP.</p>
<p>INSPECTORS FOUND THAT A 100 KILOGRAM  RING WELDED TO THE PUMP&#8217;S AXLE HAD BECOME DISLODGED, WITH A 22  KILOGRAM SECTION BREAKING OFF AND CRACKING A PIECE FROM THE PROPELLER  BELOW. FIVE OF THE EIGHT BOLTS AFFIXING THE AXLE HAD ALSO COME LOOSE.</p>
<p>THE SEARCH FAILED TO TURN UP FOUR OF  THE FIVE FASTENING NUTS. A STRAY NUT ENTERING THE FUEL CORE COULD  DISTURB THE REACTION PROCESS. OFFICIALS HAVE RECORDED NO ABNORMAL  INCREASE IN CORE TEMPERATURE SINCE THE ACCIDENT.</p>
<p>INSPECTORS SUSPECT THE MISSING PIECES  ARE LODGED IN THE OPENING OF TURBINE PUMP WHICH RECIRCULATES COOLED  WATER TO THE REACTOR.</p>
<p>OSAKA UNIVERSITY LECTURER SANSHIRO  KUME SAID THAT PUMP FAILURES IN SUCH PLANTS CAN LEAD TO A MELTDOWN OF  THE <span style="font-weight:normal;">NUCLEAR</span> CORE SIMILAR TO  THAT WHICH OCCURRED AT THE U.S. THREE MILE ISLAND FACILITY IN  PENNSYLVANIA IN 1979.</p>
<p>BOILING WATER REACTORS SUCH AS THOSE  AT THE <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> PLANT USE HEAVY WATER AS A COOLANT TO CONTROL  THE PACE OF THE CORE&#8217;S ATOMIC REACTION. A FAILURE IN THE CIRCULATION  SYSTEM CAN LEAD TO OVERHEATING OF THE REACTOR&#8217;S CORE.</p>
<p>TOKYO ELECTRIC SAID IT WILL SHUT DOWN  AN ATOMIC REACTOR IN NIIGATA PREFECTURE WHICH USES THE SAME AXLE  APPARATUS ON SATURDAY.</p>
<p>CRACKS DISCOVERED IN RINGS ON SIMILAR  PUMP SYSTEMS DURING AN INSPECTION OF THE NO. 1 REACTOR IN AUGUST LAST  YEAR PROMPTED REPLACEMENT OF THE PART ON OTHER REACTORS OF THE SAME  PLANT DURING SCHEDULED INSPECTIONS.</p>
<p>THE PUMP FAILURE AT THE NO. 3 REACTOR  OCCURRED A DAY BEFORE THE SCHEDULED INSPECTION FOR THE REACTOR WAS TO  START ON JANUARY 7.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__49_323964393"></a>9  février 1989 : des recherches pour comprendre les accidents  sur les joints des pompes</h2>
<p><strong>NRC,  JAPANESE LOOKING FOR CAUSE OF FAILED BWR PUMP BEARING RINGS &#8212; Eric  Lindeman, Washington</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 3</p>
<p>Vol. 30,  No. 6</p>
<p>Copyright 1989 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>NRC is trying to determine whether  cracking and failure of recirculation pump in-water bearing rings  could be a generic problem for U.S. BWRs after reports of the problem  at Tokyo Electric Power Co.&#8217;s (TEPCO) <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-1 and -3,  both 1,067-MW (net) BWR-5s. The agency plans to meet with officials  of General Electric and the BWR Owners Group within two weeks, but  &nbsp;&raquo;preliminary indications&nbsp;&raquo; from U.S. utilities and from the Japanese  Ministry of International Trade &amp; Industry (MITI) are that the  failed bearing rings &nbsp;&raquo;are more of a Japanese problem,&nbsp;&raquo; said one NRC  official.</p>
<p>According to NRC, the problem first  occurred at <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-1 in 1984 and was identified again  during an annual maintenance outage last year. Then, last month,  after shutting down the unit to investigate vibration in the primary  loop recirculation pump at <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3, TEPCO found that  the bearing ring was broken into three pieces: one piece loose in the  pump, another stuck on the upper impeller, and another inside the  reactor vessel.</p>
<p>The unit 1 pump was manufactured in  the U.S. by Byron-Jackson Co., but the unit 3 pump was made in Japan  by EBARA Co.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;Preliminarily, it looks like there  are identifiable differences between the way the rings are welded  here and in Japan, and some design differences,&nbsp;&raquo; said Don Grace of  the BWR Owners Group. &nbsp;&raquo;They use an automated welding process, and we  use a manual one,&nbsp;&raquo; he said. &nbsp;&raquo;They also have an electrical system  that uses 50 cycles per second versus our 60 cycles. So the Japanese  end up with bigger components (electric motors) and more stresses.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>MITI officials believe that the  cracking was caused by component stresses induced by water flow,  according to NRC. &nbsp;&raquo;They consider that this problem does not depend  on BWR types and pump suppliers,&nbsp;&raquo; said NRC Office of <span style="font-weight:normal;">Nuclear</span> Reactor Regulation Director Thomas Murley in a February 3 letter to  General Electric, &nbsp;&raquo;but it might occur at any plant which used the  same welding technique (a fillet weld joining a stainless steel  bearing).&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__51_323964393"></a>28  février 1989 : des débris de métal trouvés  dans les réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>MORE  BROKEN METAL FOUND IN FUKUSHIMA </strong><span style="font-weight:normal;">NUCLEAR</span><strong> REACTOR.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>890228077</p>
<p>Copyright Kyodo News International Inc. 1989</p>
<p>MORE BROKEN METAL FOUND IN <strong>FUKUSHIMA  NUCLEAR</strong> REACTOR+</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, FEB. 28 KYODO</p>
<p>nuclear POWER PLANT  TECHNICIANS RECOVERED 23 MORE PIECES OF BROKEN METAL FROM THE TURBINE  AND PRESSURE CONTAINER OF A <span style="font-weight:normal;">NUCLEAR</span> REACTOR HERE, ACCORDING TO A REPORT OBTAINED TUESDAY FROM TOKYO  ELECTRIC POWER CO., THE OPERATOR OF THE PLANT.</p>
<p>THE NEW DISCOVERY SHOWS THAT THE  DAMAGE TO THE REACTOR IS GREATER THAN WAS FIRST THOUGHT, AS THE 23  PIECES OF METAL ORIGINATED FROM A DIFFERENT SOURCE THAT THOSE FOUND  EARLIER IN THE WATER RECYCLING PUMP.</p>
<p>THE NO. 3 REACTOR AT THE NO. 2 <strong>FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR</strong> POWER PLANT WAS SHUT DOWN IN EARLY JANUARY  AFTER ABNORMAL VIBRATIONS WERE MONITORED IN THE PUMP.</p>
<p>THIS IS SAID TO BE THE FIRST TIME IN  THE WORLD THAT BROKEN PARTS HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED IN A PRESSURE  CONTAINER.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__53_323964393"></a> 20 avril 1989 : TEPCO présente des excuses  publiques pour la panne d&#8217;une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA  PUMP FAILURE PROMPTS PUBLIC APOLOGY &#8212; Naoaki Usui and Ann  MacLachlan, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 1</p>
<p>Vol. 30,  No. 16</p>
<p>Copyright 1989 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>The breakdown of a recirculation pump  at <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3 is turning into a major headache for Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (Tepco) and a public relations disaster for the  whole Japanese nuclear industry. In what industry observers  say is an absolutely unprecedented move, Tepco President Shoh Nasu  apologized in public last week to the nation and to the nuclear industry for the pump fiasco that began January 6 (NW, 9 Feb., 3).</p>
<p>A group of pronuclear local residents  demanded that Tepco exert stricter safety control at its reactors,  and a special task force named March 1 by the Ministry of  International Trade &amp; Industry (MITI) has mapped out its strategy  for investigating the incident.</p>
<p>The 21-member special investigating  team, headed by Tokyo University professor Mamoru Akiyama, agreed on  a six-point action plan aimed at pinpointing the cause of the  accident. Their plan includes investigations, including mockup tests,  to analyze why and how the recirculation pump damage took place;  investigations of operations management; search for foreign objects;  investigation of the soundness of reactor equipment and fuel; and  research into preventive measures in engineering, fabrication,  installation and operation.</p>
<p>The team, mainly comprising  scientists from universities and government laboratories but  including no utility experts, plans to set up several subcommittees,  officials said. It was not known when the team will come up with  conclusion and recommendations, they added.</p>
<p>Tepco&#8217;s Nasu publicly apologized for  the incident at the 22nd annual conference of the Japan Atomic  Industrial Forum, Inc. (JAIF) in Tokyo. In an unusually grave tone,  he said: &nbsp;&raquo;As the president of Tepco, let me express my heartfelt  apologies for the accident of a recirculation pump this January at  the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II nuclear power plant,&nbsp;&raquo; Nasu said. &nbsp;&raquo;I  sincerely regret that the accident has shaken the trust and safety  cultivated among local residents&#8230;for 23 years&#8230;and, consequently,  has encouraged the antinuclear movement.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>A day after Nasu&#8217;s unusual apology,  representatives of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural chamber of  commerce and local pronuclear residents demanded that the Science &amp;  Technology Agency (STA) conduct thorough investigations of the  accident as well as study measures to calm local inhabitants&#8217; fears.  STA has the Atomic Energy Commission and nuclear Safety  Commission under its jurisdiction.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3 pump first  developed minor vibration on the evening of January 1, while running  at 1,030 megawatts, MITI earlier reported. Then, at daybreak on  January 6, one of its two recirculation pumps registered &nbsp;&raquo;wild  vibration,&nbsp;&raquo; which led operators to cut power from 990 MW to 740 MW.  Shutdown procedures started at noon January 6, the recirculation pump  stopped in the evening, and the reactor was completely shut down  early January 7.</p>
<p>Inspection revealed that the ring  that holds down the pump&#8217;s shaft bearing had developed fatigue, and  the nearly 100-kilogram ring was dislocated, dropped, and damaged,  MITI said in its latest interim report released on March 17. By then,  engineers found and recovered one 2.4-kg piece of turbine blade from  inside the recirculation piping, five 330-gram bolts in the jet pump,  five 12-g washers inside the jet pump and the reactor recirculation  pump, and a number of metal pieces inside the reactor vessel and the  jet pump. Twenty-three of the metallic pieces were recovered as well  as powdery metal, MITI said. The total weight of the powder and  fragments is estimated at 25 kg.</p>
<p>Although MITI has not released any  further report, Tepco Managing Director and General Manager of nuclear Power Administrations Ryo Ikegame told Nucleonics Week  last week that engineers are now removing control rod guide tubes  after moving control rods and fuel into the spent fuel pit. The lower  part of the reactor vessel is being emptied to permit flushing out  all the foreign materials inside the vessel as well as in the fuel  bundles.</p>
<p>The accident apparently occurred when  a bearing ring of the pump, fabricated for main contractor Toshiba  Corp. by Ebara Corp. under license to Byron Jackson of the U.S.,  dropped onto an impeller. Ikegame believes the drop was triggered by  metal fatigue which in turn is thought to have resulted from a faulty  weld, Ikegame said. He said the judgment is based on a special  pattern observed on the scratched pump bearing surface.</p>
<p>Ikegame said Tepco had found the  bearing problem on <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-1 in June 1988. In July, the  part was changed on <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-4 during that unit&#8217;s planned  outage and on <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-2 in October. The company was  planning to change the part on all the affected pumps during  scheduled outages, including at <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3 beginning  January 7. Unfortunately for Tepco, the pump failed just a day  before. Two others&#8211;<strong>Fukushima</strong>-I-6 and  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa-1&#8211;are scheduled for bearing and ring change in  1989, Ikegame said.</p>
<p>Ikegame said he has no idea when <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 will restart, because &nbsp;&raquo; nobody has experience  in washing out fuel bundles.&nbsp;&raquo; He said TEPCO will clean the bundles  late this month or early next month and it will know better after  that.</p>
<p>Ikegame, while doubting the accident  would cloud the future of the BWR, told Nucleonics Week that Japan&#8217;s  largest utility has for some time been studying the introduction of  PWR technology on its system. &nbsp;&raquo;Some day we would like to have both  types of reactors in our company,&nbsp;&raquo; Ikegame said. &nbsp;&raquo;But it takes time  to prepare technical staff.&nbsp;&raquo; He said even if TEPCO does not use  PWRs, in the end &nbsp;&raquo;the study will improve the BWR too. We can learn  many things.&nbsp;&raquo; A source at Japan&#8217;s sole PWR fabricator, Mitsubishi  Heavy Industries, Ltd., said his company is beefing up its marketing  drive on Tepco.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__55_323964393"></a>3 juin  1989 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur à la suite d&#8217;une fuite  d&#8217;eau</h2>
<p><strong>COOLING  WATER LEAKS IN FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR REACTOR. (JAPAN)</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>890603039</p>
<p>Copyright Kyodo News International Inc. 1989</p>
<p>COOLING WATER LEAKS IN <strong>FUKUSHIMA  NUCLEAR</strong> REACTOR+</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, JUNE 3 KYODO</p>
<p>A nuclear POWER REACTOR AT <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> SECOND nuclear PLANT IN NORTHERN JAPAN  OPERATED BY TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER CO. SUFFERED COOLING WATER LEAKAGE  IN THE HEAT EXCHANGER SYSTEM, AND WORKERS STARTED TO STOP THE REACTOR  OPERATION, <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> PREFECTURAL GOVERNMENT SAID SATURDAY.</p>
<p>IT SAID THE LEAKAGE WAS DISCOVERED AT  AROUND 10 A.M. SATURDAY, AND THE WORKERS AT THE 1.1 MILLION-KILOWATT  BOILING WATER REACTOR TOOK STEPS TO MANUALLY STOP ITS OPERATION. THE  REACTOR WILL STOP BY 6 A.M. SUNDAY, IT SAID.</p>
<p>TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER SAID THE REACTOR  TROUBLE IS THE FIRST SUCH ACCIDENT TO HAPPEN AT ITS nuclear POWER PLANTS.</p>
<p>SATURDAY&#8217;S ACCIDENT INCREASED TO SIX  THE NUMBER OF TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER REACTORS WHICH HAVE BEEN CRIPPLED  OR SUSPENDED FOR PERIODIC CHECKS.</p>
<p>THE TOKYO-BASED ELECTRICITY SUPPLIER  HAS TWO PLANTS IN <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> PREFECTURE AND ONE IN NIIGATA  PREFECTURE WITH A TOTAL OF 11 REACTORS.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__57_323964393"></a>19 juin  1989 : une succession d&#8217;accidents dans les centrales japonaises</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  Bucks Trend, Pushes Nuclear Power BY</strong> Michael Berger,  Chronicle Asia Bureau Chief</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  San Francisco Chronicle</span></span></span></p>
<p>SFC<strong>ED</strong> FINAL</p>
<p>A1</p>
<p>©  1989 Hearst Communications Inc., Hearst Newspapers Division. Provided  by ProQuest Information and Learning. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo Japan, long haunted by a  &laquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;&raquo;nuclear allergy&nbsp;&raquo; growing out of the atomic  devastation it suffered in the last days of World War II, is pushing  ahead with plans to increase its already growing dependence on nuclear power.</p>
<p>Bucking a trend among developed  nations &#8211; which includes a standstill in nuclear plant  construction in the United States and an unprecedented phase-out of nuclear stations by Sweden &#8211; Japan, France and West Germany  are moving in the opposite direction.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>A series of incidents last year at nuclear plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and Shimane prefectures,  however, cast some doubt on that analysis.</p>
<p>The accidents, though apparently  minor, went unreported to authorities until days after they were  discovered.</p>
<p>In the most serious accident, metal  fragments broke loose from a pump at one of the three <strong>Fukushima</strong> plants in January, causing a reactor to be shut down. MEDIA BLAMED</p>
<p>Japan Atomic Industry Form executive  Mori blamed the information lag on the media, which he described as  &laquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;&raquo;basically anti-nuclear.&nbsp;&raquo; He said that a  &laquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;&raquo;vicious circle&nbsp;&raquo; had been created by reporters&#8217;  tendencies to report all malfunctions as though they were major  accidents &#8211; thus making plant managers more reluctant to share  information.</p>
<p>The negative media treatment since  Chernobyl may be one reason Tokyo Electric Power Co., which operates  the <strong>Fukushima</strong> station, announced recently that seven  executives had been punished because of the accident. The plant  manager has taken early retirement and six executives, including the  president, have accepted temporary salary reductions of 10 percent.</p>
<p>Investigations into the cause of the  January accident, and a leak discovered early this month in another <strong>Fukushima</strong> reactor, are still in progress.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;&raquo;A more serious problem,&nbsp;&raquo;  said another industry executive who asked not to be identified, &laquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;&raquo;is  that even though our safety procedures for identifying problems are  quite thorough, the workers who are subcontracted to repair defective  systems are not always top quality.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Depending on subcontractors to handle  the quarterly safety inspections and resulting maintenance work  lowers labor costs and helps profits. Unlike U.S. nuclear plant maintenance firms, which may provide service for clients  nationwide, subcontractors here are local firms that serve only the  utility in their area.</p>
<p>Amazingly, the maintenance workers &#8211;  mostly day laborers or farmers hired on a part-time basis &#8211; receive  no training from the companies that operate the plants. MINOR  ACCIDENTS</p>
<p>An industry report last year revealed  that most of the 31 minor accidents over an 18-month period in  1987-88 were the result of careless mistakes by maintenance workers.</p>
<p>Such cutting of corners seems  inexplicable considering the financial return of the power companies.</p>
<p>All nine private companies are  protected by government regulations from competition, and each serves  its own exclusive territory.</p>
<p>Even though revenues fell last year  because of utility rate decreases, the nine still reported combined  after-tax profits of $3.03 billion.</p>
<p>Although plans are going ahead for  the 17 new plants, an industry executive sees trouble down the road.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;&raquo;We have no balanced nuclear energy policy,&nbsp;&raquo; he said. &laquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;&raquo;The  government is using the current concern about the &laquo;&nbsp;greenhouse  effect&#8217; to rationalize its buildup plan, but we are overcommitted to nuclear energy.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>There are insufficient resources, he  said, for alternative energy research and development, &laquo;&nbsp;&nbsp;&raquo;nor  are we thinking about how to use nuclear power more  imaginatively, such as for pumping water back to dams for recycling  in hydroelectric projects.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__59_323964393"></a> 20 octobre 1989 : les mesures de sécurité  dans les centrales japonaises &laquo;&nbsp;sont à  même de prévenir un accident grave&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  N-accident prevention measure praised.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 1989</p>
<p>Tokyo, Oct 20 (Jiji Press) &#8211; Japan&#8217;s  exhaustive nuclear safety measures are capable of preventing  the occurrence of a major nuclear power plant accident, the nuclear Safety Commission said Friday in the 1989 White Paper  on nuclear safety.</p>
<p>The White Paper took up the accidents  and problems that have occurred at nuclear power plants  throughout the world in an attempt to improve the safety of nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>While noting that Japan&#8217;s nuclear power plants are considered highly trustworthy throughout the world,  it admitted that the occurrence of two accidents at the Tokyo  Electric Power Co&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant in which about 30  kilograms of metal fragments from a damaged recycling water pump fell  into the reactor did not reflect Japan&#8217;s deep experience in nuclear safety and vowed to make it an important lesson in framing future  safety measures.</p>
<p>Hereafter, it will be important to  detect troubles as early as possible, determine the cause, and  promptly work out preventative measures where similar accidents or  trouble is anticipated, the report said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__61_323964393"></a> 26 octobre 1989 : alerte sur le vieillissement  des centrales japonaises</h2>
<p><strong>JAPANESE  UTILITIES WARNED TO GUARD AGAINST PLANT AGING &#8212; Naoaki Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 2</p>
<p>Vol. 30,  No. 43</p>
<p>Copyright 1989 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s commercial nuclear power reactors have so far experienced far fewer unscheduled outages  than those in other countries, but the country must be more concerned  about problems possible toward the end of this century as units age,  the fiscal year 1989 nuclear Safety White Paper said.</p>
<p>The 448-page nuclear Safety  Commission (NSC) annual report, approved by the Cabinet late last  week, analyzed problems and incidents in recent years and detailed  measures taken to improve safety, particularly in light of mounting  concern among Japanese after the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.</p>
<p>In 1987, in the latest international  statistics available, Japan had 0.4 unscheduled outage per unit,  compared with 4.6 for the United States, 6.4 for France, 2.5 for West  Germany, and 2.1 for Great Britain, the White Paper said.</p>
<p>In FY-88, which ended on March 31,  Japan experienced a total of 23 incidents, the White Paper said. Of  those, 13 occurred while reactors were in operation, four resulting  in automatic scrams and nine in manual shutdowns, it said. In  addition, 10 incidents were discovered during scheduled shutdowns,  five of which related to damage of steam generator tubes, it said.</p>
<p>During the first eight months of  FY-89, eight incidents were reported, three involving BWRs and the  rest PWRs, it said. The April-August problems were as varied as a  heat exchanger tube leak (<strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-2, June 3), a feedwater  pump short circuit (Tsuruga-2, June 28), poor connection of a  recirculation pump control relay (Shimane-2, April 10), and  intergranular attack (IGA) on steam generator tubes (Genkai-1, April  27), NSC said.</p>
<p>The White Paper, in analyses of  incidents by type, reported that there have been 43 incidents related  to the BWR recirculation pump system over the 8.5 years from April  1981 to August 1989. Of the 43, six involved pumps and motors, while  19 involved electrical and measuring instrumentation, the White Paper  said.</p>
<p>The paper presented as a typical BWR  incident two recirculation pump problems at the 540-MW Hamaoka-1,  reported in August 1987 and February 1988. Two pumps tripped in both  cases, after deteriorating sealing caused the pumps&#8217; electromagnetic  switches to burn, it said. The worn-out switches were replaced, but  improved replacement management is called for, the report said.</p>
<p>The disabled recirculation pumps,  however, did not lead to neutron flux vibration as happened at  LaSalle-2 in the U.S. in March 1988, the commission noted (NW, 30  June, 1). Core stability evaluation before construction is mandated  in Japan, which makes the chances very low that a reactor would  develop flux vibrations while in operation, the NSC report said.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;An important lesson&nbsp;&raquo; for BWRs, the  report said, must be learned from the January 1989 trouble at the  1,100-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3, in which a recirculation pump bearing  ring dropped off, disintegrated, and damaged the reactor vessel (NW,  24 Aug., 3). Although the White Paper did not present a final  judgment on the incident since &nbsp;&raquo;investigations are still underway,&nbsp;&raquo;  it stated that the reactor should have been shut off on January 1  when abnormal vibration was first detected. It was not until January  7 that the reactor was shut. The commission said the lesson from the  incident was that lessons from &nbsp;&raquo;two earlier bearing ring damage  incidents (at the unit) had not been fed back sufficiently, and that,  as a result, foreign objects were allowed to penetrate inside the  reactor, making the situation worse.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>Wear and tear caused by aging is  attracting special attention at NSC, as Japan has been operating nuclear power plants for over 20 years, with the oldest  reactor having accumulated more than 100,000 hours of operation.  &nbsp;&raquo;The design lifespan of a nuclear facility is said to be  30-40 years,&nbsp;&raquo; the NSC report said. &nbsp;&raquo;We will start to see facilities  reaching that lifespan toward the end of this  century&#8230;.Consequently, it will become more and more critical to  accurately evaluate the life of such facilities from now on.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>As two examples of wear-and-tear  incidents, NSC presented the January 1989 incident at the Tokai-1  gas-cooled reactor, commissioned in July 1966, and the Hamaoka-1  recirculation pump damage. In the Tokai-1 case, a cable tray dropped  off after its surface had oxidized in the high-temperature  carbon-dioxide atmosphere and triggered deformation of the tray&#8217;s  metal suspension, NSC said.</p>
<p>Thorough implementation of &nbsp;&raquo;safety  culture&nbsp;&raquo;&#8211;early discovery of wear of equipment as well as preventive  safety measures, including proper repair and replacement&#8211;is critical  in coping with problems caused by aging, the report said. It also  stressed high-level quality control throughout all phases of  engineering, fabrication, installation, and operation of nuclear units.</p>
<p>Despite Japan&#8217;s high level of  operator training, human factors are still contributing to nuclear power plant incidents, the White Paper said. On the engineering  level, a faulty instrument circuit drawing triggered automatic  shutdown during the test run of Shimane-2 in July 1988, it said.</p>
<p>The wrong signal cable was removed in  March 1988 at Tsuruga-2, resulting in automatic shutdown of the  1,160-MW PWR; five months later, a welded portion of the flexible  tube was overstressed and cracked, forcing operators to manually  scram the reactor, NSC pointed out. All these incidents eventually  led to revision of manuals and procedures, it reported.</p>
<p>Constant care and improvement of  procedures, building up data bases on human errors, simulator  training, and other measures are promoted by the Japan Atomic  Research Institute, the nuclear Power Engineering Center, and  the Central Research Institute of the Electric Power Industry, the  White Paper said.</p>
<p>In an appendix, the White Paper  printed a dozen &nbsp;&raquo;most frequently asked questions&nbsp;&raquo; about nuclear power plant safety, with brief answers, an editorial format adopted  for the first time in last year&#8217;s report.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__63_323964393"></a>30  novembre 1989 : l&#8217;AEC déclare que malgré les accidents,  le Japon n&#8217;abandonnera pas l&#8217;énergie nucléaire.</h2>
<p><strong>JAPAN  AEC SAYS NUCLEAR IS NEEDED AND WORLD IS NOT ABANDONING IT &#8212; Naoaki  Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 7</p>
<p>Vol. 30,  No. 48</p>
<p>Copyright 1989 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>The industrialized West is not at all  stampeding to dump nuclear power generation, and atomic energy  will remain the core of Japan&#8217;s energy structure, but only with the  &nbsp;&raquo;understanding&nbsp;&raquo; of people, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)  stressed in its fiscal year 1989 Atomic Energy White Paper, approved  by the Cabinet recently.</p>
<p>The annual White Paper also said  Japan has been&#8211;and will continue&#8211;expanding its international  cooperation in the field, shifting its efforts from attempts to catch  up with advanced countries to creative initiatives of its own,  particularly in nuclear fusion, safety research, and  radioactive waste treatment technologies.</p>
<p>The AEC report, discussing public  acceptance, expressed regret over the January 1989 recirculation pump  accident at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3 BWR (NW, 9 Feb., 3). &nbsp;&raquo;There is  no denying the incident ended up casting a shadow over citizens&#8217;  trust in nuclear power generation,&nbsp;&raquo; the 363-page paper  stated.</p>
<p>The AEC argued that each country is  mapping out its own energy policy that reflects its demand trend,  geographic conditions, and available resources. &nbsp;&raquo;The number of the  world&#8217;s nuclear power plants is steadily increasing, and it  can not be said that atomic power generation is suffering an overall  setback,&nbsp;&raquo; AEC said. For example, the West German decision to scrap  its own spent fuel reprocessing plant (NW, 8 June, 3) was based on  economic considerations against the backdrop of the 1992 European  Community integration, and does not alter the nation&#8217;s basic policy  of using reprocessed fuel, it said. Italy and Austria, which use much  less power than Japan, can import electricity or depend on  non-nuclear power sources, it theorized.</p>
<p>The United States commissioned seven  new nuclear plants in 1988, becoming the first country with  more than 100-million kilowatts, or 19.5% of capacity, in nuclear energy, the White Paper said. The shutdown of Rancho Seco, it said,  resulted mainly from poor capacity factors which made it economically  impractical.</p>
<p>With this background, nuclear power generation should play a core role in Japan&#8217;s &nbsp;&raquo;best energy  mix,&nbsp;&raquo; the report said. In FY-87, nuclear accounted for 26.6%  of total electricity generated, showing excellent capacity factors  compared with other nuclear countries, it noted.</p>
<p>nuclear&#8217;s importance becomes  more evident in light of the necessity of lowering Japan&#8217;s dependence  on petroleum, rapidly growing domestic energy demand, global  environmental destruction, and poor prospects for renewable energies  such as solar and wind, it said.</p>
<p>This was the first time AEC linked  growing domestic energy demand with the need for nuclear power. Domestic energy consumption increased 4.8% and 5.4% in FY-87  and FY-88, respectively, it said. The paper did not give a forecast  for FY-89 since the Ministry of International Trade &amp; Industry is  currently revising its backbone Long-Term Energy Demand-Supply  Forecast, AEC officials said.</p>
<p>The FY-89 White Paper spent 12 full  pages&#8211;compared with 12 lines last year&#8211;stressing Japan&#8217;s  international initiatives in nuclear utilization. For  instance, &nbsp;&raquo;it was a notable achievement that Japan took the  initiative in proposing an international cooperation project, Omega  Project, to exchange information on nuclide partitioning and  transmutation technologies, which was formally decided by the OECD  NEA (nuclear Energy Agency) in June 1989,&nbsp;&raquo; it said. Japan  should contribute &nbsp;&raquo;actively and positively&nbsp;&raquo; to the international nuclear community, including the industrialized countries,  developing world, and global organizations, the paper said, listing a  number of ventures underway.</p>
<p>The paper&#8217;s reference to public  acceptance was slightly subdued compared with last year. In addition  to pointing to the <strong>Fukushima</strong> incident, it called for more  meticulous and open dialogue with the public. Government and industry  efforts are still insufficient in terms of &nbsp;&raquo;understandability and  two-way character,&nbsp;&raquo; it said.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;There is no denying that nuclear power plants and fuel cycle facilities have potential danger since  they deal with radioactive substances,&nbsp;&raquo; the White Paper said. &nbsp;&raquo;But  it is important to generate a national consensus based not on  emotional fear but on correct understanding.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Critics, however, said that the FY-89  White Paper, in its not-too-invisible efforts to brush off  antinuclear activism, often lacked objectivity. For example, the  Rancho Seco shutdown certainly resulted from economic problems, but  its low capacity factors resulted from safety problems, they pointed  out.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__65_323964393"></a>8  janvier 1990 : une accumulation d&#8217;accidents en 1989</h2>
<p><strong>Operating rate rises for nuclear plants.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 1990</p>
<p>Tokyo, Jan 8 (Jiji Press) &#8211; Japan&#8217;s  37 commercial nuclear power plants operated at an average 72.3  pct of their total capacity in 1989, up 1.9 percentage points from  1989, the Natural Resources and Energy Agency said Monday.</p>
<p>But accidents and troubles pushed the  operating rate down by 2.3 points, the largest in eight years, the  agency said.</p>
<p>This indicates that last year&#8217;s  accidents and troubles were more frequent than in the previous years.</p>
<p>The accidents in 1989 included a  coolant leak at the No 1 reactor of Kansai Electric Power Co&#8217;s Oi nuclear power station in Fukui Prefecture.</p>
<p>A pump breakdown, which has forced a  reactor to suspend operation for almost one year, was not counted as  an accident in calculating the adverse effect of accidents and  troubles on the operating rate.</p>
<p>This accident was found during  regular checks at the No 3 reactor of Tokyo Electric Power&#8217;s second <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> power station in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__67_323964393"></a>23  février 1990 : arrêt du réacteur 2 en raison  d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>PUMP  DEFECT BLAMED FOR JAPAN&#8217;S NUCLEAR MALFUNCTION.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1990  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, FEB 23, Reuter &#8211; The Ministry  of International Trade and Industry (MITI) blamed a defect in the  core cooling system for the malfunction at a nuclear power  plant owned by Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc.</p>
<p>An unusal decline in output forced  the company to halt the operation of one of its atomic power plants  in January 1989.</p>
<p>A team of MITI experts determined  that incomplete welding in a primary loop recirculation pump caused  damage to nuts and bolts in the pump. The company is clearing the  unit, which is still closed, of this debris in the reactor pressure  vessel.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric&#8217;s nuclear power  plants have a total output capacity accounting for about a third of  Japan&#8217;s overall atomic energy supply capacity of 29.28 million  kilowatts.</p>
<p>The company has suffered a 10 pct  drop in its nuclear power generation since the shutdown of the  third unit of <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 plant in northern Japan, a Tokyo  Electric spokesman said.</p>
<p>It has been making up for the  shortage by buying power from other power companies.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;This type of defect have never  been found in Japanese nuclear plants. There have been no  reports in other nations about a similar malfunction,&nbsp;&raquo; a MITI  official said.</p>
<p>MITI urged Tokyo Electric and other  Japanese power firms to change the same type of rings in the pumping  system, which is designed to cool the reactor pressure vessel.</p>
<p>The stoppage of the pumps would push  up the temperature in the vessel and reduce the number of neutrons,  causing the reaction rate to slow, the MITI official said. All  Japan&#8217;s 37 nuclear power plants except one have undergone or  are undergoing the procedure to change the parts, he said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__69_323964393"></a> 20 mars 1990 : la Haute-Cour de Sendai repousse  une demande d&#8217;arrêt de la centrale de Fukushima</h2>
<p><strong>COURT  DISMISSES SUIT AGAINST NUCLEAR PLANT.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1990  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, March 20, Reuter &#8211; Japan&#8217;s  anti-nuclear movement suffered a setback on Tuesday when a  court rejected a legal suit by a citizen&#8217;s group which wanted to halt  operations of a nuclear power plant north of Tokyo.</p>
<p>The Sendai High Court dismissed a  suit demanding the regional government revoke the licence of a nuclear generator in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture that was  temporarily closed after plant officials discovered mechanical faults  in January 1989.</p>
<p>Japanese courts have dismissed four  other civil suits against nuclear power plants. The country is  pursuing an aggressive policy to increase the nuclear share of  its electricity output.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s 35 nuclear reactors  provide about 30 per cent of its electricity and the government plans  to build a further 18 to boost the proportion to 60 per cent.</p>
<p><strong>COURT  REJECTS FUKUSHIMA CITIZENS&#8217; ANTINUCLEAR SUIT. (FUKUSHIMA GENERATING  PLANT)</strong></p>
<p>20 mars  1990</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>900320035</p>
<p>Copyright Kyodo News International Inc. 1990</p>
<p>COURT REJECTS <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> CITIZENS&#8217; ANTINUCLEAR SUIT+</p>
<p>SENDAI, MARCH 20 KYODO</p>
<p>A HIGH COURT HERE DISMISSED TUESDAY  AN APPEAL BY CITIZENS OF <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> PREFECTURE TO HALT THE  OPERATION OF A LOCAL nuclear FACILITY, IN THE FIRST RULING OF  ITS KIND SINCE THE ATOMIC DISASTER IN CHERNOBYL.</p>
<p>THE SUIT, BROUGHT BY 33 LOCAL  RESIDENTS, SAID THE GOVERNMENT&#8217;S FAILURE TO CONDUCT A SAFETY  INSPECTION OF THE TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER CO.&#8217;S TROUBLED <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> GENERATING PLANT WAS A VIOLATION OF NATIONAL SAFETY CODES.</p>
<p>HUMAN ERROR AND COMPLICATIONS  RESULTING FROM MECHANICAL FAILURE, COULD NOT BE FORSEEN BY DESIGNERS,  AS SHOWN IN THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT, THE CITIZENS ARGUED.</p>
<p>BUT PRESIDING JUDGE YOSHIO ISHIKAWA,  IN DISMISSING THE SUIT, SAID GENERATOR SAFEGUARDS AT <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> WERE MORE THAN SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT A CHERNOBYL-STYLE DISASTER.</p>
<p>A GOVERNMENT REPORT ISSUED LAST MONTH  CITED BOTH OPERATIONAL ERROR AND MECHANICAL FAILURE AS THE CAUSE OF  AN ACCIDENT IN JANUARY, 1989 AT THE <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong> PLANT&#8217;S NO. 2  GENERATOR.</p>
<p>OPERATORS STOPPED THE PLANT ONE WEEK  AFTER IRREGULARITIES WERE FIRST NOTICED, AND LATER ALMOST 50  KILOGRAMS OF BROKEN PUMP FRAGMENTS WERE FOUND IN AND AROUND THE  REACTOR&#8217;S CORE.</p>
<p>THE RESIDENTS ALSO CALLED FOR SAFETY  CHECKS TO INCLUDE PROCEDURES FOR RECYCLING SPENT nuclear FUEL  AND THE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES. PRESENT CHECKS LIMITED TO THE  REACTOR DESIGN WERE INADEQUATE TO GUARD AGAINST ACCIDENTS, THEY SAID.</p>
<p>BUT ISHIKAWA SAID IN HIS RULING,  &laquo;&nbsp;THERE IS NO ROOM FOR DOUBT ABOUT THE RATIONALITY OF SAFETY  INSPECTIONS.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>HE SAID <strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>&#8216;S  LIGHT-WATER REACTOR WAS DESIGNED TO CONTROL THE nuclear FISSION REACTION IN THE EVENT OF A SURGE IN RADIATION OUTPUT AS  OPPOSED TO THE SYSTEM OF LEAD RODS USED TO ADJUST THE REACTION SPEED  IN THE CHERNOBYL GENERATOR.</p>
<p>TUESDAY&#8217;S DECISION REPRESENTS THE  FIFTH DISMISSAL IN JAPANESE COURTS OF CITIZEN&#8217;S SUITS TO SUSPEND THE  OPERATING LICENSES OF nuclear FACILITIES ON SAFETY GROUNDS. nuclear POWER  PROVIDES SOME 26.6 PERCENT OF JAPAN&#8217;S ELECTRICITY SUPPLY.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__71_323964393"></a> 29 mars 1990 : La Haute-Cour  de Sendai déclare que les centrales sont bien conçues  et ne peuvent pas causer de catastrophes</h2>
<p><strong>JAPAN  COURT SAYS BASIC PLANT DESIGN SAFE BUT WARNS INDUSTRY &#8212; Naoaki  Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 4</p>
<p>Vol. 31,  No. 13</p>
<p>Copyright 1990 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>A Japanese appeals court declared  that the basic engineering of the country&#8217;s nuclear power  plants is sufficiently safe and reliable, but said strict attention  must be paid to component manufacture and operational safety. While  turning down a 16-year-old request by plant neighbors to scrap a  Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco) BWR, the court warned the industry  against supplying defective equipment&#8211;for example, recirculation  pumps that break down during operation.</p>
<p>The Sendai High Court in northern  Japan ruled last week on the suit, filed in 1974 by a group of 33  citizens who had sought nullification of the construction permit for  Tepco&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-1 BWR. The plaintiffs charged that the  government&#8217;s safety evaluation and scrutiny of the design was  insufficient.</p>
<p>The opinion, handed down by presiding  Judge Yoshio Ishikawa and two other officers, was the fifth court  verdict in Japan that essentially endorsed the government&#8217;s nuclear plant safety evaluation procedures. The angry plaintiffs declared  they will appeal the case to the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>In their <strong>Fukushima</strong> challenge,  the plaintiffs argued that government safety evaluation standards are  too vague and radiation dose limits have not yet been firmly  established, and charged that the accidents at Chernobyl-4 and Three  Mile Island-2 reflect flaws in basic nuclear engineering.</p>
<p>The local residents originally  brought their case to the <strong>Fukushima</strong> District Court in 1974,  about two years after construction of <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-1 had been  approved by the Ministry of International Trade &amp; Industry  (MITI). The <strong>Fukushima</strong> court ruled in 1984 that the  government&#8217;s safety evaluation was viable.</p>
<p>The March 20 ruling by the Sendai  appeals court said that the reactor&#8217;s basic design sufficiently  guarantees safety and can prevent reactivity-related accidents such  as what happened at Chernobyl.</p>
<p>However, the court warned that  keeping operational nuclear power plants safe &nbsp;&raquo;is another  matter&#8230;.For a nuclear power plant to be safe, detailed  engineering, construction work and operation must be made strictly in  accordance with that basic engineering which was proven safe,&nbsp;&raquo; the  verdict said. &nbsp;&raquo;Consequently, those engaged in various phases must  make their best efforts to secure safety.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;For example, they must not  manufacture recirculation pumps which break down (easily), or make  mistakes the operators at Chernobyl made,&nbsp;&raquo; Ishikawa said, in a  pointed reference to the defective recirculation pump component that  triggered a major incident at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3 BWR in  January last year (NW, 1 Mar. &#8217;89, 1).</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;It is believed that nuclear power generation cannot be discontinued, and, if so, there will be no  other way but to promote nuclear power generation by improving  safety through research,&nbsp;&raquo; the judges concluded after commenting on  the general energy situation. &nbsp;&raquo;What would be the alternative to nuclear power generation when and if it were to be  discontinued?&nbsp;&raquo; they asked.</p>
<p>Despite its mixed sentiments, the  ruling was welcomed by government and industry. Tepco President Sho  Nasu called it meaningful in securing a stable supply of electricity,  and Masashi Yamamoto, director general of MITI&#8217;s Agency of Natural  Resources &amp; Energy (ANRE), told reporters he highly appreciates  the verdict which basically supported the government&#8217;s stance.</p>
<p>The plaintiffs, however, were  furious. Their chief attorney, Sanzo Onoda, said the judges lack  knowledge of nuclear power plants and their verdict, which  simply &nbsp;&raquo;parrots&nbsp;&raquo; government claims, is worse than &nbsp;&raquo;the propaganda  leaflets Tepco scatters all over the place.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Industry watchers believe that the  latest verdict reflected the limits of the court in technical nuclear questions. &nbsp;&raquo;It judged that basic engineering is OK,&nbsp;&raquo; said one  observer. &nbsp;&raquo;But it ducked giving any judgment of its own on detailed  engineering and other fields; it only said that that was &#8216;another  matter.&nbsp;&raquo;&#8217;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__73_323964393"></a> 14 avril 1990 : les accidents nucléaires  font douter les Japonais</h2>
<p><strong>RECENT  INCIDENTS BEGIN TO TURN JAPANESE AGAINST NUCLEAR POWER.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Economist</span></span></span></p>
<p>EC</p>
<p>66</p>
<p>(c) The  Economist Newspaper Limited, London 1990. All rights reserved</p>
<p>After circling the globe for four  years, the political fallout from Chernobyl is at last settling on  Japan. With Hiroshima still vivid in their minds, the Japanese have  never been comfortable with the idea of nuclear power. Still,  27% of Japan&#8217;s electricity is now generated by nuclear plants,  and people seemed ready to go along with the government&#8217;s plans to  raise that to 40% by 2000. If nothing else, more nuclear power  makes Japan less beholden to imported oil. But a spate of recent  incidents has turned the Japanese against nuclear power.</p>
<p>The industry had been hoping to put a  friendly face on nuclear power by sending the Mutsu, Japan&#8217;s  first and only nuclear ship, on a year-long scientific cruise  around the world. The vessel has been in dry-dock for the past 16  years; technicians from the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute  have been reinforcing its radiation shield to stop the reactor from  leaking gamma rays. That done, the ship&#8217;s reactor was supposed to be  brought up to power over the past few weeks. This task was so badly  bungled that even the nuclear officials in charge were  frightened. The residents of Aomori, the big city closest to the  Mutsu&#8217;s home port, have been up in arms.</p>
<p>The Mutsu&#8217;s tests were hurriedly  suspended, but the Japanese public&#8217;s fragile faith in nuclear power had been shaken yet again. Already there had been press reports  about a long chain of mechanical failures at one of Tokyo Electric  Power Company&#8217;s big nuclear plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong>.  Because of accidents, several of the reactors in <strong>Fukushima</strong> had  to be shut down. One of the reactors has been out of action for more  than a year. Plant failures of various sorts left Japan&#8217;s 37 nuclear power stations operating at only 70% of capacity last year-the lowest  figure in seven years.</p>
<p>The nuclear lobby had thought  things were looking up. The nuclear-friendly Liberal Democrats  had been swept back to power in February, beating a Socialist party  that promised not to allow any new nuclear plants and to phase  out existing ones. That included the nuclear industry&#8217;s big  new complex near the village of Rokkasho, in Aomori prefecture (home,  too, to the ill-fated Mutsu).</p>
<p>Six years ago the Federation of  Electric Power Companies (the umbrella for Japan&#8217;s seven big  electrical utilities) chose Rokkasho as the site for all its nuclear-fuel work. Other countries have scattered the various  parts of the nuclear-fuel cycle in different places. Despite  the risk from earthquakes, Japan has put all its nuclear eggs-from enriching the uranium in the first place to reprocessing  the spent fuel and then storing the radioactive waste-in the one  Rokkasho basket.</p>
<p>The local authority was  delighted-indirectly, it was a part-owner of the site that the  federation bought for its three nuclear-fuel plants-but the  local people have been much less enthusiastic. Last summer 172  residents sought a court order to get the government&#8217;s approval of  the fuel plants overturned. When the lawsuit stalled, the opponents  took to the streets. The sleepy, conservative town has become  politicised. So much so that, four months ago, it threw out the  Liberal Democrat-backed mayor, who favoured the plants, and elected a  Socialist who had been demanding that construction at the site be  stopped.</p>
<p>Even Japanese farmers are rebelling.  Having lately seen on television how the Russians are still having to  destroy crops affected by Chernobyl, they worry about contamination  of their own crops in the event of a Japanese nuclear accident. Nervous Liberal Democrats have taken heed. In the February  election several ruling-party candidates contesting seats with nuclear facilities nearby declared themselves anti-nuclear.</p>
<p>The Ministry of International Trade  and Industry is just about to revise its forecast of Japan&#8217;s energy  needs upwards by a smidgen (after lowering it six times since 1975),  to take account of the country&#8217;s new taste for bigger cars, fancier  appliances and more personal consumption all round. But any thoughts  that nuclear energy might profit from this increased demand  have disappeared. The 1987 forecast that nuclear power would  account for 40% of Japan&#8217;s electricity in 2000 would have required  53m kilowatts of nuclear capacity. Some 16 nuclear stations are now being built. When they are finished, they will raise  Japan&#8217;s nuclear capacity from today&#8217;s 29m kilowatts to 46m  kilowatts. Then what?</p>
<p>Not much. Many think that will be the  high-water mark of Japan&#8217;s nuclear industry. A consensus is  forming that the best fuel for Japan is natural gas. It produces no  sulphur, no tar and relatively small amounts of carbon dioxide, the  greenhouse gas. It can easily be liquefied for shipping. And, best of  all, there is plenty of it around-especially in friendly nearby  countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei and Australia, where  Japanese power companies have long-term contracts and all the refrige  rated vessels they need for transporting the fuel back to Japan.</p>
<p>MITI reckons that gas-fired  electricity is no bargain. It costs about the same as electricity  from coal or oil, and 10% more than from nuclear power; but,  as America&#8217;s power companies have discovered over the past 15 years, nuclear energy can turn out far more expensive than it looks  on the drawing board.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__75_323964393"></a>28 juin  1990 : manifestation anti-nucléaire lors de l&#8217;assemblée  annuelle des actionnaires de TEPCO</h2>
<p><strong>RARE  ANTINUCLEAR CHALLENGES SET FOR TEPCO ANNUAL MEETING &#8212; Naoaki Usui,  Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 9</p>
<p>Vol. 31,  No. 26</p>
<p>Copyright 1990 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO)  officials were anticipating a less-than-smooth general shareholders&#8217;  meeting tomorrow (June 28) as hundreds of antinuclear activists were  planning to attend to question nuclear power plant safety.  Their questions are expected to be fueled by recirculation pump seal  problems that occurred at two TEPCO units in mid-June.</p>
<p>Hundreds of antinuclear power plant  activists, armed with their own stock certificates, are planning to  throw questions or otherwise embarrass annual general shareholders  meetings of Japan&#8217;s nine commercial utility companies. Tactics  engaged in by antinuclear hawks have taken a new twist over the last  several years as they started buying 100 shares per person, the legal  minimum to qualify to attend annual meetings. To management, nothing  is more important than that meeting to show how the corporation has  been doing the right thing.</p>
<p>Tomorrow, for TEPCO&#8217;s most important  corporate ritual of the year, an estimated 250 antinuclear Japanese  were planning to attend the shareholders&#8217; session. TEPCO is Japan&#8217;s  largest utility, operates 12 nuclear plants, and maintains  one-third of the nation&#8217;s total electricity market.</p>
<p>TEPCO officials were already  anticipating difficulties when two 1,100-MW BWRs at <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II  almost simultaneously developed recirculation pump seal problems and  had to be shut, heavily cutting into TEPCO&#8217;s capacity at a time when  power demand was rising. Both <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-1 and -4 had to be  taken off line to replace faulty seals from June 13 to June 16, and  unit 4 was again shut almost immediately because its new seal was  faulty.</p>
<p>The incidents themselves were  minor&#8211;none of them of the magnitude of the disintegrating  recirculation pump at <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3 in January 1989 that  forced the company president to publicly apologize&#8211;but they meant  that six of TEPCO&#8217;s 12 units were incapacitated. <strong>Fukushima</strong>-I-2  and -3 and <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-2 and -3 were all down for routine  maintenance and refueling. The incidents came when temperatures in  Japan were unusually warm, boosting electric power demand. TEPCO  reported a peak demand June 19 of 40.71-million kilowatts, for which  it had to borrow from surrounding utilities.</p>
<p>Public affairs personnel of TEPCO  have been snowed under since then by preparatory work to survive the  June 28 session, with the meeting scheduled to start at 10 a.m. &nbsp;&raquo;We  don&#8217;t know how long it will last,&nbsp;&raquo; a tired staff member told  Nucleonics Week. &nbsp;&raquo;And we don&#8217;t even know how many shareholders will  show up.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Last year, the annual TEPCO  shareholders meeting took 130 minutes and had 650 attendants. Those  130 minutes were unusually long by Japanese standards, under which  all management proposals and reports are railroaded through in 10 to  15 minutes. Indeed, Japanese corporate culture cherishes &nbsp;&raquo;smooth&nbsp;&raquo;  shareholders meetings and, consequently, detests lengthy and stormy  ones.</p>
<p>But for the year 1990, neither TEPCO  nor eight other utilities were expecting a sweet session. Activists,  armed with a total of 5,000 questions about nuclear power  plant safety, were even demanding that TEPCO set up babysitting  services for the day because many of the activist-shareholders are  young mothers. TEPCO, at press time, was still refusing, claiming  that the meeting was not intended for children.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, industry speculation that  former TEPCO Executive Vice President Ryo Ikegame, who was demoted to  a Managing Director after the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3 incident, might  be reinstated at the upcoming meeting, was denied by TEPCO officials.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__77_323964393"></a>12  juillet 1990 : le ministère japonais déclare que le  réacteur 3 est en état de marche</h2>
<p><strong>MITI  SAYS FUKUSHIMA-II-3 SAFE BUT NSC VOWS FURTHER SCRUTINY &#8212; Naoaki  Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 3</p>
<p>Vol. 31,  No. 28</p>
<p>Copyright 1990 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s Ministry of International  Trade &amp; Industry (MITI) officially reported last week that the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3 BWR, shut off since January 1989 after a  recirculation pump bearing ring disintegrated, has been repaired  sufficiently to resume operation. However, the nuclear Safety  Commission (NSC) decided to have its 49-member Reactor Safety  Specialist Subcommittee scrutinize the 70-page final report, closing,  in effect, the way for Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) to use the  1,100-MW plant during the peak demand period from mid- to end-August.</p>
<p>MITI&#8217;s final document, accompanied by  34 pages of illustrations and tables, followed three interim reports  submitted by the Agency of Natural Resources &amp; Energy (ANRE),  MITI&#8217;s utility supervising wing, and the nation&#8217;s largest utility  operator. NSC&#8217;s reactor safety subcommittee, expected to be chaired  by Kazuo Sato, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) Board  director, will hold its first meeting late this week or early next  week. The large subcommittee takes a long startup time because it  requires a quorum for a majority, a Science &amp; Technology Agency  (STA) source said, hinting the evaluation will not be completed by  the peak demand period.</p>
<p>The MITI report said it is estimated  there is a maximum 47 grams of powdered metals, including some 200  particles of 0.3 millimeter or more in diameter, still unrecovered  and remaining inside the reactor pressure vessel, piping, and other  equipment. In addition, four larger metal pieces&#8211;maximum 1.6 grams  in weight, measuring up to 42.4 x 9.4 x 2 mm&#8211;are thought to be stuck  inside. The figures are 95% correct, MITI claims, based on recovered  debris and their locations. Debris remaining inside fuel and the  channel box being used at the time of the incident were excluded from  this estimation because &nbsp;&raquo;it has not yet been decided whether they  are to be used again or not,&nbsp;&raquo; the report said.</p>
<p>Before a thorough &nbsp;&raquo;washing&nbsp;&raquo;  operation, engineers recovered 185 &nbsp;&raquo;relatively large&nbsp;&raquo; metal pieces,  excluding the debris of washers, MITI said. After the rinsing, no  piece larger than 0.5 millimeter in diameter has been discovered by  naked eye inspection, it said. &nbsp;&raquo;The possibility is small that  relatively large metal pieces over 0.5 millimeter in diameter still  remain inside,&nbsp;&raquo; the report said. Concerning finer metal powder, the  report estimated that 9 to 47 grams still reside inside the reactor  components.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;Chances that these metal powders  and debris might impact future plant operation is very small,&nbsp;&raquo; the  MITI report said. &nbsp;&raquo;Even if some might impact the operation, it has  been confirmed that they will not impact safety.&nbsp;&raquo; Bearing, rotor,  casing cover, and other components of the recirculation pump were  replaced, and other equipment and fuel turned out to be either  &nbsp;&raquo;unaffected, or free of any influence that is related to  soundness,&nbsp;&raquo; the MITI inspectors concluded.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;As a result of these  evaluations&#8230;there has not been recognized any item that might cause  a safety problem in operating the plant,&nbsp;&raquo; MITI said. But it also  called for implementation of new policies proposed in February&#8211;such  as introduction of bearing rings welded by the complete penetration  method or made by the integrated centrifugal casting method&#8211;as well  as more meticulous pre-operational safety confirmation and, at least  tentatively, reinforcement of operation supervising efforts.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;A nuclear power plant under  operation usually carries dozens of kilograms of metal powder, such  as rust and slime,&nbsp;&raquo; said an STA source. &nbsp;&raquo;In the case of <strong>Fukushima</strong>-II-3, what it has is 1/1000 of that volume.&nbsp;&raquo; He was  obviously hinting that he thinks the plant is safe enough for  immediate resumption of operation.</p>
<p>However, the January 7, 1989 incident  came amid the public&#8217;s mounting skepticism about nuclear safety, and restart immediately after the MITI report might trigger a  political bombshell, many observers agree. Indeed, the annual general  shareholders meeting of TEPCO on June 28 turned out to be a shouting  match between antinuclear activist/shareholders and pro-management  stock owners, they pointed out.</p>
<p>The 1,100-MW reactor developed  irregular vibrations on New Year&#8217;s Day last year, but operators,  after slowing it down, continued operation. Then, on January 7, the  vibration became bad enough for plant personnel to manually shut it  down&#8211;only three days before the annual maintenance outage was  scheduled to start. Analysts later found insufficient penetration by  welds of the reactor recirculation pump bearing ring led to  stress-originated metal fatigue, which eventually triggered the  100-kilogram component to disconnect. Upon the impact, the bearing  ring, bolts, turbine blades, turbine blade rings, casing, and casing  covers were damaged. Further, five bolts, five washers, and a  fragment of turbine blade were disconnected and a total of 31.3  kilograms of metal was lost by abrasion (NW, 9 March &#8217;89, 1). This  incident is considered the worst accident in three decades of  Japanese nuclear power generation history, though there were  no off-site consequences.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__79_323964393"></a> 9 août 1990 :  TEPCO attend la remise en marche du réacteur 3 en raison d&#8217;une  forte demande d&#8217;électricité,</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  FACES RECORD POWER DEMAND, WAITS FOR FUKUSHIMA II-3 RESTART &#8212;  Naoaki Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 5</p>
<p>Vol. 31,  No. 32</p>
<p>Copyright 1990 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>An expert committee of the Japanese nuclear Safety Commission (NSC) is continuing to assess the  safety of restarting Tokyo Electric Power Co.&#8217;s (TEPCO) <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3, as TEPCO struggles to respond to record demand without the  1,100-MW BWR.</p>
<p>The unit has been shut since January  1989 when a recirculation pump bearing ring disintegrated. Last  month, the Ministry of International Trade &amp; Industry (MITI) said  the unit was satisfactorily repaired and could resume operation, but  the NSC wanted to review the repairs first (NW, 12 July, 3).</p>
<p>Following two sessions in July, an  NSC expert subcommittee on August 3 visited manufacturing plants of  Toshiba Corp. and Ebara Corp., fabricators of the reactor and the  pump, respectively. They inspected, among other things, test  equipment used in the past-incident investigation, officials said.  The 22-member subcommittee is to follow up the visit with another  inspection tour on August 22, to <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 itself, at the  site north of Tokyo, NSC officials said. An evaluation meeting is to  be held August 29.</p>
<p>Although it is theoretically possible  that the August 29 meeting might authorize the plant&#8217;s restart,  observers agree that the chance is very slim, partly because it might  make NSC look like it has been railroaded into approving resumed  operation. A September restart is seen as the earliest feasible.  Critics are already claiming that last week&#8217;s inspection of the two  manufacturing plants&#8211;consisting predominantly of observing test  equipment and videos, according to officials&#8211;was nothing more than  &nbsp;&raquo;a school excursion to get second-hand information.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, TEPCO without <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 is in a very hot situation, literally. The summer is unusually  hot, and so far power demand has been making a record virtually every  day. Lack of rain is drying up hydropower reservoirs, crippling hydro  generation. &nbsp;&raquo;And now, oil prices are certainly rising in the wake of  the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait,&nbsp;&raquo; one expert noted.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__81_323964393"></a>6  septembre 1990 : report du redémarrage du réacteur 3</h2>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA  II-3 OUTAGE IS NOW EXPECTED TO EXTEND TO OCTOBER &#8212; Naoaki Usui,  Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 4</p>
<p>Vol. 31,  No. 36</p>
<p>Copyright 1990 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s nuclear Safety  Commission (NSC) experts were to meet September 5 to discuss the  feasibility of restarting the 1,100-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 BWR,  closed since January, 1989, but informed sources believe it will take  at least another month before the team gives the final approval.</p>
<p>Despite shortfalls such as absence of  its own test capability and enforcement authority, the NSC power  reactor subcommittee headed by Kazuo Sato, board director of the  Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, is displaying meticulous  efforts to verify the reactor&#8217;s safety, observers agree. &nbsp;&raquo;And that&#8217;s  despite lobbying and pressures from the utility industry and the  Ministry of International Trade &amp; Industry (MITI),&nbsp;&raquo; one  well-placed observer noted.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;We expect heated arguments,&nbsp;&raquo;  declared Sato at the plant immediately after his August 22 field  inspection of the site north of Tokyo. &nbsp;&raquo;And the issue shall not be  closed until we get answers to every single question our members  might have. I don&#8217;t know when we can reach a conclusion.&nbsp;&raquo; Nineteen  of the team&#8217;s 22 members, followed by dozens of reporters, visited  the site, running from one un-air-conditioned place to another on the  scorching summer day.</p>
<p>The team inspected samples of  debris&#8211;metal fragments found at the bottom of the reactor vessel,  from the turbine rotor and bearing ring of the troubled recirculation  pump&#8211;as well as inside the pressure vessel and the reactor core  during the whirlwind, 6.5-hour visit. Lit up by blue illumination,  the core is now being reloaded, a process Tokyo Electric Power Co.  (TEPCO) expects to take until the end of September.</p>
<p>The team met on August 29 for the  third time to discuss the <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 issue. The meeting  focused on the sequence of the bearing ring damage, the sturdiness of  the new ring and of piping, support structures, and components after  unusual vibration, and evaluation of residue metal powder inside the  reactor. There are skeptics among the members on MITI figures&#8211;17  grams of residue metallic powder in the reactor, for example&#8211;one  inside source said.</p>
<p>The September 5 meeting is likely to  fail to come up with any conclusion on restarting the unit, a  well-placed source said. The team is to file its report to its  parent, NSC, by September 26, officials said. Then, NSC is to hand  TEPCO and MITI its decision. Some observers believe that NSC could  authorize the reactor to start operation in early October, but this  could not be confirmed officially.</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 was manually  shut down on January 7 last year after developing wild vibrations,  caused by disintegration of a recirculation pump. Engineers found  that the disintegration resulted from inadequate welding of the  pump&#8217;s bearing ring, which allowed the 100-kilogram piece of steel to  disconnect. After investigation, MITI reported to NSC in July that  the unit was repaired safely enough to be reconnected to the grid.</p>
<p>At the same time, MITI submitted  measures to prevent similar incidents from happening. The proposed  measures included introduction of bearing rings welded with the  complete penetration method or the integrated centrifugal casing  method, and more meticulous pre-operational safety confirmation.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__83_323964393"></a> 11 octobre 1990 : la NSC approuve le redémarrage  du réacteur 3</h2>
<p><strong>JAPAN&#8217;S  NSC APPROVES FUKUSHIMA II-3 RESTART &#8212; Naoaki Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 2</p>
<p>Vol. 31,  No. 41</p>
<p>Copyright 1990 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s nuclear Safety  Commission (NSC) approved restart of the 1,100-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 BWR October 4, 21 months after a defective recirculation pump  component disintegrated and forced the plant off-line. But the NSC  criticized the utility industry for not recognizing the incident&#8217;s  precursors and urged further research on detection methods for  similar fatigue failures.</p>
<p>The watchdog commission issued its  approval after one of its subcommittees came up with a restart  recommendation at its eighth meeting on the plant since July. The  meetings have been marked by intense debate on and scrutiny of the  Ministry of International Trade &amp; Industry&#8217;s (MITI) analyses and  restart proposals, made in July (NW, 6 Sept., 4).</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) will  reactivate the unit at the end of October &nbsp;&raquo;at the earliest,&nbsp;&raquo;  utility sources told Nucleonics Week. TEPCO must obtain localities&#8217;  consent, which is a &nbsp;&raquo;moral obligation,&nbsp;&raquo; and then test equipment  before the restart, they said.</p>
<p>The 12-page final report by the Power  Reactor Subcommittee of NSC&#8217;s Special Committee on Standards of  Reactors essentially accepted as logical and reasonable the MITI  analyses and proposals. The 22-member team scrutinized, in  particular, three major points on which MITI based its July  recommendation that the repaired plant is now safe enough.</p>
<p>First, the subcommittee judged  feasible MITI&#8217;s recommendation to introduce new bearing rigs  fabricated by the complete penetration method or integrated  centrifugal casting method instead of fillet welding used for the <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 component. &nbsp;&raquo;It is virtually impossible to  totally eliminate resonance,&nbsp;&raquo; the report said, accepting MITI&#8217;s  recommendation. &nbsp;&raquo;And MITI&#8217;s policy to improve relative strength (of  the bearing ring) by changing the cross-section size and form of the  welded portion seems practical.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Secondly, the subcommittee accepted  MITI&#8217;s evaluation that impacts and stresses the disintegrated ring  caused on the casing&#8211;including its ridge portion&#8211;and support  structure of the pump will not affect safety of the reactor. Piping  and accompanying components also were judged safe enough.</p>
<p>Finally, the subcommittee also  accepted MITI&#8217;s estimate that, though there remain up to four pieces  of metal and 47 grams of metallic powder inside the reactor, chances  are slim that they will harm plant safety.</p>
<p>The October 4 full meeting of NSC  approved the subcommittee report, and, by doing so, removal the final  procedural barrier to restart. But NSC, in a special statement,  scolded the utility industry, saying it should have been aware of the  possibility that such a &nbsp;&raquo;serious accident&nbsp;&raquo; might occur and that it  should take more effective safety precautions.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;The operator should have recognized  as a serious warning&nbsp;&raquo; two similar but minor incidents which took  place in 1984 and 1988 in <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-1, the NSC said. &nbsp;&raquo;It  (TEPCO) should have studied the cause of such pump damages cautiously  and established accident prevention measures in advance.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Part of the recirculation pump  bearing ring of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-1, also a 1,100-megawatt BWR,  separated and landed on the impeller in November 1983. In July 1988,  cracking was discovered in the bearing ring replaced after the 1983  incident. Both incidents were judged to have been caused by  insufficient welding. After the second mishap, MITI instructed  utilities to replace fillet welded rings with complete penetration  welded models, but did not require the backfit until the next  scheduled maintenance outage for each unit.</p>
<p>In January 1989, what some officials  call &nbsp;&raquo;the most serious&nbsp;&raquo; accident in Japan&#8217;s three decades of nuclear power generation occurred, as the bearing ring of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 disintegrated, and debris found its way into  the pressure vessel and the reactor coolant system. The mishap came  only two days before the scheduled maintenance outage.</p>
<p>The NSC &nbsp;&raquo;judges that the pump has  been repaired to a status which casts no safety problems, but it is  suggested (by the NSC) that the pump undergo thorough  inspection&#8211;with the casing opened&#8211;during the next regular  inspection outage,&nbsp;&raquo; the NSC said.</p>
<p>The NSC&#8217;s &nbsp;&raquo;expectation is that  positive actions be taken, including research and development of  irregularity assessment technology and its implementation, so that a  similar accident will not take place again.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> Comment/Analysis</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__85_323964393"></a>23  octobre 1990 : &laquo;&nbsp;les ingénieurs japonais estiment que  leurs centrales sont virtuellement à l&#8217;abri des tremblements  de terre&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>Safety  comes first in Japan&#8217;s bid to build more nuclear plants BY</strong> Kwan  Weng Kin, Tokyo Correspondent</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Straits  Times</span></span></span></p>
<p>STIMES</p>
<p>(c) 1990  Singapore Press Holdings Limited</p>
<p>KASHIWAZAKI (Niigata Prefecture) &#8211;  Along a desolate stretch of coastline overlooking the Sea of Japan  and near neatly-manicured rice fields, two giant nuclear reactors are slowly taking shape.</p>
<p>Next to the cavernous construction  sites where 6,000 men toil away under banners that extol safety above  everything else, three other identical reactor units are already  humming away, providing electricity to cities as far away as Tokyo,  which is about 230 km south-east of here.</p>
<p>With the completion in July 1997 of  two more units,the US$20 billion (S$34 billion), seven-reactor power  station will become the largest nuclear facility in the world.</p>
<p>Japan is rushing to build more nuclear plants.</p>
<p>A government advisory council&#8217;s  report in June urged the building of at leas t 40 more reactors by  2010 in addition to the existing 38. This will raise the proportion  of electricity produced by nuclear plants from the present 27  per cent to about 43 per cent.</p>
<p>The proponents of nuclear energy say it is the most efficient method of generating electricity  and, apart from the problem of the disposal of spent nuclear fuel, it does the least harm to the environment, compared to the  burning of fossil fuels.</p>
<p>But experts doubt whether the target  can be reached because of mounting opposition by anti-nuclear groups.</p>
<p>At Rokkasho village in Aomori  prefecture, residents threw out local official s who supported the  building of a nuclear facility nearby and elected new  officials who called for a freeze.</p>
<p>The Rokkasho village, of course, has  more to complain about than others. The</p>
<p>proposed facility at Rokkasho is to  contain not an ordinary power plant but a storage site for spent nuclear fuel, a uranium enrichment plant and a re-processing  plant.</p>
<p>Because of such resistance, the  report said it now takes about 26.8 years fo r a plant to start  operations after the initial proposal. In the 1970s, it took only 7.9  years.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco),  which runs the Kashiwazaki plant, has largely overcome residents&#8217;  opposition. Initially, officials spent countless evenings talking to  residents and also met anti-nuclear activists.</p>
<p>Finally, persuasion won the day.  Residents also became aware that by playing</p>
<p>host to the power facility, they  could expect a windfall in new tax revenues and government grants.</p>
<p>Mindful of this, Tepco eventually  decided to site its plant at a location straddling both Kashiwazaki  and the neighbouring village of Kariwa in order to spread the goodies  around more evenly.</p>
<p>Public relations is considered a very  important part of the plant&#8217;s activities. The constant stream of  visitors range from farmers&#8217; groups and local politicians to ladies&#8217;  clubs and high school students all the way from Tokyo.</p>
<p>Surveys indicate that nearly 90 per  cent of the Japanese people now support the use of nuclear energy.</p>
<p>A few years ago, after the Chernobyl  accident in the Soviet Union, there was</p>
<p>a minor panic in Japan.</p>
<p>But officials at the Kashiwazaki  plant firmly believe that Japan will not have a similar accident. The  superintendent of the Kashiwazaki facility, Mr Takeki Kawahito, said:  &laquo;&nbsp;We have containment vessels around our reactors, emergency  cooling systems and about 20 other safety measures which the  Chernobyl plant did not have.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;When the water disappeared from  the Chernobyl reactor, the nuclear reaction</p>
<p>increased. In the case of Japan,  self-regulating systems built into the reactors will stop the  reaction once the water is lost.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Kawahito believes that the reactors  at Kashiwazaki and other Tepco plants, which are mostly built by  Japanese companies under licensing arrangements with the original US  manufacturers, are superior to the American facilities.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The Japanese ones are better in  terms of maintenance and quality control. W e also have better  quality steel for the housing surrounding the reactors and our  electrical mechanism are far superior.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Still, despite the supposedly more  advanced technology, breakdowns do occur.</p>
<p>In 1990, the failure of a recyling  pump of a reactor at Tepco&#8217;s older plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture led to the shutting down of the plant.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, abnormal  conditions in the coolant used in two reactors a t the same <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant, stopped operations for three days.</p>
<p>One major concern of opponents to nuclear plants is the fear of a major earthquake. But Japanese  engineers believe their plants are virtually earthquake-proof.</p>
<p>The reactors at Kashiwazaki, for  example, are designed to withstand an earthquake three times more  powerful than the Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923, which measured 7.9  on the Richter scale and devasted Tokyo and its environs.</p>
<p>But where nature is concerned,  Japanese engineers are careful not to put all</p>
<p>their faith in scientific theory.</p>
<p>In one corner of the large control  room that monitors the workings of one of</p>
<p>the reactors at Kashiwazaki is a  small Shinto altar.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;That,&nbsp;&raquo; explained the  deputy superintendent of the facility with a twinkle i n his eye, &laquo;&nbsp;is  the secret of our know-how.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__87_323964393"></a> 25 octobre 1990 : inquiétudes dans le  voisinage pour le rédémarrage du réacteur 3</h2>
<p><strong>NEARBY  TOWNS CAUTIOUS ABOUT RESTART OF FUKUSHIMA II-3 &#8212; Naoaki Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 7</p>
<p>Vol. 31,  No. 43</p>
<p>Copyright 1990 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>The move to restart the 1,100-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 BWR faced yet another hurdle last week, as  mayors of two neighboring towns refused to immediately accept a  resumption request by Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) President Sho  Nasu, utility and local sources told Nucleonics Week.</p>
<p>This is likely to further delay  resumption of operation which the utility hoped would come by the end  of October, TEPCO sources noted. Although &nbsp;&raquo;agreement&nbsp;&raquo; of local  townships is not a legal requirement, Japanese utilities are  extremely sensitive about local reactions.</p>
<p>Mayors Soichiro Yamada of Tomioka and  Sadashige Yuki of Naraha on October 17 told Nasu, who visited their  town halls, that they wanted to consult with townsfolk and asked the  TEPCO chief to come back again with a 100% confirmation that the  plant restart would be safe, the sources said.</p>
<p>Nasu&#8217;s visit to the towns and to <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato came after the nuclear Safety Commission (NSC) finally ruled that the repaired BWR unit is  ready to resume operation (NW, 11 Oct., 2). Fuel has already been  loaded, and the plant technically can be started at any moment, a  TEPCO spokesman said. The plant has been out since January 7, 1989  due to disintegration of a recirculation pump bearing and subsequent  debris penetration into the reactor vessel. Disintegration resulted  from insufficient welding, officials reported.</p>
<p>A small number of antinuclear  activists are staying in the two towns, campaigning against the  complex and the restart with vans equipped with bull horns, local  sources said. &nbsp;&raquo;Some town folks are joining the caravan,&nbsp;&raquo; a villager  said.</p>
<p>The town assembly of Tomioka&#8217;s 17,000  residents is moving to delegate full authority on the issue to its  mayor, local sources said. Naraha&#8217;s assembly, representing its 8,300  citizens, met on October 22 and did so, the town hall confirmed. The  latest development symbolizes how concerned both the industry and  local residents have become about the January 1989 incident in  particular and overall safety of nuclear power plants in  general, observers noted.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__89_323964393"></a> 1 novembre 1990 : l&#8217;AEC plaide pour un  développement du nucléaire</h2>
<p><strong>JAPAN  ATOMIC ENERGY WHITE PAPER STRESSES NEED FOR MORE NUCLEAR &#8212; Naoaki  Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 3</p>
<p>Vol. 31,  No. 44</p>
<p>Copyright 1990 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>It is &nbsp;&raquo;imperatively necessary&nbsp;&raquo; for  energy-vulnerable Japan to develop and utilize nuclear energy  and to establish a more complete, domestic fuel cycle industry,  Japan&#8217;s Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) stresses in its recently  released 1990 Atomic Energy White Paper. But public trust must also  be earned back, it warned.</p>
<p>The White Paper is mainly an update  of last year&#8217;s edition, with a few new twists, including a brief  reference to last June&#8217;s decision by utilities to start preliminary  conceptual design studies of a top-entry, loop-type demonstration  model fast breeder reactor (FBR).</p>
<p>The 416-page report was approved by  the cabinet October 26. A digested, English-language version is  planned, but it was unclear at press time when it will become  available, AEC officials said.</p>
<p>In general, the White Paper stressed  that nuclear power is more important than ever for Japan,  given global environmental issues, rising electricity demand, and the  crisis in the Middle East.</p>
<p>The August invasion of Kuwait by Iraq  and resulting oil price hikes once again made clear Japan&#8217;s  vulnerable energy supply situation, and, consequently, the importance  of energy security and savings. Particularly important is the  development of non-fossil energy sources including nuclear,  which already accounts for 26% of the country&#8217;s total electricity  generation, the AEC report said.</p>
<p>The greenhouse effect, acid rain, and  other global environmental problems, caused largely by carbon dioxide  from fossil fuels, make it a major challenge to improve energy  efficiency and switch over to non-fossil fuels, the paper added. nuclear power should play an important role in that effort  because it produces neither carbon nor nitrogen oxides, the report  said.</p>
<p>Currently, Japan operates 39  commercial power reactors&#8211;21 BWRs, 17 PWRs and one gas-cooled  reactor&#8211;whose capacity totals 31.48-million kilowatts.</p>
<p>The country&#8217;s nuclear capacity  is targeted to reach 50.5-million KW (13.2% of its primary energy  need and 35% of total electricity generation) by the year 2000, and  72.5-million KW (16.9% and 43%, respectively) by 2010.</p>
<p>Reflecting nascent public concern  about nuclear power, the 1990 White Paper conceded that the  January 1989 &nbsp;&raquo;trouble&nbsp;&raquo; at <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 unit has damaged  public trust of nuclear power in Japan. Tokyo Electric Power  Co. shut down the unit on January 7, 1989 after finding fragments of  a broken recirculation pump in the reactor vessel. It was the first  incident of its kind in the Japanese nuclear power industry.</p>
<p>More diverse brackets of the public,  including those who have not been interested in the issue until quite  recently, have come to be concerned and fearful of nuclear energy, particularly since the Chernobyl accident, the White Paper  admitted. The public&#8217;s &nbsp;&raquo;understanding and cooperation&nbsp;&raquo; is more  important than ever for smooth nuclear development and  utilization, it said.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;It is not easy to eliminate doubts  and concern about nuclear power generation, which already have  been generated among the public,&nbsp;&raquo; the White Paper said. &nbsp;&raquo;And, under  current, severe circumstances, it is a mandatory precondition to  secure safety&#8230;.nuclear officials must build up and  accumulate safety records steadily with meticulous attention to the  finest details.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>In that context, the trouble at <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 &nbsp;&raquo;cast a shadow&nbsp;&raquo; over the local residents&#8217; and  the public&#8217;s trust of nuclear power, the White Paper admitted.  Lessons Japan must learn from the trouble is never to overlook any  minor disorder or trouble, to thoroughly analyze causes, and to  release findings in a &nbsp;&raquo;proper way,&nbsp;&raquo; the report added.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__91_323964393"></a> 4 avril 1991 : poursuite judiciaire poru demander  l&#8217;arrêt du réacteur n°3</h2>
<p><strong>SUIT  SEEKS SHUTDOWN OF A NUCLEAR REACTOR BY</strong> P-I News Services</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Seattle  Post-Intelligencer</span></span></span></p>
<p>SEPI<strong>ED</strong> FINAL</p>
<p>a2</p>
<p>©  1991 Hearst Communications Inc., Hearst Newspapers Division. Provided  by ProQuest Information and Learning. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>With Japan&#8217;s nuclear power  industry and protest movement both on the rise, five activists  yesterday filed the nation&#8217;s first lawsuit demanding the shutdown of  an operating reactor.</p>
<p>The suit came less than two months  after Japan&#8217;s worst nuclear plant accident, which was followed  by breakdowns and safety disclosures at five other plants.</p>
<p>Japan obtains 26.6 percent of its  electricity from nuclear power, and the government expects the  figure to reach about 35 percent by 1995.</p>
<p>The suit in Tokyo District Court  demands that Tokyo Electric Power Co. close its No. 3 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima Nuclear</strong> Power Plant in northern Japan to protect the  safety of area residents.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__93_323964393"></a> 23 mai 1991 : 23 accidents déclarés  dans les centrales japonaises en 1990</h2>
<p><strong>JAPANESE  NUCLEAR PLANTS REPORT 23 EVENTS AND INCIDENTS IN FY-90 &#8212; Naoaki  Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 15</p>
<p>Vol. 32,  No. 21</p>
<p>Copyright 1991 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s 39 commercial nuclear power plants encountered a total of 23 incidents that required  reporting to the government during fiscal year 1990, up one from the  previous year and an average 0.6 case per unit, the Ministry of  International Trade &amp; Industry (MITI) reported.</p>
<p>The cases included four scrams, nine  manual shutdowns, and 10 anomalies discovered while reactors were  shut, MITI said. None of them brought about any radioactive releases  to the surrounding environment, the ministry added. The fiscal year  runs April 1, 1990 through March 31, 1991.</p>
<p>Generally believed to be the most  serious event was the February 9 steam generator tube rupture at the  500-MW Mihama-2 PWR of Kansai Electric Power Co., which resulted in a  scram and the first automatic actuation of the emergency core cooling  system in Japan. MITI and nuclear Safety Commission  investigation teams are still checking why the rupture occurred.</p>
<p>Three other scram cases included:</p>
<p>&#8211;On September 9, Tokyo Electric  Power Co.&#8217;s (Tepco) 784-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> I-3 BWR scrammed, caused  by a defective connecting pin in the main steam separation valve,  which drove the valve to choke off a steam pipe.</p>
<p>&#8211;On December 4, Chugoku Electric  Power Co.&#8217;s 820-MW Shimane-2 BWR scrammed, when the reactor mode  switch was prematurely flipped from &nbsp;&raquo;start&nbsp;&raquo; to &nbsp;&raquo;operation.&nbsp;&raquo; That  triggered a warning signal that the main steam separation valve was  closed, and the scram.</p>
<p>&#8211;On February 21, Tepco&#8217;s 1,100-MW  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa-2 BWR scrammed, caused by a signal that the main  oil pump pressure went too low, which, in turn, was triggered by  mishandling of an oil piping valve.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__95_323964393"></a>29  octobre 1991 : des blocs de construction française pour la  digue de Fukushima</h2>
<p><strong>Tohoku  Electric to Use French Accropode blocks.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 1991</p>
<p>Sendai, Oct. 29 (Jiji Press)&#8211;Tohoku  Electric Power Co. said Tuesday it has decided to use blocks made by  Sogreah Consulting Engineers of France for its harbor construction  project now under way in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<p>This will the first project in Japan  to use Accropode, a new type of breakwater blocks developed by the  Grenoble-based company.</p>
<p>Accropode blocks, with six  projections, are considered more economical than conventional blocks  as they make highly stable barriers against waves by using about  one-third less blocks than the total number usually required.</p>
<p>Tohoku Electric will be able to cut  construction costs for the project in Haramachi, <strong>Fukushima</strong>, by  some 23 pct, or 2.5 billion yen, by using Accropode blocks, company  officials said.</p>
<p>The 13-billion-yen project is part of  preparatory engineering for the construction of a nuclear power plant in the city, scheduled to go on line in 1997.</p>
<p>The electric power company serving  the northeastern Japan region also said that it will sign a tie-up  agreement with Preussen Elektra, the second largest power supplier in  Germany, next spring.</p>
<p>Initially, the two power companies  will exchange information on nuclear, thermal and wind power  generation, Tohoku Electric officials said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__97_323964393"></a>8  juillet 1992 : arrêt du réacteur 1 à la suite  d&#8217;une hausse de pression</h2>
<p><strong>Incident at Fukushima nuclear reactor.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Service: Asia-Pacific</span></span></span></p>
<p>BBCFE<strong>NGC</strong> BBC<strong>GC</strong> CTGBBC</p>
<p>(c) 1992  The British Broadcasting Corporation [date of publication]. All  Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced except with the  express permission of The British Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>The No 1 nuclear reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 nuclear Power Plant, which is operated  by the Tokyo Electric Power Company, Ltd. [TEPC], automatically  stopped on 29th June due to a sudden rise in pressure inside the  reactor. The reactor was undergoing a regular inspection and the  incident occurred while inspectors were resuming operation of the  reactor. No radioactive leakage was detected around the reactor.  According to a report sent to the Ministry of International Trade and  Industry [MITI] from TEPC, the reactor automatically stopped as soon  as a censor detected abnormally high pressure in the reactor. (NHK  Television Tokyo in Japanese 0300 gmt 30 Jun.)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__99_323964393"></a> 29 septembre 1992 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur  à la suite d&#8217;une panne sur une  pompe</h2>
<p><strong>Japanese  nuclear reactor shut down for pump failure</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France-Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">AFPR</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(Copyright 1992)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept 29 (AFP) &#8211; A nuclear reactor was automatically shut down when its water pump stopped at a  power plant north of Tokyo Tuesday, but there was no fear of  radioactive leakage, officials said.</p>
<p>An emergency core cooling system was  activated immediately after the pump failure and the level of cooling  water in the reactor dropped to some two meters (seven feet) from  five meters (17 feet) above the top of the fuel rods, the officials  said.</p>
<p>The cooling system supplied fresh  water to the core of the 784,000 kilowatt boiling water reactor and  the water was refilled to the normal level in about two minutes,  according to the officials at the Natural Resources and Energy  Agency.</p>
<p>The accident took place at a coastal nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co. in <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  some 200 kilometers (125 miles) north of here.</p>
<p>It was the fifth time since 1979 that  an emergency cooling system in a Japanese nuclear reactor was  activated. In February 1991, a nuclear reactor leaked small  amounts of radioactive material into the air and the sea when a valve  broke at a plant in Mihama, western Japan.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__101_323964393"></a>30  septembre 1992 : arrêt du réacteur 2 à la suite  d&#8217;une erreur humaine</h2>
<p><strong>Human  Error Causes Emergency Nuclear Plant Shutdown BY</strong> MARI  YAMAGUCHI</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Associated Press</span></span></span></p>
<p>ASP</p>
<p>(Copyright 1992. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; A mistaken flip of a  switch by a nuclear power plant worker caused a reactor&#8217;s  cooling pumps to fail, a government official said Wednesday, but an  emergency system took over and prevented a nuclear meltdown.</p>
<p>The automatic activation of the  emergency cooling system prevented radiation from being released by  the plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture, 70 miles northeast of  Tokyo.</p>
<p>Local officials sharply criticized  the Tokyo Electric Power Co., the plant&#8217;s owner, for not notifying  residents for hours about the emergency shutdown of the 18-year-old  reactor.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The case is very serious  because it triggered (the emergency core cooling system),&nbsp;&raquo; said  Jinzaburo Takagi, a physicist who heads the Citizens&#8217; nuclear Information Center, an anti-nuclear group.</p>
<p>It was the first shutdown using the  emergency system since Japan&#8217;s worst nuclear accident, at  Mihama in western Japan in February 1991, when a small amount of  radioactivity was released into the atmosphere.</p>
<p>Tuesday&#8217;s accident, at the number 2  reactor of <strong>Fukushima Nuclear</strong> Plant No. 1, involved a  784-megawatt lightwater reactor, the most widely used reactor design  in the world. It uses ordinary water for cooling and to moderate the  flow of neutrons that split the atoms that produce nuclear reactions.</p>
<p>The emergency system that went into  effect at the plant is the last reliable defense against a core  meltdown. The system pours cooling water onto a reactor&#8217;s nuclear fuel rods to prevent them from reaching dangerously high  temperatures.</p>
<p>A meltdown could occur if a reactor&#8217;s  rods heat to the point where their uranium fuel starts to melt and  collects in a puddle on the reactor floor. A partial meltdown occured  during the nuclear accident at Three Mile Island in  Middletown, Pa., on March 28, 1979, the worst commercial accident in  U.S. history.</p>
<p>The world&#8217;s worst nuclear accident occurred on April 26, 1986, at the Chernobyl nuclear plant in Soviet Ukraine. It involved an explosion at a graphite-block  moderated reactor.</p>
<p>Tuesday&#8217;s accident was caused when a  plant operator mistakenly flipped a switch. That informed the control  computer that a backup water pump was operating when it actually was  not, said Ryuko Fujii, chief of the Ministry of International Trade  and Industry&#8217;s nuclear safety division.</p>
<p>The computer then automatically shut  off another pump, leaving only one primary pump supplying water to  the reactor&#8217;s cooling system.</p>
<p>The insufficient supply of water to  cool the reactor caused another group of backup pumps to fail, Fujii  said. He said plant operators corrected their mistake within a  minute, but it was too late to keep the water level from dropping  dramatically.</p>
<p>The cooling water initially fell  three feet, triggering an emergency shutdown system, a Tokyo Electric  official said. However, the water continued to fall and the emergency  cooling system kicked in, pouring water into the reactor to cool the  fuel rods.</p>
<p>In all, the water level fell to about  7.2 feet above the fuel rods, but they were never exposed during the  incident, said the company official, speaking on condition of  anonymity.</p>
<p>The fact that the fuel rods were not  exposed meant that the water could continue to cool them and prevent  them from reaching dangerously high temperatures.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;There was no fuel uncovered,  which is major thing you worry about with those reactors,&nbsp;&raquo; said  Scott Peters, a spokesman for the U.S. Council for Energy Awareness,  a Washington, D.C., group that promotes nuclear and coal  energy. &laquo;&nbsp;There was no radiation release from the plant. &#8230; The  system worked as it was designed to work.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Takagi said the flood of water from  the emergency cooling system could have damaged the fuel rods,  because of the sudden drop in temperature. Fujii said such damage was  unlikely, but a thorough inspection would be carried out.</p>
<p>Because the water fell so rapidly at  the <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant, some Japanese nuclear specialists  initially suspected a more serious problem. Many of Japan&#8217;s  commercial nuclear reactors are now about 20 years old, and  critics have warned that they are becoming more dangerous. The <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant was completed in 1974.</p>
<p>Local officials demanded to know why  it took the plant 2 1/2 hours to notify them that the emergency  system had been triggered.</p>
<p>The Tokyo Electric spokesman said the  company informed the prefecture shortly after the first three pumps  shut down. But he said it didn&#8217;t mention the emergency cooling system  was activated until the company and government nuclear officials had finished an initial investigation.</p>
<p>The power company often tries to  minimize the seriousness of problems at its plants.</p>
<p>In the accident in 1991, a reactor at  the Mihama nuclear Power Plant shut down automatically after a  pipe in its steam generator burst, allowing small amounts of  radioactive water to escape.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__103_323964393"></a> 30 septembre 1992 : plaintes contre TEPCO en  raison de mauvaises informations sur les  accidents</h2>
<p><strong>Fury  over shutdown of TEPCO nuclear plant.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1992  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept 30, Reuter -Japanese  power company TEPCO&#8217;s delay in alerting regional authorities to an  emergency at one of the nation&#8217;s oldest nuclear plants has  sparked fury.</p>
<p>A Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO)  spokesman said Tuesday&#8217;s accident which prompted the shutdown of its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Number One Plant in northern Japan caused no  radioactive leak.</p>
<p>But <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural  officials angrily complained that the company waited two hours to  notify them of the emergency, although the shutdown itself was  reported within 20 minutes.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We asked them to improve  reporting procedures after an accident three years ago at another  reactor in the same plant,&nbsp;&raquo; one official in the prefectural nuclear safety section said.</p>
<p>TEPCO said an emergency core cooling  system (ECCS) shut down the 784,000-kilowatt reactor after the water  level above the fuel rod dropped from a normal 5.3 metres to just 2.2  metres.</p>
<p>The TEPCO spokesman said one of the  three pumps supplying water to the reactor core had failed. He said  the firm was investigating the cause of the breakdown and reporting  delay.</p>
<p>It was the second time that an ECCS  had been activated in response to a reactor accident.</p>
<p>In February 1991 the Mihama plant in  central Japan was halted after leakage from cracks in steam tubes  caused water levels to fall.</p>
<p>Professor Tokunosuke Nakajima of Chuo  University told Kyodo news agency that such accidents raised doubts  over the credibility of safety measures at the nation&#8217;s nuclear plants.</p>
<p>Officials from <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural headquarters and nearby towns were visiting the plant to  investigate the incident.</p>
<p>Japan, which must import virtually  all its energy, has 41 nuclear plants, generating 27 pct of  its electricity supply.</p>
<p>Plans call for the number to almost  double to 78 by 2010.</p>
<p>(c) Reuters Limited</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> Asian-Pacific News</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__105_323964393"></a>1  octobre 1992 : le Japon s&#8217;interroge sur la sécurité de  ses centrales nucléaires</h2>
<p><strong>Nuclear  Plant&#8217;s Shutdown Raises Questions in Japan </strong></p>
<p>Associated  Press News Service</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Asian Wall Street Journal</span></span></span></p>
<p>AWSJ</p>
<p>PAGE 4</p>
<p>(Copyright (c) 1992, Dow Jones &amp; Co., Inc.)</p>
<p>TOKYO &#8212; Japanese government  officials and nuclear experts raised questions on Wednesday  about a rare shutdown of a nuclear power plant that triggered  a last-line emergency cooling system to prevent a meltdown.</p>
<p>The incident on Tuesday was the first  shutdown using the emergency core-cooling system since Japan&#8217;s worst nuclear accident at Mihama in February 1991, when a small  amount of radiation was released into the atmosphere. The emergency  system is a last-ditch backup built into most power plants to avert  core meltdown by pouring water on the nuclear fuel rods.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co., the  operator of the plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture, about 114  kilometers northwest of Tokyo, said that no radiation had leaked from  the reactor. The cause of the accident wasn&#8217;t immediately known and  is still under investigation, the company said.</p>
<p>A spokesman for Tokyo Electric said  the No. 1 reactor of the <strong>Fukushima Nuclear</strong> Plant automatically  shut down Tuesday afternoon following the failure of three pumps &#8212;  two that pressurize steam and another that pushes water into the  reactor. The pump failures caused the level of the cooling water to  fall, prompting the emergency system to automatically kick in to  cover the fuel rods.</p>
<p>Ryuko Fujii, an official with the nuclear safety division of Japan&#8217;s Ministry of International  Trade and Industry, said simultaneous failure of three pumps is rare  and &laquo;&nbsp;should not happen.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Because the water declined so rapidly  to a dangerously low level, some nuclear specialists suspect a  more serious problem was to blame. &laquo;&nbsp;The water should not keep  falling like that,&nbsp;&raquo; said Jinzaburo Takagi, a physicist who heads  the Citizens&#8217; nuclear Information Center, an anti-nuclear group.</p>
<p>Mr. Takagi said that the system&#8217;s  pouring large amounts of water over the exposed fuel rods could  damage the rods because of the sudden drop in temperature. He added  that the incident could be related to the age of the facility. Many  of Japan&#8217;s commercial nuclear reactors, including the one in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, are about 20 years old.</p>
<p>Local officials, who have begun a  probe of the shutdown, said they are demanding to know why it took  the plant more than two hours to notify them that the emergency  system was used. &laquo;&nbsp;The basic rule is that we should be notified  as soon as possible,&nbsp;&raquo; said a <strong>Fukushima</strong> official, who  spoke on condition of anonymity.</p>
<p>The Tokyo Electric spokesman said the  company informed the prefecture shortly after the first three pumps  shut down, but didn&#8217;t mention the use of the emergency system until  it traced the problem. The company acknowledged it didn&#8217;t mention the  use of the system in a statement on Tuesday until a reporter asked  about it at a news conference.</p>
<p>In the 1991 accident, a reactor at  the Mihama nuclear plant in Fukui prefecture shut down  automatically after a pipe in its steam generator burst, sending  radioactive water from the primary into the secondary cooling system.  Officials said that some radiation had escaped in that accident, but  that the level was below what is believed to be damaging to the  environment.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__107_323964393"></a> 29 octobre 1992 : deux groupes d&#8217;anti-nucléaires  déboutés de leurs poursuites  judiciaires</h2>
<p><strong>Nuclear  opponents lose court battle</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France-Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p>AFPR</p>
<p>(Copyright 1992)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Oct 29 (AFP) &#8211; Two civic  groups opposed to nuclear power plants lost supreme court  battles here Thursday, dealing a blow to anti-nuclear activities.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court rejected appeals  filed by the groups against government approvals of the construction  of a nuclear power plant in Ehime Prefecture by Shikoku  Electric Power Co. and another in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture by  Tokyo Electric Power Co.</p>
<p>Upholding earlier verdicts by lower  courts, the supreme court ruled that the government permits were  lawful and official safety checks of the construction plans were  appropriate.</p>
<p>Citing safety reasons, a group of 16  citizens filed a suit in 1973 against the plant in Ehime, western  Japan, while another group of 17 people filed similar complaints in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, northern Japan, in 1975.</p>
<p>The pressurized water reactor in  Ehime was put into operation in 1977, while the boiling water reactor  in <strong>Fukushima</strong> started up in 1982.</p>
<p>Currently Japan has 42 nuclear reactors which generate 27 percent of its total electric power.</p>
<p>ss/mb AFP AFP SEQN-0266</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__109_323964393"></a>31  octobre 1992 : un réacteur arrêté en raison d&#8217;une  panne sur une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>Pump  trouble stops Japanese nuclear reactor</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France-Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p>AFPR</p>
<p>(Copyright 1992)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Oct 31 (AFP) &#8211; A nuclear reactor at a power plant north of here was shut down Saturday due to  a water pump failure but there was no danger of a radioactive leak,  plant officials said.</p>
<p>The pump trouble led to a decrease in  the level of cooling water, prompting the 1.1 million-kilowatt  boiling water reactor to stop automatically and activate a reserve  pump, the officials said.</p>
<p>Water subsidence was not rapid enough  to set in motion the emergency core cooling system of the reactor  designed to prevent a meltdown, they added.</p>
<p>The accident took place at a nuclear power plant of the Tokyo Electric Power Co. in Tomioka, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, some 200 kilometers (124 miles) north of Tokyo.</p>
<p>It was the second similar reactor  accident month to hit one of the company&#8217;s nuclear power  facilities recently. The emergency cooling system of a  784,000-kilowatt reactor at a nearby plant was activated September 29  when its pump stopped and the level of cooling water plunged rapidly.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__111_323964393"></a> 5 novembre 1992 : la Cour suprême décide  que les tribunaux ne peuvent pas juger les questions de sécurité  nucléaire</h2>
<p><strong>JAPAN  HIGH COURT: EXPERT ANALYSIS NOT SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW &#8212; Naoaki  Usui, Tokyo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>Pg. 16</p>
<p>Vol. 33,  No. 45</p>
<p>Copyright 1992 McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>In a landmark decision, the Japanese  Supreme Court ruled October 29 that the judiciary branch has no duty  to scrutinize technical details of nuclear plant assessments  made by expert bodies such as the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC),  rejecting appeals by neighbors of two reactors to nullify licenses  granted by the Ministry of International Trade &amp; Industry (MITI).  The decision effectively blocks laymen from challenging the official  safety assessments on which nuclear plant licenses are based.</p>
<p>The high court said that decisions  concerning the safety of a nuclear power plant are the  prerogative of the Prime Minister, based on advice from the AEC and  its experienced specialists. The Supreme Court thus upheld previous  rulings that AEC&#8217;s research and screening process had no obvious  shortcomings. The courts&#8217; jurisdiction in nuclear licensing,  it said, should be limited to verifying the correctness of the  administrative part of the licensing procedure.</p>
<p>The government and utilities welcomed  the decision; antinuclear activists expressed concern.</p>
<p>The court&#8217;s decision was embodied in  separate verdicts on two similar cases&#8211;one brought in 1972 by 16  residents near Shikoku Electric Power Co.&#8217;s Ikata-1, the other two  years later by 17 neighbors of Tokyo Electric Power Co.&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-1. In both cases, plaintiffs asked for licenses to be nullified on  grounds of insufficient safety assessment and screening.</p>
<p>The decision came only a month after  the Supreme Court said nuclear plant neighbors had legal  standing to sue over the safety of nuclear plant projects (NW,  1 Oct., 1).</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__113_323964393"></a> 10 novembre 1992 : arrêt du réacteur  1à la suite d&#8217;une panne sur le moteur d&#8217;une valve</h2>
<p><strong>Motor  flaw shuts down Japanese nuclear plant again.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1992  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Nov 10, Reuter &#8211; A fault in a  motor shut down a Japanese nuclear plant for the second time  in six weeks but there was no radiation leak, a company spokesman  said on Tuesday.</p>
<p>The 18-year-old <strong>Fukushima</strong> Number One Plant, one of Japan&#8217;s oldest, was manually shut down on  Monday after an alarm warned of trouble in the motor operating the  valve of a steam pump that drives the turbine of the reactor&#8217;s  cooling system.</p>
<p>It was the second emergency in six  weeks at the 784,000-kilowatt station on Japan&#8217;s Pacific coast,  operated by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO).</p>
<p>On September 29, an emergency core  cooling system designed to prevent a meltdown shut off the reactor  after the water level above the fuel rods dropped from a normal 5.3  metres (17 feet) to just 2.2 metres (seven feet).</p>
<p>TEPCO had just restarted the reactor  after repairs when the latest incident occurred. Its  cause is being investigated.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__115_323964393"></a> 7 avril 1993 : TEPCO projette de construire deux nouveaux réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>Utility  to Add Two Nuclear Power Generators</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Financial Wire</span></span></span></p>
<p>CLNF</p>
<p>(Copyright 1993)</p>
<p>The Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc.  {9501} (TEPCO) intends to build two additional nuclear power  generators at its nuclear power generation plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<p>Reference: Nihon Keizai Shimbun,  04/07/93, p.11</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__117_323964393"></a>10 mai  1993 : poursuites judiciaires après la mort d&#8217;un travailleur  de la centrale</h2>
<p><strong>Compensation sought for nuclear  worker&#8217;s death</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan Kyodo News International, Inc</span></span></span></p>
<p>JPES</p>
<p>COPYRIGHT 1993 KYODO NEWS  INTERNATIONAL, INC.</p>
<p>SHIZUOKA, May 5 Kyodo</p>
<p>The bereaved parents of a nuclear power plant worker who died of leukemia say they will seek  compensation from labor authorities Thursday, arguing that their son  died after being exposed to radioactivity.</p>
<p>Masahide Shimahashi, 63, and his wife  Michiko, 56, said Wednesday that they will ask the Labor Standards  Inspection Office in Iwata, Shizuoka Prefecture, in central Japan to  recognize the death of their son, Nobuyuki, as resulting from  exposure to radioactivity at a Hamaoka atomic power station run by  Chubu Electric Power Co.</p>
<p>Nobuyuki reportedly died of leukemia  in October 1991 at age 29. He had been working at the power plant for  nearly nine years.</p>
<p>The application by the Shimahashis  comes two days after the Labor Ministry formally recognized the death  of another former nuclear power plant worker in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, northeast Japan, as stemming from exposure to  radioactivity.</p>
<p>Nobuyuki was exposed annually to  radioactivity of less than 50 millisieverts, the maximum amount  permitted under the nuclear Reactor Control Law, according to  a notebook on exposure to radioactivity at the power station.</p>
<p>However, the total amount of  radioactive exposure during his eight years and 10 months at the  plant came to 50.63 millisieverts, well over the 44.16 millisieverts  allowed for Nobuyuki, the notebook showed.</p>
<p>The Labor Ministry bases its judgment  on the total amount of exposure to radioactivity in recognizing  deaths as being caused by radioactive exposure and thereby enabling  families and relatives of victims to get compensation.</p>
<p>A spokesman for Chubu Electric Power  said, &laquo;&nbsp;We have observed the regulations set by the nuclear Reactor Control Law. As to the application, we cannot make any  comment because it is a matter the Labor Ministry will independently  make a judgment about.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Last December, the families of two  men applied at the West Labor Standards Inspection Office in Kobe,  Hyogo Prefecture, for formal recognition that they got leukemia from  working in nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>One died of the disease last August  after working at power stations of Kansai Electric Power Co. at Oi  and Takahama, Fukui Prefecture, and at one of Kyushu Electric Power  Co. at Genkai, Saga Prefecture, between June 1978 and May 1989.</p>
<p>His colleague who also worked at the  three nuclear power plants from 1987 through 1992 contracted  leukemia.</p>
<p>According to civic groups supporting nuclear power plant workers, there are two other similar cases  in Japan, in which compensation is being sought.</p>
<p>Another person living in Shizuoka  Prefecture also is preparing to apply for compensation on similar  grounds.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__119_323964393"></a>20 juin  1994 : l&#8217;ANRE demande une enquête sur l&#8217;accident de mai</h2>
<p><strong>Agency  orders check on Fukushima reactor accident</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan Kyodo News International, Inc</span></span></span></p>
<p>JPES</p>
<p>Copyright 1994 KYODO NEWS INTERNATIONAL, INC.</p>
<p>TOKYO, June 17 Kyodo</p>
<p>The Agency of Natural Resources and  Energy has instructed Tokyo Electric Power Co. to thoroughly  investigate last month&#8217;s accident at one of the company&#8217;s nuclear reactors in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, agency officials said  Friday.</p>
<p>The agency, part of the Ministry of  International Trade and Industry, suspects the metal fittings holding  down jet pumps in Japan&#8217;s boiling-water reactors may be defective  after it learned that the fittings had been replaced in the early  1980s to prevent just such an accident.</p>
<p>Operations at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 power plant&#8217;s 1,100-megawatt third reactor were closed down on  May 30 when part of a metal fitting on one of the 20 jet pumps that  regulate power output fell off.</p>
<p>Concern about the fittings 14 years  ago, following a similar accident at a U.S. nuclear power  facility, led Tokyo Electric Power to change the fittings on all its  boiling-water reactors as a preventive measure.</p>
<p>According to the agency, the accident  at an Illinois nuclear power plant in February 1980 was  attributed to stress and corrosion around the holes for bolts that  hold the jet pumps in place.</p>
<p>The power company replaced all the  fittings in its reactors with a new type that was supposedly more  resistant to stress and corrosion. The exchange operation was  completed in 1984.</p>
<p>Since then, there have been no  reports of any accidents related to the fittings, but the effects of  stress and corrosion have been found at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1  power plant&#8217;s first reactor and at the Hamaoka power plant&#8217;s first  reactor in Shizuoka Prefecture.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> reactor,  currently under investigation, was under construction at the time of  the exchange operations and was installed with the newer-style  fittings.</p>
<p>The same <strong>Fukushima</strong> reactor  experienced trouble with its circulating-water pump in January 1989  and at that time, the jet pumps were removed from the reactor.</p>
<p>The agency suggested that the trouble  with the metal fittings on the jet pumps may be related to the 1989  incident, but added that if trouble exists with the newer-style  fittings, it may have to order the fittings on the boiling-water  reactors be changed again.</p>
<p>The majority of Japan&#8217;s nuclear power reactors are of the boiling-water type. An exception is the  &laquo;&nbsp;Monju&nbsp;&raquo; reactor in Tsuruga, Fukui Prefecture along the  coast of the Sea of Japan. It is a plutonium-fueled fast breeder  reactor, which has become the cornerstone of Japan&#8217;s energy policies  for the future.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__121_323964393"></a> 1 août 1994 : reconnaissance d&#8217;irradiation  pour deux travailleurs de la centrale</h2>
<p><strong>Two  win recognition over power plant radiation illness</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan Kyodo News International, Inc</span></span></span></p>
<p>JPES</p>
<p>Copyright 1994 KYODO NEWS INTERNATIONAL, INC.</p>
<p>TOKYO, July 27 Kyodo</p>
<p>Two Labor Standards Inspection  offices have acknowledged the claims of a worker and the family of a  deceased worker that they suffered from work -related radiation  illnesses contracted at nuclear power plants, informed sources  said Wednesday.</p>
<p>The claims follow a previous  successful claim by a former worker at the Tokyo Electric Power Co. nuclear plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<p>The two recent claims were submitted  by a 38-year-old man from Hyogo Prefecture, whose name has been  withheld, and on behalf of another man, Nobuyuki Shimahashi, now  deceased, who worked at the Chubu Electric Power Co. nuclear power plant in Hamaoka, Shizuoka Prefecture.</p>
<p>The 38-year-old man was responsible  for regular maintenance on equipment at three nuclear power  stations in Saga and Fukui prefectures. He submitted a claim to the  Kobe Nishi office, in Hyogo Prefecture, in December 1992.</p>
<p>The office said that because the  man&#8217;s health is still good it cannot disclose details of the amount  of radiation he received.</p>
<p>Shimahashi was responsible for  replacing measuring instruments at nuclear power stations for  more than nine years from 1981. He was diagnosed as having chronic  myeloid leukemia, a bone marrow disease.</p>
<p>After his death, his parents filed  the claim with the Iwata office in Shizuoka Prefecture.</p>
<p>Shimahashi was subjected to radiation  amounting to 50.63 millisieverts. One sievert is the equivalent of  radiation received over one hour at a distance of 1 centimeter from a  platinum vessel half a millimeter thick containing a radiation source  equivalent to 1 milligram of radium.</p>
<p>The bureau ruled that he met the  requirements for recognition of a claim because the dosage exceeded  the accepted standard and he contracted the disease more than a year  after he was first subjected to radiation.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__123_323964393"></a>22 août  1994 : TEPCO espère pouvoir construire deux nouveaux réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to add reactors at Japan plant.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1994  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Aug 22 (Reuter) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said it would add two light water  reactors at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Number One nuclear power  plant in northern Japan.</p>
<p>A spokesman said TEPCO hopes  construction of the two advanced boiling water reactors (ABWR), each  with a capacity of 1.36 million kilowatts, will start in 1996 or  1997, following environmental assessment beginning next April.  Commercial operation may likely start early in the next century.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> 1 plant, which  already has six reactors, will have an output capacity of 7.41  million kilowatts with the addition of the two ABWRs.</p>
<p>The spokesman did not elaborate on  construction costs but said nuclear reactors have cost about  300 billion to 400 billion yen each in the past.</p>
<p>Japan currently has 47 nuclear reactors, generating about 222 billion kilowatt-hours annually, or  about a third of the nation&#8217;s total electricity consumption.</p>
<p>The spokesman said TEPCO would also  add two coal-fired generators at the nearby Hirono power station, in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture. The two 600,000-kilowatt units, burning  a mixture of coal and water, were estimated to cost 320 billion yen  altogether and were to go on stream around 2005.</p>
<p>While acquiring suitable sites for nuclear plants in Japan is difficult amid opposition by  environmentalists, TEPCO already had plenty of land around its  existing <strong>Fukushima</strong> 1 facilities and local governments in the  area were cooperative, the spokesman said.</p>
<p>After the new installations, <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture, which also has the 4.4 million-kilowatt <strong>Fukushima</strong> Number Two plant, will have the largest nuclear power capacity in Japan.</p>
<p>The spokesman said TEPCO has offered  to construct a giant national soccer training centre in the area to  help promote the local economy.</p>
<p>Kyodo news agency quoted Hideaki  Kumano, vice minister of the Ministry of International Trade and  Industry (MITI), as telling reporters the government supported  construction of new nuclear plants.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The ministry&#8217;s policy on nuclear power plants remains unchanged,&nbsp;&raquo; Kumano said.  &laquo;&nbsp;nuclear power generation will continue to be an  important energy source in Japan.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama&#8217;s  Socialist Party had traditionally opposed the use of nuclear power but said last month it supported the use of existing plants.</p>
<p class="western">(c) Reuters Limited 1994</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__125_323964393"></a>14  septembre 1995 : un tremblement de terre accélère la  réaction nucléaire sur trois réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>Quake  accelerated nuclear reaction at 3 more reactors</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright Kyodo News International Inc. 1995</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept. 14 &#8211;</p>
<p>Three boiling-water reactors (BWRs)  temporarily halted operation after nuclear reaction was  accelerated by the shaking motion of an earthquake in 1987, the  second finding of such an incident in Japan following one in 1993 at  another BWR, Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Thursday.</p>
<p>In November 1993, the  524,000-kilowatt reactor at the Onagawa nuclear power plant of  Tohoku Electric Power Co. in Miyagi Prefecture, northern Japan,  stopped automatically after a quake accelerated its nuclear reaction by shaking the fuel assembly.</p>
<p>The Tokyo electric power company said  a similar phenomenon happened in April 1987 to the three BWRs, which  generate a total of 2 million kw of electricity, at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, near  Miyagi Prefecture.</p>
<p>The earthquake registered an  intensity of 5 on the Japanese scale of 7 in Shirakawa, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<p>The government, however, does not  think it necessary to review the current safety measures on nuclear reactors because both of the facilities stopped automatically and are  safe, said the International Trade and Industry Ministry and the  Natural Resources and Energy Agency.</p>
<p>Following the 1993 incident, Tokyo,  Tohoku and three other electric power companies that have BWRs began  researching with manufacturers how earthquake affect such a type of  reactor.</p>
<p>According to the research, neutrons  apparently increased rapidly after the quakes jolted the fuel  assemblies. Such an increase was not anticipated in the designing  stage, officials said.</p>
<p>There are a total of 10 such reactors  in Japan.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__127_323964393"></a>27  novembre 1995 : arrêt du réacteur 6 en raison de  pressions anormales</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  shuts nuclear reactor at Fukushima plant.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1995  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Nov 27 (Reuter) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) has shut its 1.1 million-kilowatt <strong>Fukushima</strong> Number Six reactor in northwestern Japan to inspect  a drainage system, the company said.</p>
<p>TEPCO said the water level in the  reactor&#8217;s pressure vessel rose to abnormal levels and was shut down  manually.</p>
<p>The company did not know at this  stage when the inspection will be completed, a company spokesman  said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__129_323964393"></a> 1 mai 1996 : une &laquo;&nbsp;pléthore  d&#8217;accidents&nbsp;&raquo; à Fukushima</h2>
<p><strong>Meltdown.  (declining use of nuclear power) BY</strong> Nicholas Lenssen;  Christopher Flavin</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">World  Watch</span></span></span></p>
<p>WRWA</p>
<p>p22</p>
<p>ISSN:  0896-0615; Volume v9; Issue n3</p>
<p>Copyright 1996 Information Access Company. All rights reserved.  COPYRIGHT 1996 Worldwatch Institute</p>
<p>The worst industrial accident ever to  befall humanity left a wound that has not healed with time. Now, the nuclear power industry appears to be wearing out its welcome  on the planet &#8211; and opening the door wider to renewables.</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p>Even the advanced nuclear program of Japan has yielded a plethora of accidents. In February  1991, at the Mihama 2 pressurized water reactor, a steam generator  tube ruptured, forcing the first use of an emergency cooling system  in Japan. Public confidence was weakened by inconsistent statements  from utility and government officials, and two days passed before the  government admitted that radiation had escaped from the site. Eight  months later, at a <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant, an emergency cooling  system was once again forced into operation following an operator&#8217;s  error. Tokyo Electric Power Company officials did not admit that the  emergency system had been activated until challenged by journalists.</p>
<p class="western">[…]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__131_323964393"></a>30  septembre 1996 : construction du réacteur n°8</h2>
<p><strong>Japanese nuclear plant under construction</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">International  Coal Report</span></span></span></p>
<p>ICLR</p>
<p>ISSN:  0260-4299</p>
<p>Copyright 1996 Information Access Company. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>Utility Plant Capacity Operational  target</p>
<p>Tohoku Onagawa III 825MW March 2002</p>
<p>Tokyo Kashiwazaki VI 1,356MW December  1996</p>
<p>Tokyo Kashiwazaki VII 1,356MW July  1997</p>
<p>Kyushu Genki IV 1,180MW July 1997</p>
<p>EPDC Ohma 606MW March 2002</p>
<p>Tohoku Maki 825MW December 2005</p>
<p>Tokyo <strong>Fukushima</strong> VIII 1,356MW  2005</p>
<p>Chubu Hamaoka V 1,358MW 2005</p>
<p>Source: Japanese Institute of Energy  Economics</p>
<p class="western">[...]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__133_323964393"></a> 24 octobre 1996 : TEPCO achète des machines  anglaises pour réparer ses  enceintes de confinement</h2>
<p><strong>NUCLEAR  LIFELINE FOR JAPAN.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Engineer</span></span></span></p>
<p>ENGN</p>
<p>1</p>
<p>(c) 1996  Miller Freeman</p>
<p>Derby milling machines to play a  vital role in repairing damage to Toshiba&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> reactor  shields</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s Toshiba corporation has  turned to Britain to buy machinery vital to repair serious defects on  three of its nuclear reactors.</p>
<p>Toshiba has awarded Fermanite Silk  Engineering a contract to provide a remotely controlled milling  machine essential to replace damaged shields inside the reactor  pressure vessels. The contract is worth at least #2m to the Derby  firm.</p>
<p>Toshiba is being secretive about the  project. It has provided Fermanite with very simplified drawings and  a specification that it says must fit three different `geometries&#8217;.</p>
<p>The specs include working in a  lethally radioactive environment of 1,000 rads an hour.</p>
<p>`We know nothing about the plants  they&#8217;re planning to modify,&#8217; said John Goodman, Fermanite&#8217;s project  manager, who said that the machine was due for delivery in the first  quarter of next year.</p>
<p>Dr Jinzaburo Tagaki, the executive  director of the Citizen&#8217;s nuclear Information Centre in Tokyo  and a former nuclear chemist for Toshiba, said the units were  almost certain to be boiling water reactors at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> site which began operating in the 1970s.</p>
<p>Tagaki said cracking on the thermal  shields, or shrouds, was the greatest problem on these BWRs and that  the company had had to effect a temporary repair on one reactor, <strong>Fukushima</strong> 1-2, two years ago.</p>
<p>He said Toshiba was now probably  having to cut out badly cracked sections of shield. The milling  machine would be used to grind the cut to enable a new section to be  welded into place.</p>
<p>With the shutdowns for repairs likely  to take the best part of a year, the problem is potentially serious  for Toshiba.</p>
<p>`Here you have a substantive failure  half-way through the reactor life,&#8217; said John Large, a leading UK nuclear consultant. `Now you have extremely difficult repair  operations going on in an intensely hostile environment. It certainly  can&#8217;t be dismissed as a glitch.&#8217;</p>
<p>By Andrew Cavenagh.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__135_323964393"></a> 27 novembre 1996 : retard dans le redémarrage  de réacteurs à la suite de la découverte de  fissures</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  may delay nuclear reactor start-up.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1996  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Nov 27 (Reuter) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said on Wednesday that it may delay  re-starting a nuclear reactor in northern Japan due to  ruptures in pipes which were discovered during maintenance checks.</p>
<p>Cracks were discovered in two of the  10 pipes which are connected to a pump which circulates coolant water  around the heart of the 460,000-kilowatt reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  TEPCO said.</p>
<p>There is no danger of radiation  leaking as a result of the problems, said TEPCO, which is Japan&#8217;s  biggest power utility.</p>
<p>The reactor has been shut since  August for maintenance checks and was originally scheduled to resume  operations in late January.</p>
<p>However, the start-up may be delayed  because of time needed to investigate the cause of the ruptures and  replace the damaged pipes, TEPCO said.</p>
<p>The unit, which was put on line in  1971, is the fourth oldest of Japan&#8217;s 50 commercial reactors  currently in service.</p>
<p>Japan relies on nuclear power  for about 33 percent of its electricity needs.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__137_323964393"></a> 12 décembre 1996 TEPCO demande l&#8217;autorisation de construire deux nouveaux réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  TEPCO To Seek Approval For 2 Nuclear Reactors In 1997</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones Telerate Energy Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>NRG</p>
<p>(Copyright (c) 1996, Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.)</p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;Japan&#8217;s largest  power utility, Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), plans to file an  official request with the government in July 1997 for permission to  build two new nuclear power reactors in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, a TEPCO official said Thursday.</p>
<p>As TEPCO is nearly finished compiling  environmental impact studies of the reactors, it plans to submit a  formal request to <strong>Fukushima</strong>&#8216;s local government authorities for  permission early next year, he added.</p>
<p>The company is projected to construct  two Advanced Boiling Water Reactors (ABWR) with power generating  capacity of 1.38 million kilowatts each in the town of Futabacho,  targeting to start operation in 2004 and 2005, the TEPCO official  said.</p>
<p>TEPCO has already been operating 10 nuclear reactors at its two power stations in <strong>Fukushima</strong>.  As economic compensation, the company has donated the town of  Futabacho a football training center which is currently under  construction, the official added.</p>
<pre class="western">Amid growing public mistrust of the country's nuclear program after a sodium
leak accident at the fast-breeder reactor 'Monju' in December 1995, industrysources said it's getting harder for Japanese power utilities to find sitesfor new nuclear plants.   -Mika Watanabe 813 3505-5901</pre>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__139_323964393"></a> 20 décembre 1996 : des actionnaires de  TEPCO déboutés d&#8217;une demande  d&#8217;arrêt de la centrale</h2>
<p><strong>SHAREHOLDERS LOSE SUIT FOR NUKE PLANT HALT.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 1996</p>
<p>Tokyo, Dec. 19 (Jiji Press)-Tokyo  District Court Thursday turned down a request from shareholders of  Tokyo Electric Power Co. to suspend the firm&#8217;s operations of a nuclear power generator in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, northern Japan.</p>
<p>The suspension was demanded by five  shareholders of the power utility firm, including a writer and a  citizens&#8217; group member, who are protesting the operation of the nuclear reactor after the breakage of a pump for circulation  of coolant in January 1989.</p>
<p>They accused Tokyo Electric Power  Chairman Sho Nasu and other board members of negligence in ensuring  safety of the power plant. The lawsuit was unprecedented in that  shareholders sought suspension of nuclear reactor operations.</p>
<p>Presiding Judge Seishi Kanetsuki said  evaluations of safety and other issues on nuclear reactors are  highly technical and thus should be made by experts inside and  outside of the power utility firm.</p>
<p>It was appropriate for Tokyo Electric  Power to rely on the report by a special investigation team of the  Agency of Natural Resources and Energy which found no problem in  restarting the power generator, Kanetsuki said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__141_323964393"></a> 17 janvier 1997 : petit incendie au  réacteur n°2</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  utility puts out minor fire at nuclear plant.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1997  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Jan 17 (Reuter) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO), Japan&#8217;s largest power utility, said on  Friday it had extinguished a small fire which broke out in the  building housing a nuclear reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  northern Japan.</p>
<p>The fire, which broke out at about  1423 JST, was put out in seven minutes. The incident has not affected  operation of TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.2 reactor, with a capacity  of 1.1 million kilowatts, nor contaminated the surrounding  environment, TEPCO said. No one was injured.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__143_323964393"></a> 21 janvier 1997 : délai dans le redémarrage  d&#8217;un réacteur après la découverte de fuites</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to delay start-up of nuclear reactor.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1997  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Jan 21 (Reuter) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said on Tuesday it would delay  restarting a nuclear reactor in northern Japan, originally due  to take place in late January, because of the need to do more repair  work.</p>
<p>TEPCO found ruptures in two of 10  pipes connected to a pump circulating coolant water around the  460,000-kilowatt reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant last November  during routine maintenance checks that started in August.</p>
<p>The electricity utility last week  started repair work on the cracks, which are expected to take about  one month, a company spokesman said.</p>
<p>The exact starting date is unclear as  some fine-tuning will be necessary at the facility following the  repair before the reactor goes back on line, he said.</p>
<p>The unit, which started commercial  operations in 1971, is the oldest of TEPCO&#8217;s 16 reactors, he added.</p>
<p>The ruptures pose no danger of  radiation leakage, TEPCO said last year after the problem came to  light.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__145_323964393"></a> 29 avril 1997 : arrêt du réacteur  n°2 à la suite d&#8217;une fuite de gaz radioactif</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  nuclear reactor shut down after gas leak.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 1997  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, April 29 (Reuter) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co (TEPCO) halted operations at a nuclear reactor on Tuesday after a rise in radioactivity in exhaust gas at  the plant, a company spokesman said.</p>
<p>The spokesman said there was no  evacuation of the plant or of residents around it at <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  about 200 km (125 miles) north of Tokyo.</p>
<p>But the shutdown was a new blow to  Japan&#8217;s nuclear power programme which was hit last month by  the country&#8217;s worst nuclear accident when fire broke out at a nuclear fuel processing plant.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;There is no evacuation of  workers from the plant or any alerts declared by the regional  authorities,&nbsp;&raquo; a TEPCO spokesman told Reuters. &laquo;&nbsp;The incident  was never a serious threat but we took early precautions by shutting  the plant down.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>He said the alarm on a monitor  checking the level of radioactivity of exhaust gas at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear Power Plant&#8217;s No. 2 reactor sounded at 6.55 p.m.  (0955 GMT) on Monday.</p>
<p>In response, the company manually  lowered generating power and then shut down the 1.1 million kilowatt  reactor completely about 12 hours later, he said.</p>
<p>The spokesman said a gauge that  measured gas produced when steam condensed in the reactor indicated  the level of radioactivity was 20 times higher than normal after the  alarm sounded.</p>
<p>But checks on Tuesday showed there  was no radioactivity leakage anywhere in the plant, the spokesman  added.</p>
<p>He said the brief rise in radiation  was caused by a pinhole leak in part of a cover over a nuclear fuel rod in the reactor.</p>
<p>The plant would be shut for about  three weeks while the cover was repaired and other checks were  carried out, he said.</p>
<p><strong>Japanese nuclear reactor leaks traces of radioactivity</strong></p>
<p>29 avril  1997</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Associated  Press Newswires</span></span></span></p>
<p>APRS</p>
<p>Copyright 1997. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; A nuclear power  plant in northeastern Japan has leaked small amounts of  radioactivity, prompting the plant&#8217;s operator to shut down the  reactor, a company spokesman said Tuesday.</p>
<p>The privately-owned Tokyo Electric  Power Co. turned off its boiling water reactor late Monday after an  exhaust monitor registered 20 times the normal level of  radioactivity.</p>
<p>Alarms on the monitor went off  shortly before 7 p.m. Monday. The plant made the decision to shut  down at 11:20 p.m. when radioactivity levels began to rise again  after an initial fall.</p>
<p>The cause of the leak is still being  investigated, said a spokesman at Tokyo Electric, which runs the  plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, 239 kilometers (149 miles)  northeast of Tokyo.</p>
<p>The spokesman, Takeshi Takamori, said  the lead posed no danger to the environment. Takamori did not specify  exactly how much radioactivity was released, but he said it was  insignificant.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s nuclear power industry  has suffered a series of accidents in recent years.</p>
<p>A nuclear reprocessing center  north of Tokyo suffered a fire and explosion on March 11, and  radioactivity was released. The plant operator, the government-linked  Power Reactor and nuclear Fuel Development Corp., or Donen,  has been accused of mishandling the accident and covering up  mistakes.</p>
<p>For example, police suspect Donen of  hiding photographs of the accident site, news reports said Tuesday.</p>
<p>Donen official have acknowledged the  plant repeatedly filed false reports to the government, saying that  an employee had made sure the fire had been extinguished, when in  fact no such confirmation had taken place.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__147_323964393"></a> 30 avril 1997 : le  réacteur n°2 restera arrêté jusqu&#8217;à  une date non précisée</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  reactor start-up date yet to be set.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 1997  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, April 30 (Reuter) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said on Wednesday the start-up date of  a nuclear reactor that was closed on Tuesday remained unclear.</p>
<p>The 1.1 million kilowatt (kw) reactor  at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.2 nuclear Power Plant, about 100 km  northwest of Tokyo, was shut early Tuesday morning after the  radioactivity level in exhaust gas rose 20 times above normal levels  late Monday night.</p>
<p>Coolant water was also contaminated  with radiation, a TEPCO spokesman said. But he said no radiation had  leaked into the environment.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;It is too early to say when the  reactor can resume operations, as we don&#8217;t know for sure the cause  (of the surge in the radioactivity level),&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman said.</p>
<p>But he said a pinhole in the metal  cover of a nuclear fuel rod in the reactor could have caused  the leakage.</p>
<p>It usually takes about two to three  weeks to repair a pinhole in metal tubes and then restart the  reactor.</p>
<p>TEPCO plans to compensate for the  lost electricity production by boosting operating rates of other nuclear reactors, the spokesman said.</p>
<p>On the International nuclear Event Scale (INES) of zero to seven, the leak was provisionally  evaluated zero by the government&#8217;s Agency of Natural Resources and  Energy, indicating the incident did not threaten safety.</p>
<p>An accident last month at a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in Tokaimura, 120 km northeast of Tokyo, was  evaluated three on the scale. A fire and explosion at the  reprocessing plant exposed 37 workers to low-level radiation.</p>
<p>INES was jointly developed by the  International Atomic Energy Agency and the Organisation for Economic  Cooperation and Development&#8217;s nuclear Energy Agency to  evaluate the significance of incidents at nuclear plants.</p>
<p>TEPCO, Japan&#8217;s largest electric power  utility currently operates 16 nuclear reactors including the  unit closed on Tuesday, whose power generation capacity totals about  16 million kw.</p>
<p class="western">&#8211;Tokyo Energy Desk +81-3-3432-8837</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__149_323964393"></a> 7 mai 1997 : arrêt  du réacteur n°1 en raison d&#8217;une baisse du liquide  réfrigérant</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  says reactor shut due to lack of coolant.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 1997  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, May 7 (Reuter) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said on Wednesday its 784,000 kilowatt  reactor in eastern Japan was automatically shut on Tuesday evening  due to a lack of coolant supply to the reactor.</p>
<p>TEPCO had been gradually lowering  operating rates of the reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 nuclear power plant, 228 km (143 miles) northeast of Tokyo, at the time of  the automatic shutdown.</p>
<p>The operating rates were being  lowered in preparation for a 10-day maintenance closure scheduled to  start at midnight on Tuesday.</p>
<p>The boiling water reactor is  programmed to halt its operations if the water level in the reactor  pressure vessel, which needs to be kept at a depth of 14 metres, goes  below 13 metres, a TEPCO spokesman said.</p>
<p>The cause of the shortage in coolant  water supply is under investigation, and it is unclear if the reactor  will be closed longer than 10 days due to the malfunction, he said.</p>
<p>The shutdown has caused no radiation  leakage, he added.</p>
<p class="western">&#8211;Tokyo Energy Desk +81-3-3432-8837</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__151_323964393"></a> 20 mai 1997 :  redémarrage envisagé du réacteur n°2</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  plans to restart reactor May 29.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 1997  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, May 20 (Reuter) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) plans to resume operation of its 1.1  million-kilowatt (kw) nuclear reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture in northern Japan around May 29, a company spokesman said  on Tuesday.</p>
<p>TEPCO halted operation of the nuclear reactor in the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 2 power plant on April 29 after  the level of radioactivity in the reactor&#8217;s exhaust gas rose.</p>
<p>The accident was caused by a leak in  one of the reactor&#8217;s fuel rods. The fuel rod has been replaced, the  company said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;As things now stand, we plan to  restart the reactor around May 29,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman said.</p>
<p>There was no report of a radiation  leak due to the accident.</p>
<p class="western">&#8211;Tokyo Energy Desk +81-3-5473-3706</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__153_323964393"></a> 9 juin 1997 : fuite radioactive sur le réacteur  n°1</h2>
<p><strong>Radioactive  water leaks from Japanese nuclear plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Associated  Press Newswires</span></span></span></p>
<p>APRS</p>
<p>Copyright 1997. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; A small amount of  radioactive water leaked from a nuclear power plant in  northeastern Japan, but it posed no threat to people or the  environment, a company spokesman said Monday.</p>
<p>The leak from a valve of the  reactor&#8217;s coolant water-supply pump occurred Sunday at the Tokyo  Electric Power&#8217;s No. 1 <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> power plant at Okuma,  and is being investigated, the company said. Okuma, a Pacific coastal  town, is 225 kilometers (140 miles), northeast of Tokyo.</p>
<p>An estimated 100 liters (26 gallons)  of coolant leaked, said Tokyo Electric Power spokesman Hiroaki  Ishibashi. He said levels of the radioactivity were no higher than  usual.</p>
<p>A plant operator found the leak while  patrolling the affected reactor, which was running at a full capacity  of 784,000 kilowatts, Ishibashi said. The reactor was under a regular  inspection that began Feb. 18 and was to end early next month.</p>
<p>Following Sunday&#8217;s accident, the  reactor&#8217;s output was reduced to 550,000 kilowatts, he said.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s nuclear energy  industry has been rocked recently by accidents and a cover-up scandal  that reduced its credibility.</p>
<p>On March 11, a fire and explosion at  a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant exposed 37 workers to  low-level radiation. That plant&#8217;s operator, the state-run Power  Reactor and nuclear Fuel Development Corp., or Donne,  submitted a false report on the accident to the government, officials  said.</p>
<p>Japan has 51 nuclear power  plants, which supply 35 percent of the nation&#8217;s electricity. Tokyo  Electric operates 16 nuclear power plants, including the <strong>Fukushima</strong> one.</p>
<p class="western">(km/twx)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__155_323964393"></a>12 juin  1997 : forte augmentation des accidents dans les centrales japonaises</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  nuclear industry reporting more incidents.` BY</strong> By Peter  Lardner</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1997  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, June 12 (Reuter) &#8211; The  reporting of accidents within Japan&#8217;s troubled nuclear energy  industry has improved dramatically, government officials said on  Thursday, but some say the change may raise more questions than it  answers.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s nuclear energy  reputation has come under criticism at home and abroad over the past  six months because of a litany of accidents and botched cover-ups.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The utilities have been very  good lately in reporting incidents whether it be a minor matter like  somebody tripping and hurting themselves,&nbsp;&raquo; a spokesman quoted  Japan&#8217;s Science &amp; Technology Agency Chief, Riichiro Chikaoka, as  saying.</p>
<p>Indeed, plant officials seem to have  taken to heart the need for more open reporting, with three minor  incidents logged in the past ten days alone, and an average of more  than one incident per week over the last six weeks.</p>
<p>An official from Japan&#8217;s Citizen&#8217;s nuclear Information Center welcomed the new wave of reporting,  but saw it as worrisome as well.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;It&#8217;s good to see there has been  an increased volume in accident reports, but a little concerning when  you consider that this many accidents likely have been happening all  along,&nbsp;&raquo; the official said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The concern is that the volume  of reporting on minor incidents will give people a false sense of  security that big accidents will be reported accurately,&nbsp;&raquo; he  added.</p>
<p>Among mishaps reported over the last  six weeks have been a partial plant closure due to a massive school  of jellyfish blocking a coolant water intake pump, a small fire in a  toilet in a building that houses a reactor, and a stoppage due to  unexpected clanging sounds coming from within a plant&#8217;s system.</p>
<p>Two other reports, however, involved  radioactive leakage&#8211; one at a Shikoku Electric Power Co Inc facility  in western Japan, another at a Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO)  facility in <strong>Fukushima</strong>.</p>
<p>A third, also at TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant but in a different reactor, involved a stoppage due to  radioactivity in exhaust gas being 20 times higher than normal.</p>
<p>In May, an International Atomic  Energy Association (IAEA) spokesman said that the global nuclear watch-dog was closely monitoring the &laquo;&nbsp;turmoil&nbsp;&raquo; in Japan,  adding that the &laquo;&nbsp;Japanese approach to crisis management (was)  clearly different to those seen in the United States and Europe.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>The comments came in response to a  March fire and explosion at a Tokaimura processing plant 120 km (75  miles) north of Tokyo which exposed 37 workers to low-level  radiation.</p>
<p>After the accident it was discovered  that the chief investigator of Japan&#8217;s top nuclear agency  deliberately destroyed photographs of the fire in a failed cover-up.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;It&#8217;s hard to judge this new  wave of reports, because there&#8217;s nothing to compare it to,&nbsp;&raquo; said  the Citizen&#8217;s nuclear Information Center official.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Before,&nbsp;&raquo; he said, &laquo;&nbsp;there  was just very little reporting.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Unfortunately, we&#8217;ll have to  wait for the next big mishap to really tell if companies have really  come clean.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p class="western">(c) Reuters Limited 1997</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__157_323964393"></a>14  octobre 1997 : fissure découverte sur une canalisation</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  finds cracked reactor pipe, no radiation leak.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1997  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Oct 14 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said on Tuesday it had found a crack in  a pipe housing a neutron measuring device at a nuclear reactor  in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture northeast of Tokyo during regular  maintenance checks.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We found a crack about three  centimetres long inside the pipe in the course of routine  maintenance,&nbsp;&raquo; a TEPCO spokesman said. The crack caused no  radiation leakage, he added.</p>
<p>It was unclear whether the  784,000-kilowatt unit, one of six reactors at TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 nuclear power plant, would remain closed longer than  originally planned due to the crack, he said.</p>
<p>The reactor has been shut since  mid-September for maintenance checks, and was initially scheduled to  resume operations next January 11.</p>
<p>- Tokyo energy desk (813) 3432-3708</p>
<p>email :  tokyo.energy.newsroom@reuters.com</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__159_323964393"></a> 5 décembre 1997 :  arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur à la suite d&#8217;une panne</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to shut 1.1 mln kw reactor after malfunction.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 1997  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Dec 5 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said it would shut down a 1.1 million  kilowatt (kw) reactor on the Pacific coast by 11 p.m. (1400 GMT) on  Friday after a malfunction at the unit.</p>
<p>There was no radiation leakage, a  TEPCO spokesman said.</p>
<p>It is not clear at the moment how  long the reactor will remain closed, the spokesman said, adding that  the cause of the malfunction was not yet known.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;One of the control rods got  stuck when we were rearranging them this morning,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>Control rods are rotated periodically  to maintain maximum power generation efficiency at nuclear reactors.</p>
<p>The unit is one of four reactors at  TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.2 nuclear power plant, located 210  km northeast of Tokyo. ((Tokyo Energy Desk +81-3  3432-3708 tokyo.energy.newsroom@reuters.com))</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__161_323964393"></a> 20 janvier 1998 : TEPCO envisage de remplacer 144  barres de contrôle en raison de  malfaçons</h2>
<p><strong>Tokyo  Elec. Power, Japan Atomic Power to Replace Control Rods.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 1998</p>
<p>Tokyo, Jan. 20 (Jiji Press)-Japan  Atomic Power Co. and Tokyo Electric Power Co. separately said Tuesday  they will replace 144 control rods at boiling-water nuclear reactors because of manufacturing flaws.</p>
<p>The rods, made by ABB Atom AB of  Sweden, failed to work properly last October at the No. 1 reactor of  Japan Atomic Power&#8217;s nuclear power plant in Tsuruga, Fukui  Prefecture, and in December at the No. 1 reactor of Tokyo Electric  Power&#8217;s second <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture,  the companies said.</p>
<p>Rods will be replaced at a total of  11 boiling-water reactors, they said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__163_323964393"></a> 24 janvier 1998 : les résidents vivant  autour de la centrale s&#8217;inquiètent de l&#8217;utilisation du  plutonium</h2>
<p><strong>Residents  near reactors concerned about plutonium use</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright  Kyodo News International Inc. 1998</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Jan. 24 &#8211;</p>
<p>Residents living in the vicinity of  two nuclear power plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and Niigata  prefectures have expressed concerns about the government&#8217;s plan to  begin burning plutonium there in 1999, government officials said  Saturday.</p>
<p>The International Trade and Industry  Ministry and some other authorities recently made public the results  of a local symposium held to discuss the matter earlier this month,  during which some 140 residents presented in written form their  opinions about the use of plutonium.</p>
<p>Around a half of the 140 residents  expressed concerns or questioned the safety of the so-called  &laquo;&nbsp;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; program, in which plutonium is burned in  thermal neutron reactors, they said.</p>
<p>The government plans to begin using  plutonium next year &#8212; the first time ever in Japan &#8212; at Tokyo  Electric Power Co.&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power  plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, north of Tokyo, and later at  the same company&#8217;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in  Niigata Prefecture on the Sea of Japan coast.</p>
<p>Koshiro Ishimaru, a 55-year-old post  office worker in Tomioka, Niigata Prefecture, expressed concerns that  the costs of the new method may burden the power company and may make  it less aware of safety considerations.</p>
<p>A man in Kashiwazaki, Niigata  Prefecture, said even the facilities&#8217; current operations make him  worry about the possibility of accidents.</p>
<p>Another man in Kariwa, also in  Niigata, said that some consumers have refrained from buying farm  products from areas nearby the reactors and that the program may  further motivate consumers to veer away from such products.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Fumiko Yokota, a  60-year-old housewife in Naraha in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture,  expressed support for the project, saying nuclear power is a  &laquo;&nbsp;realistic&nbsp;&raquo; option for electricity generation.</p>
<p>The program involves burning pellets  of mixed oxide fuel (MOX), comprised of plutonium and uranium, inside nuclear reactors to generate heat, which in turn is tapped to  generate electricity.</p>
<p>The state has approved a  recommendation by the Atomic Energy Commission, the government&#8217;s  advisory panel on nuclear energy policy, to have more than 10 nuclear reactors generating electricity through the burning of  MOX fuel by the year 2010.</p>
<p>Japan hopes to consume plutonium,  recycled from spent nuclear fuel, at thermal neutron reactors,  which include light-water reactors and other types of ordinary  reactors.</p>
<p>In December, Japan announced that its  stock of plutonium stood at about 54 tons as of December 1996, up  from about 46 tons the previous year, with most of the increase being  due to the plutonium contained in spent nuclear fuel.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__165_323964393"></a> 30 juillet 1998 : arrêt du réacteur  n°6 à la suite d&#8217;une fuite de vapeur</h2>
<p><strong>Tokyo  Electric shuts down nuclear reactor after steam leak</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Associated  Press Newswires</span></span></span></p>
<p>APRS</p>
<p>(c)  1998. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; Tokyo Electric Power Co.  shut down one of its nuclear reactors in northern Japan  Thursday due to a steam leak in turbine pipes, the company said.</p>
<p>The steam leak was discovered at 2:10  p.m. (0510 GMT) at the company&#8217;s 1.09 million-kilowatt, No. 6 nuclear reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, 239 kilometers (149 miles) northeast of  Tokyo. Reactor operation was stopped at around 5 p.m. (0800 GMT).</p>
<p>The cause of the leak will be  investigated Friday, the company said. It added that there had been  no danger of a radioactive leak.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__167_323964393"></a> 18 août 1998 : TEPCO demande aux autorités  locales l&#8217;autorisation d&#8217;utiliser du plutonium (MOX)</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  asks local gov&#8217;ts to accept plutonium use</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright  Kyodo News International Inc. 1998</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Aug. 18 &#8211;</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO)  asked authorities in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture on Tuesday to allow  the use of fuel containing plutonium at its nuclear power  plant in Okuma from the beginning of 1999, company officials said.</p>
<p>If the prefectural government and the  Okuma and neighboring Futaba town governments give preliminary  consent to the plan, the company will ask for the central  government&#8217;s permission to use mixed-oxide fuel at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant in Okuma.</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato in  late July had suggested his intention to accept the plan.</p>
<p>Mixed-oxide fuel &#8212; the product of  uranium mixed with plutonium extracted from spent nuclear fuel  &#8212; is not currently used at any of Japanese nuclear power  plants.</p>
<p>Besides the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant, the company plans to introduce the fuel  at its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in Niigata  Prefecture.</p>
<p>Kansai Electric Power Co. has already  applied to the central government to use the fuel at the Takahama nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture, after local  authorities gave the plan their preliminary approval in May.</p>
<p>Kansai Electric Power plans to  introduce the fuel at the two reactors by 1999 and 2000,  respectively.</p>
<p>The government gave a green light to  the project in February 1997 as a stopgap measure to use Japan&#8217;s  plutonium supply. Its plan to establish a nuclear fuel cycle  was stalled following a liquid sodium leakage accident in 1995 at the  Monju prototype fast-breeder reactor in Fukui Prefecture.</p>
<p><strong>Local  governments asked to accept use of plutonium.</strong></p>
<p>19 août  1998</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Service: Asia-Pacific</span></span></span></p>
<p>BBCFE<strong>NGC</strong> BBC<strong>GC</strong> CTGBBC</p>
<p>(c) 1998  The British Broadcasting Corporation [date of publication]. All  Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced except with the  express permission of The British Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>Source: Kyodo News Service, Tokyo, in  English 0254 gmt 18 Aug 98</p>
<p>Text of report by the Japanese news  agency Kyodo</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong>, Japan, 18th August:  Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) asked authorities in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture on Tuesday [18th August] to allow the use of fuel  containing plutonium at its nuclear power plant in Okuma from  the beginning of 1999, company officials said.</p>
<p>If the prefectural government and the  Okuma and neighbouring Futaba town governments give preliminary  consent to the plan, the company will ask for the central  government&#8217;s permission to use mixed-oxide fuel at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 nuclear power plant in Okuma. <strong>Fukushima</strong> Governor  Eisaku Sato in late July had suggested his intention to accept the  plan.</p>
<p>Mixed-oxide fuel &#8211; the product of  uranium mixed with plutonium extracted from spent nuclear fuel  &#8211; is not currently used at any of Japanese nuclear power  plants. Besides the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 nuclear power plant,  the company plans to introduce the fuel at its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in Niigata Prefecture. Kansai Electric  Power Co has already applied to the central government to use the  fuel at the Takahama nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture,  after local authorities gave the plan their preliminary approval in  May. Kansai Electric Power plans to introduce the fuel at the two  reactors by 1999 and 2000 respectively.</p>
<p>The government gave a green light to  the project in February 1997 as a stopgap measure to use Japan&#8217;s  plutonium supply. Its plan to establish a nuclear fuel cycle  was stalled following a liquid sodium leakage accident in 1995 at the  Monju prototype fast-breeder reactor in Fukui Prefecture.</p>
<p>(c) BBC Monitoring Summary of World  Broadcasts.</p>
<p><strong>TEPCO  seeks approval to use MOX nuclear fuel.</strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">19 août  1998</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 1998  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Aug 19 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said on Wednesday it had asked local  authorities in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture on the Pacific coast for  approval to use mixed-oxide fuel (MOX) at its nuclear reactor.</p>
<p>MOX, a mixture of uranium and  plutonium, can reduce nuclear fuel consumption at reactors by  between 20 and 30 percent because it is manufactured from spent fuel.</p>
<p>TEPCO plans to initially use MOX fuel  at one of the six reactors at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 nuclear Power Plant in the fourth quarter of 1999.</p>
<p>It can apply to the Trade Ministry  for permission to use MOX only after it secures approval from the  local government.</p>
<p>Currently, all of Japan&#8217;s 51  commercial nuclear reactors use conventional uranium fuel. ((Tokyo Energy Desk +81-3 3432 3708  tokyo.energy.newsroom@reuters.com)).</p>
<p class="western"><strong>Nucléaire &#8211;  les Japonais veulent se mettre au Mox.</strong></p>
<p class="western">21 août 1998</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Les  Echos</span></span></span></p>
<p>ECHOS<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">(c) 1998 LES ECHOS  Visitez le site-web http://www.lesechos.fr pour plus d&#8217;informations  Visit the Les Echos website at http://www.lesechos.fr for more  information</p>
<p class="western">INDUSTRIE</p>
<p class="western">ÉNERGIE</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric  Power (Tepco), la principale compagnie électrique japonaise, a  annoncé hier avoir demandé aux autorités locales  l&#8217;autorisation d&#8217;introduire du combustible Mox dans son réacteur nucléaire de <strong>Fukushima</strong>.  Cette centrale serait ainsi la première au Japon à  utiliser du Mox, un mélange d&#8217;uranium et de plutonium, qui  permet de recycler une partie du plutonium produit par les centrales  atomiques. Très contesté par les écologistes, le  Mox est déjà largement utilisé en France, en  Allemagne, en Suisse et en Belgique.</p>
<p class="western">(c) 1998 LES ECHOS.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__169_323964393"></a>26 août  1998 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 à la suite d&#8217;une  panne</h2>
<p><strong>PLATT&#8217;S  &#8211; TEPCO&#8217;s Fukushima nuke power plant shuts on malfunction.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  1998. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platt&#8217;s)-26Aug98/225 am  EDT/0625 GMT Japan&#8217;s Tokyo Electric Power Co said Wednesday its  460,000 KW No 1 <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture, northeast Japan, automatically shut down at 10:53 am on  Aug 26 due to a malfunction. The power company is now investigating  the cause of the incident. There was no nuclear leak outside  due to the accident, TEPCO said. The reactor was running at full  rates when an unspecified problem occurred on the power transmission  side, it said.</p>
<p>Copyright, 1998, The McGraw-Hill  Companies Inc.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__171_323964393"></a>2  novembre 1998 : la préfecture de Fukushima accepte l&#8217;usage du  MOX</h2>
<p><strong>Fukushima  Prefecture ready to accept mixed-oxide nuclear plan.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Asia Pacific &#8211; Political</span></span></span></p>
<p>BBCAPP<strong>NGC</strong> BBC<strong>GC</strong> CTGBBC</p>
<p>(c) 1998  The British Broadcasting Corporation [date of publication]. All  Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced except with the  express permission of The British Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>Text of report by the Japanese news  agency Kyodo</p>
<p>Tokyo, 2nd November: <strong>Fukushima</strong> Governor Eisaku Sato expressed Monday [2nd November] his government&#8217;s  readiness to be the site for Japan&#8217;s first use of fuel containing  plutonium at a nuclear power plant.</p>
<p>At a news conference, Sato consented  to a plan by Tokyo Electric Power Co to use from next year  mixed-oxide fuel at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 nuclear power  plant in Okuma.</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> became the first  prefectural government to express an intention to accommodate such a  plan.</p>
<p>Mixed-oxide fuel, the product of  uranium mixed with plutonium extracted from spent nuclear fuel, is not currently used at any nuclear power plant in  Japan.</p>
<p>Kansai Electric Power Co is also  planning to use the fuel at the Takahama nuclear power plant  in Fukui Prefecture along the Sea of Japan.</p>
<p>The Fukui prefectural government has  not given approval to the plan. Source: Kyodo News  Service, Tokyo, in English 0240 gmt 2 Nov 98.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__173_323964393"></a> 6 décembre 1998 :  75% des résidents de la centrale de Kashiwazaki-Kariwa  sont  opposés à l&#8217;usage du MOX</h2>
<p><strong>75  pc of Niigata residents oppose plutonium use</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright  Kyodo News International Inc. 1998</p>
<p>NIIGATA, Japan, Dec. 6 &#8211;</p>
<p>About 75% of residents of Kashiwazaki  and surrounding areas in Niigata Prefecture oppose a plan to use a  plutonium fuel mix by 2000 at a nearby nuclear power plant on  the Sea of Japan coast, according to survey results released Sunday.</p>
<p>The survey, conducted by a local  civic group between August and November, also showed that 80% of the  respondents thought a referendum was needed to make a decision on the  &laquo;&nbsp;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; plan at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant operated by Tokyo Electric Power Co.</p>
<p>The group received 3,805 responses.</p>
<p>The pluthermal program involves  burning pellets of mixed oxide (MOX) fuel, comprised of plutonium and  uranium, inside light-water reactors to generate heat, which is turn  tapped to generate electricity.</p>
<p>A similar program at a nuclear plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture received the prefectural  government&#8217;s approval last month.</p>
<p>According to the results, 75% opposed  the plan and 3.4% supported it.</p>
<p>A total of 79.5% advocated holding a  referendum, with more than half of the respondents saying a  referendum should &laquo;&nbsp;definitely&nbsp;&raquo; be held. Those who said  there was no need totaled 6.3% while 3.3% were strongly against it.</p>
<p>Shugo Hanyu, the head of the civic  group, said his group has decided to initiate a petition in late  January next year asking for a referendum.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__175_323964393"></a>25  janvier 1999 : incendie sur le réacteur n°1</h2>
<p><strong>Fire  at Fukushima nuclear power complex extinguished.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Asia Pacific &#8211; Political</span></span></span></p>
<p>(c)  1999 The British Broadcasting Corporation [date of publication]. All  Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced except with the  express permission of The British Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>Text of report by the Japanese news  agency Kyodo</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong>, Japan, 25th  January: A fire that broke out Monday [25th January] at a nuclear power complex of Tokyo Electric Power Co in Naraha, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, was put out shortly after it was discovered by plant  workers, company officials said.</p>
<p>There is no concern of radioactive  leakage from the company&#8217;s No 2 nuclear power plant, northeast  of Tokyo, and no-one was hurt in the incident, the officials said.</p>
<p>The fire broke out at around 1030 on  the second floor of the turbine building of the No 1 reactor at the  plant, which has been shut down for regular inspection since 17th  December last year, according to the officials.</p>
<p>The Futaba regional fire department  suspects that a solvent for resin used in inspecting and repairing  power generators caught fire, although the department is still  investigating the fire, the company officials said.</p>
<p>The blaze is the second at the plant  in a week. A small fire broke out in a waste disposal building last  Tuesday, the officials said.</p>
<p>Source: Kyodo News Service, Tokyo, in  English 0723 gmt 25 Jan 99.</p>
<p>BBC Worldwide Monitoring/ (c) BBC  1999.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__177_323964393"></a> 8 février 1999 :  TEPCO déclare que son plus vieux réacteur (28 ans) peut  encore fonctionner 32 ans</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  says oldest reactor safe for another 32 yrs.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 1999  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Feb 8 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc said on Monday its 28 year old nuclear reactor, with due repairs, could be operated safely for another 32  years without any technical problems.</p>
<p>A TEPCO spokesman said the power  utility submitted a report of its evaluation of the 460-megawatt  reactor &#8211; its smallest and oldest &#8211; of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1  plant to the Trade Ministry on Monday.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s move follows a report by the  Trade Ministry in April 1996 which said old reactors could safely  continue operation if appropriate maintenance work were carried out  and inspections were made.</p>
<p>TEPCO said it would conduct similar  evaluations on other reactors, after they become around 30 years old.  ((Tokyo Energy Desk +81-3 5473 3708  tokyo.energy.newsroom@reuters.com)).</p>
<p><strong>Japanese nuclear operators say plants can run safely for up to 60  years.</strong></p>
<p>8  février 1999</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Asia Pacific &#8211; Political</span></span></span></p>
<p>BBCAPP<strong>NGC</strong> BBC<strong>GC</strong> CTGBBC</p>
<p>(c) 1999  The British Broadcasting Corporation [date of publication]. All  Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced except with the  express permission of The British Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>Text of report by the Japanese news  agency Kyodo</p>
<p>Tokyo, 8th February: Three leading nuclear power plant operators submitted to authorities Monday  [8th February] a report which may pave the way for keeping atomic  power plants running for up to 60 years, officials said Monday.</p>
<p>In the report to the agency of  natural resources and energy, Tokyo Electric Power Co, Kansai  Electric Power Co and Japan Atomic Power Co concluded that with  proper maintenance, there will be no technical problem with the  safety of nuclear power reactors even if they run for 60  years.</p>
<p>Currently, the life of nuclear power plants is assumed to be 30-40 years.</p>
<p>To prepare the report, the three  companies conducted detailed technical assessments of Japan Atomic  Power&#8217;s Tsuruga plant and Kansai Electric Power&#8217;s Mihama plant, both  of which are located in Fukui Prefecture and began operating in 1970,  and Tokyo Electric Power&#8217;s plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture,  which was put into service in 1971.</p>
<p>The agency forwarded the report to  the nuclear Safety Commission, Japan&#8217;s policy-making body on nuclear safety, later in the day with a comment that it will  endorse the report, agency officials said.</p>
<p>Based on the report, the agency is  expected to write safety guidelines on nuclear power plants in  fiscal 1999 so that they can run for a long period of time.</p>
<p>The report was compiled at a time  when Japanese electric power companies are faced with difficulties  building new nuclear power plants and public concern is  growing about the safety of ageing reactors.</p>
<p>Source: Kyodo News Service, Tokyo, in  English 0902 gmt 8 Feb 99.</p>
<p>BBC Worldwide Monitoring/ (c) BBC  1999.</p>
<p><strong>TEPCO  aims to prolong life of nuclear reactors. BY</strong> By Miho  Yoshikawa</p>
<p>31 mars  1999</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 1999  Reuters Limited</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan March 31  (Reuters) &#8211; Clad in uniforms of shiny baby-blue overalls, hard hats  and gloves, a handful of men are busy at work deep in the heart of  the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear power station&#8217;s No. 2  reactor in northern Japan.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO), the  world&#8217;s largest private power utility, is taking advantage of an  annual maintenance shutdown to refit the reactor with a 35-tonne  stainless steel cylinder shroud.</p>
<p>TEPCO hopes the face-lift will enable  it to operate the 28-year-old power station, its oldest, for another  30 years or more.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Both our own evaluations and  those of the government say that we can safely run the plant for 60  years,&nbsp;&raquo; a TEPCO spokesman said.</p>
<p>TEPCO became the world&#8217;s first  utility to replace a nuclear reactor&#8217;s shroud &#8211; which provides  a passage for coolant &#8211; when it completed work on <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi&#8217;s No. 3 reactor last year. Two other reactors are due for a  similar overhaul.</p>
<p>The power company discovered cracks  in the shroud of the 784,000 kilowatt No. 2 unit during maintenance  checks in 1994.</p>
<p>By law, maintenance must be conducted  every 13 months and the accompanying shutdown usually lasts 40 to 50  days, with the replacement of components and other tasks inside the  reactor core usually carried out by robots.</p>
<p>The work at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi,  however, is expected to take a full year and the reactor had to be  decontaminated to make it safe for human workers.</p>
<p>With some of Japan&#8217;s oldest nuclear power plants nearly 30 years old, the industry needs to address the  issue of how long a reactor can be operated safely.</p>
<p>There are no binding laws or  guidelines in Japan that set down the lifespan of a nuclear reactor, and there is no industry consensus as to how long reactors  can safely be operated beyond a widely accepted 30-year minimum.</p>
<p>A year ago, Japan Atomic Power Co&#8217;s  166,000-kilowatt nuclear reactor on the Pacific coast became  Japan&#8217;s first nuclear plant to be shut down and dismantled  after 31 years of operation. It was Japan&#8217;s oldest commercial  reactor.</p>
<p>The decision to close the plant was  largely due to economics. It was the only reactor in Japan using  graphite as its moderator and carbon dioxide gas as its coolant,  resulting in operation costs that were double those of other  commercial reactors.</p>
<p>TEPCO said that whether it actually  operated <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi for another 32 years would depend  on the economics of the plant.</p>
<p>The cost of replacing a shroud is  more than 10 billion yen ($83 million), while maintenance checks on a  reactor cost on average four to five billion yen.</p>
<p>Those costs are slight, however,  compared with the average 350 billion to 400 billion yen cost of  building a new reactor.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;(We decided to change the  shroud) because we believe that it makes economic sense to do so,&nbsp;&raquo;  the TEPCO spokesman said.</p>
<p>Finding a site to build a new plant  could also be difficult, given the unpopularity of Japan&#8217;s nuclear policy following a spate of nuclear plant mishaps in recent  years, including clumsy coverup attempts. ($1=120 yen) ((Tokyo Energy  Desk +81-3 5473 3708 tokyo.energy.newsroom@reuters.com)).</p>
<p>(C) Reuters Limited 1999.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__179_323964393"></a> 27 avril 1999 : le Japon  envisage de développer son nucléaire civil</h2>
<p><strong>Atermoiements japonais sur l&#8217;avenir du  nucléaire civil.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">La  Tribune</span></span></span></p>
<p>TRDS<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">(c) 1999 La Tribune  (not to be redisseminated) Tel: +33 (0)1 44 82 16 16  http://www.latribune.fr.</p>
<p class="western">ENQUÊTE</p>
<p class="western">Pour le français Cogema qui retraite une  partie de ses déchets nucléaires, le Japon est un  client aussi important que l&#8217;Allemagne</p>
<p>Tokyo envisage un  développement du programme nucléaire pour lutter contre l&#8217;effet de serre.</p>
<p class="western">Mais les partis politiques ne veulent pas se  saisir d&#8217;un dossier fort peu populaire, et des incertitudes pèsent  sur l&#8217;avenir de ce programme.</p>
<p class="western">Le dernier convoi de déchets nucléaires  en provenance de France, arrivé dans l&#8217;archipel le 15 avril  dernier, n&#8217;a pas déclenché de manifestations aussi  hostiles que les précédents.</p>
<p>Au Japon, le nucléaire reste un dossier toujours aussi sensible. La question revient dans  l&#8217;actualité à chaque retour depuis la France ou  l&#8217;Angleterre, vers le Japon, d&#8217;un chargement de déchets à  haute radioactivité. Le dernier en date ne remonte qu&#8217;au 15  avril dernier, lorsque le quatrième convoi en provenance de  France et qui avait quitté Cherbourg le 25 février est  arrivé à Rokkasho, dans le nord de l&#8217;archipel, avec  1.600 tonnes de déchets vitrifiés à son bord.  Toutefois, alors que l&#8217;arrivée des précédents  convois avait mobilisé plusieurs centaines de manifestants  contre le nucléaire,  une trentaine seulement étaient présents cette fois et  ont exprimé dans le calme leur opposition. Le dossier pourrait  toutefois rebondir à nouveau cette année, où  l&#8217;on attend également l&#8217;arrivée du premier convoi de  plutonium sous forme de MOX (mixed oxyde fuel) destiné à  être brûlé dans des centrales électriques.  Et même si l&#8217;Allemagne a finalement repoussé aux  calendes grecques la fin de son programme nucléaire après un débat confus et stérile au sein du  gouvernement de Bonn, l&#8217;opinion japonaise n&#8217;en aura retenu que  l&#8217;effet d&#8217;annonce initial: l&#8217;Allemagne ose envisager la fin de son  programme nucléaire.</p>
<p class="western">Des contrats essentiels pour la Cogema</p>
<p>Les Français,  liés aux Japonais dans ce domaine par de nombreuses  coopérations et contrats commerciaux, observent avec une  attention soutenue l&#8217;évolution du dossier sur le terrain. Dans  l&#8217;activité du retraitement des combustibles nucléaires  usés, le Japon est l&#8217;un des premiers clients de la Cogema  (Compagnie Générale des Matières Nucléaires)  à égalité avec l&#8217;Allemagne. Les contrats signés  en 1977 pour le retraitement du combustible nucléaire usé japonais étant pratiquement arrivés à  échéance, la Cogema est à présent en  phase de négociation avec les dix électriciens japonais  pour la signature de nouveaux contrats. En 2000, les usines de la  Hague auront retraité 3.000 tonnes de combustible issu des  réacteurs japonais, pour une somme d&#8217;environ 20 milliards de  francs. Le renouvellement de ces contrats représente un enjeu  capital. Avec un chiffre d&#8217;affaires annuel au Japon de l&#8217;ordre de 4  milliards de francs, Cogema est l&#8217;une des premières  entreprises exportatrices françaises au Japon. Or le climat  dans lequel vont se négocier les nouveaux contrats apparaît  beaucoup moins favorable qu&#8217;il y a vingt ans.</p>
<p class="western">Objectif: réduire les émissions de  CO2 de 6 %</p>
<p>En visite à  Tokyo, Jean-Louis Ricaud, directeur de la division des combustibles  nucléaires et du retraitement de Cogema, se déclare  confiant dans la poursuite du programme volontariste du gouvernement  japonais en matière de développement nucléaire et dans le rôle que l&#8217;industrie française sera amenée  à jouer à ses côtés, en concurrence avec  l&#8217;industrie anglaise (BNFL), qui retraite également une partie  des déchets japonais. « Compte tenu des engagements pris  à Kyoto il y a deux ans, explique Jean-Louis Ricaud, le Japon  se doit de développer son programme nucléaire pour assurer la croissance et la satisfaction de ses besoins en  électricité, et le gouvernement japonais a annoncé  qu&#8217;il prévoyait 10 à 20 tranches nucléaires  supplémentaires en service d&#8217;ici à 2010. Cela signifie  que dans dix ans, il y aura plus de centrales nucléaires au  Japon qu&#8217;il y en a aujourd&#8217;hui en France. » En effet les  données de base de la situation énergétique du  Japon motivant la politique gouvernementale n&#8217;ont pas changé.  D&#8217;une part l&#8217;archipel entend restreindre autant que possible sa  dépendance de l&#8217;étranger pour l&#8217;approvisionnement en  pétrole, gaz et charbon, d&#8217;autre part, l&#8217;absence d&#8217;uranium sur  le territoire japonais encourage les autorités dans le  développement du recyclage des combustibles nucléaires.  En outre, lors de la conférence de Kyoto en décembre  1997 sur le réchauffement de la planète, le Japon s&#8217;est  fixé pour objectif d&#8217;abaisser les émissions de CO2 de 6  % par rapport au niveau de 1990. De fait, les autorités  s&#8217;apprêtent à publier un texte sur la politique du  gouvernement en matière de lutte contre le réchauffement  de la Terre qui, selon les fuites obtenues par le grand quotidien  Mainichi, comporterait un passage sur la nécessité de  développer la production d&#8217;électricité d&#8217;origine nucléaire.  Cette mention, qui ne figurait pas dans la première ébauche  du projet en décembre, aurait été ajoutée  sous la pression des milieux industriels nippons, et notamment des  compagnies d&#8217;électricité. Malgré tout, un  certain nombre de facteurs humains et économiques entravent  continuellement la logique de l&#8217;Etat en faveur du nucléaire.</p>
<p>Le gouvernement  prévoit que la part du nucléaire dans la consommation globale d&#8217;électricité qui est de  35 % actuellement dépasse les 40 % en 2010. Mais la  réalisation d&#8217;un tel objectif se heurte aux pouvoirs locaux,  sous la pression de l&#8217;opinion. Les problèmes rencontrés  lors de l&#8217;arrivée au Japon du tout premier convoi de déchets  nucléaires à haute radioactivité en 1994  illustrent bien la situation. Après quarante jours de mer, la  cargaison s&#8217;est trouvée bloquée au large du port de  Mutsu Ogawara, car le gouverneur de la préfecture d&#8217;Aomori,  seul habilité à octroyer le droit d&#8217;accoster, voulait  obtenir auparavant une promesse de l&#8217;Agence des sciences et  technologies que les déchets seraient simplement de passage  dans sa préfecture, qui en aucun cas ne se transformerait en  site de stockage permanent. Soumise à la pression des  événements, la STA a dû céder, créant  ainsi un fâcheux précédent depuis, aucune  préfecture n&#8217;a accepté de se porter candidate au  stockage permanent des déchets.</p>
<p class="western">Des négociations locales toujours  laborieuses</p>
<p>A la suite d&#8217;une  série d&#8217;accidents au surgénérateur de Monju en  1995, puis à Tokai en 1996 assortis de tentatives de  dissimulation dénoncées par de violentes campagnes de  presse, l&#8217;influence des pouvoirs locaux et des groupes de résidents  réfractaires au nucléaire n&#8217;a cessé de se renforcer.</p>
<p class="western">Les résidents de Maki sont ainsi parvenus à  empêcher la construction d&#8217;un nouveau réacteur. Le  programme gouvernemental a subi un tel retard que les électriciens  considèrent désormais les objectifs gouvernementaux  avec une certaine distance.</p>
<p class="western">Les électriciens japonais sont engagés  dans des négociations laborieuses avec les autorités  locales à chaque étape du développement de leurs  opérations. Mais, même lorsque le gouvernement local  leur accorde l&#8217;autorisation de procéder à la  construction d&#8217;un nouveau réacteur, comme c&#8217;est le cas à  Oma où le premier réacteur directement conçu  pour brûler du MOX devrait commencer ses opérations  commerciales dès 2007 sur la base du projet initial, il se  trouve un petit propriétaire placé au centre du terrain  convoité capable de retarder indéfiniment la mise en  route du projet. Sur la vingtaine de projets annoncés par le  gouvernement, au moins six d&#8217;entre eux posent de sérieux  problèmes.</p>
<p>Les obstacles  surgissent également dès qu&#8217;il s&#8217;agit de convertir un  réacteur nucléaire classique (à uranium) en réacteur pour la combustion du  MOX. Le plus gros producteur d&#8217;électricité, dont le  siège est à Tokyo, Tepco, envisage la conversion de  quatre réacteurs, dont deux seulement ont été  désignés: celui de <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  qui devrait suspendre ses opérations dès le mois  d&#8217;octobre pour être chargé avec le MOX venant de France,  l&#8217;autre, Kashiwasaki Karima dans la préfecture de Niigata, est  en butte aux résistances locales. Les associations  antinucléaires rassemblent les signatures pour un référendum.  Comme l&#8217;explique un responsable de Tepco, « les objectifs ne  changeront pas, mais l&#8217;application et le rythme du programme peuvent  subir un retard important. En tout cas, pour nous, le document  consignant le programme à long terme du gouvernement ne veut  plus dire grand-chose ». Une nouvelle version de ce programme  (dont la dernière édition date de 1994) est en  préparation. Reste à savoir dans quelle mesure il  pourra répondre aux attentes des électriciens japonais  et de leurs partenaires étrangers.</p>
<p class="western">Sophie Malibeaux, à Tokyo.</p>
<p class="western">La Tribune</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__181_323964393"></a>28 juin  1999 : des groupes anti-nucléaires demandent au Japon de  renoncer au traitement du plutonium</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  urged to stop planned shipment of plutonium.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p>JPES</p>
<p>Copyright  1999 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>SEOUL, June 22 Kyodo</p>
<p>South Korea&#8217;s leading environmental  group and Greenpeace International urged Japan on Tuesday to stop its  shipments of 440 kilograms of plutonium from France and Britain  scheduled for July.</p>
<p>In a statement, Greenpeace and the  Korean Federation of Environmental Movements (KFEM) said, &nbsp;&raquo;A  shipment of weapon-usable plutonium will soon depart from Europe for  Japan&#8217;s west coast, creating a new threat to the environment  surrounding the Korean Peninsula and the East Sea (Sea of Japan).&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>According to the statement, one ship  will deliver a cargo of over 220 kg of plutonium to Takahama nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture in Japan. The ship is expected to  pass through the Korea Strait in mid-September.</p>
<p>Another ship will carry around 220 kg  of plutonium to <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> power plant on the northeast  coast of Japan.</p>
<p>The most direct route to Takahama  could take the shipment less than 50 kilometers from the southeastern  South Korean city of Pusan.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;This coastline and seas are of  major importance for fishing communities and tourism in (South)  Korea,&nbsp;&raquo; said KFEM Secretary General Choi Yul said.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;This shipment is potentially only  the beginning of a deadly new phase in Japan&#8217;s plutonium program, and  this time the Korean environment is more directly threatened than  ever before,&nbsp;&raquo; Choi said.</p>
<p>Describing the plutonium-carrying  ships as a &nbsp;&raquo;floating Chernobyl,&nbsp;&raquo; Choi also said the consequences  would be &nbsp;&raquo;disastrous&nbsp;&raquo; if any major accident occurred along the  routes.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__183_323964393"></a> 30 juin 1999 : La France  va envoyer du MOX au Japon</h2>
<p><strong>France  to ship MOX fuel to Japan this year</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright  Kyodo News International Inc. 1999</p>
<p>PARIS, June 30 &#8211;</p>
<p>France&#8217;s national nuclear power company COGEMA said Wednesday it will carry out transportation  of mixed plutonium-uranium oxide (MOX) fuel to Japan by two armed  ships before the end of the year.</p>
<p>COGEMA has not make public the  departure date, the port of departure or route for security reasons.</p>
<p>MOX fuel is a combination of uranium  and plutonium extracted from spent nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>The company said it and British nuclear Fuels Plc have been packing the MOX fuel bound for  Tokyo Electric Power Co.&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant and for Kansai Electric Power Co.&#8217;s Takahama No. 2 nuclear power station in Fukui Prefecture.</p>
<p>COGEMA said it was not releasing  details about the shipment yet to minimize the risk of a terrorist  hijacking.</p>
<p>It said it would announce the date  and port of departure one or two days before the ships leave for  Japan, and the route and arrival schedule after the ships leave  European waters.</p>
<p>Last April, a British ship carrying  reprocessed nuclear waste entered a port in the village of  Rokkasho in Aomori Prefecture, northeastern Japan. It was the fourth  shipment of its kind since 1995.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__185_323964393"></a> 16 juillet 1999 : deuxième chargement de MOX français  pour le Japon</h2>
<p><strong>Second  load of nuclear fuel for Japan leaves French plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France-Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p>AFPR</p>
<p>Copyright  (c) 1999 Bell &amp; Howell Information and Learning Company. All  rights reserved.</p>
<p>VALOGNES, France, July 16 (AFP) &#8211; A  second shipment of recycled nuclear fuel for Japanese power  stations left the French reprocessing plant late Thursday to be  loaded on to a freighter in the northern port of Cherbourg.</p>
<p>The two special containers of fuel  were taken under heavy police guard from the plant at La Hague to be  put on a train for Cherbourg at nearby Valognes.</p>
<p>Three containers of the uranium and  plutonium fuel known as MOX had been loaded Monday after police  cleared Greenpeace protestors from two cranes in the docks at  Cherbourg and a court slapped an injunction on the environmental  group.</p>
<p>The ecological movement, barred from  approaching within 100 metres (yards) of the consignment under pain  of heavy fines, made no attempt to intervene Thursday.</p>
<p>The container ship is to sail before  the end of July, linking up with another from Barrow-in-Furness,  northwest England, for the voyage to Japan by an undisclosed route.</p>
<p>British nuclear Fuels is also  seeking an injunction in a London court Friday to stop Greenpeace  from disrupting its shipment to Japan of recycled nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>Representatives of the environmental  campaign group have been asked to be at the High Court in London for  10:00 a.m. (0900 GMT) Friday, they said.</p>
<p>Greenpeace claims that the ships will  be carrying enough nuclear fuel aboard to make 60 nuclear bombs.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;If a government or paramilitary  force seizes this cargo it could have a nuclear weapon within  three weeks,&nbsp;&raquo; spokesman Jean-Luc Thierry said Saturday.</p>
<p>Greenpeace has also charged that  security measures were inadequate, as the two freighters would travel  without naval escort.</p>
<p>The group said the two vessels had  been recently fitted with three 30mm cannon each and were expected to  protect each other against potential attack.</p>
<p>A security force of 26 officers from  the British Atomic Energy Agency Constabulary, who normally patrol  British nuclear facilities, will also be aboard.</p>
<p>Greenpeace also said that in Japan  the plutonium fuel would be loaded into conventional nuclear power reactors operated by Kansai Electric Power Company (KEPCO) at  Takahama and Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) at <strong>Fukushima</strong>.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;These reactors were never  designed to use this type of fuel and it will reduce their operating  safety margins,&nbsp;&raquo; Greenpeace said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__187_323964393"></a> 10 septembre 1999 : arrivée attendue  du MOX français à Fukushima</h2>
<p><strong>Nuclear  fuel cargo ships to arrive in Japan September 22: report</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France-Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p>AFPR</p>
<p>Copyright  (c) 1999 Bell &amp; Howell Information and Learning Company. All  rights reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept 10 (AFP) &#8211; Two armed  cargo ships carrying mixed plutonium-uranium oxide (MOX) fuel  produced in Britain and France will arrive in Japan on September 22,  a report said Friday.</p>
<p>The 4,648-tonne Pacific Teal and the  5,087-tonne Pacific Pintail are to arrive in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, some  200 kilometers (124 miles) north of Tokyo, Kyodo News said, quoting  sources.</p>
<p>After unloading some of the MOX fuel  containers at a <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant run by Tokyo Electric  Powerources said.</p>
<p>The two freighters, which left the  British port of Barrow-in- Furness on July 19, are currently in the  Tasman Sea, east of Australia, Kyodo said.</p>
<p>The ships, each armed with three  30-millimeter (1.2-inch) cannons, sailed through the Cape of Good  Hope at the southern tip of South Africa after cruising southbound  across the Atlantic.</p>
<p>The fuel carried by the ships  contained some 450 kilograms (990 pounds) of plutonium, news reports  said. MOX fuel is a combination of uranium and plutonium extracted  from spent nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>A spokesman for Tokyo Electric Power  declined to confirm the report. &laquo;&nbsp;We have said the arrival is  likely to be late September, but we have not announced any specific  date,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__189_323964393"></a> 28 septembre 1999 : manifestations au Japon  contre l&#8217;arrivée du MOX français</h2>
<p><strong>Protests  greet nuclear cargo arrival in Japan.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Scotsman</span></span></span></p>
<p>SC</p>
<p>3</p>
<p>(c) 1999</p>
<p>Christopher Cairns.</p>
<p>BRITISH shipments of plutonium for nuclear reactors have arrived in Japan after a two-month  voyage, writes Christopher Cairns.</p>
<p>The two British nuclear Fuels  vessels were greeted at the northern Japanese port of <strong>Fukushima</strong> yesterday by similar protests to those seen in July, at their  departure from Barrow in Cumbria and Cherbourg in France.  Environmentalists demonstrated against what they see as a dangerous  proliferation of the trade in nuclear material.</p>
<p>The Pacific Teal and the Pacific  Pintail each carried approximately 200kg of mixed-oxide plutonium  (MOX), which the environmental group Greenpeace claims is enough  bomb-grade material to make 60 nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>The controversial shipment &#8211; the  first of what BNFL and the Japanese nuclear industry hopes  will be many in the next ten to 15 years &#8211; took place despite  protests from several countries, including Ireland, South Africa and  New Zealand.</p>
<p>Demonstrations at the time of the  departure from Barrow resulted in Greenpeace campaigners being  arrested. There was also a ban on the pressure group&#8217;s vessel, the MV  Greenpeace, entering British waters as it tried to follow the two  BNFL vessels to Cherbourg.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power, Japan&#8217;s largest  utility company, will use the MOX fuel pellets in light-water  reactors at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 3 plant from February, said a  company spokesman.</p>
<p>The Teal completed unloading at <strong>Fukushima</strong> last night and has rejoined the Pintail, which was  moored offshore. The vessels are heading for Fukui, where the  Pintail&#8217;s cargo of MOX, from the Sellafield nuclear plant,  will be unloaded for use in the Takahama nuclear power  station.</p>
<p>Both ships are fitted with 30mm  cannon and carry an armed unit of BNFL police &#8211; neither of which,  according to Greenpeace, would have been any use had the shipments  been targeted by terrorists seriously intent on seizing the cargo.</p>
<p>The Teal was met by protesters aboard  Greenpeace&#8217;s Arctic Sunrise ship, which was surrounded by ten  Japanese vessels carrying commandos in riot gear. The protesters  launched three inflatables carrying protest banners, but they were  prevented from blocking the ship&#8217;s passage.</p>
<p>nuclear power is the source of  about 30 per cent of Japan&#8217;s electricity and is considered crucial by  the Tokyo government to meet the country&#8217;s growing energy needs.</p>
<p>A spokesman for BNFL said last night:  &laquo;&nbsp;We have been involved in nuclear shipments for more than  30 years but this particular operation was the first of its kind and  it is pleasing that things have gone smoothly. The vessels had an  incident-free journey and have arrived on schedule.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__191_323964393"></a> 8 octobre 1999 : fuites  radioactives dans un dépôt de déchets de la  centrale de Fukushima</h2>
<p><strong>Slight  Radiation Leak Discovered In Northern Japan</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(Copyright (c) 1999, Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.)</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP)&#8211;A small amount of  radiation leaked from barrels at a disposal center for contaminated  materials, officials said Friday, just a week after Japan&#8217;s  worst-ever nuclear accident.</p>
<p>The amount of radiation released was  far below the level set by law as safe, said Shuetsu Shimaya, an  official with Japan nuclear Fuel, the company that discovered  the leaks.</p>
<p>The leaks follow a nuclear accident at a uranium reprocessing plant outside Tokyo that exposed  49 people to radiation and heightened already rising fears in Japan  about lax safety standards at nuclear facilities.</p>
<p>Shimaya said the leaks, at a disposal  center in Rokkasho, 575 kilometers northeast of Tokyo, were  discovered during an inspection.</p>
<p>The barrels contained radioactive  material from a Tokyo Electric Power Co. (J.TER) nuclear power  plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture. One barrel was found leaking on  Sept. 28 and the second one was discovered Thursday.</p>
<p>The disclosure came as authorities  were mounting inspections of the nation&#8217;s nuclear facilities  to check on safety standards and prevent further accidents.</p>
<p>An investigation into last week&#8217;s  accident, in Tokaimura, 110 kilometers, found that operator JCO Co.  regularly skipped crucial security steps and ordered employees to cut  corners to save time.</p>
<p>Fears about the Tokaimura plant are  causing more suffering for residents by driving down prices for farm  goods produced there and prompting a rash of cancellations at the  region&#8217;s tourist hotels.</p>
<p class="western">(END) Dow Jones Newswires 08-10-99</p>
<p><strong>Emanations radioactives &laquo;&nbsp;faibles&nbsp;&raquo;  détectées au Japon *.</strong></p>
<p class="western">8 octobre 1999</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  &#8211; Les actualités en français</span></span></span></p>
<p>REUTFR<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">(c) Reuters Limited  1999.</p>
<p>TOKYO, 8 octobre  (Reuters) &#8211; Des émanations radioactives en faible quantité  se sont échappées de deux barils de déchets  nucléaires dans le nord du Japon, a fait savoir vendredi la  compagnie Tokyo Electric Power. * La société enquête  sur la cause de cette fuite, jugée trop faible pour être  nocive pour la population. Ces révélations surviennent  une semaine après le plus grave accident nucléaire au Japon, le 30 septembre à l&#8217;usine de retraitement de  Tokaimura, où une cinquantaine de personnes ont été  exposées à des radiations. * Selon Tokyo Electric Power  (Tepco), les deux barils font partie d&#8217;un stock de 1.760 barils de  déchets nucléaires faiblement radioactifs, qui ont été  transportés en septembre d&#8217;une centrale nucléaire située à <strong>Fukushima</strong> vers un entrepôt de déchets situé sur la commune  de Rokkasho (préfecture d&#8217;Aomori) dans le nord du pays.</p>
<p class="western">* Une inspection de routine, réalisée  vendredi, a mis en évidence des traces de fuites sur deux  barils, dit la firme, qui soutient que l&#8217;incident n&#8217;aura aucun impact  sur l&#8217;environnement. /EF.</p>
<p class="western">(c) Reuters Limited 1999.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__193_323964393"></a> 1 janvier 2000 : le &laquo;&nbsp;bug de l&#8217;an 2000&#8243;  frappe quelques équipements dans les centrales japonaises</h2>
<p><strong>Minor  faults strike Japanese nuclear plants as 2000 dawns by Shino Yuasa =  (PICTURE) = ATTENTION &#8211; RECASTS with more hitches ///</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France-Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">AFPR</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(Copyright 2000)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Jan 1 (AFP) &#8211; Minor  computer-related faults struck seven nuclear facilities in  Japan at the start of 2000 Saturday and a few of them could be  related to the millennium bug, officials said.</p>
<p>None of the glitches, three of them  occuring within one hour into the new millennium, posed any danger  despite vexing a nation still haunted by a serious nuclear accident three months ago, they said.</p>
<p>Six of the facilites were nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>At a power plant of Tokyo Electric  Power Co. in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, north of Tokyo, a panel displaying the  state of control rods in a reactor showed an erroneous date of  Feburary 6, 2036, at about 9:00 a.m. (0000 GMT).</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;It occur</p>
<p>red under mysterious circumstances,&nbsp;&raquo;  said Yoshinori Moriyama, the head of nuclear power plant  operations at the government&#8217;s natural resources and energy agency.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We have yet to determine if it  is related to Y2K problems although the company says there may be no  connection,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>At another power plant in Ishikawa,  central Japan, a system to monitor radiation levels malfunctioned  immediately after the turn of the year, officials said. Two of the  five monitoring computers stopped displaying data.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;This incident may possibly be  related to Y2K,&nbsp;&raquo; Moriyama said.</p>
<p>At a power plant in Onagawa, northern  Japan, an alarm sounded for 10 minutes just two minutes after  midnight, indicating faulty transmissions of data on radiation  levels, sea water temperature and other factors.</p>
<p>But similar glitches have been  observed in the past two months and were seen as unrelated to the  millennium bug.</p>
<p>At a centre for storing high-level nuclear waste in Aomori, at the northern tip of Honshu Island,  a date display in equipment for controlling and monitoring operations  indicated &laquo;&nbsp;1999/01/01&#8243; instead &laquo;&nbsp;2000/01/01.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>The error occured during a regular  time-readjustment operation in the morning. &laquo;&nbsp;We cannot rule out  the possibility of a Y2K trouble,&nbsp;&raquo; said Hidefumi Iida, a  spokesman for the centre.</p>
<p>Fears about nuclear power have  increased in Japan since September 30 when three workers at a uranium  processing plant in Tokaimura, northeast of Tokyo, set off the  world&#8217;s worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986. One of  the workers died on December 22.</p>
<p>In Washington, a US State Department  official, who asked not to be named, downplayed the two glitches in  the first hour as not related to Y2K. The incidents were of the type  &laquo;&nbsp;that happens at nuclear power plants all over the world  on any day of the year,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>Fifty minutes into the new  millennium, Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi addressed the nation on  television declaring that &laquo;&nbsp;fortunately, we have not heard of any  situation affecting people&#8217;s lives.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary  Fukushiro Nukaga later told a news conference, &laquo;&nbsp;We have  confirmed that no major problems have occured in such areas as  energy, transportation, nuclear power and medical services.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>However, minor computer hiccups were  reported across the country in the morning, including false displays  of dates in computers at central and local government offices and  faulty services of train ticket vending machines.</p>
<p>Ticket vending machines at a dozen  stations of East Japan Railway Co. broke down or showed false dates.  The problems were solved later, company officials said.</p>
<p>At the state weather agency, some of  its systems showed &laquo;&nbsp;100&#8243; instead of &laquo;&nbsp;00&#8243; at the  turn of the year.</p>
<p>In Osaka, monitoring devices at a  telecommunications centre, providing circuits to 1,300 companies,  failed to register correct dates two minutes after midnight.</p>
<p><strong>FOCUS  Plus d&#8217;anomalies dans les centrales nucléaires japonaises. BY</strong> par Elaine Lies</p>
<p class="western">2 janvier 2000</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  &#8211; Les actualités en français</span></span></span></p>
<p>REUTFR<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">(c) Reuters Limited  2000.</p>
<p class="western">TOKYO, 2 janvier (Reuters) &#8211; Les  dysfonctionnements informatiques survenus dans quatre centrales  nucléaires japonaises, dont un au moins est avec certitude lié  au bogue de l&#8217;an 2000, ont tous été résolus et  n&#8217;ont affecté ni la sécurité des infrastructures  ni les réseaux d&#8217;alimentation en électricité,  ont déclaré dimanche les compagnies d&#8217;électricité.</p>
<p class="western">Cinq anomalies, la plupart dans les systèmes  de surveillance du taux de radioactivité et autres données,  avaient été signalées samedi dans les centrales,  entâchant le bon passage du Japon à l&#8217;An 2000 dans toute  une gamme d&#8217;autres secteurs. La situation est revenue à la  normale samedi en début de soirée, a déclaré  dimanche un responsable du ministère du Commerce, ajoutant  qu&#8217;on ne signalait aucun nouveau dysfonctionnement depuis.</p>
<p class="western">Les compagnies d&#8217;électricité ont  déclaré enquêter sur l&#8217;origine exacte de ces  dysfonctionnements.</p>
<p>A la centrale nucléaire n°2 de <strong>Fukushima</strong> au nord de Tokyo, qui appartient à la société   Tokyo Electric Power (TEPCO), les données sur la position des  barres servant à contrôler les réactions  nucléaires n&#8217;ont pas été envoyées à  l&#8217;écran d&#8217;ordinateur habituel, même si les données  en question étaient bien sur le disque dur de l&#8217;ordinateur.</p>
<p class="western">&laquo;&nbsp;Il est trop tôt pour dire avec  certitude que cela était lié au bogue de l&#8217;An 2000&#8243;,  a déclaré un porte-parole de TEPCO, première  compagnie nippone d&#8217;électricité.</p>
<p class="western">Jamais la sécurité n&#8217;a été  affectée et la position des barres a pu être vérifiée  par d&#8217;autres moyens, jusqu&#8217;à ce que le problème ait pu  être corrigé samedi dans l&#8217;après-midi. L&#8217;enquête  menée a déterminé que l&#8217;ordinateur avait  reprogrammé sa date à février 2036. Les  techniciens ont corrigé la date et les opérations ont  repris normalement, dit un porte-parole de TEPCO.</p>
<p class="western">[...]</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> World Politics and Policy</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__195_323964393"></a> 10 janvier 2000 : TEPCO repousse ses projets d&#8217;utilisation du MOX dans le  réacteur  n°3</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Defers Plan to Use MOX Fuel at Nuclear Plant </strong></p>
<p>Dow  Jones Newswires</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Asian Wall Street Journal</span></span></span></p>
<p>AWSJ</p>
<p>5</p>
<p>(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.)</p>
<p>TOKYO &#8212; Tokyo Electric Power Co.  postponed its plan to use MOX fuel &#8212; mixed oxide of uranium and  plutonium &#8212; at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 3 nuclear reactor,  following a request from the Ministry of International Trade and  Industry to re-examine data on the safety of the fuel, which is  supplied by a Belgian company.</p>
<p>In December, a data-falsification  scandal surfaced at a British MOX supplier to Kansai Electric Power  Co.</p>
<p>Tepco had planned to begin using MOX  fuel at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> reactor in February. Both Tepco and  Kansai Electric received their first shipment of the reprocessed MOX  fuel from Europe in late September.</p>
<p><strong>Le  Japon s&#8217;interroge sur l&#8217;utilisation de Mox dans ses centrales  nucléaires.</strong></p>
<p class="western">10 janvier 2000</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Les  Echos</span></span></span></p>
<p>ECHOS<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">(c) 2000 LES ECHOS  Visitez le site-web http://www.lesechos.fr pour plus d&#8217;informations  Visit the Les Echos website at http://www.lesechos.fr for more  information</p>
<p class="western">INDUSTRIE</p>
<p class="western">ÉNERGIE</p>
<p class="western">Le Miti a commandé une étude sur le  Mox, alors que les centrales nucléaires du pays semblent de  moins en moins prêtes à utiliser ce combustible qui  contient du plutonium.</p>
<p>Une compagnie  électrique japonaise a annoncé vendredi le report de  son projet d&#8217;utiliser un stock de combustible nucléaire recyclé Mox (mixed oxydes fuel) en provenance de Belgique, à  la suite d&#8217;une affaire de falsification de documents par un  concurrent britannique. Cette décision représente un  nouveau revers pour l&#8217;adoption de la technologie Mox par le Japon, où  le nucléaire est davantage craint depuis l&#8217;accident de Tokaimura, le 30 septembre  dernier. Combustible composé d&#8217;un mélange d&#8217;uranium et  de plutonium, le Mox, produit essentiellement par la Cogema, qui  retraite le combustible nucléaire usé des centrales japonaises, doit en théorie être  utilisé peu à peu par quelque 16 à 18 centrales  nucléaires du Japon.</p>
<p>La Tokyo Electric  Power Co (Tepco) a indiqué qu&#8217;elle repoussait à une  date ultérieure le programme qui comprenait l&#8217;utilisation de  Mox fourni par Belgonucléaire pour la centrale de <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  au nord de Tokyo. Elle avait prévu de commencer à  brûler le carburant en février. Tepco a mis en avant la  nécessité de mener un contrôle approfondi du  stock, toujours en Belgique, à la suite du scandale provoqué  par la compagnie britannique BNFL, qui a reconnu avoir faussé  des tests sur son stock à destination du Japon. « Nous  devons attendre la conclusion des études afin de déterminer  dans quel délai nous pourrons débuter l&#8217;utilisation du  Mox », a indiqué un porte-parole de Tepco, Takeshi  Takamori.</p>
<p class="western">Le groupe privé Kansai Electric Power avait  déjà décidé en décembre de ne pas  utiliser, par précaution, le Mox produit par BNFL, et le 18  novembre, Tepco avait aussi déjà annoncé le  report d&#8217;un an de l&#8217;emploi d&#8217;un stock de Mox fourni par la compagnie  française Cogema à la demande des autorités  locales, soucieuses d&#8217;apaiser les craintes de la population après  l&#8217;accident de Tokaimura. La compagnie affirmait toutefois que son  programme Mox n&#8217;était pas remis en cause mais seulement  différé. Il n&#8217;empêche que la question de  l&#8217;utilisation du Mox comme prévu par les centrales nucléaires  japonaises soulève de nombreuses questions. Ryuji Fukaya, le  ministre de l&#8217;Industrie et du Commerce International (Miti), a ainsi  indiqué vendredi avoir demandé une étude «  pour s&#8217;assurer que le Mox était sûr » afin de  gagner « la confiance de la population ».</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> Foreign Desk; Section A</p>
<p><strong>Accident Makes Japan Re-examine A-Plants BY</strong> By HOWARD W.  FRENCH</p>
<p>13  janvier 2000</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  New York Times</span></span></span></p>
<p>NYTF</p>
<p>Page 1,  Column 2</p>
<p>c. 2000  New York Times Company</p>
<p>TOKYO, Jan. 11 &#8212; The director of  Tokyo&#8217;s huge electric power company made no mention of public opinion  when he announced the postponement of plans to use a new plutonium  fuel.</p>
<p>But the politician he was with when  he made the announcement, Gov. Eisaku Sato of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture, the site of many nuclear plants, left no doubt  that the public&#8217;s newly raised suspicions about nuclear power  were precisely what the postponement was all about.</p>
<p>This was no time for an expansion of  the nuclear program, Mr. Sato said, citing Japan&#8217;s worst nuclear accident, in September, which killed one worker and  exposed scores of people to radiation. &nbsp;&raquo;Now is the time for  mourning,&nbsp;&raquo; Mr. Sato said.</p>
<p>The brief meeting between the  industry chief and the governor illustrated how sharply the ground  has begun to shift under Japan&#8217;s electric utilities since workers set  off the accidental chain reaction at Tokaimura, 70 miles north of  Tokyo.</p>
<p>The accident forced a partial  evacuation of the town and set off a death watch for the irradiated  workers. And, more than any event in a history full of serious  mishaps, it rattled the ironclad coalition between industry and  government that has long made Japan, a country with precious few  domestic sources of energy, the world&#8217;s most ambitious user of nuclear energy, providing one-third of its supplies.</p>
<p>Strikingly, in a country known for  its political quiescence, the sharp movement of public opinion  against nuclear power has taken the form of a genuine  groundswell, from subway straphangers horrified by stories about  safety lapses and small civic groups that have started petition  drives against the industry&#8217;s expansion to local political candidates  who are running for office on the issue.</p>
<p>Public protest has not been common in  Japanese society for well over a generation, having mostly died out  since Japan attained the level of affluence of many Western  countries, starting in the 1960&#8242;s.</p>
<p>But in recent years &#8212; timidly at  first, and then with growing speed &#8211;localized movements have been  springing up and asserting themselves more boldly, notably in the  courts, to protect consumer interests or the environment.</p>
<p>Since the Tokaimura accident, small  citizens&#8217; groups, encouraged by the spreading awareness of the risks  of nuclear energy, have sued regional power companies to  prevent the introduction of the new plutonium fuel and petitioned  local governments to block plant construction. A scandal involving  the falsification of inspection data by the British maker of  plutonium pellets has also strengthened resistance.</p>
<p>The grassroots activists have put the nuclear industry on the defensive in ways that recall its  decline in the United States and much of Europe after the accidents  at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.</p>
<p>In the clearest example of the impact  of local mobilization, Mayor Takaaki Sasaguchi of Maki, in the Nigata  prefecture, used his announcement of his re-election campaign today  to declare his opposition to plans to build a new plant in his city.</p>
<p>The industry, citing unflinching  support from the national government and Japan&#8217;s near total  dependence on imported fuels, has pledged to stick to its plans for  plutonium, which it describes as a step toward developing so-called  fast-breeder technology.</p>
<p>With fast-breeder reactors, whose  development remains, perhaps, decades away, proponents say Japan will  be able to produce more plutonium fuel than it consumes and achieve  the holy grail of energy independence.</p>
<p>In the meantime, industry officials  say they merely need to be patient until public passions against nuclear energy die down, and they will proceed with plans to  build many plutonium-burning plants.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;There is only enough uranium in the  world to last 72 years, and our country is not endowed with fossil  fuels,&nbsp;&raquo; the chairman of the Federation of Electric Power Companies,  Hiroji Ota, said. &nbsp;&raquo;There are some other alternative power sources  like solar and wind energy. But they all present technical problems.  For all these reasons, MOX fuel is appropriate for Japan.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>MOX, or mixed oxide, fuel is the new  plutonium-based fuel that the largest utilities had planned to start  using late last year.</p>
<p>In western Takahama, a former fishing  village that is home to four nuclear power plants, the  surprising face of the antinuclear activism is a citizens&#8217; group  largely made up of homemakers and elderly people. Judging from the  group&#8217;s determination, the utilities may be underestimating the  opposition.</p>
<p>In October, the group started a drive  that collected 2,170 signatures in a town of fewer than 9,000  inhabitants. The focus of the drive, like that of much of the recent  opposition to nuclear power in Japan, is the new  plutonium-based fuel.</p>
<p>On a recent morning, the group  delivered a letter to Mayor Riichi Imai, exquisitely polite in their  protocol in a typically Japanese manner but absolutely firm in their  message &#8212; the town must refuse the new fuel.</p>
<p>Lighting a cigarette, Mr. Imai  refused to commit himself, saying he would explain his position soon  before the regional assembly. That provoked a bitter laugh from Masae  Sawayama, 90, the group&#8217;s doyenne.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;It occurred to me that our mayor  might do like most politicians do and go tell a bunch of lies  later,&nbsp;&raquo; Ms. Sawayama said.</p>
<p>The uphill struggle of the group  becomes clear on entering City Hall, where large interactive displays  show idyllic color images of the town&#8217;s plants nestled in the hills  by a rocky bay. Even public parks there are decorated with statues  and monuments that commemorate mastery of the atom.</p>
<p>Fishing has almost disappeared as a  way of life. Nowadays, whether directly or indirectly, the regional  utility, the Kansai Electric Power Company, employs the bulk of the  population.</p>
<p>The electric company has spared no  effort to keep the townspeople on its side, subsidizing regular bus  tours to its headquarters in Osaka, more than two hours away, for  safety briefings. And residents say the cable television company runs  annoyingly frequent public-service-style announcements on the  benefits of nuclear power.</p>
<p>Despite all that, the Tokaimura nuclear-fuel processing accident seems to have awakened the  deep Japanese allergy to things nuclear, born after the United  States dropped two atomic bombs on the country in 1945.</p>
<p>And many have put their foot down and  said no to the new program, seizing on studies by scientists in  France, which uses MOX fuel in a limited way, and in the United  States, which does not, that have shown that the fuels are more  unstable during burning than the plain uranium fuels that they are  intended to replace.</p>
<p>In the end, Mayor Imai, who has been  a strong supporter of nuclear power throughout his career, had  no choice but to oppose the new fuel, at least for now. The shock  from the British falsification scandal, coming on top of the  Tokaimura accident, simply made it politically impossible to give his  approval.</p>
<p>Announcing his turnabout, Mr. Imai  spoke bitterly, saying he felt betrayed by the industry experts who  had campaigned for his approval of MOX. [On Jan. 12, the Kansai said  that it would return a shipload of recycled plutonium fuel to British nuclear Fuels, the company where inspection figures had been  altered, Agence France-Presse reported.]</p>
<p><strong>ART</strong></p>
<p>Photos: In  Takahama, a village with four nuclear plants, Shizuko Abe,  second from left, leads protest on a new fuel. (Stuart Isett/Corbis  Sygma, for The New York Times)(pg. A1); Environmental advocates  marching in October at the government&#8217;s nuclear agency in  Tokyo. Their sign said: &nbsp;&raquo;Is this Chernobyl? Protesting the nuclear accident in Tokaimura.&nbsp;&raquo; The town was partly evacuated. (Reuters)(pg.  A14) Map of Japan highlighting Tokaimura: Workers set off a chain  reaction at a processing plant in Tokaimura. (pg.  A14)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__197_323964393"></a>21  juillet 2000 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur après une  fuite consécutive à un tremblement de terre</h2>
<p><strong>Japanese Nuclear Plant Shut  Because Of Earthquake</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones &amp;  Company, Inc.)</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP)&#8211;Several earthquakes shook  the Tokyo area Friday, including a predawn 6.1-magnitude earthquake  that prompted the shutdown of a nuclear reactor as a  cautionary measure. There were no immediate reports of injuries.</p>
<p>A reactor at the <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> power plant in northeastern Japan was shut down after a leak was  detected in a tank where steam used to power the turbines is turned  back into water.</p>
<p>There was no danger of any  radioactivity leaking, said Yoshimi Hitosugi, spokesman for Tokyo  Electric Power Co., which runs the plant about 150 miles northeast of  Tokyo.</p>
<p>The magnitude 6.1 quake, which hit at  3:39 a.m., was centered off the coast of Ibaraki state, 70 miles  northeast of Tokyo, the Meteorological Agency said.</p>
<p>It shook buildings for several  seconds in Tokyo.</p>
<p>Shigeru Seki, an Ibaraki police  spokesman, said some trains in the Tokyo area were stopped to check  for track damage.</p>
<p>Another quake with a preliminary  magnitude of 5.5 struck at 2:16 p.m. It was centered about 25 miles  under the seabed in the Pacific Ocean, some 90 miles southeast of  Tokyo, the agency said.</p>
<p>Earthquakes that have been rattling  the Izu island chain near Tokyo continued Friday. About 1,000  earthquakes were detected by the agency Friday, including quakes of  4.8 magnitude and 3.3 magnitude.</p>
<p>There were no reports of injuries or  damage on the islands.</p>
<p>Japan is one of the most  earthquake-prone countries in the world.</p>
<p><strong>JAPON  SEISME </strong></p>
<p class="western">CP</p>
<p class="western">21 juillet 2000</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">La  Presse Canadienne</span></span></span></p>
<p>SF<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p>Copyright (c) 2000 The Canadian Press. All  rights reserved.</p>
<p>Japon: arrêt  d&#8217;un réacteur nucléaire en raison des séismes</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8212; La  vague de secousses sismiques qui touche actuellement le Japon, et  notamment la région de Tokyo, a amené les autorités  à arrêter le réacteur d&#8217;une centrale nucléaire,  par mesure de précaution.</p>
<p class="western">Un fort séisme d&#8217;une magnitude préliminaire  de 6,1 avait déjà secoué les environs de la  capitale nippone tôt vendredi (jeudi soir à Paris),  coupant l&#8217;alimentation en eau d&#8217;une vingtaine d&#8217;habitations et  interrompant le trafic ferroviaire.</p>
<p>Le réacteur  de la centrale de <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  au nord-est du pays, a été arrêté après  la détection d&#8217;une fuite dans une cuve de condensation de la  vapeur utilisée pour entraîner les turbines.</p>
<p class="western">Il n&#8217;y aucun danger de radioactivité à  la suite de cet incident, a affirmé Yoshimi Hitosugi, le  porte-parole de la Compagnie d&#8217;électricté de Tokyo, qui  dirige cette centrale située à environ 240 kilomètres  au nord-est de la capitale.</p>
<p>Par ailleurs,  l&#8217;épicentre du séisme de 6,1, qui s&#8217;est produit  vendredi à 3H33 (18H39 GMT jeudi, 20H39 à Paris) était  situé au large des côtes de la préfecture  d&#8217;Ibaraki, à environ 112km au nord-est de Tokyo, selon  l&#8217;Agence météorologique. Il a ébranlé  pendant plusieurs secondes les bâtiments de la mégapole. AP</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima  nuclear power reactor being shut down after quake.</strong></p>
<p>21  juillet 2000</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Asia Pacific &#8211; Political</span></span></span></p>
<p>BBCAPP<strong>NGC</strong> BBC<strong>GC</strong> CTGBBC</p>
<p>(c) 2000  The British Broadcasting Corporation [date of publication]. All  Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced except with the  express permission of The British Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>Text of report in English by Japanese  news agency Kyodo</p>
<p>Sendai, 21st July: Tokyo Electric  Power Co (TEPCO) announced Friday [21st July] it has started to  manually shut down a reactor at its nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture due to an increase in waste gas, possibly  caused by an earthquake that jolted extensive areas of eastern Japan  early in the day.</p>
<p>TEPCO started to shut down the No 6  reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 plant on the Pacific coast, some  250 km north of Tokyo, at 1500 [all times local] Friday.</p>
<p>The shutdown is necessary to  determine the cause of a rapid increase in radioactive exhaust  emitted by the reactor, detected shortly after the magnitude 6.1  quake struck at 0339, it said.</p>
<p>No radioactivity was leaked outside  the plant, and operations at the reactor were otherwise normal, it  said.</p>
<p>The 1.1m-kW reactor, the largest  among the six reactors at the plant, will be completely shut down by  around 2200 Friday, the company said.</p>
<p>TEPCO suspects the earthquake  loosened pipe joints, sending air into the system that removes  radioactive substances from waste gas generated at the No 6 reactor,  it said.</p>
<p>The six reactors at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 plant have a combined generating capacity of 4.69m kW.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-Japan nuke plant to shut for check, no leak.</strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">21  juillet 2000</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2000  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, July 21 (Reuters) &#8211; Japan&#8217;s  largest power utility said it would shut one of its nuclear power plants to investigate a rise in waste gas following an  earthquake that jolted areas near Tokyo on Friday morning.</p>
<p>The nuclear station in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture, about 250 km (155 miles) northeast of  Tokyo, was put under enhanced surveillance after waste gas began  rising, Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said.</p>
<p>TEPCO officials said there was no  radioactive leak, and the generator&#8217;s output levels were unchanged  after the tremor, but as a precaution, output at the 1.1-gigawatt  reactor was lowered from 3 p.m. (0600 GMT).</p>
<p>The reactor was expected to be fully  shut down by 10 p.m. (1300 GMT).</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The shutdown was decided in  order to check and determine the cause of the incident, and there was  no radiation leak,&nbsp;&raquo; a TEPCO spokesman said.</p>
<p>An inflow of air into the system  through some crack or disjointed parts was suspected to have caused  the rise in waste gas &#8211; fumes released from a nuclear generator &#8211; at the No.6 reactor at the at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1  station.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;It is a possibility but we do  not know if it is actually the case, that&#8217;s why we are stopping (the  reactor) to investigate,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman added, referring to the  possibility that the quake caused a crack in the station.</p>
<p>The tremor at 3:39 a.m. (1839 GMT  Thursday) was measured at 6.1 on the Richter scale with its focus  about 50 km (30 miles) under the seabed off the coasts of Ibaraki  Prefecture, some 100 km (62.5 miles) northeast of Tokyo.</p>
<p>Japan has 51 commercial nuclear reactors providing about 30 percent of the country&#8217;s electricity  needs.</p>
<p>Public anger after several major  accidents at nuclear facilities over the past five years,  including Japan&#8217;s worst-ever accident in September that killed two  uranium plant workers, has forced delays in the government&#8217;s nuclear programme.</p>
<p><strong>Radioactive Water Leaks in Japan</strong></p>
<p>23  juillet 2000</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">AP  Online</span></span></span></p>
<p>ASP</p>
<p>Copyright 2000 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; A small amount of  radioactive water was found to have leaked at a nuclear power  plant in northeastern Japan after officials shut down one of its  reactors because of an oil leak, the plant&#8217;s operator said Monday.</p>
<p>There was no danger, however, of any  radiation escaping outside the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant in Okuma, said Yoshimi Hitosugi, spokesman of Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</p>
<p>Okuma, a town located on the Pacific  Coast in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture (state), is 150 miles northeast  of Tokyo.</p>
<p>Hitosugi said plant officials found  about 39 gallons of radioactive water that had leaked near the No. 2  reactor at around 10:20 p.m. Sunday, about an hour after the No. 2  reactor was manually shut down.</p>
<p>Officials had noticed an alarm  indicating the lowering of oil levels inside the tank in the turbine  facility, Hitosugi said. The oil leak was stopped after officials  closed the valve supplying oil to control the turbine, he said.</p>
<p>Plant officials were still  investigating the cause of the leakage of oil and radioactive water,  Hitosugi said.</p>
<p>On Friday, the No. 6 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> plant was shut down after a leak of waste  gas was detected in a tank where steam used to power the turbines was  turned back into water.</p>
<p>No leak of radioactive material was  reported at the No. 6 reactor, which was shut down as a cautionary  measure after a 6.1 magnitude earthquake struck in the Pacific Ocean  off the coast of eastern Japan.</p>
<p>The plant has six reactors.</p>
<p>Japan has an extensive nuclear power program, as the resource-poor nation depends on nuclear energy for a third of its electricity.</p>
<p>Public faith was shaken, however, by  the nation&#8217;s worst nuclear accident on Sept. 30 last year at a  fuel-processing plant in Tokaimura, 70 miles northeast of Tokyo, that  took the lives of two workers and seriously injured a third.</p>
<p>Dozens of people are believed to have  been exposed to less harmful radiation in the accident, which set off  an uncontrolled atomic reaction.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__199_323964393"></a> 24 juillet 2000 :  fermeture du réacteur n°2 en raison d&#8217;une fuite de pétrole  dans une turbine</h2>
<p><strong>Japon/Nucléaire-Un 2e réacteur  fermé à la centrale de Fukushima.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  &#8211; Les actualités en français</span></span></span></p>
<p>REUTFR<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">(c) Reuters Limited  2000.</p>
<p>TOKYO, 24 juillet  (Reuters) &#8211; La première compagnie japonaise d&#8217;électricité  a annoncé lundi la fermeture d&#8217;un second réacteur de la  centrale nucléaire de <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  à 250 km de Tokyo, à la suite d&#8217;une fuite de pétrole  près d&#8217;une turbine.</p>
<p class="western">Le pétrole sert à contrôler la  pression dans cette turbine.</p>
<p class="western">Tepco (Tokyo Electric Power Co) a fermé le  réacteur n°2, d&#8217;une puissance de 784 mégawatts,  dimanche soir, et a par la suite détecté de faibles  radiations dans une flaque de 150 litres d&#8217;eau apparue au-dessous  d&#8217;un réseau de barres de contrôle.</p>
<p>Vendredi, Tepco  avait fermé un premier réacteur nucléaire de la même centrale en raison d&#8217;une augmentation de la  concentration de gaz constatée à la suite d&#8217;un séisme  survenu dans la journée.</p>
<p class="western">Aucune radiation n&#8217;a été libérée  dans l&#8217;environnement extérieur à la centrale après  l&#8217;incident constaté dimanche, précise un porte-parole  de Tepco.</p>
<p>Le Japon compte 51  réacteurs nucléaires disséminés dans des  centrales civiles qui, au total, produisent 30% des besoins du pays  en électricité. La colère de l&#8217;opinion publique  à la suite de plusieurs accidents de taille dans des centrales  nucléaires ces cinq dernières années &#8211; dont le  pire accident nucléaire du pays en septembre dernier, qui a tué deux ouvriers &#8211; a  entraîné des retards dans le programme nucléaire du gouvernement. /EF.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__201_323964393"></a> 24 juillet 2000 : le  gouvernement japonais reconnaît l&#8217;inquiétude du public  en raison des récents accidents nucléaires</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  admits public fears over nuclear energy amid fresh incident by Kiriko  Nishiyama ATTENTION &#8211; RECASTS with government report ///</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France-Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">AFPR</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(Copyright 2000)</p>
<p>TOKYO, July 24 (AFP) &#8211; Japan&#8217;s  authorities admitted high levels of public anxiety about their  accident-prone nuclear energy programme Monday, as one plant  suffered its second mishap in three days.</p>
<p>The programme remained crucial to  supplying the resource-poor nation&#8217;s electricity needs, the Atomic  Energy Commission said in a draft report on Japan&#8217;s long-term nuclear power policy.</p>
<p>But it acknowledged &laquo;&nbsp;the sense  of mistrust is growing along with fears about nuclear power,  as a result of recent nuclear accidents as well as cover-ups  and falsified reports related to these.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Based on the premise that we  cannot completely rule out the possibility of accidents, emergency  measures have to be prepared to minimise damage to lives and the  health of residents in case of an accident,&nbsp;&raquo; the report added.</p>
<p>Concerns over nuclear power  have escalated in Japan since the country&#8217;s worst-ever nuclear disaster last September, which was also classified as the world&#8217;s  worst since Chernobyl in 1986.</p>
<p>A critical reaction at a uranium  processing plant in Tokaimura, 120 kilometers (70 miles) northeast of  Tokyo, killed two plant workers and exposed 439 people to radiation.</p>
<p>In the accident&#8217;s fallout, the  government said in March that plans to build 16-20 new nuclear power plants by March 2011 would be abandoned.</p>
<p>In the latest incident, energy  company officials launched a probe after a radioactive oil leak  within a nuclear power plant forced operators to shut down a  reactor on Sunday.</p>
<p>Another reactor at the same <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1 nuclear power plant, 200 kilometres north of Tokyo, was  shut down on Friday after a strong earthquake measuring 6.1 on the  open-ended Richter scale rocked the region.</p>
<p>The oil leak was confined to within  the plant in the town of Okuma and &laquo;&nbsp;we consider there is no  danger to the surrounding environment&nbsp;&raquo;, said Tokyo Electric  Power Co. Inc. (TEPCO) spokesman Ichiro Kudo.</p>
<p>About 150 liters (39 gallons) of  radioactive oil had collected from a drip out of a cracked turbine  valve, TEPCO said. Operators had shut down the No.6 reactor manually  by 9:17 pm (12:17 GMT) Sunday.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We detected radiation, but the  level was not high enough to pose a threat to people,&nbsp;&raquo; Kudo  said.</p>
<p>The No.2 reactor was still shut after  Friday&#8217;s powerful quake provoked fears that control systems  monitoring exhausts may have been damaged. But there was no radiation  leak and no danger, officials said.</p>
<p>Japan relies on 51 reactors to  produce about one-third of its electricity. It is the only nation  still developing nuclear fast- breeder reactors after France  closed its Superphenix reactor in 1997.</p>
<p>The programme, however, has been  mothballed since December 1995, when secondary cooling water leaked  from the prototype fast-breeder plant at Monju, 350 kilometres west  of Tokyo, causing a fire within the plant.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We hope to resume operations at  the plant at an early stage while gaining understanding from local  communities and from society at large,&nbsp;&raquo; said the Atomic Energy  Commission report.</p>
<p>Heightening public mistrust was an  embarrassing dispute between Japan and Britain, finally resolved on  July 11, over a consignment of nuclear fuel which arrived in  Japan last year with faked quality control data.</p>
<p>London eventually capitulated to  Japanese demands that it take back the fuel sent by British nuclear Fuels Ltd.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__203_323964393"></a> 25 juillet 2000 :  un  troisième réacteur fermé en raison d&#8217;une  augmentation anormale de l&#8217;iode</h2>
<p><strong>Japon  &#8211; Fermeture d&#8217;un troisième réacteur nucléaire à  Fukushima.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  &#8211; Les actualités en français</span></span></span></p>
<p>REUTFR<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">(c) Reuters Limited  2000.</p>
<p>TOKYO, 25 juillet  (Reuters) &#8211; La compagnie Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), première  compagnie japonaise d&#8217;électricité, a annoncé  mardi avoir fermé un réacteur nucléaire de 1,1 gigawatt sur une des deux centrales de <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  à 250 km au nord-est de Tokyo, après avoir détecté  une augmentation anormale d&#8217;iode dans l&#8217;eau du réacteur.</p>
<p>Tepco a déclaré  que le taux d&#8217;iode dans ce réacteur de <strong>Fukushima</strong> 2 restait conforme aux normes de sécurité mais que la  fermeture avait été décidée afin de  comprendre les raisons d&#8217;une telle augmentation.</p>
<p>Il s&#8217;agit du  troisième incident signalé depuis quelques jours à <strong>Fukushima</strong>.  Tepco a fermé deux réacteurs sur la centrale n°1  vendredi puis dimanche, le premier en raison d&#8217;une hausse anormale de  la concentration de gaz à la suite d&#8217;un séisme, le  second à la suite d&#8217;une fuite de pétrole près  d&#8217;une turbine.</p>
<p class="western">&laquo;&nbsp;Les incidents ne sont pas comparables et ne  sont probablement pas liés&nbsp;&raquo;, a déclaré un  porte-parole de la compagnie.</p>
<p class="western">Le Japon compte 51 réacteurs nucléaires  qui, au total, produisent 30% des besoins du pays en électricité.</p>
<p>L&#8217;opinion publique  est particulièrement sensible aux problèmes nucléaires  depuis le pire accident nucléaire du pays survenu en septembre dernier, qui a tué deux ouvriers.  /JSB.</p>
<p><strong>Nouvel  incident dans une centrale nucléaire.</strong></p>
<p class="western">25 juillet 2000</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">L&#8217;Agéfi</span></span></span></p>
<p>AGFIF<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">(c) 2000 L&#8217;AGEFI Le  Quotidien Suisse des Affaires et de la Finance. Homepage Address:  http://www.agefi.ch</p>
<p>JAPON &#8211; Les  responsables japonais de l&#8217;énergie ont ouvert hier une enquête  sur une fuite radioactive dans une centrale nucléaire du nord de Tokyo. Un incident qui a contraint les techniciens à  fermer un réacteur. Un autre réacteur de la même  centrale, <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1, située à 200 kilomètres au nord de la  capitale, avait dû être fermé vendredi à la  suite d&#8217;un séisme de force 6,1 sur l&#8217;échelle de Richter  qui avait secoué la région. Nous considérons  qu&#8217;il n&#8217;existe aucun danger pour l&#8217;environnement, a déclaré  lundi Ichiro Kudo, porte-parole de l&#8217;entreprise Tokyo Electric Power  Co. Il a expliqué que la fuite était limitée à  l&#8217;intérieur de la centrale, qui se trouve dans la localité  de Okuma.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__205_323964393"></a> 2 août 2000 : arrêt du réacteur  n°6 en raison de la rupture d&#8217;une canalisation, abîmée  lors du dernier tremblement de terre</h2>
<p><strong>Pipe  rupture caused Fukushima nuclear reactor shutdown</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Economic Newswire</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright Kyodo News International Inc. 2000</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Aug. 2 &#8211;</p>
<p>The earthquake-related rupture of a  corroded pipe and subsequent increase in waste gas led to last  month&#8217;s shutdown of a reactor at one of Tokyo Electric Power Co.&#8217;s  (TEPCO) nuclear power plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture,  northeastern Japan, the company confirmed Wednesday.</p>
<p>TEPCO officials said they found that  a small pipe at the No. 6 reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 plant  on the Pacific coast was broken in a magnitude 6.1 quake July 21 and  air inflow from the pipe&#8217;s cracks rapidly increased radioactive gas  emissions from the reactor.</p>
<p>The pipe had previously been damaged  by repeated heat and strain.</p>
<p>No radioactivity leaked outside the  plant after TEPCO manually shut down the reactor following the quake,  which jolted extensive areas of eastern Japan.</p>
<p>The ruptured pipe, measuring 34  millimeters in outside diameter and attached to a safety valve,  suffered metal fatigue as steam repeatedly passed through it,  according to the Ministry of International Trade and Industry.</p>
<p>The officials also examined pipe  joints at five other reactors in the plant and detected  deterioration, although those pipes had no cracks.</p>
<p>TEPCO officials said they are  planning to remove the corroded pipe at the No. 6 reactor and a  similar pipe at the No. 2 reactor.</p>
<p>It is rare for a reactor pipe to  rupture during a quake, according to TEPCO.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__207_323964393"></a> 30 septembre 2000 :  chronologie des principaux accidents nucléaires au Japon</h2>
<p><strong>Chronology of major nuclear accidents in Japan</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France-Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">AFPR</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(Copyright 2000)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept 30 (AFP) &#8211; Japan on  Saturday marked the first anniversary of the Tokaimura uranium plant  accident, the world&#8217;s worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl  in 1986.</p>
<p>The following is a list of the most  recent nuclear accidents in Japan:</p>
<p>December 1995: The Monju fast-breeder  reactor, in western Japan, is shut down after a massive sodium leak.  The reactor remains shut to date with the fast-breeder program  frozen.</p>
<p>March 1997: 37 people are exposed to  radiation following a fire at another nuclear reprocessing  plant in Tokaimura. The plant remains closed.</p>
<p>April 1997: Tritium leak at Fugen  advanced thermal reactor in western Japan exposes 11 workers to  low-level radiation.</p>
<p>August 1997: It is revealed that  2,000 drums of nuclear waste have been leaking over the past  30 years, again in Tokaimura.</p>
<p>July 1999: More than 80 tonnes of  primary cooling water leak in one of the country&#8217;s worst spills, in  western Japan.</p>
<p>September 30, 1999: Three workers  spark a critical reaction at the uranium reprocessing plant in  Tokaimura. Two of the workers die in the months after the accident,  which exposed 439 residents to radiation.</p>
<p>July 25, 2000: A nuclear reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, north of Tokyo, is shut down after a  suspected interior radioactive leak, the third closure in the area  after a big earthquake struck five days earlier.</p>
<p class="western">jit/ben</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__209_323964393"></a>31  octobre 2000 : Fukushima devrait être la première  centrale à utiliser du MOX</h2>
<p><strong>Fukushima  likely Japan&#8217;s 1st plant to use MOX fuel</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright Kyodo News International Inc. 2000</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Nov. 1 &#8211;</p>
<p>A <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> power  plant operated by Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) is likely to be  Japan&#8217;s first plant to use plutonium-uranium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel  in a new type of power generation, TEPCO sources said Tuesday.</p>
<p>TEPCO plans to use the fuel next  February in its No. 3 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 plant in  Okuma, some 200 kilometers northeast of Tokyo, as part of the  so-called &laquo;&nbsp;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; project, the sources said.</p>
<p>Pluthermal is a word coined to mean  the use of MOX fuel in a thermal reactor.</p>
<p>The fuel will be taken to the  24-year-old reactor during a regular check which will begin in  February, two months earlier than initially planned.</p>
<p>The central government issued a  safety certificate for the fuel, imported from Belgium, in August.</p>
<p>Details of the plan will possibly be  made public in town meetings planned to be jointly held by TEPCO and  the Ministry of International Trade and Ministry, which oversees nuclear-related business.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__211_323964393"></a>9  février 2001 : TEPCO persiste à vouloir construire de  nouveaux réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  Pres. Says to Continue Nuclear Plant Plans</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 2001</p>
<p>Tokyo, Feb. 9 (Jiji Press) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. will continue its nuclear power plant  construction projects despite its policy of limiting expansion of  power generating capacity, President Nobuya Minami said Friday.</p>
<p>nuclear plant projects will  not be affected by its plan to freeze power plant construction for  three to five years, Minami said.</p>
<p>His comments reversed remarks made by  Vice President Takeshi Taneichi, who announced the plan at a press  conference on Thursday. Taneichi said that nuclear as well as  thermal and hydroelectric power plants would be included in the plan.</p>
<p>Officials of the government of <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, where Tokyo Electric is planning to  build two nuclear reactors, expressed displeasure after the  plan for construction freeze was announced, citing the lack of  information from the company.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__213_323964393"></a>26  février 2001 : le gouverneur de Fukushima refuse d&#8217;autoriser  l&#8217;utilisation de MOX</h2>
<p><strong>Fukushima  governor rejects plutonium mixed oxide fuel for nuclear reactor.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Asia Pacific &#8211; Political</span></span></span></p>
<p>BBCAPP<strong>NGC</strong> BBC<strong>GC</strong> CTGBBC</p>
<p>(c) 2001  The British Broadcasting Corporation [date of publication]. All  Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced except with the  express permission of The British Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>Text of report in English by Japanese  news agency Kyodo</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong>, Japan, 26 February: <strong>Fukushima</strong> Governor Eisaku Sato told the prefectural assembly  on Monday [26 February] that the prefecture will not agree to the use  of uranium and plutonium mixed oxide fuel (Mox) at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 nuclear power plant.</p>
<p>Sato said, &laquo;&nbsp;It is unlikely Mox  fuel will be delivered and used for the time being.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Commenting on the governor&#8217;s  statement, Tokyo Electric Power Co (Tepco), which operates the power  plant, said the company &laquo;&nbsp;will conduct the plan with the  understanding of local residents.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Sato&#8217;s statement is likely to affect  Tepco&#8217;s plan to start using Mox fuel in the No 3 reactor of the nuclear power plant from April. This will also affect the  national policy on the nuclear fuel cycle.</p>
<p>Sato has maintained a cautious stance  on acceptance of Mox fuel, on the grounds that the people of the  prefecture are against it.</p>
<p>Tepco announced earlier this month it  had decided to suspend construction of new power plants for three to  five years.</p>
<p>After Tepco&#8217;s announcement, Sato said  it is necessary for the government to review its energy policy,  including the use of Mox fuel. &laquo;&nbsp;We have to take time for about a  year to decide what to do with it,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>Mox, a pelletized mixture of uranium  dioxide and plutonium dioxide, is designed to be burned in  light-water reactors in a practice known as plutonium thermal use.  Plutonium is obtained by reprocessing the spent nuclear fuel  from nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>Fast-breeder reactors were once  expected to carry the main thrust of Japan&#8217;s nuclear fuel  cycle policy. However, after the 1995 fire at the prototype  fast-breeder reactor Monju in Tsuruga, Fukui Prefecture, the  government placed the plutonium thermal use at the centre of the nuclear fuel cycle policy.</p>
<p>Tepco is also planning to start using  Mox fuel at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant in Niigata  Prefecture. Kansai Electric Power Co. intends to do the same at its  Takahama nuclear plant in Fukui Prefecture. Both plants are on  the coast of Sea of Japan.</p>
<p>Source: Kyodo News Service, Tokyo, in  English 0830 gmt 26 Feb 01.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__215_323964393"></a> 26 février 2001 : TEPCO annonce un gel de  ses constructions de nouveaux réacteurs.  Colère des collectivités locales</h2>
<p><strong>FOCUS:  TEPCO&#8217;s freeze plan draws anger, criticism.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p>JPES</p>
<p>Copyright 2001 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2001  Kyodo News International, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO, Feb. 21 Kyodo</p>
<p>When Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO)  announced earlier this month they were planning a three- to five-year  freeze on construction of new power facilities, they found themselves  on the receiving end of harsh criticism and anger from government  authorities.</p>
<p>The announcement came Feb. 8. TEPCO  said the freeze would affect 27 planned power generators at 12 power  plants, including four nuclear power reactors in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and Aomori prefectures.</p>
<p>The criticism from officials in  central and prefectural governments was fast and furious. For the  local authorities, the plants mean jobs and tax revenues. Tokyo,  meanwhile, believes the freeze could cause a serious disruption in  the government&#8217;s national energy and environmental policies.</p>
<p>In bid to at least partially calm  such fears, TEPCO President Nobuya Minami held an emergency news  conference a day after the announcement, in which he promised that  the four nuclear plants would go ahead as planned.</p>
<p>Much of the anger directed at TEPCO  has come from <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, the location of several of  the facilities which could be affected by the freeze.</p>
<p>After hearing the Feb. 8  announcement, prefectural officials responded with a threat of their  own. They hinted of a review over a TEPCO plan to start using  mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel in a reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear Power Plant in the prefecture. The MOX project,  scheduled to get under way from April, is not directly related to  TEPCO&#8217;s planned freeze.</p>
<p>The following week, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato accused the utility of creating &nbsp;&raquo;a situation that  not only flew in the face of the understanding of citizens of Japan  but also among people in the towns of Hirono and Futaba (in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture where more thermal and nuclear power plants have  been planned.)&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Tax revenue is a key concern for <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture. One of the facilities TEPCO is  considering putting on hold is Unit 5 at the Hirono power plant,  scheduled to go into operation from August 2002. Should the project  become stalled, the town office would stand to lose at least a  billion yen of tax revenue, forcing the town to revise its fiscal  planning.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s announcement came on the  backdrop of an energy market suffering from sluggish demand and  undergoing liberalization. Power companies saddled with excess  facilities may find it difficult to survive.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s freeze plan was not its  first. The utility took the same step last year for 17 power stations  at six plants.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;The talks on the (plants&#8217;)  postponement had a huge impact on the local areas concerned and the  discussions approached a limit,&nbsp;&raquo; a TEPCO spokesman said. &nbsp;&raquo;By using  a strong term like &#8216;freeze,&#8217; we wanted to make local people  appreciate the utility&#8217;s difficult situation.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>That strategy, however, appeared to  have backfired.</p>
<p>In Tokyo, meanwhile, central  government officials complain that news of TEPCO&#8217;s planned freeze  came as an unexpected shock.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;The announcement was different from  what they had been telling us, and it seemed to come right out of the  blue,&nbsp;&raquo; said a senior official of the Natural Resources and Energy  Agency at the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.</p>
<p>Every March, the agency coordinates  with power companies before drawing up the nation&#8217;s energy supply  plans for the next decade.</p>
<p>Another point of friction between  TEPCO and the central government is over the construction of a nuclear plant in the village of Higashi-dori in Aomori  Prefecture. TEPCO had wanted to put off its construction.</p>
<p>However, the power industry has  committed itself to cut its carbon dioxide output to 20% of 1990&#8242;s  level, on condition that it constructs an additional 13 nuclear power reactors.</p>
<p>The goal is in line with the fiscal  2010 target for Japan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>The ministry is backing the power  industry&#8217;s plan because a freeze on the Higashi-dori plant, scheduled  to go into operation from fiscal 2010, would have a huge impact on  the plan.</p>
<p>A freeze could even cause Japan to  lose face in the world community should it result in the country  failing to fulfill its commitment to cut the harmful gases.</p>
<p>Yet on the other hand, a TEPCO  executive said that going ahead with the plant would require large  amounts of funds, possibly leading to a &nbsp;&raquo;management crisis&nbsp;&raquo; at his  company.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__217_323964393"></a>26 mars  2001 : les anti-nuclaires déboutés de leurs poursuites  judiciaires visant à interdire l&#8217;usage du MOX</h2>
<p><strong>Court  dismisses civic groups&#8217; request to halt MOX fuel use.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p>JPES</p>
<p>Copyright 2001 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2001  Kyodo News International, Inc.</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, March 23  Kyodo</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> District Court  dismissed Friday a request by civic groups in Tokyo and <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture for a temporary injunction against the use of  plutonium-uranium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel at a Tokyo Electric Power  Co. (TEPCO) nuclear power plant in the prefecture.</p>
<p>Presiding Judge Hiroyasu Ikushima  said, &nbsp;&raquo;Checks on the fuel are reliable enough and there is no  question of malpractice with regard to the checks. There is no need  to consider the dangerousness of the fuel.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>A total of 864 people filed the  request, which asked the court to halt the use of MOX fuel at the No.  3 reactor of TEPCO&#8217;s No. 1 <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> power plant. They  argued that a report compiled by the company shows that checks  conducted by the Belgian maker of the fuel, Belgonucleaire, were  unreliable.</p>
<p>The civic groups questioned TEPCO&#8217;s  assertion that the Belgian maker found no defective products in  tests, saying such a result is statistically impossible. They added  that operating the reactor with defective MOX fuel pellets would pose  a serious risk.</p>
<p>The fuel was shipped to the reactor  in September 1999 to be used in TEPCO&#8217;s &nbsp;&raquo;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; nuclear power program.</p>
<p>However, in the same month it was  revealed that another fuel maker, British nuclear Fuels PLC,  had falsified data on a series of safety checks on MOX fuel shipped  to a Kansai Electric Power Co. nuclear plant in Fukui  Prefecture, casting doubt on TEPCO&#8217;s fuel.</p>
<p>TEPCO told the then Ministry of  International Trade and Industry in February last year that the  Belgian nuclear fuel manufacturer conducted proper  quality-control checks on the MOX fuel shipped to Japan, saying no  defective products were found in the tests.</p>
<p>Last month, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov.  Eisaku Sato announced the prefecture would not agree to the use of  MOX fuel at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant on  the grounds that <strong>Fukushima</strong> residents are against it.</p>
<p>Sato&#8217;s announcement is likely to  affect TEPCO&#8217;s plans to start using MOX fuel in the reactor in April  as well as Japan&#8217;s national policy on its nuclear fuel cycle.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__219_323964393"></a> 2 avril 2001 TEPCO reporte l&#8217;utilisation  du MOX dans ses centrales</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to delay use of MOX fuel at Fukushima nuclear plant.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p>JPES</p>
<p>Copyright 2001 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2001  Kyodo News International, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO, March 29 Kyodo</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) has  decided to postpone the launch of plutonium-uranium mixed oxide (MOX)  fuel at its nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, northeastern Japan because of opposition from the  governor, company sources said Thursday.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant was scheduled to become the first nuclear plant to  use MOX fuel in April. However, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato  said last month that the prefecture will not allow the use of MOX  fuel on the grounds that residents are against it.</p>
<p>MOX, a pellet mixture of uranium  dioxide and plutonium dioxide, is designed to be burned in  light-water reactors, a process known as plutonium thermal use.  Plutonium is obtained by reprocessing spent nuclear fuel from nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>Sato has said the government must  review its energy policy, including the use of MOX fuel.</p>
<p>TEPCO is also planning to start using  MOX fuel at its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant in Niigata  Prefecture, and Kansai Electric Power Co. intends to do the same at  its Takahama nuclear plant in Fukui. Both plants are on the  Sea of Japan.</p>
<p>The electric power industry plans to  carry out the &nbsp;&raquo;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; project, which uses MOX fuel in a  thermal reactor, at 16 to 18 reactors by 2010. Originally,  the project was scheduled to be launched in 1999.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__221_323964393"></a> 3 avril 2001 : un maire  demande des comptes au gouverneur de Fukushima qui a interdit l&#8217;usage  du MOX</h2>
<p><strong>Kashiwazaki mayor seeks Fukushima&#8217;s explanation of MOX use</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright Kyodo News International Inc. 2001</p>
<p>NIIGATA, Japan, April 3 &#8211;</p>
<p>The mayor of Kashiwazaki in Niigata  Prefecture, which hosts a nuclear power plant operated by  Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), demanded Tuesday that <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture explain its plan to reject the use of plutonium-uranium  mixed oxide (MOX) fuel at a TEPCO nuclear plant there.</p>
<p>Kashiwazaki Mayor Masazumi Saikawa  said <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato should provide a full  explanation as soon as possible of his plan not to allow the use of  MOX fuel, as it could affect state nuclear policy.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant was scheduled to become the first nuclear plant to use MOX fuel in Japan in April. However, Sato said in  February that the northeastern Japan prefecture will not allow MOX  use at the plant for the time being on the grounds that residents are  against it.</p>
<p>Sato&#8217;s rejection is also believed to  be connected with TEPCO&#8217;s announcement in early February to freeze  its plan to build new reactors at a thermal power plant in the town  of Hirono in the prefecture, which would result in loss of tax  revenues for the local municipality.</p>
<p>MOX fuel has already been shipped to  TEPCO&#8217;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant on the Sea of Japan, but Niigata  Prefecture is reluctant to host the nation&#8217;s first &laquo;&nbsp;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo;  process involving MOX fuel.</p>
<p>The process consists of using MOX  fuel &#8212; made by mixing uranium with plutonium chemically extracted  from spent nuclear fuel &#8212; in a thermal reactor.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;If <strong>Fukushima</strong> is calling  for a major change (in nuclear policy) without offering  sufficient explanation, we will be in trouble,&nbsp;&raquo; Saikawa said.</p>
<p>Saikawa also criticized Sato&#8217;s plan  of taking time to study a nuclear fuel cycle policy.</p>
<p>The electric power industry plans to  carry out the &laquo;&nbsp;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; project in 16 to 18 reactors by  2010. Originally, the project was scheduled to be launched in 1999.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__223_323964393"></a> 15 mai 2001 : arrêt planifié du réacteur n°6  après la découverte de fuites radioactives</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to close nuke reactor to check malfunction.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2001  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, May 15 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said on Tuesday it will shut down a 1.1  gigawatt (gW) nuclear reactor in northern Japan to check on a  higher-than-usual reading of iodine in the cooling water.</p>
<p>A TEPCO spokesman said a small amount  of radiation could have leaked inside the reactor, but that none had  escaped the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 power plant&#8217;s No 6 nuclear reactor.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We will manually shut down the  reactor from Wednesday to check the malfunction because there could  be a small hole in a pipe covering the fuel rods,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s largest power utility is  expected to suspend operations at the reactor for about 17 days, he  said.</p>
<p>Separately, TEPCO said it restarted  on Saturday operations at another nuclear reactor that had  been closed due to a technical problem in a unit that supplies water  to the reactor.</p>
<p>Japan has 51 commercial nuclear reactors, which provide about one-third of the nation&#8217;s power.</p>
<p>The industry has been criticised  after a series of accidents, including Japan&#8217;s worst-ever at a  uranium reprocessing plant in Tokaimura, north of Tokyo, in 1999 that  killed two workers.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__225_323964393"></a> 24 août 2001 : le METI ordonne la  vérification de 28 réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>Ministry to order inspection of 28 reactors after crack</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright  Kyodo News International Inc. 2001</p>
<p>TOKYO, Aug. 24 &#8211;</p>
<p>The Ministry of Economy, Trade and  Industry will order the inspection of 28 boiling water reactors used  to generate power by six companies in Japan, following the discovery  of a crack in a fuel unit of the reactor core at a power station in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture in early July, ministry sources said  Friday.</p>
<p>On July 6, nuclear safety  officials in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture announced the discovery of a  crack in a wall, called a shroud, that covers fuel within the No. 3  reactor of Tokyo Electric Power Co.&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini nuclear power station.</p>
<p>Following an investigation by Tokyo  Electric Power, the ministry&#8217;s nuclear safety division assumed  the damage is so-called stress corrosion cracking, common to all  boiling water reactors like one at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> power  station.</p>
<p>Since the reactor in question is made  of stainless metal considered resistant to such cracking, the  ministry&#8217;s nuclear safety officials believe the crack could  have been due to the way the shroud was manufactured and inspection  at other nuclear power stations is thus necessary.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power said despite the  crack, the shroud is still strong. But for extra safety, a step to  reinforce the shroud will be taken.</p>
<p>The six companies are Tokyo Electric  Power, Tohoku Electric Power Co., Chubu Electric Power Co., Hokuriku  Electric Power Co., Chugoku Electric Power Co. and Japan Atomic Power  Co.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__227_323964393"></a> 30 août 2001 : installation de quatre barres  de liaisons pour réparer une fissure sur  le réacteur 3</h2>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA  II-3 INSTALLS TIE RODS AFTER DEEP SHROUD CRACK CONFIRMED BY</strong> Mark Hibbs, Bonn; Ann MacLachlan, Paris</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>1</p>
<p>Vol. 42,  No. 35</p>
<p>(c) 2001  McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco) is  installing four tie rods at the top of the core shroud of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 BWR, as a preventive measure to address surface  stress corrosion cracking (SCC) which was confirmed in the shroud in  early July, company officials told Nucleonics Week Aug. 28.</p>
<p>Officials at the Ministry of Trade,  Economy, &amp; Industry (METI), Japan&#8217;s regulator, said that a deep  circumferential crack had been confirmed in the lower part of the  shroud but that metallurgical investigations indicated the crack is  not growing. The SCC was detected in the so-called H6A weld which  joins the bottom of the shroud with the core support piece (CSP),  officials said. H6A, a shop weld, had been machined, significantly  increasing its vulnerability to SCC, Japanese experts have concluded.</p>
<p>At Tepco, METI, and Japanese vendor  firms, the confirmation of SCC in the <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 shroud in  July prompted initial alarm because it was the first incidence of SCC  in Japan found in 316L, a low-carbon steel which Japanese utilities  had assured METI was immune from SCC, officials at METI said.</p>
<p>In reaction, METI has ordered  inspections of shrouds at all 27 other Japanese BWRs. Japanese  officials said that the next routinely scheduled refueling and  inspection outages into 2002 at all BWRs will be extended for between  several days and two weeks to inspect the shrouds for signs of SCC in  316L.</p>
<p>A Japanese safety expert said that in  the case of the new plants Kashiwazaki-6 and -7, and at BWRs whose  core shrouds were already replaced, either weld surfaces were  polished to attenuate surface stress or the shroud ring has no  welding line. Industry and experts therefore see a low probability of  SCC being found at those plants, he said.</p>
<p>At the remaining units, it&#8217;s hard to  predict the probability of cracks being found, this expert said,  because tests done to reproduce the <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 crack  indicate that crack initiation is highly dependent on machining  conditions. Those conditions could be different during fabrication of  shroud rings at each plant as well as for the individual plant  environment, he said, so the possibility of finding further SCC  &laquo;&nbsp;will be rather random.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Sources said Tepco knew about the  crack finding at <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 for at least a year prior to  involving METI regulators. &laquo;&nbsp;This was not a new development for Tepco  but it was considered to be very sensitive&nbsp;&raquo; because of the  implications for 316L, one industry source familiar with the case  said.</p>
<p>Replacement With 316L</p>
<p>Japanese officials said that Tepco  and regulators had until now believed that 316L would not be affected  by SCC. In shroud replacements, equipment made of 304SS and 304L&#8211;the  core shroud, top guide, core plate, the core spray pipe, and the jet  pumps&#8211;was all replaced with equipment made with 316L. Tepco began  making core shroud repairs at older <strong>Fukushima</strong> units in 1997  (NW, 30 July &#8217;98, 1).</p>
<p>A Japanese metallurgist said 316L is  a widely used stainless steel with maximum carbon of 0.03% and a high  nickel and molybdenum content. The alloy has been used in some nuclear applications because of its superior weldability, the  expert at Kobe Steel Co. said. &laquo;&nbsp;There shouldn&#8217;t be any corrosion  finds, but there may be in particular cases and SCC can&#8217;t be  excluded,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>METI officials said that, despite  previous blanket assertions by Japanese utilities that SCC would not  occur in 316L, a review of technical data during the last several  months has made clear that SCC is possible depending on variables  including flux, oxygenation, and electro-chemical potential (ECP).  &laquo;&nbsp;It&#8217;s true that 316 is generally superior, but if a crack is  initiated and tensile stress exists, it is also subject to SCC,&nbsp;&raquo; one  safety expert said.</p>
<p>Officials told Nucleonics Week that  Tepco and METI believe the root cause of the SCC in the H6A weld lies  in the machining done to smooth and finish its surface. They said  that action hardened the weld and substantially increased its  vulnerability to SCC. Because the weld&#8217;s treatment was exceptional,  Japanese officials said, further SCC in the shroud is not expected.</p>
<p>Tepco said four tie rods are being  installed, at 90-degree intervals, at the top of the shroud as a  preventive measure. Installation of four to 10 tie rods has been  standard practice in shroud repair or reinforcing in the U.S.,  experts said. Tepco officials said the backfit should be sufficient  for <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3, since studies indicate the crack is not  growing. The crack will continue to be monitored during inspections.</p>
<p>BWR experts said that while the <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 crack is the first confirmed in 316L in core  internals, there have been incidents of SCC found in 304L&#8211;likewise a  low-carbon steel&#8211;at several reactors in the last 15 years, including  Cofrentes in Spain and Chinshan in Taiwan. But they said that SCC has  been found in primary circuit piping, which is subject to different  SCC-related variables than the core shroud.</p>
<p>Industry sources familiar with the  Japanese BWR program said that, so far, Japanese utilities have been  slow to undertake prophylactic measures to increase the resistance of  core internals to SCC. BWR vendor General Electric has injected noble  chemicals to dramatically reduce ECP in primary circuit equipment at  about 30 U.S. BWRs, but in Japan the first application of noble  chemical injection, at Chubu Electric Power&#8217;s Hamaoka, is scheduled  in a few months.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the safety expert  stressed that the shroud cracking isn&#8217;t considered an urgent safety  issue because the shroud&#8217;s function is to maintain core structural  integrity during a loss-of-coolant accident, not to routinely ensure  system safety. He said that&#8217;s why METI suggested the inspections  could be done during scheduled outages.</p>
<p>The expert added that the repair at <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 &laquo;&nbsp;will be rather easy&nbsp;&raquo; because the crack is  located on the outside of the lower shroud ring, where tie rods are  easy to install. However, if SCC is found at a location that might  threaten a split between the top and bottom of the shroud, that  situation might pose a more difficult technical problem, he said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__229_323964393"></a> 1 novembre 2001 : arrêt  automatique du réacteur n°2 pour des raisons inconnues</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  TEPCO says reactor on automatic shutdown.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2001  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Nov 1 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc said a 1.1 gigawatt (gW) nuclear reactor, which was in the process of resuming operation after a  regular maintenance shutdown, halted operations automatically early  on Thursday.</p>
<p>TEPCO said there was no radiation  leak as a result of the incident at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 power  plant&#8217;s No. 2 reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture.</p>
<p>The company said had been in the  process of restarting the facility when operations were halted  automatically by equipment monitoring neutrons.</p>
<p>The cause of the shutdown, which took  place at 1:05 a.m. (1605 GMT Wednesday), was under investigation, the  company said.</p>
<p>TEPCO, Japan&#8217;s largest power company,  supplies electricity to Tokyo and the surrounding region.</p>
<p>nuclear power accounts for  about one-third of Japan&#8217;s electricity needs.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__231_323964393"></a>17 juin  2002 : la préfecture de Fukishima envisage d&#8217;augmenter la taxe  nucléaire à 13,5%</h2>
<p><strong>Fukushima  gov&#8217;t to propose nuclear fuel tax hike to 13.5%.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright  Kyodo News International Inc. 2002</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural  government decided Monday to propose a plan to raise nuclear fuel tax to 13.5% from the current 7%, prefectural officials said.</p>
<p>The government will propose a draft  to amend an ordinance to raise the tax Thursday at a prefectural  assembly session.</p>
<p>The proposal is expected to be  adopted at the assembly and enter into force on Nov. 10. The  prefectural government expects an increase in tax revenues of about 9  billion yen in the next five years.</p>
<p>The nuclear fuel tax is a  local tax imposed on operators of nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO),  which operates 10 nuclear power plants in the prefecture, will  ask the prefectural government to review the plan.</p>
<p>According to the amendment draft, the  taxation system will be changed into two separate systems. The ratio  of nuclear fuel tax will be raised to 10% of the fuel price  compared with the current 7%.</p>
<p>In addition, the government will  impose an additional tax on the weight of fuel at 6,000 yen per  kilogram. The combined effective tax rate will be 13.5%.</p>
<p>The prefectural government initially  sought a combined effective rate of 16.5%, the officials said.</p>
<p>However, the prefecture withdrew the  plan due to strong opposition from TEPCO, they said.</p>
<p>The nuclear fuel tax is to be  reviewed every five years.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__233_323964393"></a> 21 juin 2002 :  le ministre de l&#8217;Economie est  opposé à l&#8217;augmentation de la taxe nucléaire</h2>
<p><strong>Hiranuma  opposes Fukushima Pref. nuclear fuel tax plan.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2002  Kyodo News</p>
<p>Economy, Trade and Industry Minister  Takeo Hiranuma indicated Friday he is opposed to plans by <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture to increase the tax on nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We will have to cautiously  judge it from the standpoint of future energy and environment  policies,&nbsp;&raquo; Hiranuma said in a press conference.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Getting the taxpayer&#8217;s  understanding is another factor,&nbsp;&raquo; the minister said, referring  to Tokyo Electric Power Co., which operates two nuclear power  plants in the prefecture.</p>
<p>On Thursday, the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural government proposed to the prefectural assembly to raise  the tax on nuclear fuel paid by plant operators to 13.5% from  the current 7%, for a five-year period.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power has submitted a  petition urging the local government drop the plan, but the assembly  is expected to adopt and put it into force Nov. 10.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__235_323964393"></a>4  juillet 2002 : accord de l&#8217;assemblée préfectorale pour  la hausse de la taxe nucléaire</h2>
<p><strong>Fukushima  pref. panel OKs raise in nuclear fuel tax.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright  Kyodo News International Inc. 2002</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural  assembly&#8217;s committee on general affairs on Thursday approved a  proposal to raise the local tax on nuclear fuel, paving the  way for increasing the tax rate to 13.5% from the current 7%.</p>
<p>The full assembly is scheduled to  vote on the proposal on Friday.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO)  opposes the tax hike as it is the sole payer of the local tax. TEPCO  runs 10 nuclear reactors at its two power plants in the  prefecture.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural  government hopes that the tax increase will take effect Nov. 10  pending approval by the Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs,  Posts and Telecommunications.</p>
<p>The Japan Business Federation (Nippon  Keidanren) and the Federation of Electric Power Companies oppose the  proposed tax increase, saying it would lead to higher power bills and  undermine Japan&#8217;s industrial competitiveness.</p>
<p>The proposal calls for raising the  tax rate on nuclear fuel prices to 10% from 7% and introducing  a fresh charge of 6,000 yen per kilogram, resulting in an increase of  some 9 billion yen in tax revenues over the next five years.</p>
<p>The prefecture plans to raise the  weight-based charge to 11,000 yen per kilogram in the future.</p>
<p>At present, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture and 11 other prefectures impose the local tax on nuclear fuel.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__237_323964393"></a> 10 août 2002 : inquiétudes sur la  résistance des centrales en cas de tremblement de terre</h2>
<p><strong>FOCUS  &#8211; Concern over quake resistance of reactors rising.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright  Kyodo News International Inc. 2002</p>
<p>(EDS: THIS IS THE FOURTH OF FIVE NEWS  FOCUS STORIES ON THE nuclear POWER INDUSTRY) In August 1998,  when the public&#8217;s memory of the disastrous 1995 Great Hanshin  Earthquake was still fresh, Chugoku Electric Power Co. made public  that an 8-kilometer-long active fault had been confirmed near the  Shimane nuclear power station in the town of Kashima in  Shimane Prefecture.</p>
<p>Part of the fault is only 2.5  kilometers away from the station, but a Chugoku official issued a  safety declaration, saying, &laquo;&nbsp;Even if the fault moves, it&#8217;s  within an anticipated earthquake movement.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Chugoku had previously insisted that  no active fault existed at the place where it was discovered, but its  discovery in a fresh survey triggered a sense of crisis among  residents at the possibility of a major earthquake occurring there.</p>
<p>For the state, nuclear power  station operators and residents nearby, the earthquake resistance of  such stations is a major problem.</p>
<p>In October 2000, an earthquake rocked  western Shimane Prefecture where there is no active fault on the  surface. Its magnitude on the open-ended Richter scale was 7.3.</p>
<p>It has been said that a quake of more  than 6.5 magnitude can only occur where an active fault is seen on  the surface. The nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency says in  its earthquake resistance guideline that where there is no active  fault on the surface, the maximum anticipated quake magnitude is 6.5.</p>
<p>The quake in Shimane Prefecture  disproved this, sparking concern over the earthquake resistance of nuclear power stations built based on the committee&#8217;s  guideline.</p>
<p>The committee began drastically  reviewing its guideline last year for the first time in 20 years.  &laquo;&nbsp;The present guideline doesn&#8217;t include conceivable earthquakes,&nbsp;&raquo;  said Katsuhiko Ishibashi, a professor of state-run Kobe University.</p>
<p>Shigeo Mogi, an earthquake expert,  said, &laquo;&nbsp;Nobody knows what happens in a mammoth quake. It is  abnormal that the Hamaoka nuclear power station of Chubu  Electric Power Co. stands at a site which would most likely be shaken  a possible quake in the Tokai district in central Japan.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Emerging in the process of reviewing  the guideline is a proposal to evaluate the impact of a quake by the  probability of accidents involving damage to the nuclear core,  like that observed in the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear power  plant accident in the United States.</p>
<p>An estimate by the Japan Atomic  Energy Research Institute using the reactor No. 2 of Tokyo Electric  Power Co.&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> power plant as a model, the  likelihood of an earthquake occurring is once in every 10,000 years  and the probability of accidents occurring in a quake is once in  every 100,000 years.</p>
<p>The committee will finish reviewing  its guideline in 2004. Depending on its conclusion, reinforcement of  existing nuclear power stations may be inevitable, committee  sources said.</p>
<p>But the state and electric power  companies said nuclear power stations are safe enough, and no  major reinforcement work is needed.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__239_323964393"></a>22 août  2002 : fissures découvertes dans certaines canalisations</h2>
<p><strong>Cracks  Found in Pipes at Tokyo Electric N-Plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 2002</p>
<p>Tokyo, Aug. 22 (Jiji Press) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. said Thursday it has found cracks in some pipes at  a nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, northern  Japan.</p>
<p>But there will be no problem even if  the pipes accidentally burst, the company said.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power discovered  cracks on the surface of 36 pipes which supply or drain high-pressure  water to operate control rods in one of the plant&#8217;s reactors, during  a recent regular inspection.</p>
<p>The company will replace all of the  274 water-supplying pipes installed at the No. 3 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear plant, while further  investigating the cause of the cracks.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__241_323964393"></a> 29 août 2002 : TEPCO a dissimulé  plusieurs accidents nucléaires depuis les années 80</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  Didn&#8217;t Report Past Nuclear Plant Troubles &#8211; Kyodo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(Copyright (c) 2002, Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.)</p>
<p>TOKYO -(Dow Jones)- Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (J.TER or 9501) didn&#8217;t inform the government about problems  at its nuclear power plants from the late 1980s to the 1990s  in Japan, Kyodo News reported Thursday.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power, commonly known  as TEPCO, will brief on this matter at 1000 GMT in Tokyo. The TEPCO  president and vice presidents will attend the press conference.</p>
<p>The problems included cracks at power  plants in Kashiwazaki-Kariwa and <strong>Fukushima</strong> in northern Japan,  Kyodo reported.</p>
<pre class="western">   -Tokyo Bureau, Dow Jones Newswires; 813-5255-2929</pre>
<p>A government affiliate for nuclear plant safety said TEPCO had  allegedly improperly stated 29 cases of trouble on its inspection and  maintenance record at three nuclear power plants, Kyodo  reported.</p>
<p>The unconfirmed report comes at a  time when a series of corporate scandals have sparked public anger  and raised questions about corporate ethics and product safety in  Japan.</p>
<p>Embroiled in a beef-mislabeling  scandal, Nippon Meat Packers Inc. (J.NMP or 2282) admitted earlier  this month its unit mislabeled beef to receive subsidies under a  government-run beef buyback scheme aimed at helping businesses which  were affected by the mad cow disease outbreak in Japan last year.</p>
<pre class="western">   -Tokyo Bureau, Dow Jones Newswires; 813-5255-2929</pre>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__243_323964393"></a> 30 août 2002 : les falsifications de TEPCO  remettent en question la sécurité nucléaire</h2>
<p><strong>ANALYSIS:  Tepco Scandal Questions Nuclear Safety Measures</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nikkei  Report</span></span></span></p>
<p>NKRP</p>
<p>(c)  2002 Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Nikkei)&#8211;Tokyo Electric Power  Co.&#8217;s (9501) falsification of nuclear power plant inspection  records is casting doubt over Japan&#8217;s nuclear safety measures.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s largest power utility and its  subcontractor allegedly failed to correctly report cracks detected at nuclear power plants in Niigata and <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectures from the late 1980s to early 1990s. An investigation into  the matter is now underway.</p>
<p>The scandal has raised questions  about the risks of leaving power companies in charge of safety  measures. If concerns are not quelled, it could adversely affect  Japan&#8217;s nuclear energy policy, critics warn.</p>
<p>nuclear power plants are  inspected regularly every 13 months. During that time, nuclear reactors are shut down for a month or two to check equipment and  piping for irregularities. Experts from the nuclear and  Industrial Safety Agency are on-site for the inspection of the  emergency core cooler system and other critical equipment. But  shrouds and jet pumps, equipment where Tepco found problems, are  checked by the power companies, which are required to report only  major problems to the agency.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Many power companies leave the  safety checking to subcontractors and manufacturers, and have little  knowledge of the inspections themselves,&nbsp;&raquo; said a technology  critic.</p>
<p>Tepco had also asked General Electric  International Inc., the Japan unit of General Electric Co. of the  U.S., to conduct the tests.</p>
<p>An insider, reportedly a former GE  employee, informed the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI)  about the false reporting in July 2000. Tepco President Nobuya Minami  knew about this but did not conduct a full-scale investigation since  then.</p>
<p>Minami said he realized the  seriousness of the situation for the first time this March, when GE&#8217;s  top officials approached him about launching a joint investigation.</p>
<p>Tepco had outsourced most of its core  reactor inspections to GE, which boasts the world&#8217;s best technology  for detecting cracks in core-reactor-related parts. But Tepco  employees were also present when GE workers inspected the reactors,  insiders familiar with the matter say. On-site Tepco workers may have  failed to report the cracks to top officials after judging that they  were insignificant, critics said.</p>
<p>In May, Tepco set up an in-house  investigation team, which has been interviewing employees. But the  team noted, &laquo;&nbsp;We do not know the details, including whether Tepco  or GE falsified data.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Critics are also expected to question  whether the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency and other  regulators took enough action to prevent such mishaps. About two  years have passed since the incident was first reported. METI  launched an inquiry into Tepco soon after the issue came to light,  but Tepco&#8217;s delayed response has made it difficult to confirm the  facts of the case.</p>
<p>A pipe rupture at Chubu Electric  Power Co.&#8217;s (9502) nuclear reactor at a power plant in  Hamaoka, Shizuoka Prefecture, last November also involved a pipe that  was only required to be voluntarily tested by power companies.</p>
<p>(The Nihon Keizai Shimbun Friday  morning edition)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__245_323964393"></a> 31 août 2002 : certaines fuites ont été  négligées par des employés de TEPCO</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  employees apparently took reactor flaws lightly.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>Copyright  Kyodo News International Inc. 2002</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. employees  may not have taken cracks found at its nuclear facilities  seriously enough during inspections, sources familiar with the case  said Saturday.</p>
<p>The employees apparently thought  there was no need to mend the damage and did not report the problem,  basing their judgment on similar cases abroad that had not been  considered to pose a danger, the sources said.</p>
<p>TEPCO is suspected of concealing  damage in 29 cases at three nuclear power plants found during  the 1980s and 1990s.</p>
<p>The most serious type of damage found  were cracks in nuclear reactor shrouds. The other cases are  not considered to pose safety risks.</p>
<p>Cracks are usually caused by decay  and stress. A number of them have been reported in the United States  and Europe since the 1990s.</p>
<p>Cracked shrouds are usually replaced  in Japan. But in the U.S. and Europe they are often mended, or left  alone if the damage is not considered dangerous, the sources said.</p>
<p>In Japan, the first such crack was  first found in 1994 at the No. 2 reactor of TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant located in northeastern Japan, they  said.</p>
<p>The nuclear and Industrial  Safety Agency at the Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry plans to  investigate the suspected cover-up when it begins inspecting the  three TEPCO plants on Monday.</p>
<p>They are <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 and  No. 2 plants and the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa facility &#8211; one of the world&#8217;s  largest nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>TEPCO and its subcontractor may have  acted illegally in their alleged failure to report the damage,  according to the agency. The Japanese utility had outsourced  inspections to General Electric International Inc., the Japan unit of  General Electric Co. of the U.S.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__247_323964393"></a>2  septembre 2002 : nouvelles révélations sur les  falsifications de TEPCO</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  hit by new allegations.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Daily  Yomiuri</span></span></span></p>
<p>YOMSHI</p>
<p>1</p>
<p>(c) 2002  The Daily Yomiuri All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO),  which was found to have falsified records of inspections at its nuclear power plants, also concealed faults found in  government-ordered inspections, sources said Saturday.</p>
<p>Since last year, the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency has ordered electric power firms to  carry out inspections, yet TEPCO avoiding inspecting welded sections  of core shrouds on which cracks had been found but concealed.</p>
<p>TEPCO later told the agency that no  faults were detected with the core shrouds, the sources said.</p>
<p>The agency plans to question TEPCO  officials as it suspects the company intentionally excluded the  damaged parts from the inspection so it would not have to replace or  repair them.</p>
<p>During the latter half of the 1980s  and the 1990s, TEPCO entrusted inspections of its nuclear power plants to General Electric International Inc. (GEII).</p>
<p>Though GEII found cracks on welded  sections of the core shrouds, TEPCO altered the inspection records to  hide the problem. GEII&#8217;s inspection found a total of 35 cracks in  eight locations at five nuclear power reactors in three power  plants, but the plants continued their operations without the  sections being repaired or replaced.</p>
<p>The reactors included the No. 4  reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture; the Nos. 2, 3 and 4 reactors of <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant; and the No. 1  reactor of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in Niigata  Prefecture.</p>
<p>TEPCO eventually reported the most  serious case, a 1.4-meter-long crack in the No. 3 reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 plant, to the agency in July last year, saying  that the firm had found it during its voluntary inspection that  month.</p>
<p>After receiving the report, the  agency instructed electric power companies with nuclear power  plants to inspect core shrouds in September last year.</p>
<p>The agency gave the order because it  feared similar cracks might have occurred on identical nuclear reactors and that they might lead to safety problems.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__249_323964393"></a> 2 septembre 2002 : arrêt  prévu de quatre réacteurs utilisant des pièces  endommagées</h2>
<p><strong>Tokyo  Electric to Halt 4 N-Reactors in Fukushima.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Organisation  of Asia-Pacific News Agencies</span></span></span></p>
<p>OANA</p>
<p>©  Copyright 2002. OANA. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo, Sept. 2 (Jiji Press)-Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (9501) decided Monday to halt operations at four nuclear reactors suspected of using cracked equipment in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, northeastern Japan, by the end of the  week to conduct emergency inspections.</p>
<p>The four reactors belong to the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 and No. 2 nuclear plants.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power has already  decided to suspend operations at a nuclear reactor of the  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in Niigata Prefecture, central Japan, which  is also seen to have cracks left unrepaired in its equipment called  shrouds for separating the flow of water within reactors.</p>
<p>The company, hit by a data  falsification scandal over the condition of the plants, will later in  the day announce the timing of the suspensions at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> and Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plants.</p>
<p>The Agency for nuclear and  Industrial Safety, under the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry,  has said that there would be no safety problems even if operations at  the nuclear reactors were not stopped immediately.</p>
<p>Concern over their safety heightened  in local communities, however, and Tokyo Electric Power decided to  suspend operations following calls for emergency checks.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__251_323964393"></a> 2 septembre 2002 : les réacteurs suspects  continueront à fonctionner</h2>
<p><strong>Seven  damaged nuclear reactors to operate uninterrupted.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Asia Pacific &#8211; Political</span></span></span></p>
<p>(c)  2002 The British Broadcasting Corporation [date of publication]. All  Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced except with the  express permission of The British Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>Text of report in English by Japanese  news agency Kyodo</p>
<p>Tokyo, 2 September: Seven of the  eight nuclear reactors that allegedly have cracks on their  shrouds will continue operations until next year without a halt,  officials of their operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), said  Sunday [1 September].</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Even though there are cracks in  the shrouds, the damage won&#8217;t have an immediate effect on the safety  of the reactors,&nbsp;&raquo; a TEPCO official said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;There exists no safety problem  even in the worst-case scenario,&nbsp;&raquo; an official of the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said, expressing the agency&#8217;s intention  to allow TEPCO to continue to operate them uninterrupted.</p>
<p>Under the TEPCO plan, one reactor  suspected of having cracked shrouds will keep operating without being  stopped for safety checks for more that a year from now, the company  officials said.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s plan, however, is certain to  heighten calls among local residents and politicians for an early  halt to the problem reactors so inspections can be conducted.</p>
<p>In a move apparently taken to ease  concerns over the safety of the reactors that allegedly have cracked  shrouds, TEPCO said Sunday it will move up regular checks on the No 1  reactor at TEPCO&#8217;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant on  the Sea of Japan coast by several weeks. The process to halt the  reactor is expected to begin as early as Monday.</p>
<p>nuclear reactors must be  inspected at least every 13 months under the Electric Utility Law.  Most reactors keep operating uninterrupted until the end of the 13th  month into their full operations. With nuclear safety agency  approval, a reactor can continue operations for up to one month more.</p>
<p>Of the eight reactors allegedly with  cracks on their shrouds, the No 2 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant in northeastern Japan resumed full operations on 2 August and  is expected to operate uninterrupted until next summer.</p>
<p>The plant&#8217;s No 6 reactor is  test-operating and is in the final phase of its regular inspections.  If it resumes full-fledged operations as scheduled, it will not be  halted until autumn 2003.</p>
<p>Except for the No 1 reactor at the  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant, which will undergo a regular check this  month, the five remaining reactors in question will reach their 13th  month of uninterrupted operations between January and June 2003.</p>
<p>The nuclear safety agency has  said that it is up to TEPCO to decide whether to stop the reactors in  question for early inspections.</p>
<p>In the alleged cover-up case that is  quickly developing into a major scandal for the country&#8217;s largest  power producer, TEPCO is suspected of concealing damage in 29 cases  found at three nuclear power plants during the 1980s and  1990s.</p>
<p>TEPCO sources have said that company  employees apparently saw no need to repair the cracks found at its nuclear facilities and failed to report the problem during  inspections. The failure to report was based on the understanding  that similar cases abroad had not been considered to pose a danger,  the sources added.</p>
<p>The most serious damage found was  cracks in nuclear reactor shrouds, important non-fuel parts of  the reactor.</p>
<p>Caused by decay and stress, cracked  shrouds in nuclear reactors are normally subject to  replacement in this country, but in the United States and Europe they  are often mended, or left alone if the damage is not considered  serious.</p>
<p>Sources said the nuclear safety agency intends to investigate TEPCO&#8217;s alleged cover-up on  Monday, suspecting the firm and its subcontractor, General Electric  International Inc., may have acted illegally in not reporting the  damage. The subcontractor is the Japan unit of General Electric Co.  of the United States.</p>
<p>TEPCO sources have said the company&#8217;s  president and its chairman have expressed their intentions to resign  over the scandal.</p>
<p>Source: Kyodo News Service, Tokyo, in  English 2135 gmt 1 Sep 02.</p>
<p>The Ministry of Economy, Trade and  Industry&#8217;s nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said Thursday  it has found evidence of false records regarding cracks at Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) nuclear plants from the late 1980s  to early 1990s.</p>
<p>An inspection is under way into  Japan&#8217;s largest power utility and its subcontractor over alleged  failure to correctly report cracks detected at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant in Niigata Prefecture, and the No. 1 and No. 2 <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, it  said.</p>
<p>Speaking to reporters at his office,  Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi criticized TEPCO, saying, &nbsp;&raquo;I  haven&#8217;t received any report yet, but wrongdoing is bad.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>TEPCO has submitted a list of 29  allegedly incorrect records on cracks or signs of cracks in various  devices in the core structures of 13 reactors at the plants, which  could constitute a breach of the law governing electric power  companies, agency officials said.</p>
<p>There are also concerns that eight  reactors may still have cracked devices not replaced or fully  repaired, though the agency believes they would have no serious  impact on the safety of the reactors, the officials said.</p>
<p>TEPCO President Nobuya Minami  apologized and said in a press conference that the incident will deal  a further blow to its plan to introduce uranium-plutonium mixed oxide  (MOX) fuel at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;I don&#8217;t think now we can implement  the plan as we had aimed for,&nbsp;&raquo; Minami said. The fuel&#8217;s debut in  Japan has been delayed in part as Kariwa residents rejected it in a  referendum in May last year.</p>
<p>Niigata Gov. Ikuo Hirayama called the  alleged false records an &nbsp;&raquo;abominable act&nbsp;&raquo; and said the prefectural  government will refuse the MOX plan for the time being.</p>
<p>Kashiwazaki Mayor Masazumi Saikawa  said, &nbsp;&raquo;It is an extremely serious problem of corporate attitude if a  power company, which must take utmost care in safety, was failing to  disclose the facts correctly.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Holding an emergency news conference  in the city of <strong>Fukushima, Fukushima</strong> Deputy Gov. Akira Kawate  said the incident is grave enough to prompt the prefectural  government to make a &nbsp;&raquo;fatal decision&nbsp;&raquo; as a host of nuclear plants, although he did not elaborate.</p>
<p>Power utilities are required to check  the devices concerned themselves and report results to the government  agency. The agency does not directly inspect such devices because  they are considered unrelated to the safety of the plants, the  officials said.</p>
<p>TEPCO had outsourced checks to  General Electric International Inc. (GEII), the Japan unit of General  Electric Co. (GE) of the United States. It is not yet known whether  TEPCO or GEII is to blame for the incorrect reporting, they said.</p>
<p>GE said in a statement it will  closely cooperate with METI and TEPCO over the situation.</p>
<p>The agency plans to conduct on-site  inspections at TEPCO, and require the power company to set up  extensive preventive measures, the officials said.</p>
<p>It will also ask other power firms to  make sure that they have not engaged in similar false reporting, they  said.</p>
<p>The agency&#8217;s inspection was prompted  by insider information obtained in July 2000. It revealed the matter  before reaching a conclusion because both TEPCO and GEII have  conceded possible involvement, the officials said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__253_323964393"></a> 3 septembre 2002 : arrêt du réacteur  n°2 en raison d&#8217;une fuite radioactive.</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Manually Shuts 1,100-MW Reactor; No Leakage Outside</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>(Copyright  (c) 2002, Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.)</p>
<p>TOKYO -(Dow Jones)- Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (J.TER or 9501), or Tepco, said Tuesday it manually shut  its 1,100-megawatt nuclear reactor in northern Japan Monday  night after a monitor warned of a radiation leak from an exhaust  pipe.</p>
<p>A very small quantity of radiation  may have leaked, but there was no leakage outside the plant, Tepco  said.</p>
<p>The company decided to close the No.  2 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini nuclear power station  to inspect the cause of the trouble.</p>
<p>Tepco, the largest Japanese power  company, has been hit by a scandal over the falsification of safety  records on nuclear reactors from late 1980s to 1990s.</p>
<p>Both the government and Tepco have  said that the reactors with falsified records are operating safely.  But the incident severely undermined public trust for the country&#8217;s nuclear policy.</p>
<p>To take responsibility of the  scandal, Tepco President Nobuya Minami, Chairman Hiroshi Araki and  two advisors will resign by mid-October.</p>
<p>Monday, the company announced that it  will shut down five of the company&#8217;s 17 reactors, including the No. 2  reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini, from September to October for  safety inspections.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__255_323964393"></a> 4 septembre 2002 : fuite de gaz radioactif : cent  fois la dose normale</h2>
<p><strong>Radiation  100 times normal in Japanese N-plant. BY</strong> By Stephen Lunn *  Tokyo correspondent.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Australian</span></span></span></p>
<p>AUSTLN</p>
<p>9</p>
<p>(c) 2002  Nationwide News Proprietary Ltd</p>
<p>RADIATION levels 100 times the normal  level were found late on Monday in steam inside the Japanese nuclear power plant where inspectors last week discovered the owners had  falsified safety records and failed to repair cracks in nuclear reactors.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Company said the  new leak and the records scandal were unrelated, but admitted higher  than normal levels of radiation were detected in the exhaust from the nuclear power station.</p>
<p>The leak, which Tepco said did not  affect the atmosphere outside the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 2 plant,  reportedly originated from a small hole in a tube containing nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>This allowed the radiation to leak  into the coolant water, causing the high radiation levels.</p>
<p>News of the leak, which further  heightened public anxiety over the safety of the nation&#8217;s nuclear program, came as company president Nobuya Minami, chairman Hiroshi  Araki and three other senior officials pledged to resign and take  responsibility for the systematic cover-up of damage at three of the  company&#8217;s plants, which it is estimated could have involved up to 100  employees.</p>
<p>The Government&#8217;s nuclear inspection agency last week found Tepco had falsified reports,  including one on a crack in the shroud (stainless steel that  surrounds the reactor&#8217;s core) of the 1.1 million kilowatt  boiling-water reactor in the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 2 plant, and  continued operating without mending the crack.</p>
<p>The company originally planned to  scale down operations and inspect the shroud in October, but will now  conduct a full inspection immediately as the plant is shutting down.  Another four plants will also be shut down soon.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Our internal probe so far  leaves us with no doubt our employees were indeed involved in the  cover-ups,&nbsp;&raquo; Mr Minami said, admitting the deception could have  been occurring for more than 15 years.</p>
<p>Tepco shares, long considered some of  the most bullet-proof stocks in Japan, given the company monopolises  supply in parts of the country, lost another 1 per cent yesterday.</p>
<p>The shares are now 6 per cent lower  than before the scandal was revealed late last week.</p>
<p>nuclear energy accounts for  about one-third of Japan&#8217;s electricity supply.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__257_323964393"></a>4  septembre 2002 : TEPCO gèle la construction de quatre nouveaux  réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to Freeze Construction of 4 Nuclear Reactors.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 2002</p>
<p>Tokyo, Sept. 4 (Jiji Press) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. has decided to suspend, at least for the time  being, a plan to build four nuclear reactors in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and Aomori Prefectures, both northeastern Japan, sources familiar  with the matter told Jiji Press Wednesday.</p>
<p>As a result, Tokyo Electric has now  frozen all its major nuclear power-related projects, including  &laquo;&nbsp;plu-thermal&nbsp;&raquo; nuclear fuel recycling projects in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and Niigata Prefectures, central Japan.</p>
<p>According to the sources, Tokyo  Electric, upon obtaining local consent by the end of the current  fiscal year to March 2003, had intended to begin construction of two  reactors at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant and two others at the Aomori  plant as part of Japan&#8217;s national electricity development program.</p>
<p>But the company decided that local  understanding of constructing the 1.38-million-kilowatt reactors, the  largest in Japan, is unlikely to be forthcoming, in the wake of  recent revelations of falsified inspection and repair records at its  existing reactors.</p>
<p>If the freeze is prolonged, it could  affect Tokyo Electric&#8217;s power supply plans for the future, and even  force the Japanese government to alter its energy policy, the sources  said.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric issued a statement  denying the freeze plan. No such decision has been made, it said.</p>
<p>Operations of the new reactors were  slated to begin from around fiscal 2008 to 2010.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__259_323964393"></a>6  septembre 2002 : TEPCO a camouflé des fissures importantes  pendant quatre ans</h2>
<p><strong>&#8216;TEPCO  hid major crack for 4 years&#8217;.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Daily  Yomiuri</span></span></span></p>
<p>YOMSHI</p>
<p>2</p>
<p>(c) 2002  The Daily Yomiuri All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO),  under a cloud for falsifying inspection records of its nuclear power plants, hid a serious crack in one of its reactors, did not  repair it for years and failed to tell other operators of the risk of  cracks developing in similar reactors, the nuclear and  Industrial Safety Agency has found.</p>
<p>The crack was one of several found in  TEPCO&#8217;s No. 3 reactor in its No. 2 <strong>Fukushima Nuclear</strong> Power  Plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture around 1997, agency officials  said, adding that the cracks were not fixed until July 2001. The No.  3 reactor began operation in 1985.</p>
<p>All this time, the reactor continued  operation, the officials said.</p>
<p>They said, &laquo;&nbsp;The chance the  cracks could have caused a serious accident may have been small, but  this is the most flagrant case in a string of inspection record  falsifications.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>The agency probably will search TEPCO  headquarters Friday on the suspicion company executives were involved  in the alleged falsification of records.</p>
<p>During the latter half of the 1980s  and into the 1990s, inspections of TEPCO&#8217;s plants, including <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.2, were conducted by General Electric  International Inc. (GEII).</p>
<p>GEII inspectors found the cracks in  the No. 3 reactor around 1997 and reported them to TEPCO, the  officials said.</p>
<p>GEII found cracks in four out of  seven welded sections of the core shroud, with one crack having  expanded to cover the entire reactor core, which has a circumference  of about 20 meters, the officials said.</p>
<p>Core shrouds are in direct contact  with nuclear fuel, and cracked shrouds must be immediately  checked for durability, the officials said, but the No. 3 reactor was  kept in operation for the next four years.</p>
<p>The core shroud was made of stainless  steel, which is more crack-resistant than other materials. &laquo;&nbsp;TEPCO  should have made safety checks as soon as GEII pointed out the  cracks, and it should have informed other operators that stainless  steel core shrouds can develop cracks,&nbsp;&raquo; the officials said.</p>
<p>TEPCO eventually reported the most  serious case to the agency in July last year, claiming it had been  found in a voluntary inspection conducted that month, the agency  said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__261_323964393"></a> 13 septembre 2002 : TEPCO a falsifié des  enregistrements vidéo</h2>
<p><strong>Govt  Probe Finds Tepco Ordered Falsification Of Videotaped Inspection</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nikkei  Report</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">NKRP</p>
<p>(c)  2002 Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Nikkei)&#8211;Tokyo Electric Power  Co. (9501) in 1989 instructed General Electric International Inc. to  falsify a videotaped inspection record of its power plants, according  to documents submitted to a government panel Friday by the nuclear and Industry Safety Agency.</p>
<p>The panel, which is overseeing the  agency&#8217;s investigation of Tepco&#8217;s falsification of power plant  inspection data, met for the first time on Friday. The agency  presented the committee with evidence discovered through its  investigation so far.</p>
<p>According to the documents, the  Japanese unit of General Electric Co., to which Tepco outsourced  inspections of its power plants, found six cracks in a steam dryer  when it inspected the No. 1 reactor at a Tepco nuclear power  plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture. But while making a videotape to  report the cracks to the then Ministry of International Trade and  Industry, it was instructed by Tepco to edit out the part showing the  cracks because the utility feared it would have to replace the steam  dryer.</p>
<p>(The Nihon Keizai Shimbun Friday  evening edition)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__263_323964393"></a> 16 septembre 2002 :  TEPCO a utilisé des pièces non autorisées dans  un réacteur</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  used unauthorized bolts in reactor.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">JPES</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">0</p>
<p>Copyright 2002 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2002  Kyodo News International, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept. 10 Kyodo</p>
<p>An panel set up by Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (TEPCO) to investigate the company&#8217;s cover-up of nuclear reactor faults has found unauthorized bolts were used to repair a  reactor of its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 plant, company sources said  Tuesday.</p>
<p>The bolts were used to secure the  cover of a manhole of the plant&#8217;s No. 5 reactor, the sources said.  The manhole is used to access the pressurized container and is  located just below the reactor&#8217;s shroud.</p>
<p>During a regular check, it was found  that some of the bolts used for the cover were loose. Engineers tried  to screw them tight, but the threads were so worn the bolts needed to  be replaced, according to the investigation.</p>
<p>The engineers finally used new bolts  not certified by the government, and Tokyo Electric Power failed to  report the repair to the government, the sources said.</p>
<p>The repair of the manhole cover is  mentioned in a list of 29 possibly falsified inspection reports Tokyo  Electric Power submitted to the nuclear and Industry Safety  Agency last month, the sources said.</p>
<p>The utility claims the use of the  unauthorized bolts does not affect the safety of the reactor, the  sources said.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power has 17 reactors  in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and Niigata prefectures. It has suspended the  operation of two of them in connection with the falsification of  inspection reports, and three other reactors will be temporarily shut  down toward late October.</p>
<p>The company could be ordered to  suspend the operation of the No. 5 reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 plant if further investigation shows the bolts in question pose  a safety problem.</p>
<p>The sources quoted a company official  as saying additional suspension of its reactors would likely deal a  serious blow to the utility&#8217;s ability to supply power.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__265_323964393"></a> 26 septembre 2002 :  nombreuses fissures découvertes sur le réacteur n°3</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Reports Numerous Cracks In Pipes At Fukushima Nuke Plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nikkei  Report</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">NKRP</p>
<p>(c)  2002 Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Nikkei)&#8211;Tokyo Electric Power  Co. (Tepco) (9501) reported Wednesday that it found cracks in 242 out  of a total of 282 stainless steel pipes that send water into the  control rods of the No. 3 reactor of its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 plant  in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture. Complete breaks had occurred in three  of these pipes.</p>
<p>These pipes are used to insert  control rods, which regulate nuclear reaction, into the  reactor core through water pressure. The pipes serve as a safeguard  for the reactor, preventing it from running out of control.</p>
<p>The cracks could eventually result in  breaks that lead to water leaks and loss of water pressure.</p>
<p>Tepco reports, however, that there is  no danger of water leaks or radiation leaks.</p>
<p>The company also reports that another  system will take over if water pressure is lost. &laquo;&nbsp;When there is  no water pressure, there is a mechanism to automatically insert the  control rods into the reactor. So, there is no danger,&nbsp;&raquo; company  officials said.</p>
<p>But given that close to 90% of the  pipes had cracks, Tepco plans to fully replace the pipes in reactor  No. 3&#8242;s system and to inspect other reactors. The company also plans  to revamp its method for inspecting the pipes.</p>
<p>(The Nihon Keizai Shimbun Thursday  morning edition)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__267_323964393"></a> 30 septembre 2002 : le  gouverneur de Fukushima retire son accord pour l&#8217;utilisation de  plutonium</h2>
<p><strong>Fukushima  scraps &#8216;pluthermal&#8217; project plan over scandal.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">JPES</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">0</p>
<p>Copyright 2002 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2002  Kyodo News International, Inc.</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Sept. 26  Kyodo</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato  said Thursday he has withdrawn his approval of a Tokyo Electric Power  Co. (TEPCO) &nbsp;&raquo;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; power-generation project in the prefecture  because of the power company&#8217;s cover-up of nuclear reactor  faults.</p>
<p>Speaking at a prefectural assembly  session, Sato said conditions for the prior consent to go ahead with  the project &nbsp;&raquo;have all disappeared and (the plan), in my view, has  been withdrawn.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>The prefectural government in 1998  decided to allow the pluthermal project at TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant after holding consultations with the  mayors of the towns of Futaba and Okuma where the plant is located.</p>
<p>The pluthermal project involves  burning mixed oxide fuel (MOX) in light-water reactors. MOX is made  of uranium and plutonium extracted from spent nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>TEPCO has admitted covering up faults  found at reactors in the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in Niigata  Prefecture and <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 and No. 2 plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture from the late 1980s to 1990s.</p>
<p>On Sept. 12, Niigata Gov. Ikuo  Hirayama said the prefecture would revoke its initial decision in  1999 to allow TEPCO to proceed with a pluthermal project because of  the cover-up scandal.</p>
<p>The rejection by two prefectures of  the pluthermal project deals a heavy blow to the government&#8217;s plans  to use plutonium recovered from spent nuclear fuel for power  generation.</p>
<p>Since the TEPCO scandal came to  light, two other power companies, Tohoku Electric Power Co. in  northeastern Japan and Chubu Electric Power Co. in central Japan,  have revealed finding multiple cracks in reactor parts.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__269_323964393"></a> 4 octobre 2002 : de nouvelles  fissures  découvertes sur le réacteur n°2</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  &#8211; Further Cracks Reported at TEPCO Reactors BY</strong> Mike Hurle</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">WMRC  Daily Analysis</span></span></span></p>
<p>WDAN</p>
<p>Copyright 2002, World Markets Research Centre Limited. All Rights  Reserved</p>
<p>The Tokyo Electric Power Company has  revealed evidence of a further five cracks at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 nuclear reactor. The news follows a series of revelations over  the last month including falsification of safety inspection documents  over a period dating back to the 1980s (see Japan: 2 September 2002:  Reporting Scandal Forces Resignation of TEPCO Executives and Japan: 1  October 2002: More False Documents Surface at TEPCO). TEPCO has been  forced to close several reactors, leaving it more reliant on thermal  power plants to meet electricity demand (see Japan: 13 September  2002: TEPCO Reopens Thermal Plant to Cover nuclear Shortfall).</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__271_323964393"></a> 11 octobre 2002 : un cinquième réacteur  va être arrêté pour rechercher d&#8217;éventuelles  fissures</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to shut fifth reactor for safety checks.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2002  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Oct 11 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) said on Friday it will shut down a nuclear reactor suspected of having a crack in its shroud for  an unplanned safety check this weekend.</p>
<p>The closure on October 13 of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear plant in northern Japan would  be the fifth unplanned shutdown of a reactor by Japan&#8217;s biggest power  utility.</p>
<p>The unplanned closures of the five  reactors follows revelations the company had falsified records on nuclear plant safety checks.</p>
<p>Three other nuclear reactors  have also been shut down, but those closures were for regular  maintenance checks.</p>
<p>The combined capacity of the eight  reactors is about eight million kilowatts, or about 13 percent of  TEPCO&#8217;s total output capacity.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s shares rose five yen, or 0.22  percent, to 2,245 yen on Friday, while the benchmark Nikkei stock  average gained 1.07 percent.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__273_323964393"></a> 14 octobre 2002 :  découverte de nouvelles fuites sur le réacteur n°4</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  finds more fractures at Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">JPES</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">0</p>
<p>Copyright 2002 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2002  Kyodo News International, Inc.</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Oct. 11  Kyodo</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) said  Friday it has confirmed new fractures in 10 water pipes at the No. 4  reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear plant.</p>
<p>Water was leaking out of one of the  cracks but it poses no danger of a radioactive leak outside the  reactor, the company said.</p>
<p>The pipes carry water used to move  the driving shaft of control rods in the reactor.</p>
<p>The most serious fracture &#8212; about 10  millimeters in length &#8212; had gone right through a stainless steel  pipe 4.55 mm thick, TEPCO said. The other pipes had cracks up to 50  mm long and between 0.5 and 2 mm deep, it said.</p>
<p>The company said the most serious  fracture was found on Sept. 14</p>
<p>and the others in successive  inspections.</p>
<p>The faults were probably caused by  corrosion that resulted from seawater leaking from other pipes laid  above the water pipes, the company said.</p>
<p>TEPCO said the newly found fractures  pose no functional problems but it will replace the pipes just in  case.</p>
<p>The fractures were found in  inspections TEPCO carried out following the finding of cracks in more  than 85% of similar pipes at the No. 3 reactor at the plant.</p>
<p>TEPCO said on Sept. 30 that it found  signs of a fracture in the core shroud of the No.4 reactor, where the  cracks in the water pipes have been found. The shroud is a  stainless-steel cylinder surrounding the core and regulates the flow  of cooling water.</p>
<p>The company began reporting the  discovery of faults found in its reactors after it was revealed in  late August that during the 1980s and 1990s it had falsified safety  reports and covered up defects found in safety checks.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__275_323964393"></a>25  octobre 2002 : arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur sur ordre des  autorités</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  largest utility company ordered to shutdown reactor</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Associated  Press Newswires</span></span></span></p>
<p>APRS</p>
<p>Copyright 2002. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; Authorities ordered  Japan&#8217;s largest utility company Friday to suspend the operation of a nuclear power reactor for a year as punishment for obstructing  a government safety inspection.</p>
<p>The temporary shutdown for Tokyo  Electric Power Co., or TEPCO, is the harshest penalty ever imposed on  a commercial nuclear plant operator in Japan, said nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency spokesman Hideharu Masaoka.</p>
<p>The government measure came hours  after TEPCO admitted in a report that it manipulated safety checks on  one of the reactors at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant from 1991 to 1992.  The company also acknowledged submitting falsified reports to  government inspectors.</p>
<p>Masaoka said the company duped  inspectors by tinkering with pressure gauges just before government  inspectors arrived, though the company&#8217;s actions didn&#8217;t result in any  leakage of radioactive material.</p>
<p>TEPCO spokesman Mamoru Shirakashi  said the company began lowering the output of the reactor designated  for shutdown. The reactor can generate 460,000-kilowatts.</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> is 240 kilometers  (149 miles) northeast of Tokyo.</p>
<p>In a related announcement, Japanese  electronics maker Hitachi said its officials had helped TEPCO deceive  inspectors. An in-house committee is investigating, though the  government has not accused Hitachi of any wrongdoing.</p>
<p>Hitachi is contracted by TEPCO to  perform regular safety checks.</p>
<p>In August, TEPCO admitted it had  misreported safety problems in the late 1980s and early 1990s after  an industry ministry report revealed 29 cases of cracks or minor  structural damage in eight of the company&#8217;s 17 nuclear reactors.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s top three officials  resigned over the scandal, and authorities raided its Tokyo  headquarters last month. TEPCO contended the cracks never posed any  serious danger.</p>
<p>The public has become increasingly  wary of nuclear power since a 1999 radiation leak at a  fuel-reprocessing plant killed two workers.</p>
<p>Japan relies on nuclear power  for about 30 percent of its electricity. TEPCO&#8217;s plants supply nearly  half of the nation&#8217;s nuclear energy.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__277_323964393"></a> 25 octobre 2002 : de nouvelles falsifications  découvertes à Fukushima</h2>
<p><strong>Another  N-Reactor Misdeed Uncovered at Tokyo Elec.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 2002</p>
<p>Tokyo, Oct. 25 (Jiji Press) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. has found new malpractice at one of its nuclear power plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, northeastern Japan, the  company reported to the government Friday.</p>
<p>According to the major power  utility&#8217;s in-house investigation, employees at the company&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear plant covered up defects of the  containment building of the plant&#8217;s No. 1 reactor when the government  conducted on-site airtightness tests in 1991 and 1992 under the  Electric Utility Law, informed source said.</p>
<p>The Agency for nuclear and  Industrial Safety, under the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry,  received the company&#8217;s report on the wrongdoing the same day.</p>
<p>It plans to order a one-year  suspension of the reactor as an administrative penalty, agency  officials said. The statute of limitations has run out for slapping a  criminal penalty for a violation of the law.</p>
<p>A reactor containment building is  designed to contain radiation in the case of an accident.</p>
<p>In the legally required airtightness  tests, inspectors measured the rate of air leakage by increasing air  pressure within the containment building.</p>
<p>Since the leakage rate was high in  the company&#8217;s own advance tests, employees sent air into the building  to keep the pressure stable during the government&#8217;s inspections,  according to the investigation.</p>
<p><strong>(Update) Another TEPCO Cover-Up Revealed.</strong></p>
<p>25  octobre 2002</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 2002</p>
<p>Tokyo, Oct. 25 (Jiji Press) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. on Friday admitted to another trouble cover-up at  its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant.</p>
<p>Employees covered up defects in the  containment facility of the plant&#8217;s No. 1 reactor to pass government  on-site airtightness tests in 1991 and 1992, said the largest  Japanese power supplier, known as TEPCO.</p>
<p>A containment facility is designed to  hold in radiation in the event of an accident.</p>
<p>TEPCO and Hitachi Ltd. employees  admitted that they injected compressed air into the facility to lower  leakage rates in tests in 1991 and 1992.</p>
<p>In 1992, employees of the two  companies covered up a failure to properly repair a defective valve  in a pipe to the containment facility.</p>
<p>Following TEPCO&#8217;s revelation, the  Agency for nuclear and Industrial Safety, a unit of the  Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, said it will hold a hearing  on Nov. 22 to order a one-year suspension of the reactor as an  administrative penalty.</p>
<p>The agency will also urge Hitachi to  consider steps to prevent any repeat of the wrongdoing.</p>
<p>At separate press conferences, TEPCO  Vice President Ryoichi Shirato and Hitachi President Etsuhiko Shoyama  both offered their apologies.</p>
<p>Shoyama said Hitachi was apparently  unable to refuse participation in the cover-up at the time.</p>
<p>TEPCO President Tsunehisa Katsumata  issued a statement saying that the company will accept the penalty  and act appropriately.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__279_323964393"></a> 1 novembre 2002 : TEPCO retarde la construction  de nouveaux réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to delay nuke reactor construction &#8211; paper.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2002  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Nov 1 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co Inc (TEPCO) will postpone construction of two nuclear reactors in northern Japan by more than one year, the  Nihon Keizai business daily reported on Friday.</p>
<p>The daily quoted TEPCO&#8217;s President  Tsunehisa Katsumata as saying TEPCO will be forced to review its  reactor construction plans because the company&#8217;s covering up of past  inspections data undermined local residents&#8217; trust in TEPCO and the nuclear industry.</p>
<p>A spokesman at TEPCO, Japan&#8217;s largest  power utility, said it had not yet made a final decision.</p>
<p>TEPCO had originally planned to build  its No.7 and No.8 nuclear reactors at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1 plant, with operations scheduled to start in October 2008 and  October 2009, respectively.</p>
<p>Each reactor was to have a capacity  of 1.38 million kilowatts.</p>
<p>TEPCO had originally planned to begin  application procedures for gaining permission to construct the  reactors in FY2002/2003. Construction was set to begin in April 2004.</p>
<p>The company said last week that its  employees had manipulated the air pressure of nuclear reactor  containers to pass safety tests at the reactor.</p>
<p>TEPCO presented a report of its  findings to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, which is  viewing the manipulation as an even more serious safety breach than  TEPCO&#8217;s earlier admission that it had continued to operate nuclear plants despite suspecting there were cracks in reactor core shells.</p>
<p>Resource-poor Japan relies on nuclear power for one-third of its power supply, but a series of accidents  has eroded public faith in the industry.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s shares were unchanged by  midday at 2,265 yen, while the benchmark Nikkei stock average was up  0.39 percent.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__281_323964393"></a> 11 novembre 2002 : la  préfecture de Fukushima retarde l&#8217;application de  l&#8217;augmentation de sa taxe nucléaire</h2>
<p><strong>Fukushima  delays planned hike in nuclear fuel tax.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">JPES</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">0</p>
<p>Copyright 2002 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2002  Kyodo News International, Inc.</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Nov. 9 Kyodo</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture has  decided to postpone the planned introduction Sunday of a prefectural  ordinance sharply raising the local tax on nuclear fuel,  prefectural officials said Saturday.</p>
<p>The officials said they decided on  the postponement out of respect for the wishes of Public Management,  Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications Minister Toranosuke  Katayama. He asked the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural government to try  to obtain the consent of Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), the sole  payer of the tax, for the planned hike.</p>
<p>TEPCO runs 10 nuclear reactors  at two power plants in the prefecture.</p>
<p>The delay in the implementation of a  new nuclear fuel tax ordinance means there will be no legal  basis for the tax after the existing nuclear fuel tax  ordinance expires Saturday.</p>
<p>But the local officials said  postponing the tax hike plan will do no real damage to its tax  revenues since the tax is imposed only on fuel newly loaded. Any such  loading is unlikely at least until early next year as TEPCO  temporarily shut down six of the 10 reactors following a scandal  involving covering up reactor damage.</p>
<p>Katayama disappointed the largest  Japanese power firm when he approved the tax hike plan Sept. 27. The  approval allows the prefectural government to raise the tax rate to  10% of nuclear fuel prices from the current 7% and introduce a  fresh charge of 6,000 yen per kilogram, raising the effective tax  rate to 13.5%.</p>
<p>TEPCO issued a statement that day,  calling the ministry&#8217;s approval &nbsp;&raquo;extremely regrettable&nbsp;&raquo; and saying  it would closely analyze the ministry&#8217;s judgment before deciding  whether to file a lawsuit.</p>
<p>The prefectural government expects  the tax hike to bring in some 4.5 billion yen in tax revenues a year.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__283_323964393"></a>19  novembre 2002 : les Japonais doutent de leur industrie nucléaire</h2>
<p><strong>Le  nucléaire japonais dégringole de son piédestal. </strong><strong>BY</strong> Par WERLY Richard.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Libération</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBRT</p>
<p>26<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">Liberation. Une  publication de SNPC &#8211; France.Tel: 33 (1) 42 76 17  89http://www.liberation.fr.</p>
<p class="western">La première compagnie d&#8217;électricité  du pays avoue avoir falsifié les inspections de ses réacteurs  depuis dix ans.</p>
<p>Tomioka, envoyé  spécial. Planté devant sa camionnette, Koshiro Ichimaru  branche ses haut-parleurs et entonne ses slogans antiatome. Le train  en provenance de Tokyo décharge à la gare de Tomioka un  nouveau lot d&#8217;experts nucléaires. Soigneusement garées,  les limousines de Tepco (1), première compagnie électrique  privée au monde par sa production, qui exploite les deux  centrales voisines de la province de <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  attendent ces émissaires venus du siège. «Il en  arrive comme s&#8217;il en pleuvait», grommelle l&#8217;activiste  antinucléaire dont la fourgonnette arbore le panneau: «Stop  à l&#8217;atome, Stop aux mensonges». «Ils tentent de  remettre de l&#8217;ordre dans ce foutoir. Leurs collègues locaux  leur ont tellement menti qu&#8217;ils doivent tout revérifier.»  Démissions. Excuses, mensonges, sanctions et démissions  au sommet&#8230; Le lobby japonais de l&#8217;atome est bien mal en point  depuis les révélations de Tepco fin août. La  société d&#8217;électricité a reconnu avoir,  pendant des années, bâclé les inspections des  réacteurs de ses centrales de <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  et falsifié ses rapports auprès de l&#8217;Agence nationale  de sûreté nucléaire pour masquer des fissures, des problèmes de maintenance et son  laxisme en matière de protection antiradiations. Son PDG,  discrédité, a fini par démissionner. Les deux  centrales, dotées chacune de six réacteurs, forment un  sanctuaire au Japon, encadrant la baie de Tomioka comme les  sentinelles de la fierté technologique nipponne. Plus de 30 %  de l&#8217;électricité japonaise est actuellement d&#8217;origine nucléaire.  Un chiffre applaudi en France par la Cogema qui fournit à  Tepco l&#8217;assistance technique pour la construction de l&#8217;usine de  retraitement de Rokkashomura, copie conforme de celle de La Hague  (lire encadré) et très controversée. Mais,  depuis quelques semaines, les dessous de ce «tour de force  énergétique» commencent à apparaître.  Selon l&#8217;agence japonaise de sûreté nucléaire,  29 inspections de réacteurs auraient été  tronquées ou falsifiées par Tepco depuis 1992. Dans  seize cas, relève l&#8217;agence, la falsification des données  est «inacceptable d&#8217;un point de vue social», manière  de dire sans l&#8217;écrire que ces dissimulations d&#8217;informations  représentaient un danger pour la population. Le grand  déballage nucléaire s&#8217;est déjà soldé, outre la démission du  PDG, par la mise à l&#8217;écart de 35 de ses directeurs et  par la rétrogradation &#8211; sanction suprême au Japon &#8211; du  patron des centrales, Tsuneo Futami. Le Premier ministre conservateur  Koizumi, pas vraiment écolo, est même allé, le 30  septembre, jusqu&#8217;à intimer publiquement l&#8217;ordre à son  ministre du Commerce et de l&#8217;Industrie Takeo Hiranuma «de tout  faire pour rassurer la population et la réconcilier avec le nucléaire».  «Jusqu&#8217;à maintenant, les tenants du nucléaire ont toujours mis en avant la fiabilité de leur technologie.  Or, aujourd&#8217;hui, on voit que leurs fameux rapports étaient  bidonnés», fulmine Koshiro Ichimaru, l&#8217;activiste de  Tomioka. Nous sommes tous persuadés que la vérité  est bien plus grave que ça&#8230;» Car il y a au Japon de  quoi s&#8217;inquiéter: en septembre 1999, un accident nucléaire très grave, dû à une mauvaise manipulation  d&#8217;uranium, a eu lieu à Tokaimura, dans la province d&#8217;Ibaraki,  proche de <strong>Fukushima</strong>.  Il s&#8217;était soldé par deux morts par irradiation, mais  avait surtout démontré l&#8217;impréparation des  autorités. Or les dissimulations de Tepco à Fushima  montrent que les leçons de Tokaimura n&#8217;ont pas été  retenues. «Ils nous ont menti, s&#8217;emporte Katsuya Endo, le maire  de Tomioka. Cela fait trente ans qu&#8217;on vit avec le nucléaire mais là, la confiance est rompue.» Porte-à-porte.  Ce qui n&#8217;empêche pas les sociétés d&#8217;électricité,  citadelles du pouvoir industriel et technocratique au Japon, de  continuer de porter sans ciller la bonne parole de l&#8217;atome: à  Tomioka, les cadres de Tepco font ainsi, depuis le début du  scandale, du porte-à-porte pour faire oublier leurs  magouilles. Ils démarchent les riverains pour présenter  leurs excuses et tenter de regagner leur confiance. Une méthode  à laquelle recourent, d&#8217;ordinaire, les entreprises japonaises  en difficulté. (1) Tokyo Electric Power Company. 10 compagnies  régionales d&#8217;électricité se partagent le marché  nippon.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__285_323964393"></a> 11 décembre 2002 : publication du rapport  sur les falsifications de TEPCO</h2>
<p><strong>Final  Report Concerning Leak Tests on the Primary Containment Vessel at  Fukushima Daiichi Station.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Corporate News Network</span></span></span></p>
<p>JAPCOR</p>
<p>(c) 2002</p>
<p>Tokyo, Japan, Dec. 11, 2002 &#8211; (JCN  Newswire) &#8211; Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) today submitted the  final report concerning the problem of leak tests on the primary  containment vessel at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear Power  Station Unit-1 to the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry.</p>
<p>As soon as the suspicion had arisen  that air was being injected into the primary containment vessel,  TEPCO asked an outside team consisting of five independent expert  lawyers to investigate the situation. The investigation lasted about  two months and after its completion the team reported to TEPCO on its  findings. TEPCO&#8217;s report demonstrates its recognition of the findings  of the investigation team, and describes the measures it will take in  the future.</p>
<p>The conclusions of the investigation  team are the same as those in the interim report issued on October  25:</p>
<p>1. It was confirmed that dishonest  acts had taken place, including injecting air into the primary  containment vessel in order to lower the leak rate while TEPCO&#8217;s  workers were involved in the 15th and 16th periodic inspections at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi Station&#8217;s Unit-1.</p>
<p>2. Apart from the above-mentioned  acts at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi Station&#8217;s Unit-1 no dishonest  practice was found in any other leak tests conducted in the past at  any nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>TEPCO would like to express its  sincere apologies, both to those in the vicinity of its nuclear power stations and to all members of society, for conducting  dishonest practices during the government&#8217;s regular nuclear safety inspections.</p>
<p>We, TEPCO, will make strenuous  efforts to prevent reoccurrence of such errors and to regain public  confidence in our company and in nuclear power. We will do  this by creating &laquo;&nbsp;a system that will never allow workers to  engage in dishonest practice&nbsp;&raquo; and &laquo;&nbsp;a climate in which  workers will never engage in dishonest practice&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>About Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Company,  Incorporated (The) was established in 1951 and is Japan&#8217;s largest  electric power supplier. The company is based in the Tokyo  metropolitan area and surrounding prefectures, operates one hundred  and fifty seven hydroelectric power plants, twenty nine thermal power  plants and three nuclear power plants and supplies electricity  to about 23.2 million households and 2.8 million commercial and  industrial customers. One of the world&#8217;s largest electric utilities,  TEPCO has a generating capacity of 57,800 MW, produced by fossil fuel  (56%), nuclear (30%), and hydroelectric (14%) power sources.  Seeking diversity in the face of a reduced monopoly status caused by  deregulation, TEPCO is moving into communications. It owns a major  stake in Tokyo Telecommunication Network (TTNet, local and  long-distance phone service). TEPCO is in a telecommunications joint  venture with nine other Japanese electric companies.</p>
<p>Source: Tokyo Electric Power Co.,  Inc.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__287_323964393"></a> 26 décembre 2002 : le gouvernement accepte  l&#8217;augmentation de la taxe nucléaire dans la préféceture  du Fukushima</h2>
<p><strong>JAPAN&#8217;S  TEPCO ACCEPTS 90% NUCLEAR FUEL TAX HIKE IN FUKUSHIMA.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Asia  Pulse</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">APULSE</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2002  Asia Pulse Pte Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Dec 26, Asia Pulse &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TSE:9501) has accepted a <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural ordinance raising the nuclear fuel tax rate from  the current 7 per cent to 13.5 per cent.</p>
<p>The decision was made at a meeting  between Tepco President Tsunehisa Katsumata and <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture Governor Eisaku Sato.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;I&#8217;d like to implement the tax  hike by the end of the year,&nbsp;&raquo; Sato said.</p>
<p>The previous tax rate expired Nov.  10, and the new one will take effect Friday or Tuesday.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural  legislature passed the law in July, imposing the higher tax for five  years. The ordinance is expected to raise 23 billion yen (US$192  million) over the five years, of which about 9 billion yen will be  coming from Tepco.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;I&#8217;m concerned that other  prefectures may follow suit&nbsp;&raquo; in raising the tax, Katsumata said,  adding that &laquo;&nbsp;we had to accept the ordinance&nbsp;&raquo; because Home  Affairs Minister Toranosuke Katayama had signed off on it.</p>
<p>The new tax rate compares with the 10  per cent imposed in Fukui Prefecture and the 9 per cent in Niigata  Prefecture, where nuclear power plants are concentrated.</p>
<p class="western">(Nikkei).</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__289_323964393"></a> 15 janvier 2003 : la préfecture de  Fukushima ne sait pas si TEPCO va relancer ses réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>PLATTS  &#8211; Fukushima prefecture unsure on TEPCO nuke units restart.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2003. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-14Jan2003/926 pm  EST/226 GMT Japan&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> government has no definite ideas  yet as to how and when Tokyo Electric Power Co might be able to  restart its nuclear power units in the prefecture, as it has  not ascertained public views on the matter, a government official  said Wednesday. Seven of TEPCO&#8217;s ten nuclear power units in <strong>Fukushima</strong> were shut for inspections and maintenance after the  eruption of Japan&#8217;s nuclear safety data cover-up scandal in  August 2002. The ten units, distributed over two nuclear plants, have a combined power generation capacity of 1.1-mil  kilowatts. &laquo;&nbsp;We need more efforts to recover [public] trust in  TEPCO,&nbsp;&raquo; the government official said. A 1.1-mil kW unit at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 plant will be technically ready for restart in  March, but TEPCO has yet to receive approval from the government and <strong>Fukushima</strong> residents.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__291_323964393"></a>16  janvier 2003 : de nouvelles fissures découvertes sur deux  réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>Tokyo  Electric Finds Fresh Cracks in N-Reactors.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Jiji  Press English News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>JIJI</p>
<p>(c) 2003</p>
<p>Tokyo, Jan. 16 (Jiji Press) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. said Thursday it has found 20 previously  undetected cracks in two nuclear reactors at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 plant in northeastern Japan.</p>
<p>The cracks were found in the shrouds  that cover reactor cores, during checks made in the wake of last  August&#8217;s revelation that the company had falsified reactor inspection  data.</p>
<p>One of the cracks in a  50-millimeter-thick shroud was 23 millimeters deep, Tokyo Electric  said.</p>
<p>The company will conduct further  close examination of the cracks to establish their cause. Tokyo  Electric began to suspend operations at nuclear reactors last  September and has been conducting its checks since.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__293_323964393"></a> 10 février 2003 : TEPCO envisage de  redémarrer trois réacteurs fin mars</h2>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.2063 MARKET NEWS &#8211; Japan TEPCO to restart 3 nuclear power re  actors in late March.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMCRD<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2003  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>RIM Tokyo February 10, 2003 11:18 AM  (Tokyo local time)</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co plans in late  March to restart three of its 17 n uclear reactors following regular  inspections and maintenance, a company spokes man said Monday. The  three units are a 784,000kWh No3 unit at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai &#8211;  ichi power plant, 1.1-mil kWh No1 unit located at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ni plant, and 1.356-mil kWh No 6 reactor at the Kashiwazaki site.  &laquo;&nbsp;We should be able to r esume operations of the three reactors  unless any mechanical trouble were found,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman noted.  At present, TEPCO kept its 12 nuclear reactors off line to  conduct planned and unplanned checkups.</p>
<p><strong>PLATTS  &#8211; Japan TEPCO hopes to restart two nuke power units in Mar.</strong></p>
<p>10  février 2003</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2003. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-10Feb2003/334 am  EST/834 GMT Japan&#8217;s Tokyo Electric Power Co hopes to restart two nuclear power generation units in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and Niigata  prefectures if the residents in areas around the plants give the  go-ahead, TEPCO said Monday. One of the units is the 0.784-mil kW  Unit 3 at <strong>Fukushima</strong> I plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture  which was shut Jul 18 last year. The other is the 1.356-mil kW  Kashiwazaki Kariwa Unit 6 in Niigata prefecture, down since Jan 27  this year. TEPCO said it would complete its routine maintenance on  both units by the end of March. A TEPCO executive said over the  weekend that the restart of the units totally depended on the  residents&#8217; approval. Meanwhile, TEPCO is scheduled to shut its <strong>Fukushima</strong> I Unit 5 on Feb 11, its 13th nuclear unit to  go down. By Apr 15, it is scheduled to shut all of its 17 units for  check-ups.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__295_323964393"></a> 14 février 2003 : TEPCO envisage d&#8217;arrêter  tous ses réacteurs en avril pour des vérifications de  sécurité</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Plans Shutdown Of All Its Nuclear Units By Apr 15</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones Energy Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>NRG</p>
<p>(Copyright (c) 2003, Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.)</p>
<p>SINGAPORE -(Dow Jones)- Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (J.TER), or Tepco, Japan&#8217;s largest power utility,  is planning to shut down the remaining four of its 17 nuclear power units by April 15 for safety inspections, a company spokeswoman  said Thursday.</p>
<p>Tepco has to shut down its three nuclear power complexes &#8211; <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi,  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa and <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini &#8211; for inspection after  it was found to have falsified its plant safety records last year.</p>
<p>Its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear power complex has a total of six units, all of which have been shut  down except two. The 784-megawatt <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi No. 2 unit  is scheduled to be shut down March 31 and the 1,100-MW No. 6 unit  April 15.</p>
<p>The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa complex houses  a total of seven units, with five of the units still being inspected  and the remaining two scheduled for inspections. Inspection of the  1,100-MW Kashiwazaki-Kariwa No. 5 unit is set to begin March 1 and  the 1,356-MW No. 7 unit March 29.</p>
<p>Tepco&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini  complex has a total of four units, with two units &#8211; together with one  unit each from the other two complexes &#8211; in the final phase of  testing, as the Japanese government is hoping to avoid a total nuclear power blackout.</p>
<p>Tests for the 1,100-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini No. 3 unit are to be completed March 17 and the 1,100-MW No. 1  unit March 23. The 1,356-MW Kashiwazaki-Kariwa No. 6 unit will  complete tests March 30, and tests on the 784-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi No. 3 unit will be completed sometime in March.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The Daiichi No. 3 unit has been  shut since July 1 because of false safety records. The unit  inspection has taken more than the usual 130 days, but the government  had said the inspection for that unit is in the final phase,&nbsp;&raquo;  the spokeswoman said.</p>
<p>No restart dates have been scheduled  yet for these four nuclear units, she said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The approval for restart from  the local governments may take several weeks&#8230;The local governments  will have to examine the test results,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokeswoman said.</p>
<p>Although Tepco will complete the  operational tests on four units in March, the earliest possible  startup dates for these units are in May, she said.</p>
<p>However, some fuel oil traders are  expecting startup of the four units in June to July, possibly  extending the anticipated stronger fuel oil demand for a few more  months.</p>
<p>-By Edgar Ang, Dow Jones Newswires;  +65-64154065; edgar.ang@dowjones.com</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__297_323964393"></a> 18 février 2003 :  TEPCO est incapable de préciser la date de redémarrage  de ses réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  unable to say when Fukushima N-plant to resume operation.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">JPES</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">0</p>
<p>Copyright 2003 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2003  Kyodo News International, Inc.</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Feb. 12  Kyodo</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) is  not in a position to say when it can resume operations of its No. 1  and No. 2 <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> power stations, the head of the  company&#8217;s local office said Wednesday.</p>
<p>TEPCO will not resume operations  &nbsp;&raquo;simply because (the suspension of operations) makes it difficult to  meet summer demand for power,&nbsp;&raquo; Kiyokazu Sano said at a press  conference.</p>
<p>Plant operations have been suspended  since last August when the company was found to have falsified  records regarding reactor cracks.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;I don&#8217;t think local concern and  distrust have been wiped out yet,&nbsp;&raquo; Sano added.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__299_323964393"></a> 24 février 2003 :  le gouvernement impose à TEPCO d&#8217;améliorer ses  procédures de sécurité</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  ordered to improve safety measures at 3 plants.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">JPES</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">0</p>
<p>Copyright 2003 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2003  Kyodo News International, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO, Feb. 24 Kyodo</p>
<p>The government&#8217;s nuclear inspection agency said Monday it has ordered Tokyo Electric Power Co.  (TEPCO) to correct flaws in its safety measures for three nuclear plants in a recent damage cover-up scandal.</p>
<p>The Industrial and nuclear Safety Agency said it found problems with the largest Japanese  utility&#8217;s measures to ensure compliance with its own safety  regulations and with those to guarantee the quality of its safety  management mechanisms.</p>
<p>The agency, a unit of the Ministry of  Economy, Trade and Industry, conducted seven-week special inspections  in November and December at the firm&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 and No.  2 plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture and the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa  plant in Niigata Prefecture.</p>
<p>The intensive inspections were  conducted following revelations last August that TEPCO covered up  cracks in core shrouds at a number of reactors at the plants.</p>
<p>The agency cited three problem areas  in the utility&#8217;s safety rules. They include how TEPCO deals with  documents on repairs, and confusion over the responsibility of  division and group chiefs.</p>
<p>The agency also said it has found  minor problems that need to be addressed concerning safety measures  at plants run by Tohoku Electric Power Co., Kansai Electric Power Co.  and Chugoku Electric Power Co. during inspections between October and  December last year.</p>
<p>The problems include improper details  in plant operation manuals and they concern Tohoku&#8217;s Onagawa plant in  Miyagi Prefecture, Kansai&#8217;s Mihama plant in Fukui Prefecture and  Chugoku&#8217;s Shimane plant in Shimane Prefecture, it said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__301_323964393"></a>6 mars  2003 : craintes de pénurie d&#8217;électricité en  raison de la fermeture de 17 réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>Shutdown of 17 nuclear reactors raises summer outage fears.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2003  Kyodo News</p>
<p>The imminent shutdown of all 17 nuclear reactors run by Japan&#8217;s largest utility, Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), is raising fears of power cuts in the  summer and prompting TEPCO to urge consumers to save electricity,  TEPCO officials say.</p>
<p>The possible shutdown of all the  reactors, located in Niigata and <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectures, by  mid-April follows revelations last August that TEPCO falsified safety  reports to cover up defects at its nuclear facilities.</p>
<p>According to the company, the  possible outages as a result of shutting down the reactors for safety  checkups will affect customers in Tokyo and eight other prefectures.</p>
<p>The 17 reactors, which generate a  total of 17 million kilowatts, have been supplying electricity for  these areas, providing more than 40% for Tokyo and its vicinity.</p>
<p>TEPCO said it has sought public  cooperation on the need to save on electricity by placing newspaper  ads on Feb. 26.</p>
<p>Since the cover-up scandal in late  August, TEPCO has closed down 14 of the 17 reactors for checkups in a  bid to restore the confidence of local residents. Operations at the  remaining three reactors will be suspended by the middle of next  month.</p>
<p>According to TEPCO, power supply  demands could still be met up to May, but it will be difficult to do  so in the summer from June to early September. As of late last month,  TEPCO said it can supply an average of 51 million kw in power  generation capacity.</p>
<p>It said that in July and August, when  electricity use peaks, demand will surge beyond 60 million kw.</p>
<p>The 17 nuclear reactors belong  to the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power station and <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power station, both in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, and the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power station in Niigata Prefecture.</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato  said that now is not the time to consider resuming operations, while  Niigata Gov. Ikuo Hirayama said the central government should ensure  the safety of nuclear reactors, adding he is worried that  limiting power supplies could worsen the recession.</p>
<p>Kashiwazaki Mayor Masazumi Saikawa  expressed his approval of operations at the reactors resuming after  problems are resolved, and even residents in Niigata and <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  which are being supplied by Tohoku Electric Power Co. based in Miyagi  Prefecture, are calling for resumed operations, partly out of concern  about local employment.</p>
<p>In late August, it was revealed that  during the 1980s and 1990s TEPCO falsified safety reports and covered  up defects found during safety checks at the two <strong>Fukushima</strong> power stations and the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa power station.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 station  has six reactors, the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 station has four  reactors, and Kashiwazaki-Kariwa station has seven reactors.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__303_323964393"></a> 11 mars 2003 : le  gouvernement autorise, sous conditions, le rédémarrage  des réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>Govt  OKs Conditional Restart Of Tepco Nuclear Reactors</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nikkei  Report</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">NKRP</p>
<p>(c)  2003 Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Nikkei)&#8211;A government agency  on Monday compiled a report that will eventually allow Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (9501) to resume operating nuclear reactors shut  down in the wake of its inspection data falsification scandal.</p>
<p>But the report &#8212; compiled by the  Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry&#8217;s nuclear and Industry  Safety Agency &#8212; is also asking the utility to inspect five of the 17  reactors again under a new method to be worked out by May. This will  make it almost impossible to resume operating all of them right away.</p>
<p>It is also unclear whether the  prefectural authorities of Niigata and <strong>Fukushima</strong>, which are  home to Tepco nuclear plants, will approve of the resumption  of their operations, casting into doubt Tepco&#8217;s ability to meet peak  power demand during the summer.</p>
<p>The agency has determined that six of  the seven reactors with cracks in their core shrouds could be  operated safely without repairs for the next five years. But it is  also asking Tepco to reinspect five of those six with an ultrasonic  method because they have been found to have cracks not only in  shrouds, but also in pipes in their recirculation systems. For this  reason, these reactors are not expected to resume operations until  June at the earliest.</p>
<p>Depending on inspection results, the  company may need to replace or repair parts in these reactors. This  would further delay the restart of operations.</p>
<p>Tepco will brief the residents and  authorities of the areas hosting these plants on the agency&#8217;s report,  the progress of its own inspections and a set of measures designed to  prevent future data falsification. It will also compile this month a  timetable for repairing the reactors for resumption of operations.</p>
<p>Tepco has been producing power in  amounts sufficient to meet winter demand, estimated to peak at 54  million kilowatts. But summer demand once spiked to 64.3 million  kilowatts, and the firm needs to boost supply by roughly 10 million  kilowatts to prepare for summer demand. Ten of the company&#8217;s 17  reactors have an output of 1.1 million kilowatts each. This means  that the utility will have to resume operating nine to 10 reactors by  summer.</p>
<p>But there is no guarantee that Tepco  can convince local residents and authorities that their reactors will  be ready to resume operations by that time.</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> Governor Eisaku Sato  is often heard voicing his doubts about such resumption.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Tepco has not regained the  trust of local residents to the extent that it can begin to discuss  resuming the operation of its nuclear reactors,&nbsp;&raquo; Sato  said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;I would like to make a final  decision after reviewing Tepco&#8217;s briefing and local residents&#8217;  reactions to it,&nbsp;&raquo; Niigata Governor Ikuo Hirayama said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;It seems like both the central  government and Tepco are rushing things, but they need to take care  not to let this backfire on them in trying to gain understanding from  local residents&nbsp;&raquo; on the matter, said Masazumi Saikawa, mayor of  Kashiwazaki in Niigata Prefecture.</p>
<p>(The Nihon Keizai Shimbun Tuesday  morning edition)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__305_323964393"></a> 12 mars 2003 : TEPCO  publie son plan de remise en état de ses réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Discloses Plan For Fixing Damaged Reactors</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nikkei  Report</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">NKRP</p>
<p>(c)  2003 Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Nikkei)&#8211;Tokyo Electric Power  Co. (9501) on Tuesday made public its plan for repairing cracked  shrouds and recirculation plumbing in its nuclear power  reactors.</p>
<p>The utility&#8217;s basic approach will be  to remove the cracks from the shrouds and to remove the cracked  portions of the recirculation piping. A more sophisticated plan will  be worked out for the No. 2 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2  power plant, where the cracking was more complex.</p>
<p>Later this month, the firm plans to  brief residents in areas near the affected power plants on its plans  for repairs and preventing a recurrence of inspection data  falsification. To date, Tepco has discovered cracks in the shrouds  and recirculation plumbing of seven reactors.</p>
<p>On Monday, the Ministry of Economy,  Trade and Industry&#8217;s nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency  released a report saying it sees no problem that should prevent the  restart of operations at the reactors in which cracks were found,  except for the No. 2 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 plant.</p>
<p>The report did say there was a  problem with the method used for inspecting the recirculation  plumbing. It said inspections should be conducted again with a new  method, and that piping should be replaced.</p>
<p>Repairs are expected to take several  months. Tepco wants to repair the reactors so that it can resume  operating them by summer, one company executive said.</p>
<p>(The Nihon Keizai Shimbun Wednesday  morning edition)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__307_323964393"></a> 14 avril 2003 : l&#8217;arrêt  de tous les réacteurs de TEPCO fait craindre des coupures  d&#8217;électricité</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  faces acute power shortage as TEPCO shuts down all reactors</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France-Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">AFPR</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(Copyright 2003)</p>
<p>TOKYO, April 14 (AFP) &#8211; Japan will  face an acute electricity shortage in the summer as power giant Tokyo  Electric Power (TEPCO) said Monday it would this week complete the  shutdown of all its 17 nuclear reactors for inspection.</p>
<p>TEPCO, the world&#8217;s largest private  power utility, said it would on Tuesday stop operations at its last  running nuclear reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, 200 kilometres  (125 miles) northeast of Tokyo.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We will close the last reactor  on April 15. After tomorrow, all the 17 reactors stop running,&nbsp;&raquo;  said Mamoru Shirakashi, a TEPCO spokesman.</p>
<p>TEPCO has shut down 16 nuclear reactors since September to take responsibility for a fuel leak  incident in that month and a damaging data falsifying scandal in  October.</p>
<p>The closure of the last running  reactor is due to the fuel leak incident in which the company  detected a small amount of radioactive substance at a plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong>.</p>
<p>No radiation leakage was found beyond  the premises of the plant.</p>
<p>The government, plant makers such as  Toshiba and Hitachi, and TEPCO&#8217;s own in-house team are inspecting the  reactors, but TEPCO said it had no timetable for starting nuclear energy operations again.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We don&#8217;t know how long the  inspection will last. At this moment, we don&#8217;t know when to resume  our operations,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman said.</p>
<p>TEPCO expects demand for energy will  reach some 60 million kilowatts this summer and warns if the 17  reactors remain shut, Japan will face a serious energy shortage.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We will have a severe energy  shortfall,&nbsp;&raquo; Shirakashi said, adding that TEPCO should run at  least 10 nuclear reactors to meet demand in the summer.</p>
<p>If the 17 reactors remain closed,  TEPCO would use thermal power generation and have to import  electricity from other power companies.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;But these measures are not  enough to meet the expected energy demand in the summer,&nbsp;&raquo; the  spokesman said.</p>
<p>To seek local support for the  resumption of nuclear reactors, TEPCO executives are holding a  series of meetings with local lawmakers and neighbours.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We would very much like to  start operations again,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman said.</p>
<p>TEPCO has seven nuclear reactors at its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant in Niigata,  250 kilometres (155 miles) north of Tokyo, and runs six reactors at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Number One plant and four reactors at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Number Two plant.</p>
<p>The governors of Niigata and <strong>Fukushima</strong> must give their approval for the resumption of nuclear reactors, as must the central government.</p>
<p>Japan plans to raise its nuclear reliance, from providing 35 percent of the nation&#8217;s power in 2001 to  42 percent in 2010. Germany, by contrast, plans to eliminate all nuclear power plants by 2020.</p>
<p><strong>TEPCO&#8217;s  all nuclear reactors suspended+.</strong></p>
<p>15 avril  2003</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Organisation  of Asia-Pacific News Agencies</span></span></span></p>
<p>OANA</p>
<p>©  Copyright 2003. OANA. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO, April 15 Kyodo -</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) shut  down a nuclear reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture around  midnight Monday, meaning all 17 of its atomic power reactors have  been suspended for safety checks after scandals last summer involving  the cover-up of defects.</p>
<p>With the halt of all its nuclear reactors, TEPCO lost 17.38 megawatts, or about 30%, of its power  generation capacity.</p>
<p>Should the suspension continue, the  utility will fall short of power generation in midsummer by up to 9.5  mws, which could result in a serious power shortage in the Kanto  region centering on Tokyo.</p>
<p>It is the first time for TEPCO to  shut down all of its nuclear power reactors since January 1976  when it had two reactors.</p>
<p>TEPCO started lowering output at its  No. 6 reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear Power Station  in the afternoon and suspended power generation around midnight  Monday, company officials said.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s largest power company was  forced to suspend operations at the reactors for safety checkups  following revelations last summer that it falsified safety reports to  cover up defects at the reactors.</p>
<p>TEPCO President Tsunehisa Katsumata  said in a statement, &laquo;&nbsp;We take it seriously that an unprecedented  situation occurred due to a series of scandals.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Katsumata pledged to give priority to  ensuring the operational safety of the reactors, and carry out  inspections and repairs in a steady manner.</p>
<p>Although TEPCO will try to ensure a  sufficient energy supply by asking other power companies for support  and boosting its thermal power generation, such measures are seen as  insufficient.</p>
<p>Katsumata said the power firm needs  to resume operations at around 10 reactors to meet demand for power  supply in the summer.</p>
<p>It is now a pressing task for TEPCO  to win approval from local residents and local governments for the  resumption of operations at the reactors.</p>
<p>Of the suspended reactors, TEPCO  hopes it will resume operations at No. 6 reactor in  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear Power Station in Niigata Prefecture  as early as this month.</p>
<p>In <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, TEPCO  and the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency have already  explained safety measures to local residents and four local town  governments, and the four towns are expected to discuss the matter on  Friday.</p>
<p>It is still unclear, however, whether  TEPCO will be able to resume operations at the reactor as <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato has remained cautious of the plan. ==Kyodo  2003-04-15 00:58:21.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__309_323964393"></a> 29 mai 2003 : TEPCO attend l&#8217;autorisation de  redémarrer son réacteur n°6</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Awaits Approval To Restart Fukushima Nuclear Plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(Copyright (c) 2003, Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.)</p>
<p>TOKYO -(Dow Jones)- Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (J.TER or 9501), or Tepco, is awaiting approval from the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural government to restart its No. 6 nuclear reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi Power Station.</p>
<p>Tepco Wednesday completed inspections  and maintenance at the 1.1 million-kilowatt reactor, which could  technically be resumed for commercial operation any time, a spokesman  at Tokyo Electric said Thursday.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We are expecting the  prefectural government to visit our <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi power  station over the next several days to see if resumption of the  reactor is safe,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman added.</p>
<p>The nuclear and Industrial  Safety Agency, under the Japan&#8217;s Ministry of Economy, Trade and  Industry, has confirmed Tepco&#8217;s inspection for the No. 6 reactor was  conducted properly, suggesting resumption of the plant would be safe.</p>
<p>Tepco shut the No. 6 reactor April 15  to carry out an inspection following the discovery last August that  the company covered up reactor defects.</p>
<p>As of Thursday, 16 of Tepco&#8217;s 17 nuclear reactors are idle for inspections.</p>
<p>Tepco will likely resume in mid-June  operations at its No. 7 nuclear reactor at the  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa power station in Niigata Prefecture.</p>
<p>The company shut the 1.35  million-kilowatt No. 7 reactor March 28 for checkups, while it is  expecting to complete inspections by early June.</p>
<p>The Niigata Prefecture government  official recently said approval would be granted to Tepco for  resumption of the reactor if it could be reassured that the plant is  safe to operate.</p>
<p>May 7, Tepco resumed operations of  the No. 6 reactor at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa power station. The No. 6  reactor was the first to be restarted since the company shut all 17  of its units for inspections.</p>
<p>By mid-June, Tepco, the country&#8217;s  largest power company, is expected to operate three of its 17 nuclear reactors ahead of the summer peak demand season, which begins in late  June.</p>
<p>But Tepco in early May said it needed  to resume operating at least eight to ten nuclear reactors to  supply enough electricity to meet growing demand in the Tokyo  metropolitan area in the summer.</p>
<p>The company expects the Tokyo area&#8217;s  peak power demand to reach 64.5 million kilowatts in July, compared  with an estimated peak demand of 46.5 million kilowatts for May.</p>
<p>-By Shigeru Sato, Dow Jones  Newswires; 813-5255-2929; Shigeru.Sato@dowjones.com;</p>
<p>-Edited by Nick Vonklock and George  Bernard</p>
<p><strong>TEPCO  reactor passes check, waiting for restart.</strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">5 juin  2003</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2003  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, June 5 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co (TEPCO) (9501.T) said on Thursday one of its nuclear reactors has passed a final test and was ready to  start operating, although no restart date had been set.</p>
<p>A spokesman at TEPCO said the company  had completed a leak test at the Kashiwazaki Kariwa No.7 reactor in  Niigata prefecture, northwest of Tokyo.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The test confirmed that the  reactor met the necessary standard,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman said.</p>
<p>Another TEPCO reactor &#8211; the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi plant&#8217;s No.6 reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, north  of Tokyo &#8211; passed a final test in late May and is also ready for  restart.</p>
<p>TEPCO, the world&#8217;s largest  investor-owned power utility, began closing its nuclear reactors from September last year after revelations it had falsified  data on previous maintenance checks.</p>
<p>In early May, TEPCO restarted the  Kashiwazaki Kariwa No.6 reactor. But TEPCO&#8217;s other 16 nuclear reactors remain shut.</p>
<p>TEPCO, sensitive to public distrust  of the nuclear industry after a series of mishaps and  accidents, has said it would seek local approval before restarting  the reactors</p>
<p>TEPCO and government authorities have  said that Tokyo and the surrounding area serviced by the utility  could suffer a power shortage this summer if more nuclear reactors are not restarted.</p>
<p>TEPCO has said it would need to have  eight to 10 nuclear reactors running to meet peak summer  demand.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__311_323964393"></a> 16 juin 2003 :  découverte d&#8217;une pièce manquante sur le réacteur  n°3</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Finds Fuel Rod Missing At Fukushima Nuclear Reactor</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(Copyright (c) 2003, Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.)</p>
<p>TOKYO -(Dow Jones)- Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (J.TER or 9501) said Sunday it discovered a fuel control  rod was missing at its No. 3 nuclear reactor, which is  currently idle for inspection.</p>
<p>Immediately after realizing the rod  was missing, Tepco urgently halted part of its inspection work and  inserted a rod into the reactor, located at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-Ni Power Station, the company said in a statement.</p>
<p>The No. 3 reactor has been shut Dec.  10 last year for inspection and maintenance.</p>
<p>The cause of the missing rod hasn&#8217;t  been determined, but Tepco has started an investigation.</p>
<p>Commenting on whether the incident  will force Tepco to extend the shutdown of the No. 3 reactor, a  company spokesman said: &laquo;&nbsp;We haven&#8217;t measured the impact to our  reactor inspection yet from the missing rod.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;At this moment, we are unable  to decide when we can complete our inspections at the unit.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Local industry sources earlier this  month expected the No. 3 reactor to be restarted by the end of the  month.</p>
<p>The incident could delay approval  from local authorities to resume operations at the No. 3 reactor.  Residents of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture have previously  expressed skepticism about the safety of nuclear power plant  operations.</p>
<p>By the end of June, Tepco needs to  restart at least eight nuclear power reactors to supply enough  electricity to the Tokyo metropolitan area, as the peak summer demand  traditionally kicks in July through August, the company said in its  supply-demand forecast report early June.</p>
<p>As of Monday, 16 of its 17 nuclear reactors were idle for inspections following the discovery last  August that the company had covered up reactor cracks.</p>
<p>May 7, Tepco restarted its No. 6  reactor, the 1.35 million-kilowatt unit at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa  Power Station in Niigata Prefecture, northern Japan, after it  received a green light from local authorities to resume operations.</p>
<p>Several domestic industry sources  are, meanwhile, expecting the Niigata Prefectural government to give  the go-ahead this week to Tepco to restart its No. 7 reactor.</p>
<p>According to Tepco&#8217;s projection made  earlier this month, electricity demand in the Tokyo area will grow  24.5% to 61 million KW in July from its projected figure of 49  million KW for June.</p>
<p>Tepco&#8217;s maximum electricity supply in  July and August will be 57 million KW if the 16 reactors remain shut,  the company said.</p>
<p>-By Shigeru Sato, Dow Jones  Newswires; 813-5255-2929; Shigeru.Sato@dowjones.com;</p>
<p class="western">-Edited by Hilary Mc Cully</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__313_323964393"></a>10  juillet 2003 : le gouverneur de Fukushima autorise le redémarrage  du réacteur n°6</h2>
<p><strong>Fukushima  gov. gives OK to restart reactor.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2003  Kyodo News</p>
<p>[MISCELLANEOUS]</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato  gave his consent Thursday for restarting a reactor at the Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, which has been shut down with other TEPCO reactors  because of a defect cover-up scandal.</p>
<p>Sato gave the go-ahead for restarting  the No. 6 reactor at the plant after a meeting with TEPCO President  Tsunehisa Katsumata, who visited the governor to seek his consent,  prefectural officials said.</p>
<p class="western"><strong>TEPCO relance un 3ème réacteur  pour éviter les coupures électriques à Tokyo.</strong></p>
<p class="western"><strong>10 juillet 2003</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western"><strong>AFPFRLA Français</strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>Copyright Agence France-Presse,  2003 All reproduction and presentation rights reserved. </strong></p>
<p>TOKYO, 11 juil  (AFP) &#8211; La première compagnie privée d&#8217;électricité  du monde, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), va bientôt  relancer un troisième réacteur nucléaire afin d&#8217;éviter le risque des coupures d&#8217;électricité  durant l&#8217;été dans la région de Tokyo.</p>
<p>TEPCO redémarrera  le réacteur No 6 de la centrale de <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  d&#8217;une capacité de 1,1 mégawatts et située au  nord de Tokyo, a indiqué jeudi la compagnie après avoir  reçu l&#8217;aval des autorités locales.</p>
<p class="western">Selon l&#8217;agence de presse japonaise Jiji, le  réacteur pourrait repartir dès jeudi soir.</p>
<p class="western">Toutefois, 14 autres réacteurs sont  toujours stoppés pour des raisons de sécurité.</p>
<p class="western">TEPCO avait dû fermer entre septembre et  avril toutes ses centrales pour inspection, après la  découverte de falsifications de rapports de sécurité  faisant état de fissures depuis la fin des années 1980.</p>
<p class="western">Elle en a déjà remis deux en  fonction en mai et juin.</p>
<p class="western">Un quatrième réacteur pourrait être  relancé vendredi dans la préfecture de Niigata  (nord-ouest de Tokyo).</p>
<p class="western">Selon TEPCO, il faudrait remettre en activité  au moins 10 réacteurs pour éviter que des millions de  foyers ne soient privés d&#8217;électricité &#8211; et donc  d&#8217;air conditionné-pendant l&#8217;accablante canicule estivale.</p>
<p class="western">mis-agr/nl tf.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__315_323964393"></a>18 août  2003 : redémarrage du réacteur n°3</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  restarts nuclear reactor in Fukushima.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>JPES</strong></p>
<p><strong>0</strong></p>
<p><strong>Copyright  2003 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2003 Kyodo News  International, Inc. </strong></p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Aug. 13  Kyodo</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) on  Wednesday reactivated the No. 3 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant after it was shut down for regular checks  and safety inspections amid revelations last year that the utility  falsified safety reports.</p>
<p>The reactivation followed an  endorsement by <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Eisaku Sato on Tuesday during a  meeting with TEPCO President Tsunehisa Katsumata.</p>
<p>The reactor, which has a generating  capacity of 784 megawatts, is expected to start producing electricity  on Friday and reach full output around Monday.</p>
<p>After the falsification scandal  developed last August, TEPCO shut down all 17 of its reactors in  Niigata and <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectures by the end of April. The  resumption of the No. 3 reactor follows four other reactors &#8212; one in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and three in Niigata.</p>
<p>TEPCO has already replaced defective  equipment in the No. 3 reactor including a cracked shroud.</p>
<p>On July 18, the government&#8217;s nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency declared the reactor safe. TEPCO shut it  down a year ago.</p>
<p>But the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural  government did an independent check of the reactor even after the  assurance due to concerns among local residents and resentment toward  TEPCO over the scandal.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__317_323964393"></a> 25 septembre 2003 : un  travailleur de la centrale exposé à des radiations</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  Nuclear Pwr Plant Worker Exposed To Some Radiation</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>DJI</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2003 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc. </strong></p>
<p>TOKYO (AP)&#8211;A worker at a nuclear power plant in northern Japan was exposed to a small amount of  radiation while fixing a radioactive leak in its cooling system, the  plant&#8217;s operator said Thursday.</p>
<p>The worker at the reactor in Japan&#8217;s  northeast <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture (state) wasn&#8217;t injured by the  exposure, which occurred on Wednesday, said operator Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (J.TER or 9501). The worker&#8217;s identity wasn&#8217;t disclosed.</p>
<p>The worker was fixing a leak in the  primary water cooling system in a reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.  1 nuclear Power Plant. He was immediately treated, and the  amount of radiation exposure was believed small enough not to cause  any health threat, said Tepco spokesman Mamoru Shirakashi.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant was one of  17 nuclear reactors closed for safety inspections after the  company last year admitted to covering up structural problems from a  decade ago.</p>
<p>The reactor was reopened two weeks  ago and was running at a low output. It was to return to full  capacity next month.</p>
<p>Shirakashi said Wednesday&#8217;s mishap  wasn&#8217;t related to the problems involving the cover-up. About one  liter (2.1 pints) of radioactive water leaked from a loosened valve  attached to the primary cooling system, and the worker was fixing the  problem when exposed to radiation, he said.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s nuclear reactors  generate about 40% of the electricity consumed by Tokyo and several  surrounding prefectures (states).</p>
<p>Resource-poor Japan relies on nuclear power for 30% of its electricity.</p>
<p class="western">-Edited by Genevieve I. Soledad</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__319_323964393"></a>26  septembre 2003 : inquiétudes sur la résistance des  centrales nucléaires après un important tremblement de  terre</h2>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><strong>Major Earthquake Revives Concerns over  Resilience of Energy Infrastucture BY</strong> Mike  Hurle</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">WMRC  Daily Analysis</span></span></span></p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;" lang="en-GB">WDAN</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;" lang="en-GB">Copyright 2003, World Markets Research Centre Limited. All Rights  Reserved</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;" lang="en-GB"><span style="font-family:Courier New,monospace;font-size:x-small;">WMRC  Perspective </span></p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;" lang="en-GB"><span style="font-family:Courier New,monospace;font-size:x-small;">Significance  The refinery fire was the most high-profile incident resulting  from the tremor, which injured hundreds of people but apparently  caused no fatalities.</span></p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><span style="font-family:Courier New,monospace;font-size:x-small;">Implications  In the past week <strong>Japan</strong> has conducted a series of emergency drills that are designed to  prepare the population for a serious quake. A major concern surrounds  the possible damage that could be caused to nuclear plants, gas pipelines and refineries.</span></p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><span style="font-family:Courier New,monospace;font-size:x-small;">Outlook <strong>Japan</strong> spends billions of yen on ensuring key buildings and infrastructure  are reinforced to necessary standards, but a major earthquake in a  populated area would still cause huge loss of life and major  disruption to energy facilities and power supplies.</span></p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;" lang="en-GB">Hokkaido Gets the Shakes</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Early this morning Hokkaido island in northern <strong>Japan</strong> witnessed one of the strongest earthquakes to hit the country in the  past ten years. The tremors reached between 7.8 and 8.0 on the  Richter scale, slightly stronger than the 1995 quake at Kobe near  Osaka, which killed 6,400 people. Fortunately, the latest quake does  not yet appear to have caused any fatalities, with the epicentre far  from any major population centres. Nevertheless, 41,000 people in  central and eastern Hokkaido were evacuated from their homes,  following concerns of repeat tremors and <strong>tsunami</strong> tidal waves, while the 700MW Tomato Atsuma power station was  automatically shut down, leaving thousands of households without  power. The most high-profile consequence of the earthquake was a fire  at the 140,000-bpd Tomakomai refinery, operated by Idemitsu Kosan.  Nippon Oil also closed its 16,000-bpd Muroran refinery.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;" lang="en-GB">Tokyo Could be Next</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">The earthquake comes as seismologists warn that  the capital Tokyo is long overdue for a major earthquake of its own.  In the past week the city&#8217;s inhabitants have marked the eightieth  anniversary of the great 1923 Kanto earthquake with a series of  emergency drills, which have mobilised emergency volunteer groups and  helped to sustain the public&#8217;s awareness of the seriousness of the  threat. The main danger to life will come from electrical and  gas-related fires, particularly in areas with a high proportion of  wooden buildings. The fire at the Hokkaido refinery has, however,  raised concerns over the <strong>risks</strong> evident at larger energy installations. In the past year <strong>Japan</strong>&#8216;s  energy sector has been hit by a series of scandals over safety  inspections, firstly at nuclear power plants and more recently at two Nippon Oil refineries (see <strong>Japan</strong>: 2  September 2002 Reporting Scandal Forces Resignation of TEPCO  Executives and <strong>Japan</strong>:  5 August 2003: Safety Scandal Forces Closure of Japanese Refineries).  Although all industrial facilities in <strong>Japan</strong> are built to rigorous quake-proof specifications, the danger posed by  earthquakes underlines the importance of regular, comprehensive and  transparent safety reviews.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;" lang="en-GB">Outlook and Implications</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><strong>Japan</strong> has learned  many lessons from the Kobe quake, when supposedly quake-proof  structures including elevated highways failed to hold up. Although  fires and loss of life are inevitable, authorities in Tokyo are  confident that they have the resources and organisation to tackle and  compartmentalise problems when &#8216;the big one&#8217; strikes. Energy  companies have well-drafted procedures for coping with the aftermath  of such a disaster, which would typically involve routine closure of  power and refining facilities. Despite the high level of overall  preparation and public awareness, concerns over the nuclear industry continue to surface, reflecting a lack of confidence in the  management of plants and their ability to prevent some further  accident occurring.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;" lang="en-GB"><span style="font-family:Courier New,monospace;font-size:x-small;">WMRC  Contact  Mike Hurle (mike.hurle@wmrc.com)</span></p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__321_323964393"></a>18  novembre 2003 : l&#8217;IEA recommande au Japon de restaurer la confiance  du public dans l&#8217;industrie nucléaire</h2>
<p><strong>IEA  urges Japan to restore public confidence in nuclear energy.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>KYODO</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2003 Kyodo News </strong></p>
<p>The International Energy Agency (IEA)  urged Japan on Tuesday to restore public confidence in nuclear energy if the country wants to meet its target of a 30% increase in nuclear power generation by 2010.</p>
<p>The Paris-based IEA also said in an  energy policy report on Japan, issued every four years, that Japan  should clarify the role of nuclear power amid growing  liberalization in the nation&#8217;s electricity sector and the heavy  reliance on Middle East oil imports.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;It is important for Japan to  improve public acceptance of nuclear energy as a way to ensure  stable energy supply and mitigate climate change,&nbsp;&raquo; IEA Executive  Director Claude Mandil said in releasing the report, &laquo;&nbsp;Energy  Policies of IEA countries &#8211; Japan 2003 Review.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Nearly 90% of Japan&#8217;s oil imports  come from the Middle East.</p>
<p>Mandil said it will take some time to  restore public confidence in nuclear power because of the  outcry over the cover-up by Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) of  reactor defects.</p>
<p>Currently, 12 of TEPCO&#8217;s 17 nuclear reactors in Niigata and <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectures have suspended  operations for safety check.</p>
<p>TEPCO says it wants to resume  operating the 12 reactors as early as possible, but government  officials said it may take some time before the government and TEPCO  win support from local residents.</p>
<p>Mandil, on a four-day visit to Tokyo  through Wednesday, called on the Japanese government to boost  transparency in nuclear administration and impose stronger  rules as well as stricter punishments for violators.</p>
<p>Mandil called for further  liberalization in Japan&#8217;s electricity and gas markets, saying energy  prices in Japan remain one of the highest among the 26 member  countries of the IEA, which coordinates energy policy for the world&#8217;s  MAJOR energy consumers.</p>
<p>The report says that new entrants  find it difficult to enter the electricity market and little  competition seems to have developed between major companies with a  dominant share in the market, such as TEPCO and Kansai Electric Power  Co.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Given the slow entry rate of  new players, greater competition between the incumbents is  essential,&nbsp;&raquo; the report says, citing the need to set up a  &laquo;&nbsp;neutral transmission organization&nbsp;&raquo; to supervise the equal  use of electricity transmission networks by major utility companies  and new entrants.</p>
<p>Currently, transmission networks are  owned by major electricity firms, making it virtually impossible for  new players to start electricity transmission businesses.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;If competition fails to  develop, stronger measures such as establishing an independent  national transmission system operator should not be precluded,&nbsp;&raquo;  the report says.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__323_323964393"></a> 27 janvier 2004 : fuite  d&#8217;eau sur le réacteur n°6</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  finds water leak at Fukushima nuclear plant.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>LBA</strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>(c)  2004 Reuters Limited </strong></p>
<p>TOKYO, Jan 27 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co (TEPCO) (9501.T), Japan&#8217;s biggest electricity  producer, said on Tuesday it found a water leak in one of its  shut-down nuclear reactors earlier this week.</p>
<p>TEPCO officials saw water leaking  from a part of the core of the No. 6 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi  plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture, northeast Japan, at 5:49 p.m.  local time on Sunday, a Tokyo-based company spokesman said.</p>
<p>The leak, of 4.7 litres of water,  stopped after about half an hour, the spokesman said.</p>
<p>No radiation leaked outside of the  plant, he said.</p>
<p>The utility was forced to shut down  all 17 of its nuclear reactors in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and Niigata  prefectures by April 2003 after it admitted in August 2002 that it  had falsified nuclear safety documents for more than a decade.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi No. 6  reactor, which can generate 1,100 megawatts of electricity, had  resumed operation on July 15 last year and was shut down again for  scheduled safety inspections on September 30.</p>
<p>TEPCO had yet to set a date to  restart the reactor, the spokesman said.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s 17 reactors have a  combined capacity of 17,308 megawatts, or about 28.7 percent of its  total power generation capacity as of March 2003. Only six of these  units are now generating power.</p>
<p>At its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in  Niigata prefecture, northwestern Japan, TEPCO plans to start  conducting final checks on its No. 1 reactor on Wednesday. The 1,100  megawatt reactor was shut for scheduled inspections on September 3.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__325_323964393"></a>4 mars  2004 : la méfiance du public retarde le redémarrage des  centrales nucléaires</h2>
<p><strong>Distrust  hinders N-plant reopening</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Daily  Yomiuri</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>YOMSHI</strong></p>
<p><strong>10</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 The Daily Yomiuri All Rights Reserved. </strong></p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. has been  slow to resume operations of nuclear reactors that were  suspended after a series of scandals involving cover-ups of flaws at  its reactors due to distrust among residents toward the electric  power company.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural  government Tuesday approved the restart of the No. 3 reactor at  TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant. Although  TEPCO reopened the reactor Wednesday, 10 out of 17 reactors remain  closed for safety checks after scandals.</p>
<p>TEPCO hopes to have 14 or 15 reactors  in operation by June, but it will be difficult to ease people&#8217;s  distrust. TEPCO will have to work harder to overcome these feelings.</p>
<p>In April, all 17 reactors run by  TEPCO were forced to shut down because of the scandals. Since May,  TEPCO has been gradually resuming operation of these reactors .</p>
<p>As of Tuesday, the operation of 11  reactors had been suspended. Among the 11 reactors, the government  verified the safety of only four reactors&#8211;No. 2 and No. 4 reactors  at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant, No. 3 reactor  at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant and No. 1  reactor at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in Niigata  Prefecture.</p>
<p>TEPCO has completed inspections of  the four reactors to confirm the airtightness of their reactor  vessels. A TEPCO executive said, &laquo;&nbsp;It&#8217;s technically feasible for  another three reactors, in addition to No. 3 reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant, to restart operation.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>But the resumption of operations for  the three reactors has been delayed because TEPCO has yet to earn the  trust of local governments. The distrust of local residents toward  the safety of nuclear reactors has not been dealt with since  the scandals.</p>
<p>For example, after the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency verified the safety of No. 3 reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant, a pipe leak was  brought to light in January.</p>
<p>In late February, TEPCO President  Tsunehisa Katsumata visited the Niigata prefectural government to  explain the preventive measures the company is taking against such  problems. It is making desperate efforts to win the trust of  residents, but their efforts do not seem to be sufficient.</p>
<p>It is likely that the usage rate of  TEPCO&#8217;s nuclear power plant facilities in fiscal 2003 will  fall to an average of 30 percent. The rate will not reach half of the  80.1 percent level of fiscal 2001 before the troubles came to light.</p>
<p>Moderate weather, which led to lower  demand for heating devices in warm winter, precluded a power shortage  in fiscal 2003.</p>
<p>In Tokyo this winter, the temperature  has not fallen below 0 C. The largest amount of electricity  consumption was 49.68 gigawatts in Tokyo in January, less than the  maximum output of 54 gigawatts that TEPCO can supply with its current  limited number of operating reactors. Electricity sold in January was  about 24,880 gigawatt-hours or a 4 percent decrease from a year  earlier.</p>
<p>Due to a record cool summer and warm  winter, there was no energy crisis in fiscal 2003. As it stands,  however, it is feared that a shortage of power may occur again this  summer. It is necessary to resume operation of suspended nuclear reactors soon.</p>
<p>TEPCO plans to increase the  proportion of power generated by nuclear power plants to about  50 percent of the total power generated by fiscal 2012. But  construction of new nuclear power plants has become difficult  due to a series of troubles.</p>
<p>In addition, a plan to use plutonium  extracted from used nuclear fuel mixed with uranium in  ordinary nuclear reactors has returned to the drawing board,  and it will be difficult to implement the plan. The atmosphere  surrounding the electric power companies&#8217; nuclear power plant  projects casts a shadow over the long-term national energy policy.</p>
<p>As no measures are seen at present to  win the trust of residents, TEPCO must make efforts to gain their  trust if it wants to restart the reactors, while finding measures to  avoid troubles, improving information disclosure and raising the  awareness of the company employees about safety.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__327_323964393"></a> 17 mars 2004 :  redémarrage du réacteur n°4</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Restarted Fukushima No. 4 Nuclear Reactor 0100 GMT</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>DJI</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc. </strong></p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (J.TER or 9501), or Tepco, Wednesday restarted its No. 4 nuclear reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-Ichi power  station.</p>
<p>As scheduled, the power utility  resumed operations at the reactor at 10:00 a.m. local time (0100  GMT), a company spokesman said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;In the next three to four days,  we will start supplying electricity from the No. 4 reactor to our  transmission network in the Tokyo metropolitan area,&nbsp;&raquo; said the  spokesman.</p>
<p>The No. 4 reactor is the eighth of  Tepco&#8217;s 17 nuclear reactors to be restarted following a  scandal over falsified inspection reports in the summer of 2002.</p>
<p>The No. 4 reactor has the capacity to  generate 784,000 kilowatts of electricity.</p>
<p>-By Shigeru Sato, Dow Jones  Newswires; 813-5255-2944; Shigeru.Sato@dowjones.com</p>
<p>-Edited by Hilary Mc Cully [ 17-03-04  0118GMT ]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__329_323964393"></a>3 juin  2004 : le centre de stockage de déchets radioactifs reprend  ses activités</h2>
<p><strong>Japanese  plant resumes accepting spent nuclear fuel</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Asia Pacific</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>BBCAPPNGC BBCGC CTGBBC</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 The British Broadcasting Corporation [date of publication]. All  Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced except with the  express permission of The British Broadcasting Corporation. </strong></p>
<p>Text of report in English by Japanese  news agency Kyodo</p>
<p>Aomori, Japan, 3 June: A nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in Rokkasho, Aomori Prefecture, resumed  accepting spent nuclear fuel Thursday [3 June] for the first  time in about 19 months.</p>
<p>Some 46 tons of spent nuclear fuel arrived in the village&#8217;s port from <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture  on the day.</p>
<p>Waste delivery to the plant was  halted in November 2002 due to welding defects that caused a leak of  radioactive water at the plant in the northeastern Japan prefecture.</p>
<p>The spent nuclear fuel, from  Tokyo Electric Power Co.&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 2 plant in the towns  of Tomioka and Naraha, was delivered Thursday morning to Mutsuogawara  port on the 4,913-ton cargo ship Rokuei Maru.</p>
<p>Following the arrival of the fuel,  Aomori prefectural and Rokkasho municipal officials boarded the ship  to inspect the containers. Aomori prefectural police provided  security in the area due to the residual hazard of the fuel.</p>
<p>The containers will be loaded onto  trailers during the day and transported to the reprocessing plant in  Rokkasho about 7 km from the port. Japan nuclear Fuel Ltd is  building the plant.</p>
<p>Ahead of the facility&#8217;s scheduled  full-fledged operations in July 2006, trial operations using depleted  uranium are scheduled to take place this month and another test using  spent nuclear fuel is being planned for next June.</p>
<p>Japan nuclear Fuel plans to  store about 1,600 tons of spent nuclear fuel in the facility  before full-fledged operation takes place. During fiscal 2004, it  will accept about 529 tons from nuclear plants in Japan.</p>
<p>Source: Kyodo News Service, Tokyo, in  English 0054 gmt 3 Jun 04</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__331_323964393"></a> 29 juin 2004 : TEPCO va redémarrer trois de  ses réacteurs et souhaite y utiliser  du plutonium</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Focusing On Starting Up 3 Fukushima Nuclear Reactors</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nikkei  Report</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>NKRP</strong></p>
<p><strong>©  Copyright 2004. Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. All rights reserved. </strong></p>
<p>TOKYO (Nikkei)&#8211;Tokyo Electric Power  Co. (9501) is shifting its attention toward restarting three nuclear reactors at two <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture facilities now that the  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa power plant in Niigata Prefecture is fully online.</p>
<p>Tepco&#8217;s power supply capacity exceeds  the estimated 64.5-million-kilowatt maximum demand at the height of  summer. But the utility giant is stepping up efforts to resume  operations at the remaining three reactors in light of the  precondition set by <strong>Fukushima</strong> Governor Eisaku Sato to discuss  establishing a pluthermal power plant. Pluthermal facilities reuse  plutonium recovered from spent nuclear fuel. He has refused to  address the program until all of the nuclear reactors are  operational.</p>
<p>The pluthermal plans, which were  being considered for one of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> facilities and the  Niigata plant, were scrapped after a widespread practice of covering  up accidents was revealed in 2002. President Tsunehisa Katsumata had  said that &laquo;&nbsp;we are not in a position to make a proposal.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>If the pluthermal plans do not move  forward, power companies will face a mounting stockpile of spent  fuel. nuclear reactors may be forced to suspend operations if  spent fuel levels exceed storage capacity. The No. 2 <strong>Fukushima</strong> facility could reach capacity in about two years if current fuel  shipments to a reprocessing plant in Rokkasho, Aomori Prefecture, are  suspended.</p>
<p>(The Nihon Keizai Shimbun Tuesday  morning edition)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__333_323964393"></a> 5 août 2004 :  arrêt du réacteur n°3 en raison de &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes  techniques&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to shut nuclear unit due to technical problem.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>LBA</strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>(c)  2004 Reuters Limited </strong></p>
<p>TOKYO, Aug 5 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (9501.T) said on Thursday it would carry out an  unplanned shutdown at its 784,000-kilowatt nuclear generator  in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, northwestern Japan, due to technical problems.</p>
<p>There had not been any radiation  leak, TEPCO said.</p>
<p>TEPCO, Japan&#8217;s biggest power  producer, will halt power generation at the No. 3 unit of its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi plant later on Thursday for inspections, a  company spokesman said.</p>
<p><strong>More  Problems at Japan&#8217;s Fukushima Reactor BY Mike Hurle</strong></p>
<p><strong>5 août  2004</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">WMRC  Daily Analysis</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>WDAN</strong></p>
<p><strong>Copyright  2004, World Markets Research Centre Limited. All Rights Reserved </strong></p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) in  Japan has made an unplanned shutdown of a reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear complex. The Number Three reactor, which has a  generating capacity of 784MW, will undergo a full inspection later  today, to replace routine inspections that had been scheduled for  later this month. TEPCO blamed unspecified technical difficulties and  ruled out the possibility of any leak.</p>
<p>Significance: The <strong>Fukushima</strong> complex is one of TEPCO&#8217;s main sources of electricity generation. The  Number Three reactor was one of the facilities to be closed down  following the nuclear safety reporting scandal in September  2002 and was amongst the first to reopen, in mid-2003. TEPCO has an  optimum 17,400MW of nuclear generating capacity, equivalent to  31% of its total installed capacity. However, Reuters reports that at  present six of its 17 reactors are closed.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__335_323964393"></a>6 août  2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°2</h2>
<p><strong>RIM LPG  NO.790 MARKET NEWS: &#8211;Fukushima oks TEPCO to restart No2 reactor at  Fukushima Dai-ni Stn</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  LPG Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>RIMLPG</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 RIM INTELLIGENCE CO. </strong></p>
<p>RIM Tokyo August 6, 2004 12:39 PM  (Tokyo local time)</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture Thursday  allowed Tokyo Electric Power Co to resume operations of the 1,100-MW  No2 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ni nuclear power  station. It was revealed on the day by an official for the  prefecture. Upon receiving formal approval for a restart, TEPCO put  back on stream the No2 reactor at 10:00 AM on Friday.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__337_323964393"></a> 9 août 2004 : arrêt du réacteur  n°2 à la suite d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau</h2>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.2425 Market News &#8211;TEPCO halts No2 Fukushima Dai-ni reactor  on rise in water levels in reactor</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>RIMCRDNGC Rim  Intelligence (English)GC CTGRME</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 RIM INTELLIGENCE CO. </strong></p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co Monday  announced that it put to an emergency halt the 1,100-MW No2 reactor  at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ni station on Sunday evening. The reactor  was fresh out of reactivating from slumber. The halt followed a rise  in water levels in the nuclear reactor due to a water leak in  the building housing the reactor and an annex to it. &laquo;&nbsp;When to  resume the operation remains sketchy. We are currently looking into  ways we can adopt to investigate the problem,&nbsp;&raquo; a TEPCO source  said. Upon receiving formal approval from <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture  for its restart on Thursday, the No2 reactor was back in operation on  Friday. The halt of the reactor reduced the number of TEPCO&#8217;s running  reactors to 10, whose combined electricity generation was said to be  at 10,308-MW. Generation combined of the remaining seven reactors was  said to be at 7,000-MW. TEPCO has 17 reactors in total.</p>
<p><strong>Platts  &#8211; Japan&#8217;s TEPCO idles Fukushima-2 plant&#8217;s No 2 nuclear power unit.</strong></p>
<p><strong>9 août  2004</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>PLATT</strong></p>
<p><strong>Copyright  2004. Platts. All Rights Reserved. </strong></p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-9Aug2004/122 am  EDT/522 GMT Japan&#8217;s Tokyo Electric Power Co idled its 1.1-mil kW No 2 nuclear power unit at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 nuclear power plant in northern Japan Sunday due to water leak, the company  said Monday. TEPCO had just restarted this unit last Friday before  shutting it down again two days later. With the latest shutdown, the  company now has seven idled nuclear units in eastern Japan,  out of the total 17. The No 1 (460,000 kW), No 3 (784,000) and No 6  (1.1-mil kW) nuclear units at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 power  plant have been shut for overhaul. Its No 4 (1.1-mil kW) unit at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 plant is also idled for maintenance. In central  Japan, TEPCO has shut its No 4 (1.1-mil kW) and No 6 (1.356-mil kW) nuclear power units at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant for turnaround.</p>
<p>Demand for fuel oil and liquefied  natural gas for power generation is likely to remain strong in August  as TEPCO will run its thermal power generation at high rate following  the shutdown of its nuclear power units and hot summer.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__339_323964393"></a>17 août  2004 : explosion sur une conduite de vapeur</h2>
<p><strong>Steam  blowout accident reported at thermal power plant in Fukushima</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>KYODO</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 Kyodo News </strong></p>
<p>Steam burst from a ruptured pipe at a  thermal power plant Sunday in the town of Shinchi, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, six days after four workers were killed in a similar  accident at a nuclear power plant, the government nuclear watchdog said Tuesday.</p>
<p>No one was injured in the Shinchi  plant accident.</p>
<p>The nuclear and Industrial  Safety Agency of the Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry received a  report on Sunday&#8217;s accident as it has been gathering information from  thermal power stations on pipe checks in the wake of the fatal  accident at the nuclear power plant in Mihama, Fukui  Prefecture, of Kansai Electric Power Co., agency officials said.</p>
<p>The agency warned all thermal power  stations in Japan on Tuesday to secure the safety of their workers,  the officials said.</p>
<p>The coal-fired thermal power plant in  Shinchi is operated by Soma Kyodo Power Co., a fifty-fifty joint  venture between Tokyo Electric Power Co. and Tohoku Electric Power  Co.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__341_323964393"></a>26 août  2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°2</h2>
<p><strong>Platts  &#8211; Japan&#8217;s TEPCO restarts No 2 Fukushima-2 nuclear power plant.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>PLATT</strong></p>
<p><strong>Copyright  2004. Platts. All Rights Reserved. </strong></p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-26Aug2004/314 am  EDT/714 GMT Japan&#8217;s biggest power supplier Tokyo Electric Power Co  Thursday said it had restarted the No 2 (1.1-mil kW) nuclear reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 nuclear power plant in  northern Japan following repairs. The company idled the reactor Aug 8  after discovering a water leak. As of Thursday, six of the company&#8217;s nuclear reactors were still idled for maintenance; the No 1,  No 3 and No 6 units at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 plant, while the No 4  unit at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 plant, and the No 4 and No 6 units at  the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in central Japan. TEPCO&#8217;s low sulfur  fuel oil demand for thermal power generation is expected to remain  strong, however, despite the nuke plant&#8217;s restart, as TEPCO has to  supply electricity to Kansai Electric, industry sources said.</p>
<p>Kansai is currently seeking  electricity supplies from utilities to cover its own shortfall as  Kansai&#8217;s nuclear power reactor at the 826,000 kW No 3 unit in  Mihama power plant, central Japan, was shut following an accident.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-26Aug2004/316 am  EDT/716 GMT The accident, which occured Aug 9, killed five and  injured seven, as hot steam erupted from a water pipe. The accident  was the result of pipe corrosion as Kansai had previously failed to  carry out proper inspections. Kansai is currently conducting  inspections of all its nuclear units after shutting them down.  Kansai also restarted three thermal power units (1.350-mil KW in  total) to cover the supply shortfall. TEPCO recently issued a tender  to buy 20,000 kl (125,800 bbl) of low sulfur fuel oil for September  delivery, but the company only secured 10,000 kl of low sulfur fuel  oil.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__343_323964393"></a>27  septembre 2004 : les centrales japonaises devront fermer en 2016 si  elles ne peuvent pas recycler leurs déchets</h2>
<p><strong>Operations  at N-plants may cease by 2016</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Daily  Yomiuri</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>YOMSHI</strong></p>
<p><strong>2</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 The Daily Yomiuri All Rights Reserved. </strong></p>
<p>Operations at all nuclear power plants will be halted by fiscal 2016 if spent nuclear fuel from the plants cannot be reprocessed, as the plants&#8217; storage  capacities will have reached their limits, The Yomiuri Shimbun has  learned.</p>
<p>The Atomic Energy Commission of Japan  issued this warning to a committee on long-term nuclear use,  which considers the pros and cons of the nuclear fuel-cycle  policy.</p>
<p>There are 52 reactors at 16 nuclear power plants operated by 10 electric power companies in Japan.</p>
<p>Currently most of the spent nuclear fuel is kept in the plants&#8217; storage pools, while some of it has also  been brought to a reprocessing plant in Rokkashomura, Aomori  Prefecture, which is scheduled to begin operation soon.</p>
<p>However, if after a review of the nuclear fuel-cycle policy the government decides to give up  the reprocessing project this year, the spent nuclear fuel  must be returned to the power plants&#8217; storage sites from the  reprocessing facility in Rokkashomura.</p>
<p>While operations at the nuclear power plants continue, the amount of spent nuclear fuel will  increase. As a result, the storage facilities will reach capacity by  2016, forcing the power plants to shut down the reactors.</p>
<p>According to the report, if the spent nuclear fuel kept in Rokkashomura is returned, the storage  pools at Tokyo Electric Power Co.&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture and Kansai Electric Power  Co.&#8217;s Takahama power plant in Fukui Prefecture will be full.</p>
<p>The report also said the Hamaoka  power plant in Shizuoka Prefecture, operated by Chubu Electric Power  Co., and Hokkaido Electric Power Co.&#8217;s Tomari power plant are  expected to face shutdowns in fiscal 2006 and 2008 respectively.</p>
<p>The storage facility at Hokuriku  Electric Power Co.&#8217;s Shiga power plant in Ishikawa Prefecture, which  is expected to be the last one to reach capacity, will be full in  fiscal 2016.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The termination of the  reprocessing of the spent nuclear fuel will result in  operations being halted at the nuclear power plants, so we  need to discuss measures to be taken,&nbsp;&raquo; a commission official  said.</p>
<p>===</p>
<p>N-plant barred from operating</p>
<p>The nuclear and Industrial  Safety Agency has decided not to allow Kansai Electric Power Co. to  resume operations at Mihama nuclear Power Plant in Mihamacho,  Fukui Prefecture, until it can be confirmed that the company is  conforming to the government&#8217;s technical standards instead of  following its original safety confirmation measures, according to  sources.</p>
<p>A cooling pipe ruptured at the  plant&#8217;s No. 3 reactor last month, killing five people and injuring  six.</p>
<p>The decision will be officially  approved Monday at a meeting of the Economy, Trade and Industry  Ministry&#8217;s accident investigation panel.</p>
<p>Economy, Trade and Industry Minister  Shoichi Nakagawa will issue direct instructions to KEPCO President  Yosaku Fuji.</p>
<p>As for neglecting to inspect the pipe  that burst in the accident, KEPCO has said it entrusted inspection of  all KEPCO facilities to another company and was unaware of the  negligence prior to the accident.</p>
<p>The agency has refused to accept the  excuse and is demanding KEPCO accept responsibility for inspections.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__345_323964393"></a> 29 septembre 2004 :  arrêt du réacteur n°2 pour &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes  techniques&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to shut Fukushima reactor for unplanned check.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>LBA</strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>(c)  2004 Reuters Limited </strong></p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept 29 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) (9501.T), Japan&#8217;s biggest power utility,  said it would shut down the No. 2 nuclear power generation  unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi plant in northern Japan on  Wednesday due to technical problems.</p>
<p>TEPCO will start shutting the  784,000-kilowatt unit at around 5:30 p.m. (0830 GMT) for unplanned  inspections, a spokesman said.</p>
<p>The company will investigate the  cause of the trouble during the shutdown and does not know when the  unit will be restarted, the spokesman said.</p>
<p>Earlier on Wednesday, TEPCO reduced  the power output from the unit.</p>
<p>The company had said there was no  radiation leaking into the outside environment.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__347_323964393"></a>6  octobre 2004 : érosion anormale des conduites d&#8217;eau sur le  réacteur n°1</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  yet to replace pipe at Fukushima nuke plant despite erosion</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>KYODO</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 Kyodo News </strong></p>
<p>Water piping at a reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant has likely eroded  beyond an acceptable margin of safety but has yet to be replaced by  operator Tokyo Electric Power Co., the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural  government said Wednesday.</p>
<p>The local government said it has  consulted the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency for its  opinion as projections based on inspections last year show the pipe  at the plant&#8217;s No. 5 reactor may now be at least 0.1 millimeter  thinner than required.</p>
<p>In August, a badly corroded coolant  pipe at the Mihama nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture  burst, spilling out superheated steam that killed four workers and  injured seven others, one of whom later died. The Mihama plant is run  by Kansai Electric Power Co.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric claimed there was no  safety problem with the pipe at the reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> NO. 1 plant, saying it has confirmed the thickness and will in any  case be replacing that particular section of piping during regular  safety checks to begin Nov. 1.</p>
<p>According to the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural government, the carbon steel pipe located in the  reactor&#8217;s turbine house carries pressurized water at 140 C and erodes  at the rate of 0.6 mm a year.</p>
<p>The required thickness for the pipe  is 3.8 mm. It was 4.3 mm thick when it was checked last year and was  diagnosed as having a remaining service life of about nine months.  The prefectural government believes the pipe may have eroded to 3.7  mm or less.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&raquo;The pressure inside the pipe is low  at the section concerned and the pipe can withstand it even at a  thickness of just 0.3 mm. We also have the understanding of the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency,&nbsp;&raquo; a Tokyo Electric  official said.</p>
<p>Following the Mihama accident, Tokyo  Electric reported to the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural government that  it has been managing pipe erosions appropriately, but the local  government demanded pipe data on each nuclear plant.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__349_323964393"></a> 7 octobre 2004 : le gouvernement assure que  l&#8217;érosion des conduites d&#8217;eau ne pose pas de problèmes</h2>
<p><strong>Gov&#8217;t  says no problem with eroded pipe at Fukushima nuclear plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>KYODO</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 Kyodo News </strong></p>
<p>The nuclear and Industrial  Safety Agency said Thursday it saw no safety problem with water  piping at a reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant, dismissing concerns that it may have been eroded beyond  safety levels.</p>
<p>The agency told the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural government that it has concluded that there is no safety  problem and has given approval for Tokyo Electric Power Co. to  continue operations of the No. 5 reactor at the power station.</p>
<p>The prefectural government said  Wednesday it consulted the agency for its opinion as projections  based on inspections last year showed the pipe at the reactor may now  be at least 0.1 millimeter thinner than required.</p>
<p>Municipalities have become more  sensitive to the safety of nuclear reactors after a fatal  accident in August at the Mihama nuclear power plant in Fukui  Prefecture.</p>
<p>In that accident, a badly corroded  coolant pipe ruptured, spilling out superheated steam that killed  four workers and injured seven others, one of whom later died.</p>
<p>The agency, which is under the  Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, cited as reasons for its  conclusion that there is &nbsp;&raquo;no safety problem as long as the pipe  thickness meets the standard in regular checks,&nbsp;&raquo; and &nbsp;&raquo;the steam  flowing through the pipe is at low temperature and the internal  pressure is also low.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>The required thickness of the pipe is  3.8 mm. It was 4.3 mm thick when it was checked last year and was  diagnosed as having a remaining service life of about 10 months. The  prefectural government believes the pipe may have been eroded to 3.7  mm or less.</p>
<p class="western"><strong>SE EAST ASIA:  Japan </strong></p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__351_323964393"></a>14  octobre 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 à la  suite d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  shuts Fukushima reactor</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Power  in Asia</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>PWRA</strong></p>
<p><strong>18</strong></p>
<p><strong>Number  413</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 McGraw-Hill, Inc. </strong></p>
<p>The Tokyo Electric Power Company  (Tepco) was forced to shut down one of its reactors at the <strong>Fukushima  nuclear</strong> generation complex in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture on  September 29. The closure of the plant followed a malfunction in the  pumping system.</p>
<p>The company said that the 784MW No.2 nuclear reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1 nuclear power plant had been closed because of a problem with the reactor  recirculation pumps. It added that no radiation had leaked to the  environment from the reactor as a result of the incident.</p>
<p>Explaining the sequence of events,  Tepco said that an alarm at around 08.35 in the morning had indicated  a problem with a pump system, with the pump automatically switching  off. The reactor&#8217;s output fell to 540MW.</p>
<p>Tepco added that this was followed by  a second alarm, indicating problems with another pump system, as  employees were manually reducing output to 200MW. This led Tepco to  shut down the reactor, the company said.</p>
<p>Meanwhile Tepco said that the 1,100MW  No.1 boiling water reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.2 nuclear power plant had closed temporarily the same day for entirely  unrelated reasons. The scheduled closure of the reactor was to allow  for refueling and maintenance at the plant, Tepco said.</p>
<p>Meanwhile in a separate nuclear development, the Kansai Electric Power Company informed an official  safety panel in Fukui prefecture on October 8 that it had completed  inspections at all its nuclear reactors in the prefecture. The  plants were shut down following the fatal accident at its Mihama nuclear generating complex in August.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__353_323964393"></a> 18 octobre 2004 : report  du redémarrage du réacteur n°4 en raison d&#8217;un  problème sur le circuit de refroidissement</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-Japan&#8217;s TEPCO delays Fukushima reactor restart.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>LBA</strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>(c)  2004 Reuters Limited </strong></p>
<p>TOKYO, Oct 18 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) (9501.T), Japan&#8217;s biggest utility, said on  Monday it had delayed the restart of the No. 4 nuclear power  unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ni plant in northern Japan due to a  coolant system problem.</p>
<p>TEPCO attempted to restart the 1.1  million kilowatt unit on Saturday but suspended the process at 8:37  a.m. (2337 GMT) the next day due to the problem, a spokesman said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We are currently investigating  the cause of the problem,&nbsp;&raquo; said the spokesman, adding the  company did not know when it could restart the unit.</p>
<p>The No 4. reactor has been shut since  Oct. 13, 2002, following a scandal over falsified reactor inspections  records.</p>
<p>Last week, TEPCO shut the No. 5 nuclear unit at its nearby <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi plant to  replace a high-pressure gas pipe.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural  government suspected the thickness of the pipe, which is not directly  connected to the reactor core in the 784,000 kilowatt unit, might  have fallen below safe levels and had asked TEPCO to replace it  immediately.</p>
<p>TEPCO has 17 nuclear power  units with combined capacity of 17.31 million kilowatts. As of  Monday, eight were running.</p>
<p><strong>RIM  PRODUCTS NO.4408 MARKET NEWS &#8211;Japan TEPCO halts Fukushima Daini  reactor on steam adjuster glitch</strong></p>
<p><strong>18  octobre 2004</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Products Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>RIMPRDNGC Rim  Intelligence (English)GC CTGRME</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 RIM INTELLIGENCE CO. </strong></p>
<p>Japanese largest power provider Tokyo  Electric Power Co, or TEPCO, halted the process of reactivating the  No4 1,100-MW reactor at its 4,400-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini nuclear power station on Oct 17, a company spokesman said Monday. The  decision came as a glitch was found at the steam adjusting valve in  its reactor cooling system. TEPCO on Oct 16 stepped up efforts to  reactivate the No4 reactor after the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture gave  the green-light a day before.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__355_323964393"></a> 20 octobre 2004 :  redémarrage du réacteur n°5</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  Restarts Fukushima No. 5 Nuclear Reactor</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>DJI</strong></p>
<p><strong>(c)  2004 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc. </strong></p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (9501.TO), or Tepco, restarted its No. 5 nuclear reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-Ichi power station Tuesday  evening, after replacing part of a high-pressure air pipe associated  with the reactor.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s largest power utility will  start generating electricity from the 784,000-kilowatt reactor  Thursday or Friday, a company spokesman said Wednesday.</p>
<p>Tepco had shut the No. 5 reactor Oct.  13, after the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural government asked the  company to immediately replace a portion of the high-pressure pipe.  The government suspected corrosion may have caused the pipe thickness  to fall below safe levels.</p>
<p>Aug. 9, five workers at the No. 3  reactor at the Mihama power station owned by Kansai Electric Power  Co. (9503.TO) were killed when hot steam leaked from a ruptured pipe.</p>
<p>Since that fatal accident, which  increased skepticism about nuclear power plant safety in  Japan, the nation&#8217;s power companies have conducted unplanned  inspections to see whether water and air pipes at their power  stations are safe to operate.</p>
<p>Going forward, Tepco plans to shut  the No. 5 nuclear reactor at the at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-Ichi power station at the beginning of November to conduct  planned inspection and maintenance that will last two months.</p>
<p>As of Wednesday, ten of Tepco&#8217;s 17 nuclear reactors are up and running, the spokesman added.</p>
<p>-By Shigeru Sato, Dow Jones  Newswires; 813-5255-2944; Shigeru.Sato@dowjones.com</p>
<p>-Edited by Hilary Mc Cully [ 20-10-04  0233GMT ]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__357_323964393"></a> 20 octobre 2004 : redémarrage du  réacteur n°4 après réparations</h2>
<p><strong>Platt&#8217;s  &#8211; Japan&#8217;s TEPCO restarts Fukushima-1 nuke unit after 7-day shutdown.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>PLATT</strong></p>
<p><strong>Copyright  2004. Platts. All Rights Reserved. </strong></p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-19Oct2004/1154 pm  EDT/354 GMT Tokyo Electric Power Co on Tuesday restarted a 784,000 kW nuclear unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 power plant in northern  Japan&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture after replacing faulty pipes, a  company spokesman said Wednesday. The unit was shut on Oct 13 after  the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural government urged TEPCO to  immediately replace pipes that did not meet the standard thickness  required by the government. As the unit was idled for only seven  days, industry sources expect no increase in TEPCO&#8217;s fuel oil  purchase for thermal power generation. After this restart, seven out  of TEPCO&#8217;s 17 nuclear units remain idled. These units have a  combined power generation capacity of 6.43-mil kW. TEPCO one by one  brought down all its nuclear power units for inspections and  repairs after a scandal broke out in August 2002 over maintenance  data cover-ups by the company.</p>
<p>To make up for its nuclear power production shortfall, TEPCO ramps up thermal generation, which  in turn increases its purchases of crude, fuel oil and liquefied  natural gas feedstock.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-19Oct2004/1155 pm  EDT/355 GMT The nuclear power industry in Japan took another  blow in August this year following a non-radioactive steam leak at a  Kansai Electric power plant. The leak from a corroded pipe at  Kansai&#8217;s Mihama plant in western Japan killed four workers and  spurred concern among local governments over nuclear power  generators neglecting to maintain the mininum required thickness of  pipes in the units. Six out of Kansai&#8217;s 11 nuclear units,  representing 4.9-mil kW of generation capacity, are currently idled  for maintenance and check-ups.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__359_323964393"></a>28  octobre 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°4 en raison de la  panne d&#8217;une valve</h2>
<p><strong>SE</strong> EAST  ASIA: Japan</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>Tepco  halts reactor operation</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Power  in Asia</span></span></span></p>
<p>PWRA</p>
<p>21</p>
<p>Number 414</p>
<p>(c) 2004  McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>The Tokyo Electric Power Company  (Tepco) was forced to stop operations at one of its nuclear reactor within 24 hours of the restart of the plant after a two-year  closure.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power was forced to  close the 1,100MW No. 4 reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture on  October 17 because one of the control valves did not open fully. The  reactor had been brought back into service on October 16 after having  been shut down in October 2002.</p>
<p><strong>RIM LPG  NO.844 MARKET NEWS: &#8211;Fukushima Dai-ichi No2 reactor restarts at 1PM  on Friday</strong></p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__361_323964393"></a> 29 octobre 2004 :  redémarrage du réacteur n°2</h2>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  LPG Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMLPG</p>
<p>(c) 2004  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>RIM Tokyo October 29, 2004 1:11 PM  (Tokyo local time)</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co, or TEPCO,  announced on Friday that it restarted the 784-MW No2 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi nuclear Power Station at 1:00PM on  the same day after finishing repairs on the recycling pump on the  reactor. The reactor is expected to start generation at the end of  the month. The reactor remained sustained since Sep 29, when an alarm  set off at the pump and the reactor shut for investigations. The  restart of the No2 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi site  raised the number of TEPCO&#8217;s running reactors to 11, whose combined  generation is said to be at 11,664-MW. The six other reactors, which  remain shut, have a combined generation capacity of 5,644-MW.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__363_323964393"></a>2  novembre 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°4</h2>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.2480 Market News &#8211;TEPCO restarts Fukushima Dai-ni No4  reactor Tuesday</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMCRD<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2004  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co, or TEPCO,  said on Tuesday that it restarted the 1,100-MW No4 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ni nuclear Power Station at 9:51AM on the  same day after the completion of investigations into a breakdown of a  main turbine. If start-up operations go smooth, the reactor would  restart generation on Thursday evening. On Oct 16, the reactor  restarted after receiving formal approval from <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture on the previous day. The reactor shut again, however, on  Oct 23, for a breakdown of the main turbine. The restart of the No4  reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ni raised the number of TEPCO&#8217;s  running reactors to 12, whose combined generation is at 12,760-MW.  TEPCO holds the remaining five reactors shut. The five reactors  generate 4,544-MW in total.</p>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.2480 Market News &#8211;TEPCO restarts Fukushima Dai-ni No4  reactor Tuesday</strong></p>
<p>2 novembre  2004</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMCRD<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2004  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co, or TEPCO,  said on Tuesday that it restarted the 1,100-MW No4 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ni nuclear Power Station at 9:51AM on the  same day after the completion of investigations into a breakdown of a  main turbine. If start-up operations go smooth, the reactor would  restart generation on Thursday evening. On Oct 16, the reactor  restarted after receiving formal approval from <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture on the previous day. The reactor shut again, however, on  Oct 23, for a breakdown of the main turbine. The restart of the No4  reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ni raised the number of TEPCO&#8217;s  running reactors to 12, whose combined generation is at 12,760-MW.  TEPCO holds the remaining five reactors shut. The five reactors  generate 4,544-MW in total.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__365_323964393"></a>4  novembre 2004 : redémarrage du réacteur n°6</h2>
<p><strong>RIM LPG  NO.847 MARKET NEWS: &#8211;TEPCO sees Fukushima Dai-ichi No6 reactor to  start generation Nov 7</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  LPG Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMLPG</p>
<p>(c) 2004  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>RIM Tokyo November 4, 2004 1:38 PM  (Tokyo local time)</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co said on  Thursday the 1,100-MW No6 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-Ichi nuclear Power Station would start generating power on Nov 7.  The reactor restarted on Nov 3 on receiving approval from <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture on Nov 2. The prefecture had deferred giving the approval  due to some safety considerations to solve. As of Thursday, the total  power generation of TEPCO&#8217;s running reactors, 12 in total, was at  12,508-MW.</p>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.2483 Market News &#8211;Fukushima Dai-ichi No6 reactor starts  generation Sat</strong></p>
<p>8 novembre  2004</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMCRD<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2004  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co, or TEPCO,  announced on Monday that the 1,100-MW No6 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi nuclear Power Station started generation on Saturday  morning. The generation was said to reach 94% of capacity at 11:30AM  on Monday. As of Monday, the power generation by TEPCO&#8217;s 12 running  reactors combined was at 12,508-MW. TEPCO has 17 nuclear reactors in all and the generation of the remaining five, which  currently shut, is at 4,800-MW.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__367_323964393"></a>30  novembre 2004 : enquête du gouvernement de Fukushima sur le  réacteur n°1</h2>
<p><strong>RIM LPG  NO.864 MARKET NEWS: &#8211;Local gov&#8217;t to investigate into TEPCO  Fukushima-Daiichi No1 reactor</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  LPG Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMLPG</p>
<p>(c) 2004  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>RIM Japan November 30, 2004 5:41 PM  (Tokyo local time)</p>
<p>The authorities of <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture plan to investigate into the No1460-MW reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear power station operated by  Japanese largest power utility Tokyo Electric Power Co, or TEPCO, on  Dec 1, a spokesman of TEPCO said Tuesday. The intention came after  TEPCO on Nov 29 replied to the questionnaire regarding a regular  maintenance on the reactor. The local government is poised to decide  whether it would give consent on a restart after examining the result  of its investigation. In the previous cases, TEPCO received green  light seven to 10 days after the investigation into the plants  started.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__369_323964393"></a> 8 décembre 2004 :  arrêt du réacteur n°2 en raison d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau  radioactive</h2>
<p><strong>Tokyo  Elec Pwr To Shut Fukushima Nuclear Reactor 0900GMT</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2004  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (9501.TO), the largest power utility in Japan, will shut  its No. 2 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi nuclear Power Station Wednesday evening, following a leak of radioactive  coolant water.</p>
<p>The 784,000-kilowatt reactor, located  in northern Japan, will be shut at 6:00 p.m. local time (0900 GMT), a  Tepco spokeswoman said.</p>
<p>The power utility will investigate  the cause of the water leak during the unplanned shutdown. &laquo;&nbsp;We  are not sure how long we need the reactor to remain offline,&nbsp;&raquo;  the spokeswoman added.</p>
<p>She said a company worker found 0.8  liter of radioactive coolant water had leaked from a pipe associated  with the reactor Wednesday morning.</p>
<p>-By Shigeru Sato, Dow Jones  Newswires; 813-5255-2944; Shigeru.Sato@dowjones.com</p>
<p>-Edited by Hilary Mc Cully [ 08-12-04  0854GMT ]</p>
<p><strong>Japon:  2 réacteurs nucléaires fermés pour une petite  fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive BY</strong> MIS</p>
<p class="western">9 décembre 2004</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p>AFPFR<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">Copyright  Agence France-Presse, 2004 All reproduction and presentation rights  reserved.</p>
<p class="western">TOKYO, 9 déc (AFP) -</p>
<p class="western">Deux réacteurs nucléaires ont été  fermés jeudi au Japon en raison d&#8217;une petite fuite d&#8217;eau  radioactive dans leurs systèmes de canalisation, a indiqué  jeudi Tokyo Electric Power (TEPCO), la première compagnie  d&#8217;électricité privée au monde.</p>
<p>Les fuites se sont  produites dans la centrale nucléaire de <strong>Fukushima</strong> (nord du Japon) mais elles n&#8217;ont pas affecté l&#8217;environnement  extérieur, a précisé TEPCO.</p>
<p class="western">Selon la presse locale, trois ouvriers de la  centrale auraient été exposés à de  faibles radiations sans avoir à craindre pour leur santé.</p>
<p class="western">mis-fl/agr/mpd</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__371_323964393"></a> 17 décembre 2004 : arrêt du réacteur n°6 en raison d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to shut remaining Fukushima-Daiichi unit.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2004  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Dec 17 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) (9501.T), Asia&#8217;s biggest power utility,  said on Friday it will shut the No. 6 nuclear power generation  unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi plant to investigate a possible  water leak.</p>
<p>A TEPCO spokesman said it would shut  the 1.1 million-kilowatt unit on Dec. 19.</p>
<p>The spokesman said that with the  closure of the No. 6 unit, all its nuclear power generation  units at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi plant, located in northern  Japan, will be offline.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__373_323964393"></a> 17 décembre 2004 : TEPCO va arrêter  tous ses réacteurs pour chercher l&#8217;origine d&#8217;une  fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to suspend all reactors at Fukushima No. 1 plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2004  Kyodo News</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Friday  it will suspend the operations of the only running reactor at the  six-reactor <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, possibly from Monday, to investigate a  likely radioactive water leakage.</p>
<p>The utility said it will take  necessary steps on Sunday and stop the No. 6 reactor.</p>
<p>Five of the plant&#8217;s six reactors have  already been put out of operation due to defects and regular  inspections.</p>
<p>The suspension of operations of the  last reactor is feared to significantly influence power supplies in  its service areas, although the company said it will have other power  plants cover the loss while expecting the peak of electric power  demand for this winter to come in January and February.</p>
<p>The electric power firm suspects a  water leakage near a valve attached to a pipe inside the reactor  containment vessel.</p>
<p>Up to about 750 liters of water have  been draining away every hour and the amount has been gradually  increasing, but there is no radiation leak outside of the plant and  little immediate impact on the safety operations of the reactor, it  said.</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> EAST  ASIA: Japan</p>
<p><strong>Tepco  closes Fukushima reactors</strong></p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__375_323964393"></a> 7 janvier 2005 : arrêt  de tous les réacteurs en raison d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive</h2>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Power  in Asia</span></span></span></p>
<p>PWRA</p>
<p>20</p>
<p>Number 419</p>
<p>(c) 2005  McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>The Tokyo Electric Power Company  (Tepco) has suffered further problems at one of its nuclear power plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture.</p>
<p>Tepco said on December 8 that it had  shut down two of the six reactors at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear power complex in the prefecture because of leakages of  radioactive water. It noted that at the time three of the four other  reactors at the complex were undergoing scheduled safety inspections  and other tests.</p>
<p>Tepco added that three workers had  been exposed to minor doses of radiation as a result of the  incidents, but emphasized that there had been no radiation leak  outside the plant. In addition, the exposure to the workers had not  exceeded permitted levels and no one had been injured, the company  said.</p>
<p>Leaks were found at both the 784MW  No.2 and No.4 boiling water reactors. At the No.2 reactor, 0.8 liters  of water had leaked from the pipes of a moisture separator while at  the No.4 reactor less than 0.5 liters of water had leaked.</p>
<p>Subsequently Tepco said on December  17 that it was suspending operations at the No. 6 reactor at the nuclear power complex in order to investigate a suspected  radioactive water leak. Tepco said that it suspected the leak was  near a valve inside the reactor containment vessel.</p>
<p>The 784MW No.6 reactor at the complex  had been the only operating reactor at that point. Operation of the  five other reactors at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1 complex had been  stopped because of scheduled inspections and the previous leaks.</p>
<p>Up to 750 liters of water had been  leaking an hour with the amount gradually increasing. However, Tepco  emphasized that there had been no leakage of radiation outside the  plant and that there was little immediate impact on the safety of the  reactor.</p>
<p>Tepco said that the temporary  suspension of operations at the No.6 reactor and the other reactors  at the plant would not affect supplies during the winter peak power  demand period of January and February. The closures would be covered  by output from the company&#8217;s other power plants.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the Kansai Electric Power  Company has closed its Takahama No. 2 nuclear reactor in Fukui  prefecture for a three month period to conduct scheduled safety  inspections. The 826MW unit at the four-reactor complex was closed in  mid-December.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__377_323964393"></a> 9 février 2005 : redémarrage des six réacteurs</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  resumes operation of reactor at Fukushima No. 1 plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2005  Kyodo News</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. resumed  Wednesday the operation of a reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, about 50  days after the operations of all six reactors at the plant were  suspended due to defects and inspections, the utility said.</p>
<p>The No. 6 reactor will start  generating electricity from Friday, and will be operated at normal  capacity from Sunday, the electric power company said.</p>
<p>The 1,100-megawatt, boiling-water  reactor was shut after water leakage was found on Dec. 20 last year.</p>
<p>Water leakage was also found at the  plant&#8217;s No. 2 and No. 4 reactors on Dec. 8, leading to a suspension  of their operations.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the utility has been  preparing to resume the operation of the No. 5 reactor, but its  process has been delayed because of a difference between the <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefectural government and the central government  over whether water piping at the reactor should be replaced.</p>
<p>The prefecture has said the piping  has corroded to an unacceptable level and asked the electric power  firm to replace it.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__379_323964393"></a>14  février 2005 :  le réacteur n°3 ne redémarrera  qu&#8217;en mars</h2>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.2542 Market News &#8211;TEPCO&#8217;s No3 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear  reactor to restart early Mar</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMCRD<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2005  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co said on Feb  10 that the 784-MW No3 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi nuclear Power Station will restart in early March. At a time  when the reactor entered turnaround, its restart was expected to be  in late Dec. The schedule was then postponed, however, by a delay in  maintenance work caused by the removal of pipes and investigations  into the cause of a breakdown at a related facility, according to an  informed source. Meantime, the 1,100-MW No6 plant at the same site  was expected to restart generation on Feb 11. As of Feb 10, seven out  of the 17 reactors, owned by TEPCO, are in operation, generating  8,212-MW total, or about 47.4% of total the capacity of 17,308-MW.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__381_323964393"></a>22  février 2005 : redémarrage du réacteur n°2</h2>
<p><strong>Platt&#8217;s  &#8211; Japan&#8217;s TEPCO restarts 784,000 kW No 2 Fukushima reactor Tuesday.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2005. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-22Feb2005/152 am  EST/652 GMT Power producer Tokyo Electric Power Co Tuesday restarted  the 784,000 kW No 2 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 nuclear power plant in northern Japan, the company said. TEPCO had idled the  unit on Dec 9 last year after it found a small radioactive water leak  from the piping systems. The company has restarted the unit after  completing repairs, a company official said. TEPCO at present has  nine nuclear reactors inoperational, which has removed  8.312-mil kW of generating capacity out of a total of 17.308-mil kW  that the company has over 17 units across the country. TEPCO&#8217;s  784,000 kW No 4 reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 and 1.1-mil kW No 1  reactor at the Kashiwazaki-kariwa plant in central Japan have been  shut due to mechanical problems.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__383_323964393"></a> 17 mars 2005 : le  réacteur n°3 ne peut être redémarré en  raison d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  suspends restart of Fukushima nuke unit again.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2005  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, March 17 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) (9501.T) said it suspended the restart of  the No. 3 nuclear power generator at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi  plant due to technical trouble on Wednesday, the unit&#8217;s second such  halt this month.</p>
<p>TEPCO, Japan&#8217;s biggest power utility,  had begun restarting the 784,000-kilowatt unit in northern Japan&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture on Tuesday.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We suspended the restart  process to investigate (trouble at) a coolant pump,&nbsp;&raquo; TEPCO said  in a statement issued on Thursday.</p>
<p>A nuclear power unit usually  resumes generating electricity two or three days after being  restarted.</p>
<p>TEPCO had shut the unit on Aug. 9,  2004 for regular inspections and tried to restart it on March 8 with  the aim of resuming power generation on March 14.</p>
<p>But the company had to suspend the  process after it found a mechanical problem on March 9.</p>
<p>Currently, eight of TEPCO&#8217;s 17 nuclear reactors are generating electricity.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__385_323964393"></a>18 mars  2005 : arrêt du réacteur N°3 en raison d&#8217;une panne  sur une pompe à eau</h2>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.2566 Market News &#8211;Fukushima Dai-ichi No3 reactor shuts down  again, pushing back restart</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMCRD<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2005  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co said on  Thursday that the 784-MW No3 plant at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi nuclear Power Station stopped re-activating the reactor after  a glitch was found on the water pump on Wednesday evening. The plant  restarted on Tuesday and was supposed to restart generation on  Thursday evening. The No3 plant restarted the reactor on March 8 and  then stopped the activation process for a breakdown of a safety  valve. On March 12, an oil leak was then reported on a pump in the  plant&#8217;s cooling system, pushing back its restart to March 15. As of  Thursday, TEPCO got eight nuclear-powered plants to run. The  eight plants, excluding the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi No3 plant,  generate 8,740-MW total, or 50.5% of the total generation of TEPCO&#8217;s  17 plants.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__387_323964393"></a>21  avril 2005 : redémarrage du réacteur n°1</h2>
<p><strong>Platt&#8217;s  &#8211; Japan&#8217;s TEPCO resumes restart of 1.1-mil kW Fukushima nuke unit.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2005. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-21Apr2005/250 am  EDT/650 GMT Japanese power supplier Tokyo Electric Power Co Thursday  resumed restart of the 1.1-mil kW No 1 nuclear reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 nuclear power plant in northern Japan after  a failed attempt earlier this week, the company said. TEPCO has  completed all the repair work after it was forced to halt restart on  Monday due to a technical glitch. Industry sources expect TEPCO&#8217;s  demand in low sulfur fuel oil for thermal power generation to slow  down as more nuclear units have become operational. After the  restart of the No 1 <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 reactor, TEPCO would have 10 nuclear power reactors with a combined generation capacity of  10.624-mil kW, in operation, representing 61.4% of the utility&#8217;s  total capacity of 17.308-mil kW. In March, TEPCO only had seven nuclear units with a combined capacity of 7.64-mil kW. TEPCO  bought 498,000 kl (423,300mt or 3.13-mil bbl) of low sulfur fuel oil  in March.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__389_323964393"></a> 26 mai 2005 : arrêt du réacteur n°1 en raison d&#8217;un &laquo;&nbsp;problème  technique&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>PLATTS &#8211; Japan&#8217;s TEPCO idles  Fukushima-2 No 1 nuclear unit Wed on glitch.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright 2005. Platts. All Rights  Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-25May2005/951 pm  EDT/151 GMT Japanese power supplier Tokyo Electric Power Co idled its  1.1-mil kW No 1 nuclear power reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 nuclear power plant on Wednesday due to a technical glitch,  the company said. After the shutdown, TEPCO had 10 reactors with a  combined generating capacity of 10.624-mil kW in operation. TEPCO&#8217;s nuclear utilization rate also fell to 61.4% from 67.7%. As a  result, tightness in the domestic spot market for low sulfur fuel oil  will tighten further, industry sources said. LSFO supplies to the  domestic spot market are currently tight due to a drop in the  operating rate of Japanese refiners amid regular turnarounds.  Japanese refiners operated their refineries at 76.2% of capacity for  the week ending May 21, falling from 78.9% a year earlier, according  to the latest data provided by the Petroleum Association of Japan.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__391_323964393"></a>3 juin  2005 : redémarrage du réacteur n°1</h2>
<p><strong>PLATTS  &#8211; Japan&#8217;s TEPCO restarts 1.1-mil kW Fukushima-2 nuke unit.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2005. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)-3Jun2005/420 am  EDT/820 GMT Japanese utility Tokyo Electric Power Co Thursday  restarted its 1.1-mil kW No 1 nuclear reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 power plant in eastern Japan after completing  repairs, TEPCO said Friday. TEPCO had idled the unit on May 25 due to  a technical problem. Following the restart, TEPCO has in operation a  total 11 nuclear units with a combined power generation  capacity of 11.724-mil kW representing 68% of its total nuclear power capacity. Industry sources expect TEPCO&#8217;s low sulfur fuel oil  purchase to slow down in line with the rise in its nuclear power plants&#8217; operating rates. In the latest tender, TEPCO bought  25,000 kl (21,250mt) of low sulfur fuel oil for June delivery, lower  than the planned 40,000kl (34,000mt), as offer prices were higher  than the company&#8217;s estimates amid tight LSFO spot supplies.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__393_323964393"></a> 11 août 2005 :  arrêt du réacteur n°1 à la suite d&#8217;une fuite  radioactive</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  To Shut Fukushima Nuclear Reactor On Water Leak</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2005  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (9501.TO) plans to shut down the No. 1 nuclear reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-Ichi power station Thursday  evening to conduct unplanned inspections, a company spokesman said.</p>
<p>The power utility will investigate  the leakage of water containing tritium, a radioactive substance, in  a building that houses a No. 1 reactor turbine.</p>
<p>The No. 1 reactor &#8211; which has a  maximum capacity to generate 460,000 kilowatts of electricity &#8211; will  be shut around 6:00 p.m. local time (0900 GMT).</p>
<p>Excluding the No. 1 reactor, Tepco is  operating 10 of its 17 nuclear reactors, the spokesman said,  adding: &laquo;&nbsp;the shutdown of the reactor won&#8217;t affect our  electricity supply in the Tokyo area.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s electricity demand typically  peaks in July or August, as households and offices keep air  conditioners turned-on during the hot summer months.</p>
<p>-By Shigeru Sato, Dow Jones  Newswires; 813-5255-2944; Shigeru.Sato@dowjones.com</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__395_323964393"></a> 17 août 2005 : un tremblement de terre  occasionne une fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive</h2>
<p><strong>Quake  caused radioactive water to leak at reactors</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2005  Kyodo News</p>
<p>Tuesday&#8217;s magnitude 7.2 quake caused  radioactive water to leak within three reactors in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture but the radioactivity level was low and the incident did  not affect the environment outside the facilities, Tokyo Electric  Power Co. said Wednesday.</p>
<p>Water in pools to store spent nuclear fuel at the reactors was shaken by the quake and entered air ducts  about 10 centimeters above the surface, causing a total of 24.5  liters of water to leak onto the floors of the reactor buildings from  joints in the ducts, it said.</p>
<p>The leakage took place at the No. 2  and No. 6 reactors of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power  plant and the No. 4 reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant.</p>
<p><strong>Japan  quake causes radioactive water spill from spent fuel storage pools;  no leakage outside</strong></p>
<p>17 août  2005</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Associated  Press Newswires</span></span></span></p>
<p>APRS</p>
<p>(c) 2005.  The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; Water containing small  amounts of radiation spilled out of spent fuel storage pools at two nuclear power plants in northern Japan when a powerful  magnitude-7.2 earthquake shook the region, the plants&#8217; operator said  Wednesday.</p>
<p>The water spill from the three pools  &#8212; two at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear Power Plant and the  third at the separate No. 2 plant &#8212; did not leak radiation outside  the compounds and workers were not exposed, Tokyo Electric Power Co.  said. <strong>Fukushima</strong> is about 260 kilometers (160 miles) northeast  of Tokyo.</p>
<p>Tuesday&#8217;s powerful quake shook wide  areas of northern Japan and injured 81 people, according to public  broadcaster NHK, but there were no deaths. Tokyo police earlier said  that 60 people were injured in the quake.</p>
<p>Water in spent fuel storage pools  splashed against the walls during the quake, and some entered  wall-mounted ventilation duct openings, company spokesman Hitoshi  Hagiwara said. The water later dripped to the floor from the pipes&#8217;  joints, he said.</p>
<p>More than 24 liters (6.3 gallons) of  water spilled from the three pools, which store spent fuel from three  reactors at the two plants, Hagiwara said. The leakage has now been  cleaned up, he said.</p>
<p>The reactors, which are located in  the same buildings as the pools, were unaffected by the quake, the  company said in a statement.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__397_323964393"></a> 22 août 2005 :  arrêt du réacteur n°5 à la suite d&#8217;un  problème sur le circuit de refroidissement</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-TEPCO to shut Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear unit</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2005  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>(Add details, spokesman comment)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Aug 22 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) , Asia&#8217;s biggest utility, said on Monday  it will manually shut down the No. 5 nuclear power generation  unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi plant for unplanned inspections.</p>
<p>It said the manual shutdown process  for the 784,000-kilowatt unit in northern Japan will start at 11 p.m.  (1400 GMT).</p>
<p>The company has decided to shut down  the unit, as it suspects a technical problem with one of the  emergency coolant systems for the nuclear power generator.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We need to stop the unit to  check whether there really is a problem,&nbsp;&raquo; said a TEPCO  spokesman.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__399_323964393"></a> 16 septembre 2005 :  arrêt du réacteur n°1 pour réparer une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-TEPCO to shut Fukushima nuclear unit for checks</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2005  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>(Adds details)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept 16 (Reuters) &#8211; Top  Japanese utility Tokyo Electric Power Co. said it would shut a nuclear power unit on Friday for unplanned checks due to  technical problems, but had no immediate plan to buy extra oil for  thermal generation.</p>
<p>TEPCO will start shutting the 1.1  million kilowatt No. 1 unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daini plant in  northern Japan to inspect and replace defective pump parts, a  spokesman said.</p>
<p>There was no radiation leak to the  outside environment, he said, adding that the company did not know  how long the unit would be shut.</p>
<p>The shutdown brings to eight the  number of TEPCO&#8217;s 17 nuclear power generators that are closed  for inspections.</p>
<p>In 2003, TEPCO was forced to shut all  of its nuclear power plants for inspections after it admitted  it had falsified nuclear safety documents for more than a  decade.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s oil purchase volumes  have declined since that year, when it had to boost fuel purchases  massively to compensate for lost nuclear power generation  capacity.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__401_323964393"></a>10  octobre 2005 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 en raison d&#8217;une  panne sur une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>Coolant  pump at Fukushima nuclear power plant shuts down</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2005  Kyodo News</p>
<p>A pump for circulating coolant at  Tokyo Electric Power Co.&#8217;s nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture automatically shut down on Monday, affecting output of the  No. 2 reactor, but there was no risk of radiation leakage, the  company said.</p>
<p>The pump ceased operating after an  alarm went off to indicate that it was malfunctioning, TEPCO said.</p>
<p>The company is to investigate after  lowering the No. 2 reactor&#8217;s output to some 30 percent of capacity,  it said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__403_323964393"></a> 12 décembre 2005 : arrêt du réacteur n°4 en raison d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;eau</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-TEPCO to shut nuclear unit for unplanned checks</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2005  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>(Adds details)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Dec 12 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) , Asia&#8217;s largest utility, said on Monday  it would shut a nuclear power unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi  plant in northern Japan for unplanned inspections as a pipe had  leaked water.</p>
<p>TEPCO will start closing the plant&#8217;s  No. 4 generator at 10 p.m. (1300 GMT), it said in a statement.</p>
<p>The shutdown of the 784,000-kilowatt  unit comes about a week after it had restarted electricity generation  on Dec. 3 for a test run to complete scheduled inspections since late  June.</p>
<p>With the shutdown, six of TEPCO&#8217;s 17 nuclear power generators will be offline.</p>
<p>TEPCO has no immediate plan to start  any idle oil-fired power plants or boost oil purchases after the  shutdown, a spokesman said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We have enough capacity to  supply electricity stably even after the latest shutdown, and demand  typically peaks during summer, not winter,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman said.</p>
<p>Earlier on Monday, Kysuhu Electric  Power Co. said it would shut a 890,000-kilowatt nuclear power  generator for scheduled inspections for about three months.</p>
<p>With the TEPCO and Kyushu Electric  shutdowns, 35 million kilowatts of nuclear power generation  capacity, or about 72.5 percent of Japan&#8217;s total, will be in  operation, according to Reuters calculations.</p>
<p>Nine Japanese utilities and a  wholesaler have 54 nuclear power generators for commercial  use, with total generating capacity of 48.222 million kilowatts. (for  table of Japan&#8217;s nuclear power plant operations status, click  on [ID:nT308116])</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__405_323964393"></a> 21 décembre 2005 : réduction de l&#8217;activité du réacteur n°2 à  la suite de &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes techniques&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  cuts nuclear generator operation for repairs</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2005  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Dec 21 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) said on Wednesday it was reducing the  operation of a nuclear power generator at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi plant to less than 50 percent of the unit&#8217;s  capacity for unplanned repairs.</p>
<p>TEPCO, Asia&#8217;s largest utility, began  slowing down the 784,000-kilowatt No. 2 generator at the northern  Japan plant late on Tuesday as it had found technical problems, a  company spokesman said.</p>
<p>The unit is running at 500,000  kilowatts, and the rate will be reduced to 380,000 kilowatts on  Thursday morning for repairs.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The repairs will take several  days,&nbsp;&raquo; the spokesman said. &laquo;&nbsp;After they are completed, we  will bring the unit&#8217;s run rate back to normal.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>TEPCO will not increase its thermal  power generation because the operation cut will have limited impact  on the company&#8217;s overall electricity supply, he said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__407_323964393"></a> 19 janvier 2006 : découverte de fissures  sur les barres de contrôle du  réacteur n°6</h2>
<p><strong>Cracks  in nuclear reactor control rods found in Fukushima plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2006  Kyodo News</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. has reported  it found cracks in the stainless covers of rods used to control nuclear fission at a reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture,  the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said Thursday.</p>
<p>Of one of the nine cracked control  rods of the No. 6 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear plant, the 1-millimeter-thick cover had curled up and partly fallen  off, a case never found before at other nuclear reactors, the  agency said.</p>
<p>The agency ordered TEPCO to  investigate the cause of the damage, which was found during a regular  checkup, saying it could lead to a &nbsp;&raquo;serious situation&nbsp;&raquo; if the  control rods cannot be used.</p>
<p>The agency has also called for TEPCO  and five other power utilities &#8212; Tohoku Electric Power Co., Hokuriku  Electric Power Co., Chubu Electric Power Co., Chugoku Electric Power  Co. and Japan Atomic Power Co. &#8212; which operate the same type of  boiling water reactors to conduct checkups.</p>
<p>According to the agency, similar  cracks were found in 2003 in the No. 1 reactor at Japan Atomic  Power&#8217;s Tsuruga Power Station in Fukui Prefecture and in TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear plant.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__409_323964393"></a> 6 février 2006 :  Toshiba a falsifié les données d&#8217;un compteur du  réacteur n°6</h2>
<p><strong>Toshiba  falsified TEPCO reactor&#8217;s coolant flow meter data.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">JPES</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">0</p>
<p>Copyright  2006 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO, Jan. 31 Kyodo</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Tuesday  that major electronics maker Toshiba Corp. had falsified data on a  coolant flow meter for one of the six reactors at TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<p>But the data fabrication has posed no  problem in legal terms or in the safe operation of the plant&#8217;s No. 6  reactor with the output capacity of 1.1 million kilowatts, the  company said.</p>
<p>The Toshiba-supplied meter was found  to have failed to meet accuracy requirements as specified by the  power company, it said.</p>
<p>TEPCO said the data on the flow meter  was falsified when it was replaced with a new one in 1993.</p>
<p>The country&#8217;s largest power utility  company said it has confirmed the data fabrication after receiving a  document from an in-house whistle-blower in September 2005 claiming  Toshiba, a key manufacturer of nuclear power facilities,  supplied the flow meter with fabricated data. The flow meter measures  coolant flows at the reactor.</p>
<p>TEPCO said it has told Toshiba to  take measures to prevent a recurrence of similar cases.</p>
<p>The <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant, located in the towns of Okuma and Futaba in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture facing the Pacific, has six reactors with a total power  output capacity of 4.7 million kilowatts. The No. 6 reactor began  operation in October 1979.</p>
<p>TEPCO operates another nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture &#8212; the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear plant whose four reactors have a total power  output capacity of 4.4 million kilowatts.</p>
<p><strong>Toshiba  says may have tampered with reactor data</strong></p>
<p class="western">10 février 2006</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">LBA</p>
<p class="western">(c) 2006 Reuters  Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Feb 10 (Reuters) &#8211; Japanese  electronics maker Toshiba Corp. said on Friday its engineers may have  tampered with test data on equipment used in the world&#8217;s biggest nuclear power station, operated by Tokyo Electric Power Co. .</p>
<p>Both TEPCO, Asia&#8217;s biggest power  utility, and Toshiba &#8212; which has just bought Westinghouse, the U.S.  power plant arm of British nuclear Fuels, for $5.4 billion &#8212;  are investigating, though a TEPCO spokesman said the equipment meets  government precision standards and poses no operational risk.</p>
<p>The parts measure the volume of water  flowing into the reactor at the No.7 power unit at TEPCO&#8217;s  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in northern Japan.</p>
<p>TEPCO said late last month it had  found that Toshiba had tampered with test data on similar equipment  in 1993 to meet TEPCO&#8217;s internal precision standards on coolant flow  meters.</p>
<p>The equipment, used at the No.6 nuclear power unit at TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi power  plant, meets government standards and raises no safety issues, TEPCO  said.</p>
<p>The TEPCO spokesman said no decision  had yet been taken on penalising Toshiba, Japan&#8217;s number-two  electronics conglomerate.</p>
<p>Earlier on Friday, Toshiba shares  closed up 1.2 percent at 766 yen, while TEPCO slid 0.7 percent to  2,930 yen. The Nikkei average &lt;.N225&gt; fell  1.11 percent.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__411_323964393"></a> 20 février 2006 :  arrêt du réacteur n°3 en raison d&#8217;une fuite sur une  pompe</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  TEPCO to halt nuclear reactor for repair</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2006  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Feb 20 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) will shut down a nuclear reactor in  northern Japan to fix a leaking water pump, a TEPCO spokesman said on  Monday.</p>
<p>TEPCO will begin shutting down the  784,000-kilowatt No.3 generator at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi  plant, starting from 5 p.m. (0800 GMT) on Tuesday, said TEPCO  spokesman Kiyoto Ishikawa.</p>
<p>The repairs to fix the water leak  were being conducted as a precaution, he said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;It&#8217;s not a situation where this  would cause any particular problems,&nbsp;&raquo; Ishikawa said, adding that  there was no risk of any radiation leaking to the outside.</p>
<p>TEPCO also plans to replace control  rods in the reactor, and it was uncertain how long the unit would  remain shut down, Ishikawa said.</p>
<p>TEPCO said in a statement that signs  of the water leak were initially detected in October but were not  considered serious enough at the time to immediately impair the  reactor&#8217;s operation.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__413_323964393"></a> 17 mars 2006 : arrêt  du réacteur n°4 en raison d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.2801 MARKET NEWS &#8211;TEPCO to shut Fukushima Daini No.4  reactor on Mar 19 on pump glitch</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMCRD<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2006  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co said on  Friday it will close the 1,100-MW No.4 nuclear reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini power station on March 19 for safety checks.  It aimed to replace a mechanical seal on the reactor&#8217;s recirculation  pump after a glitch was detected. With the closure of the reactor,  the number of TEPCO&#8217;s operating nuclear reactors will decline  to 12, out of its 17 reactors, with the total capacity of 11,868-MW,  accounting for 68.6% of its total.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__415_323964393"></a> 28 avril 2006 : les procédures de sécurité  en cas de tremblement de terre doivent être  améliorées</h2>
<p><strong>Nuclear  plants antiquake safety guidelines to be upgraded</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2006  Kyodo News</p>
<p>The nuclear Safety Commission  on Friday drafted a revision of anti-earthquake guidelines for nuclear power plants, urging the operators to see to it that  those facilities can withstand temblors with a magnitude of 6.5 or  greater, the maximum in the current standards.</p>
<p>The governmental commission did not  propose a figure to replace the magnitude 6.5, set in 1981, but major  power companies plan to voluntarily set 450 gal, a unit of quake  equivalent to a magnitude of 6.8, as a new criterion, company  officials said.</p>
<p>The commission plans to finalize the  revision around this summer and the power companies are expected to  subsequently present to the state the new figure, commission members  said.</p>
<p>The company officials suggested,  however, the move is unlikely to have a major impact on the  operations of most of the 55 nuclear plants run in Japan  because they were already designed to withstand earthquakes with a  magnitude of 6.5 or higher.</p>
<p>The facilities which would need  reinforcement construction after the new guidelines are in place  include nine reactors nationwide such as the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1  and 2 reactors run by Tokyo Electric Power Co. and the Takahama plant  by Kansai Electric Power Co., they said.</p>
<p>The commission came up with the plan  to revise the 25-year-old standards following calls to do so after  strong earthquakes including the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake which  killed more than 6,400.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__417_323964393"></a> 15 mai 2006 : arrêt  du réacteur n°4 en raison d&#8217;une fuite d&#8217;huile</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-TEPCO to shut nuclear power unit due to oil leak</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2006  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>(Adds details)</p>
<p>TOKYO, May 15 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. said on Monday it would shut a  1.1-million-kilowatt nuclear power generation unit in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, northern Japan, for unplanned inspections and  repair work because of an oil leak.</p>
<p>The No. 4 unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daini  plant would be brought offline on Tuesday, the company said in a  statement.</p>
<p>A company spokesman did not know when  TEPCO could complete the repair works and restart the unit.</p>
<p>The company did not immediately plan  to boost oil purchases for thermal power generation, he said, without  specifying the reason.</p>
<p>TEPCO typically buys 4.8-4.9 million  kilolitres of crude oil and low-sulphur fuel oil for thermal power  generation every month.</p>
<p>There was no radiation leak to the  outside environment because of the leak, the company said.</p>
<p>For table of nuclear power  plant operation status, click on [ID:T296857]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__419_323964393"></a> 18 mai 2006 : des informations confidentielles sur la sécurité de la centrale ont été  diffusées par erreur sur Internet</h2>
<p><strong>Nuclear  power plant training info leaked onto Internet via Winny software</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2006  Kyodo News</p>
<p>Training data on Tokyo Electric Power  Co.&#8217;s nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture have  been leaked onto the Internet from its employee&#8217;s personal computer  through Winny file-sharing software, TEPCO said Thursday.</p>
<p>The leaked information does not  include key data on nuclear material or manuals on how to  operate nuclear plants, the largest Japanese power utility  said, adding it has received a stern warning from the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency under the Ministry of Economy, Trade and  Industry.</p>
<p>The information, created by the BWR  Operator Training Center, contains an outline of equipment at such  power plants, it said.</p>
<p>The center is offering training to nuclear power operators at its simulation facility in the  central control room.</p>
<p>In August last year, a TEPCO employee  brought home a CD containing training data that have been kept in  custody in TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear station  without approval and stored the data in his personal computer for  private use, the company said.</p>
<p>It is uncertain when the data were  leaked, it added.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__421_323964393"></a>22 mai  2006 : fuite radioactive sur le réacteur n°4</h2>
<p><strong>Small  amount of radiation leaks within Japanese nuclear plant; no leak  outside</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Associated  Press Newswires</span></span></span></p>
<p>APRS</p>
<p>(c) 2006.  The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; A small amount of  radiation leaked within a Japanese nuclear power plant in  northern Japan, but no radiation escaped from the compound, the  plant&#8217;s operator said Monday.</p>
<p>A monitor at the No. 4 reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 Power Plant showed higher than normal levels  of radiation early Sunday morning, according to Manabu Yusa, a  spokesman for operator Tokyo Electric Power Co., or TEPCO.</p>
<p>A pin-sized hole in the fuel rod may  have caused the leak, Yusa said. Other monitors within the compound  showed no change in radiation levels, and there was no danger of a  leak outside the compound, he said.</p>
<p>No workers were exposed to radiation,  and the plant will continue to operate under heightened monitoring,  he said.</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> is 239 kilometers  (149 miles) northeast of Tokyo.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__423_323964393"></a> 23 mai 2006 : arrêt  d&#8217;un réacteur à la suite d&#8217;une fuite de vapeur  radioactive</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  Shuts Down Nuke Plant After Steam Leak &#8211; Kyodo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2006  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (9501.TO) announced Tuesday it will manually shut down for  inspection one of the reactors at a nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture after radioactive steam leaked from a  pipe valve, Kyodo News reported.</p>
<p>There is no impact on the surrounding  environment, the nation&#8217;s largest utility said. [ 23-05-06 0355GMT ]</p>
<p><strong>New  glitch prevents restart of Tepco&#8217;s Fukushima-1 nuclear unit</strong></p>
<p>23  mai 2006</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2006. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co had to idle  the 1.1 gigawatt No 6 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 nuclear power plant in northeastern Japan at 1300 local time (400 GMT)  Tuesday for safety checks, after discovering steam leakage in a  pipeline, the company said in a statement.</p>
<p>Tepco found the leak while in the  process of restarting the unit Monday evening. The unit had been shut  on May 16 after an oil leak was found in a pipeline between an  electric generator and electric transformer.</p>
<p>Sources estimate a 30-day shutdown of  the 1.1 GW nuclear unit could cost Tepco 174,000 kl (163,386  mt, 1.09 million barrels) in additional crude and fuel oil  consumption. Tepco normally makes up for a shortfall in nuclear power generation with thermal power generation using low sulfur fuel  oil, crude, LNG and coal feedstocks.</p>
<p>Tepco currently has 11 of its 17 nuclear units across Japan operational, corresponding to  11.024 GW or 63.7% of its total nuclear power generation  capacity of 17.308 GW.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__425_323964393"></a> 30 mai 2006 : arrêt  du réacteur n°6 en raison d&#8217;une fuite de vapeur  radioactive</h2>
<p><strong>LEAD:  Tokyo Electric shutting down reactor after radioactive steam leak.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">JPES</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">0</p>
<p>Copyright  2006 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, May 23 Kyodo</p>
<p>(EDS: UPDATING WITH MORE INFORMATION,  CHANGING DATELINE)</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Tuesday  it is manually shutting down one of six reactors at a <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture nuclear power station for inspection after finding  a radioactive steam leak.</p>
<p>There has been no impact on the  surrounding environment, according to Japan&#8217;s largest utility.</p>
<p>The halt came only half a day after  Tokyo Electric restarted the reactor, which had been shut down for  regular checks.</p>
<p>The radioactive steam leaked at the  No. 6 reactor of the company&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power station that straddles the towns of Okuma and Futaba in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, some 250 kilometers north of Tokyo.</p>
<p>A company engineer spotted steam  leaking from a valve in the reactor&#8217;s piping system at around 11 a.m.  Tuesday. The leak continued even after the valve&#8217;s shaft seal was  tightened, company officials said.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric said it began shutting  down the reactor manually at 1 p.m. Tuesday. The reactor will be  completely shut down later in the day, the officials said.</p>
<p>At midnight Monday, the utility began  to restart the No. 6 reactor, which had been shut down for a regular  inspection.</p>
<p>The No. 6 reactor, which has an  output capacity of 1.1 million kilowatts, is the biggest of the six  reactors at the power station whose combined capacity stands at 4.7  million kw.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric operates another nuclear power station near the site &#8212; the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power station &#8212; which has seven reactors with a  combined output capacity of 8.37 million kw.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__427_323964393"></a> 12 juin 2006 : arrêt  du réacteur n°3 pour réparation</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  says to shut a nuclear unit for 3 weeks</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2006  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, June 12 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. , Japan&#8217;s largest utility, said on Monday it would  start shutting down the No.3 nuclear power generator in its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daini plant, northern Japan, on Tuesday to replace  parts at the unit.</p>
<p>It will take at least three weeks for  TEPCO to replace the parts in the 1.1-million kilowatt unit, a  spokesman said.</p>
<p>The spokesman said the company  decided to go ahead with the shutdown to replace the unit parts  because it had found cracks in corresponding parts of the same type  in other nuclear units at its plants.</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> EAST  ASIA: Japan</p>
<h1 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__429_323964393"></a> 22 juin 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°1  en raison d&#8217;une fuite de vapeur radioactive</h1>
<p><strong>Tepco  closes Fukushima reactor</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Power  in Asia</span></span></span></p>
<p>PWRA</p>
<p>22</p>
<p>Number 455</p>
<p>(c) 2006  McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>The Tokyo Electric Power Company  (Tepco) shut down one of the reactors at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1 nuclear power station in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture in late  May after a radioactive steam leak was discovered. The company  emphasized that there had been no threat to the environment or  employees from the leak in the reactor&#8217;s piping system.</p>
<p>The manual stop was ordered less than  a day after the 1,100-megawatt (MW) No.6 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1 plant had been restarted following a regular inspection. The <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1 generation complex comprises six reactors with  4,700 MW of total capacity.</p>
<p>Meanwhile in better news for the  embattled Japanese nuclear industry, the Kansai Electric Power  Company (Kepco) has received local government approvals to restart  the Mihama No.3 reactor. The reactor in Fukui prefecture in western  Japan was closed in August 2004 following an industrial accident in  which a corroded pipe broke and five employees were killed by the  emission of super-heated water and steam.</p>
<p>The approvals received by Kepco in  late May from the Fukui prefectural and Mihama municipal authorities  will allow the electric power company to recommence generation from  the reactor to help meet the summer peak demand. The restart of the  plant has already received preliminary approval from the national  industry and nuclear authorities, with formal government  approval expected after further inspections in the second quarter of  2006.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__431_323964393"></a>24  juillet 2006 : fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive sur le réacteur n°1</h2>
<p><strong>Small  amount of water containing radiation leaks within Japanese nuclear  plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Associated  Press Newswires</span></span></span></p>
<p>aprs</p>
<p>(c) 2006.  The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8211; Water containing a small  amount of radiation leaked from a funnel at a nuclear power  plant in northern Japan, but no radiation escaped from the compound,  the plant operator said Monday.</p>
<p>About 4.7 liters (9.8 pints) of  radioactive water was found to have leaked from a funnel at the No.1  reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.2 Power Plant early Sunday, Tokyo  Electric Power Co. said in a statement.</p>
<p>No radiation escaped from the  compound and no workers suffered injuries, according to company  spokesman Hiroyuki Kono.</p>
<p>The reactor has been undergoing a  routine checkup and officials were just starting up the reactor when  the leak occurred, according to Kono, adding that the incident will  not affect the plan to restart the reactor.</p>
<p><strong>Fukushima</strong> is 239 kilometers  (149 miles) northeast of Tokyo.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__433_323964393"></a>1 août  2006 : l&#8217;entreprise qui a construit la centrale n°2 poursuivie  pour corruption</h2>
<p><strong>Obayashi  employees grilled over Mizutani Kensetsu scam </strong></p>
<p>Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2006  Kyodo News</p>
<p>TOKYO, Aug. 2 &#8212; Prosecutors  investigating a tax evasion scandal involving construction firm  Mizutani Kensetsu Co. have questioned employees of general contractor  Obayashi Corp. in connection with an airport project Obayashi  subcontracted to Mizutani, investigation sources said Tuesday.</p>
<p>Mizutani posted sales of 10 billion  yen from projects related to the construction of Chubu Centrair  International Airport in the business year through August 2003, when  former company chairman Isao Mizutani, 61, allegedly evaded 230  million yen in corporate taxes, the sources told Kyodo News.</p>
<p>The prosecutors are set to indict  Mizutani on Wednesday on charges of the tax evasion.</p>
<p>Obayashi mainly subcontracted to  Mizutani land development projects for the construction of the  airport in Aichi Prefecture.</p>
<p>The prosecutors asked the Obayashi  officials to explain details about contracts with Mizutani over the  airport construction and the process of their making the deals, the  sources said.</p>
<p>Mizutani was also involved in major  construction projects such as Kido Dam and the No. 2 nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co., both in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, as a subcontractor of major builders, the sources said.</p>
<p>As part of efforts to probe why  Mizutani was able to win so many deals, the prosecutors have  questioned officials of major construction companies such as Taisei  Corp. and Kumagai Gumi Co. that failed to win bids for the projects  for which Mizutani was subcontracted, the sources said.</p>
<p>Police plan to serve a fresh arrest  warrant on Isao Mizutani following the planned indictment for another  tax evasion allegation in the business year through April 2004, they  said.</p>
<p class="western">==Kyodo</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__435_323964393"></a> 11 août 2006 :  fuite de vapeur radioactive</h2>
<p><strong>Radioactive  Steam Leak At Nuclear Plant In Japan &#8211; Tepco</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2006  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO (AP)&#8211;A negligible amount of  radioactive steam released at a nuclear plant in northern  Japan escaped outside the compound, but there is no fear of damage to  environment, operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. (9501.TO), or Tepco,  said Friday.</p>
<p>An increase in the level of tritium  was detected during an air sampling outside the plant Sunday, and the  operator later found out that radioactive material was leaking in  steam from the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear Power Station,  about 240 kilometers (150 miles) northeast of Tokyo, the company  said.</p>
<p>The amount of the leak, however, was  negligible and left no damage to the environment outside the plant,  it said. [ 11-08-06 1059GMT ]</p>
<p>The plant shut the boiler which was  leaking the steam Friday, the company said.</p>
<p>The plant is currently investigating  the cause of the leak, it said.</p>
<p>Tritium is a radioactive isotope of  the element hydrogen and is produced in nuclear reactors. [  11-08-06 1143GMT ]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__437_323964393"></a>29  septembre 2006 : arrêt du réacteur n°4 pour  réparations</h2>
<p class="western"><strong>UPDATE 1-TEPCO to  shut Fukushima nuclear unit for 1 month</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2006  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>(Adds details)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept 29 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. Inc. (TEPCO) said on Friday it plans to begin  shutting down the 784,000-kilowatt No. 4 nuclear power  generation unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi plant in northern  Japan on Sunday for unplanned maintenance.</p>
<p>TEPCO, Asia&#8217;s biggest utility, said  the unit was operating normally but that it has decided to replace  fuel rods as a precaution to ensure stable electricity generation for  peak winter demand. The shutdown will last about a month, TEPCO said  in a statement.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__439_323964393"></a> 6 novembre 2006 : arrêt  du réacteur n°5 à la suite d&#8217;une panne</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-TEPCO shuts nuclear power unit for unplanned checks</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2006  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>(Adds details)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Nov 6 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. Inc. (TEPCO) has shut its 784,000-kilowatt No. 5 nuclear power generation unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi  plant in northern Japan for unplanned checks, a company spokesman  said on Monday.</p>
<p>The unit, which had been restarted on  Oct. 29 to complete scheduled inspections, was shut down late on Nov.  2, the company said.</p>
<p>TEPCO, Japan&#8217;s biggest utility, said  it had found a crack in part of the power unit following the restart  and would investigate the cause. The company said it did not know how  long the shutdown would last.</p>
<p>There was no risk of any radioactive  leak to the outside, TEPCO said.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__441_323964393"></a> 5 décembre 2006 :  TEPCO découvre de nouvelles falsifications de données  dans les rapports de ses centrales</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  2-Japan TEPCO finds more nuclear data falsification</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2006  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>(Recasts, adds details after  announcement)</p>
<p>TOKYO, Dec 5 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) , Japan&#8217;s largest utility, said on Tuesday  it had found more past data falsification at its nuclear power  plants.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s contract plant maker last  week discovered improper modifications of coolant water temperatures  at the No. 1 unit at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi plant in 1985 and  1988, the utility said in a statement.</p>
<p>The modified data was used for the  most recent mandatory inspections at the plant, which were completed  in October 2005.</p>
<p>A TEPCO spokesman said the data  modification did not affect the safety of the unit&#8217;s operations.</p>
<p>TEPCO, which runs three nuclear power plants including Kashiwazaki-Kariwa, the world&#8217;s largest, has  faced stiff criticism after a lapse that came to light in 2002.</p>
<p>TEPCO said at that time it had  falsified nuclear safety inspection data for more than a  decade.</p>
<p>Public confidence in Japan&#8217;s nuclear industry has been eroded by TEPCO&#8217;s cover-ups of safety blunders as  well as accidents at other companies&#8217; plants.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__443_323964393"></a> 17 janvier 2007 : arrêt  du réacteur n°2 en raison de &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  TEPCO to shut Fukushima nuclear unit again</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2007  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Jan 17 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. Japan&#8217;s largest utility, said it would shut the  No. 2 nuclear power generation unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi plant, northern Japan, later on Wednesday due to problems.</p>
<p>TEPCO began restarting the unit on  Tuesday after a shutdown for regular inspections.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__445_323964393"></a>1  février 2007 : nouvelles révélations sur les  falsifications de données</h2>
<p><strong>EDITORIAL  / Revelations of problems at N-plants disturbing</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Daily  Yomiuri</span></span></span></p>
<p>YOMSHI</p>
<p>4</p>
<p>(c) 2007  The Daily Yomiuri All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>It is shocking to learn that  irregularities were rampant at nuclear power plants, even  though such problems occurred in the past.</p>
<p>An in-house investigation by Tokyo  Electric Power Co. revealed that there were many wrongdoings in the  past, including the falsification of data concerning equipment  inspections&#8211;something closely related to the safety of nuclear facilities&#8211;at TEPCO&#8217;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant in  Niigata Prefecture and its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 and No. 2 nuclear plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<p>Voices asking how such irregularities  could have occurred likely will be raised.</p>
<p>In 2002, the then chairman and the  president of TEPCO were forced to resign to take responsibility for  multiple cases of data manipulation at TEPCO nuclear facilities.</p>
<p>This time, following the revelation  of the falsification of inspection data for dams by electric power  companies, the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency ordered  each electric power company to conduct a survey of its facilities.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s investigation found 199 cases  at three nuclear power plants that possibly violated related  laws and ordinances. The number of cases that violated its internal  regulations likely was huge.</p>
<p>Among them, an egregious example of  data manipulation was found. Although, in 1992, a pump for emergency  use was broken at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa No.1 reactor, TEPCO covered  up the malfunction and passed the state inspection.</p>
<p>===</p>
<p>Safety principles flouted</p>
<p>The three principles to ensure the  safety of a nuclear power plant when a problem occurs are  halting operations, cooling the reactor and confining radiation. The  pump in question is designed to cool the reactor core in an  emergency. TEPCO finagled the government inspection to make it appear  that the pump was working normally, and the reactor was kept in  operation after the inspection.</p>
<p>The company deserves to be severely  criticized for its cavalier attitude toward safety. The government  inspections also were riddled with flaws.</p>
<p>However, each case mentioned above  happened before the 2002 data manipulation cases. It is likely that  these irregularities were overlooked because at that time the  government inspections attached more importance to examining  documents than interviewing employees of electric power companies.  According to TEPCO&#8217;s in-house investigation, the broken equipment in  question was repaired, and data have not been manipulated recently.  Therefore, the safety of the facilities has not been compromised,  according to TEPCO.</p>
<p>But TEPCO should thoroughly examine  why it committed such irregularities, breaking laws and ordinances in  the process, and learn a lesson from the experience.</p>
<p>Since the 2002 cases, TEPCO&#8217;s  inspection system has been largely reformed. The system to check  plant operations and the preservation of records has been  strengthened, and it is difficult for irregularities to happen under  the new system. In addition, the government inspection system also  was renewed so specialized inspectors can make surprise inspection.</p>
<p>===</p>
<p>Inspections must be stringent</p>
<p>Wrongdoing cannot easily be committed  under the present circumstances. But if the safety-first attitude  weakens, even the new inspection systems will not fulfill their  purposes. Both TEPCO and the government should redouble their resolve  to protect safety.</p>
<p>Under the current inspection system,  an electric power company must suspend operations of its nuclear power plants every 13 months and check specified items. But the  government is considering a European-type system, in which the state  decides the operational period and inspection items for each nuclear plant individually because experience suggests that with that system,  power companies can operate nuclear power plants more flexibly  and maintain safety at a higher level.</p>
<p>However, the plan will not work  unless a strict inspection system is in place. TEPCO should leave  behind once and for all a corporate culture that condones falsifying  inspection data.</p>
<p>(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Feb. 1,  2007)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__447_323964393"></a> 18 février 2007 :  arrêt du réacteur n°4 en raison d&#8217;une radioactivité  excessive</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  Fukushima Reactor Shut Down Due To Radioactivity -Kyodo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>NEW YORK (Dow Jones)&#8211;A nuclear reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture automatically shut down Sunday  morning after excessive radioactivity was detected, but there was no  impact on the surrounding environment, its operator Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (9501.TO) said, Kyodo News reported.</p>
<p>The halt came while Tokyo Electric  was starting up the No. 4 reactor of the company&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power station in the town of Tomioka, located  210 kilometers from Tokyo, after completing a regular inspection, the  report said.</p>
<p>The utility suspects there was a  glitch in the reactor&#8217;s alarm system as its radioactivity monitoring  devices in and outside the facility detected no abnormalities, but it  is investigating the cause of the incident, the report added.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric also said a turbine of  the same reactor&#8217;s emergency cooling system automatically shut down  on Saturday evening during a test operation. Kyodo reported. It is  believed to have been caused by a worker accidentally touching the  switch that cuts the input of steam for turning the turbine, it said.</p>
<p>The reactor began starting up from 10  p.m. Friday and was expected to reach its rated output of 1.1 million  kilowatts around next Friday, but this is likely to be delayed due to  the incidents, the utility said, according to the report. [  18-02-07 1056GMT ]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__449_323964393"></a> 1 mars 2007 : découverte de nouvelles  falsification dans les centrales de TEPCO</h2>
<p><strong>More  Unreported Shutdown Cases Found At Tepco Plants-Report</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;Three additional  cases have been found in which Tokyo Electric Power Co. (9501.TO)  didn&#8217;t report to the government emergency shutdowns of its nuclear reactors as well as a technical problem, the Mainichi Shimbun  reports.</p>
<p>Two of the three cases occurred in  February 1992 at the firm&#8217;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power  plant in Niigata Prefecture, northern Japan. The company did not  report an emergency shutdown as well as the fact that a part of the  reactor&#8217;s cooling device was out of order, the paper said.</p>
<p>The other case, also involving an  unreported emergency shutdown, was in November 1985 at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant.</p>
<p>-By Tokyo Bureau, Dow Jones  Newswires; 813-5255-2929 [ 28-02-07 2340GMT ]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__451_323964393"></a> 1 mars 2007 : la  découverte des falsifications de TEPCO ne devraient pas gêner  le fonctionnement de ses centrales</h2>
<p><strong>METI:  Tokyo Electric Cover-Ups Won&#8217;t Impact Nuclear Plant Ops</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (9501.TO) won&#8217;t be required to shut down its nuclear power plants for inspections following a discovery that the company  failed to report two emergency nuclear reactor shutdowns in  the 1980s and 1990s, a government official said Thursday.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;These cases happened long time  ago. The legal prescription period is three years,&nbsp;&raquo; the official  in charge of inspecting Japan&#8217;s nuclear power plants said.</p>
<p>Thursday, Japanese media reported  that Tepco failed to report the two emergency shutdowns to the  government although it is required to according to Japanese law.</p>
<p>Tepco, Japan&#8217;s largest power utility  by revenue and capacity, operates 17 nuclear power plants with  a total of 17,308 megawatts of power generation capacity, according  to a Tepco spokesman.</p>
<p>The emergency shutdowns occurred in  1992 at Tepco&#8217;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in  Niigata Prefecture, northeastern Japan, and in 1985 at the company&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant, also in the  northeastern district.</p>
<p>Jan. 31, Tepco discovered 216  falsification cases and reported them to the Ministry of Economy,  Trade and Industry.</p>
<p>In response, METI on Feb. 1 ordered  Tepco to investigate the newly revealed cases of falsified data at  its power plants.</p>
<p>The two unreported emergency shutdown  cases were discovered during the course of the investigation.</p>
<p>-By Mari Iwata, Dow Jones Newswires;  813-5255-2929; mari.iwata@dowjones.com</p>
<p>-Edited by Tracy Gan [ 01-03-07  0442GMT ]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__453_323964393"></a> 12 mars 2007 : TEPCO a dissimulé un arrêt  d&#8217;urgence d&#8217;un de ses réacteurs en 1998</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  nuclear power firm covered up 1998 emergency shutdown &#8211; company  sources</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">BBC  Monitoring Asia Pacific</span></span></span></p>
<p>BBCAPP<strong>NGC</strong> BBC  Monitoring<strong>GC</strong> CTGBBC</p>
<p>(c) 2007  The British Broadcasting Corporation. All Rights Reserved. No  material may be reproduced except with the express permission of The  British Broadcasting Corporation.</p>
<p>Text of report in English by Japanese  news agency Kyodo</p>
<p>Sendai, March 12: <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span> apparently covered up an  emergency shutdown of a reactor in 1998 at Onagawa nuclear power plant in Miyagi Prefecture, company sources said Monday.</p>
<p>The company did not have records of  the incident in its daily operation logbook and failed to report the  incident to the government in an apparent violation of a law that  requires utilities to swiftly notify it about emergency shutdowns,  company officials said, citing recent in-house investigations.</p>
<p>The company cannot be charged over  the violation because the three-year statute of limitations has  already passed.</p>
<p>The suspected coverup follows one  involving <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>, which recently reported to  the government that it failed to provide notification about emergency  shutdowns at nuclear power plants in Niigata Prefecture in  1992 and <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture in 1985.</p>
<p>All the cases occurred due to  problems or operational delays when the reactor output was being  reduced as workers tried to halt it.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span> the same day explained the  investigation results to the nuclear and Industrial Safety  Agency under the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.</p>
<p>No other electric power companies  have so far been found to be involved in such coverups, although  Tokyo Electric and some other utilities have been charged with  manipulation of data on their reactor operations.</p>
<p>Earlier Monday, the managing director  of <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span>, Kunihide Kobayashi, visited the  Miyagi prefectural government to apologize.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;I came to know about it last  week, and was confirming the fact with people involved. I would like  to deeply apologize about this situation,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>Miyagi Gov. Yoshihiro Murai said,  &laquo;&nbsp;It&#8217;s a grave problem that the company didn&#8217;t observe the rules.  ( <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span>) needs to reflect on it a lot.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>According to the company officials,  the reactor automatically went into emergency shutdown on June 11,  1998, after a rise in neutrons was detected, while workers were  phasing down output for a manual shutdown.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span> conducted checkups of reactor devices  to prepare for summer when power consumption typically increases. It  restarted power generation on June 17 that year, they said.</p>
<p>Following the data manipulation and  coverup cases, the agency has ordered all power companies to conduct  investigations to see if there have been any irregularities and  provide reports by the end of this month.</p>
<p>Source: Kyodo News Service, Tokyo, in  English 0515 gmt 12 Mar 07</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__455_323964393"></a> 20 mars 2007 : TEPCO a  dissimulé que des barres de contrôle sont tombées  des réacteurs en 1993 et 2000</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco:  Rods Fell Out Of Reactors At Two Nuclear Power Plants</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;Tokyo Electric  Power Co. (9501.TO), or Tepco, said Tuesday it has discovered that  control rods had fallen out of reactors at two of its nuclear plants during regular maintenance in 1993 and 2000.</p>
<p>This follows similar cases reported  by other Japanese utilities since late last week.</p>
<p>In Tepco&#8217;s case, the incidents didn&#8217;t  lead to any serious problems, and there was no legal obligation for  Tepco to report them to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry,  the company said.</p>
<p>According to Tepco, Japan&#8217;s largest  utility by revenue and capacity, two control rods fell out of the No.  3 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture, northeastern Japan, in 1993. The  incident occurred because maintenance operations weren&#8217;t carried out  in the right order, said a company official.</p>
<p>Following the incident, Tepco revised  its maintenance manual to spell out the proper steps. But during  regular maintenance in 2000 at the No. 1 reactor at its  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant in Niigata prefecture,  northeastern Japan, two control rods fell out because the procedure  for maintenance operations wasn&#8217;t strictly followed, said Tepco.</p>
<p>Similar incidents have been reported  by other power utilities recently, which prompted Tepco to look into  its past operations.</p>
<p>Chubu Electric Power Co. (9502.TO)  said Monday that control rods had fallen out of the No. 3 reactor at  its Hamaoka nuclear plant in central Japan during regular  maintenance in 1991. A similar incident took place during regular  maintenance in 1988 at Tohoku Electric Power Co.&#8217;s (9506.TO) No. 1  reactor at its Onagawa nuclear power plant in northeastern  Japan&#8217;s Miyagi prefecture.</p>
<p>Hokuriku Electric Power Co. (9505.TO)  discovered last week a cover-up of an accident at the No. 1 reactor  at its Shika nuclear power plant in Ishikawa prefecture,  western Japan, in June 1999.</p>
<p>During maintenance, control rods fell  out from the then-inactive reactor. The fall activated the reactor,  and its operation became uncontrollable for about 15 minutes.  Hokuriku Electric failed at the time to report the accident to METI,  despite being obliged to do so.</p>
<p>Last autumn, METI ordered Japan&#8217;s 10  regional utilities to look into past cover-ups after several cases of  data falsification at hydropower plants had been reported by the  companies. The 10 utilities are scheduled to submit reports to METI  respectively at the end of March.</p>
<p>The control rod cases were discovered  in the course of investigations for the report.</p>
<p>-By Mari Iwata, Dow Jones Newswires;  813-5255-2929; mari.iwata@dowjones.com</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__457_323964393"></a>22 mars  2007 : les compagnies qui gèrent les centrales nucléaires  ne communiquent pas entre elles</h2>
<p><strong>N-plants  need to share and share alike BY</strong> Toshiaki Sato and Tatsuo  Nakajima / Yomiuri Shimbun Staff Writers</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Daily  Yomiuri</span></span></span></p>
<p>YOMSHI</p>
<p>3</p>
<p>(c) 2007  The Daily Yomiuri All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>If the accidental slippage of control  rods in nuclear power reactors during regular checkups, which  was recently reported by electric power companies, had been  immediately announced, the same problem at Hokuriku Electric Power  Co.&#8217;s plant in 1999 possibly could have been prevented.</p>
<p>The history of similar problems in  the past did not serve as a lesson to prevent the criticality  accident in the No. 1 reactor of Shika nuclear power station  in Shikamachi, Ishikawa Prefecture.</p>
<p>This is partly because electric power  companies had been reluctant to share such information due to rivalry  among manufacturers of nuclear reactors.</p>
<p>Hiroyuki Ito, a division chief in  charge of the operation of nuclear power plants at Tokyo  Electric Power Co., admitted at a press conference Tuesday that  information did not flow freely between the companies. &laquo;&nbsp;If we  are accused of lacking awareness of the risk [of control rods  slipping], we can&#8217;t deny it,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>In TEPCO&#8217;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power station, manuals to operate valves to control water flows had  been revised by 1992 to prevent the occurrence of abnormally high  water pressure that could lead to the slippage of control rods in the  No. 1 reactor.</p>
<p>But information about the risk was  not conveyed to operators of the No. 3 reactor of <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power station, where the same kind of accident  occurred in 1993.</p>
<p>And in 2000, slippage of control rods  occurred in the No. 1 reactor of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant due to  errors in operating valves to control water pressure, though workers  there should have known how to prevent such an accident.</p>
<p>Though TEPCO asked Toshiba Corp. to  analyze conditions that could lead to this type of accident, there  was no evidence of the company having shared the information  throughout the firm.</p>
<p>The company could not even share the  information internally, let alone provide the information to other  electric power firms to create a system for preventing similar  accidents.</p>
<p>Not only TEPCO but also Tohoku  Electric Power Co. and Chubu Electric Power Co. did not release such  information, thus they could not work together to prevent the  accident at the Shika plant.</p>
<p>Electric power companies are not  obliged to report accidents in which control rods slip to the  government, unless they develop into a criticality accident.  Consequently, the firms had a tendency to downplay problems that they  did not need to report to the government.</p>
<p>The rivalry between Toshiba and  Hitachi Ltd., which manufactured the boiling light water reactors  that caused the problems, obstructed the exchange of accident  information among the firms.</p>
<p>According to the Japan Atomic  Industrial Forum, 32 of 55 nuclear reactors in the nation are  boiling water reactors. Including joint works, Toshiba was involved  in manufacturing 20 of the reactors and Hitachi was involved in  building 17 of them.</p>
<p>Mechanical problems are closely tied  to manufacturers&#8217; technological information and patents. The two  companies, and also the electric power industry as a whole, had  reasons to be cautious about exchanging information.</p>
<p>An official of an electric power  company said, &laquo;&nbsp;It felt as if we needed to obtain permission to  talk about anything if it could be perceived as sharing information  beyond the walls of manufacturers and electric power firms.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Spokesmen for both Toshiba and  Hitachi said their firms did not share such accident information with  rival companies, in principle.</p>
<p>But the atmosphere has gradually  changed since 2002, when TEPCO was found to have concealed other  problems in its nuclear power plants.</p>
<p>The companies concerned have improved  their information databases about problems in nuclear power  plants. In April last year, manufacturers of boiling water reactors  and electric power companies established a liaison council, but it is  still early days for this initiative.</p>
<p>Prof. Yotaro Hatamura at Kogakuin  University said: &laquo;&nbsp;It&#8217;s just a decade ago when people in  industrial circles began recognizing the importance of accumulating  data on past accidents. At the time of the slippage problems, we  couldn&#8217;t blame a failure to learn from mistakes.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>However, Hatamura added that it was  possible for the highest-ranking official in each of the plants to  decide that the accident should be reported to others because a  similar problem could occur in other nuclear plants.</p>
<p>All five cases of control rods  slipping took place inside boiling water reactors, due to errors in  operating water pressure controlling valves.</p>
<p>The nuclear and Industrial  Safety Agency and electric power firms have instructed workers in nuclear plants to reexamine manuals and strictly follow work  procedures.</p>
<p>But it is doubtful whether this  measure alone can prevent serious problems. As long as there is human  involvement in the process, nuclear power plants should be  designed on the assumption that human errors cannot be avoided  completely.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Though we&#8217;ll work at paying  attention to processes for the time being, in the future facilities  in the plant will be designed to eliminate human errors,&nbsp;&raquo; Ito  said.</p>
<p>Four of the 32 boiling water reactors  in the nation are improved types, in which control rods are moved up  and down by screws. In the four reactors, a slippage accident like  those recently found cannot occur.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__459_323964393"></a> 22 mars 2007 : TEPCO a  dissimulé des accidents critiques en 1978 et 1999</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-Japan TEPCO may have had nuclear criticality</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2007  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, March 22 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) said on Thursday it may have had a nuclear power plant &laquo;&nbsp;criticality&nbsp;&raquo; incident in 1978.</p>
<p>Another utility admitted last week it  had a similar incident in 1999 that was concealed.</p>
<p>A spokesman for TEPCO, Japan&#8217;s  biggest utility, said fuel rods fell in a reactor core of a plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, northern Japan, the No.3 unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi plant, and may have caused self-sustaining nuclear fission, or criticality.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We cannot deny the possibility  that the incident caused nuclear reaction,&nbsp;&raquo; a TEPCO  spokesman said.</p>
<p>TEPCO also said it had discovered two  other cases of similar mishandling of nuclear fuel rods in  1979 and 1980 but confirmed that they did not cause nuclear fission.</p>
<p>TEPCO was holding a briefing from 6  p.m. (0900 GMT).</p>
<p>Utilities are now reporting such  incidents to the government after the Trade Ministry ordered them in  November to investigate power plant records and report the findings  by the end of March, a process the ministry said would help improve  the industry&#8217;s safety controls.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s admission comes after  Hokuriku Electric Power Co. said last week it had covered up an  incident in 1999 that caused &laquo;&nbsp;criticality&nbsp;&raquo;, an unintended  self-sustaining nuclear fission chain reaction, that lasted  for 15 minutes.</p>
<p class="western"><strong>LEAD 1 Japon &#8211;  Incident &laquo;&nbsp;critique&nbsp;&raquo; dans une centrale en 1978</strong></p>
<p class="western">22 mars 2007</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  &#8211; Les actualités en français</span></span></span></p>
<p>REUTFR<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western">(c) Reuters Limited  2007.</p>
<p class="western">TOKYO, 22 mars (Reuters) &#8211; La compagnie  d&#8217;électricité japonaise Tepco (Tokyo Electric Power) a  déclaré jeudi qu&#8217;un incident avait atteint un stade  critique en 1978 dans l&#8217;une de ses centrales nucléaires et  avait peut-être duré dans les sept heures trente.</p>
<p>L&#8217;incident &#8211; une  réaction de fission nucléaire spontanée &#8211; n&#8217;avait fait aucun blessé et n&#8217;avait pas  provoqué de radiations, a déclaré Nagao Suzuki,  directeur général des services de gestion des  centrales, lors d&#8217;un point de presse.</p>
<p>Il n&#8217;existe pas  d&#8217;archives sur cet incident, qui a été révélé  au grand jour par les déclarations de deux anciens ouvriers de  la centrale, située à <strong>Fukushima</strong> dans le nord du Japon.</p>
<p class="western">Une autre compagnie avait reconnu la semaine  dernière avoir connu un incident de ce type en 1999, qui avait  été tenu secret.</p>
<p class="western">Les compagnies d&#8217;électricité doivent  désormais signaler de tels incidents au gouvernement,  maintenant que le ministère du Commerce leur a ordonné,  en novembre, d&#8217;enquêter sur les archives des centrales et de  communiquer toute découverte d&#8217;ici la fin mars, processus qui,  selon le ministère, permettra d&#8217;améliorer les contrôles  de sécurité dans cette branche. /GWB/EF</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__461_323964393"></a> 5 avril 2007 : les  entreprises qui gèrent le nucléaire japonais ont commis  plus de 10 000 infractions</h2>
<p><strong>Over  10,000 irregularities committed by Japan&#8217;s power utilities </strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Kyodo News</p>
<p>TOKYO, April 5 &#8212; Japan&#8217;s 12 electric  power firms have committed irregularities involving power generation  facilities some 10,650 times in a total of 306 different types, an  industry group said Thursday.</p>
<p>The total breaks down to 450 times in  97 types involving nuclear power generation, 1,200 times in  128 types involving thermal power generation and 9,000 times in 81  types involving hydro power generation.</p>
<p>Tsunehisa Katsumata, chairman of the  Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, made the  announcement at a meeting of the governing Liberal Democratic Party.</p>
<p>Katsumata, who is president of Tokyo  Electric Power Co., told the LDP meeting that the power industry will  file with the government as early as Friday a set of measures aimed  at preventing a recurrence of such irregularities involving power  generation.</p>
<p>The package will incorporate measures  to strengthen training and education of staff from power firms and  their subcontractors and also to tighten efforts to share information  among the utilities and equipment makers, Katsumata said.</p>
<p>He offered an apology at the LDP  meeting for &nbsp;&raquo;causing worries and trouble to many people&nbsp;&raquo; through  the series of mistakes and coverups of incidents involving power  generation.</p>
<p>In reports to the government last  Friday, the 12 power firms said they have found irregularities of 306  types through their probes conducted since last November.</p>
<p>The 12 are Hokkaido, Tohoku, Tokyo,  Chubu, Hokuriku, Kansai, Chugoku, Shikoku, Kyushu and Okinawa  electric power companies as well as Electric Power Development Co.,  known as J-Power, and Japan Atomic Power Co.</p>
<p>In its report to the government,  Tokyo Electric Power said it concealed the emergency shutdown of a  reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant in  1984.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric said in the report  that the reactor shut down because an increase of neutrons sparked  temporary criticality in the reactor. The company said it  deliberately chose not to report the incident to the government.</p>
<p class="western">==Kyodo</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> TERRE</p>
<p><strong>Le  Japon découvre des incidents cachés BY</strong> TEMMAN  Michel</p>
<p class="western">14 avril 2007</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Libération</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBRT<strong>NGC</strong> Libération  &#8211; All<strong>GC</strong> CTGLIB<strong>ED</strong> 1e  EDITION</p>
<p class="western">010</p>
<p>8067<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p>Libération.  Une publication de SNPC &#8211; France. Tel: 33 (1) 42 76 17 89 <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">http://www.liberation.fr</span></span></span>.</p>
<p>Avec un parc nucléaire en plein essor, le pays s&#8217;inquiète des dysfonctionnements.</p>
<p>La polémique  sur l&#8217;insécurité nucléaire,  toujours à vif au Japon, est relancée. Les responsables  de deux compagnies d&#8217;électricité, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Chubu  Electric Power</span></span></span> et <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric Power</span></span></span>, ont reconnu  avoir sciemment étouffé des incidents survenus dans  leurs centrales nucléaires (au centre et au nord du Japon),  l&#8217;un en 1988, l&#8217;autre en 1991. Avouant les avoir délibérément  &laquo;&nbsp;masqués&nbsp;&raquo;, ils ont été sévèrement  blâmés par les autorités.</p>
<p>Le ministère  de l&#8217;Economie et de l&#8217;Industrie a de son côté confirmé,  huit ans après les faits, l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un autre accident, en  1999 au nord du pays, à la centrale de Shika gérée  par Hokuriku Electric Power. Suite à une fausse manoeuvre, une  réaction nucléaire en chaîne s&#8217;est produite de façon incontrôlée  durant quinze minutes. Le système d&#8217;arrêt d&#8217;urgence n&#8217;a  pas fonctionné, mais le réacteur a pu être stoppé  manuellement. Le directeur de la centrale a alors décidé  de dissimuler l&#8217;accident. Les agents de la sûreté nucléaire n&#8217;ont découvert cet épisode que récemment et ont  depuis ordonné l&#8217;arrêt du premier réacteur pour  vérification, le second étant hors-service depuis  juillet à cause d&#8217;une turbine défaillante.</p>
<p>Bien qu&#8217;en cours  de modernisation avec le développement de centrales de 3e  génération, le parc nucléaire nippon suscite donc des inquiétudes. Car ce n&#8217;est pas la  première fois que de telles défaillances sont tues. Ces  dernières semaines, d&#8217;autres accidents nucléaires,  survenus dans deux centrales du géant de l&#8217;électricité  Tepco (en 1993 à <strong>Fukushima</strong> et en 2000 à Kashiwazaki Kariwa), ont été  dévoilés au public. Le programme nucléaire nippon, très lié à la France (via Areva), est  ambitieux. En 2002, l&#8217;archipel s&#8217;est engagé à accroître  de 30 % son volume d&#8217;électricité nucléaire d&#8217;ici à 2010 (afin de disposer alors d&#8217;environ 80 réacteurs).  Du coup, l&#8217;Agence pour la sûreté nucléaire réfléchit à la façon de renforcer sa  coopération avec les acteurs de la filière, autant que  les cadres de contrôle de la sécurité des  installations. Les Japonais n&#8217;oublient pas la tragique série  d&#8217;accidents graves survenus dans leur pays. En particulier dans les  centrales de Tsuruga en janvier 1981 (278 irradiés) ou de  Tokaimura en mars 1997 (37 irradiés) et septembre 1999 (2  tués, 600 irradiés, 320 000 réfugiés), ou  encore de Mihama en août 2004 (5 morts et 6 blessés)&#8230;</p>
<p class="western">Tokyo de notre correspondant</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__463_323964393"></a> 20 avril 2007 : le  gouvernement demande des vérifications plus strictes</h2>
<p><strong>Gov&#8217;t  demands stricter checks at 7 nuclear plants to stem coverups </strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Kyodo News</p>
<p>TOKYO, April 20 &#8212; The government  ordered four power companies Friday to conduct additional checks,  along with regular inspections, on their seven nuclear power  plants to try to prevent the recurrence of data falsification  scandals involving nuclear reactors in Japan.</p>
<p>The order was part of a 30-point set  of measures the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry unveiled the  same day to ensure safety at Japanese nuclear plants and  rebuild public trust in atomic power after two power companies  concealed &nbsp;&raquo;criticality&nbsp;&raquo; accidents at their reactors.</p>
<p>Officials at the nuclear and  Industrial Safety Agency, an arm of the ministry, will also carry out  special monitoring and supervision of the seven plants.</p>
<p>The agency suspects nine reactors at  the seven plants have violated rules under the Electric Utility Law  or the nuclear reactor regulation law.</p>
<p>The seven are <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>&#8216;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 and  No. 2 plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture and the  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in Niigata Prefecture, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Hokuriku  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>&#8216;s Shika plant in Ishikawa  Prefecture, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Chugoku  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>&#8216;s Shimane plant in Shimane  Prefecture, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Atomic Power Co.</span></span></span>&#8216;s Tsuruga plant in Fukui  Prefecture and Tokai plant in Ibaraki Prefecture.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s 10 regional power companies  plus Japan Atomic Power and <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Electric  Power Development Co.</span></span></span> have reported 316 cases  of irregularities at their nuclear, hydraulic and thermal  power plants that they had found in their probes since November  following an order by Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Akira  Amari.</p>
<p>Of the 316, 98 cases involve nuclear power generation, including the occurrence of a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction, or a criticality reaction, at Hokuriku  Electric&#8217;s Shika plant in 1999 and Tokyo Electric&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear plant in 1978, respectively.</p>
<p class="western">==Kyodo</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__465_323964393"></a> 27 avril 2007 : alerte  sur l&#8217;air conditionné sur les réacteurs n°2 et 4</h2>
<p><strong>Tokyo  Elec Blames Air Conditioner For Reactor Shutdown -Kyodo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>NEW YORK (Dow Jones)&#8211; <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span> (9501.TO) said Friday that  an air conditioner was responsible for the automatic shutdown in  February of a nuclear reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture  after supposedly detecting excessive radioactivity, Kyodo News  reported Friday.</p>
<p>Draft from the air conditioner at the  No. 4 reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power  station in the town of Tomioka hit the alarm device&#8217;s measurement  gauge and created static due to friction, thus causing the apparatus  to malfunction, the company was quoted as saying.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric said it&#8217;s the first  time such a problem has come to light and that it&#8217;ll examine whether  a similar situation exists at its other nuclear reactors,  Kyodo reported.</p>
<p>According to the utility, the problem  occurred with the alarm system&#8217;s device for monitoring radioactivity  levels inside the main steam pipe, the report said.</p>
<p>The reactor automatically stopped  Feb. 18 after the alarm went off for purportedly detecting abnormally  high levels of radioactivity after it was started up following a  regular inspection and was preparing to generate electric power, the  utility was quoted as saying.</p>
<p>According to the report, the move was  determined to be a glitch as the reactor&#8217;s other radioactivity  monitoring devices detected no abnormalities.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric said it&#8217;s taking  measures such as adding grounding wires to reduce static, Kyodo  reported. [ 27-04-07 1218GMT ]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__467_323964393"></a>14 juin  2007 : arrêt du réacteur n°3 en raison d&#8217;une fuite  d&#8217;eau</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  TEPCO to shut nuclear unit for inspection</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, June 14 (Reuters) &#8211; Japan&#8217;s  Tokyo Electric Power Co. said on Thursday it would start manually  shutting down the No. 3 nuclear power generation unit at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi plant in northern Japan from later in the  evening for an unplanned inspection. A water leak was found and  although that did not have an immediate impact on the nuclear unit, the company decided to shut down, Japan&#8217;s biggest utility said  in a statement.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__469_323964393"></a>16  juillet 2007 : &nbsp;&raquo; Les centrales nucléaires japonaises  conçues pour résister aux pires séismes&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><strong>Les centrales nucléaires japonaises conçues pour  résister aux pires séismes (ACTUALISATION, PAPIER  D&#8217;ANGLE) BY</strong> ROC</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">AFPFR<strong>NGC</strong> Agence France Presse (AFP)<strong>GC</strong> CTGAFP<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;" lang="en-GB">Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2007 All reproduction and  presentation rights reserved.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">TOKYO, 16 juil 2007 (AFP) -</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Le séisme qui a frappé lundi le <strong>Japon</strong> a provoqué  un incendie et une légère fuite radioactive dans la <strong>centrale nucléaire</strong> de Kashiwazaki-Kariwa, une des plus  grandes du monde, qui comme ses semblables au <strong>Japon</strong> est  normalement conçue pour résister aux pires secousses.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Le nucléaire revêt une importance stratégique au <strong>Japon</strong>, la deuxième économie mondiale qui est  presque totalement dépourvue de ressources énergétiques  telles que le pétrole, le charbon ou le gaz naturel.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Les 57 réacteurs nucléaires japonais fournissent  environ 35% des besoins en électricité du pays, et le  gouvernement cherche à augmenter cette proportion à 40%  à l&#8217;horizon 2010 pour réduire la dépendance  énergétique.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Mais dans un Archipel qui subit chaque année 20% des  tremblements de terre les plus violents enregistrés dans le  monde, la construction de réacteurs nucléaires doit  obéir à des normes de sécurité  draconiennes.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">D&#8217;autant que les sentiments anti-nucléaires restent  extrêmement vifs au <strong>Japon</strong> depuis les bombardements  atomiques de Hiroshima et Nagasaki en 1945.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Propriété du géant <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power</span></span></span> (Tepco), Kashiwazaki-Kariwa  fournit en électricité la capitale située à  250 km plus au sud.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Avec ses sept réacteurs d&#8217;une capacité totale de 8.212  mégawatts, elle est l&#8217;une des centrales les plus puissantes du  monde.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Elle est aussi située à quelques kilomètres de  l&#8217;épicentre du séisme de magnitude 6,8 sur l&#8217;échelle  de Richter qui a pulvérisé des dizaines de maisons et  endommagé de nombreuses routes lundi. Un précédent  tremblement de terre meurtrier, de même magnitude, avait déjà  dévasté la région en octobre 2004.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Un incendie s&#8217;est déclaré dans un transformateur  électrique, ainsi qu&#8217;une fuite radioactive jugée sans  gravité par Tepco.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">&laquo;&nbsp;Nous pouvons confirmer que de l&#8217;eau contenant de la matière  radioactive a fui&nbsp;&raquo;, a reconnu un porte-parole de la compagnie,  Shougo Fukuda.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">&laquo;&nbsp;Mais la fuite est bien en dessous des niveaux qui pourraient  affecter l&#8217;environnement&nbsp;&raquo;, a-t-il assuré, ajoutant  qu&#8217;aucun employé n&#8217;avait été exposé à  des radiations.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Comme tous les réacteurs nucléaires du <strong>Japon</strong>,  ceux de Kashiwazaki-Kariwa sont équipés de capteurs  sismiques, reliés à un dispositif qui arrête  immédiatement le système dès qu&#8217;une secousse  survient.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">De plus, les centrales nucléaires japonaises sont  obligatoirement construites sur un sol rocheux, selon des normes  géologiques extrêmement strictes, afin de minimiser les  secousses. Celles situées au bord de la mer sont aussi  protégées par des murs anti-<strong>tsunami</strong>.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Après le tremblement de terre de Kobe (ouest), qui avait  atteint 7,2 sur l&#8217;échelle de Richter en 1995, faisant plus de  6.400 morts mais aucun dommage aux réacteurs de la région,  la Commission de sécurité nucléaire japonaise  avait durci les normes architecturales des centrales, qui dataient de  1978.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Depuis lors, tous les réacteurs en activité sont censés  résister à des séismes d&#8217;au moins 7,75 sur  l&#8217;échelle de Richer.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Dans certaines régions particulièrement à <strong>risques</strong>, les centrales sont conçues pour résister  à des méga-secousses pouvant atteindre une magnitude de  8,25. L&#8217;usine de retraitement de combustible de Rokkassho (nord),  actuellement en phase de tests, résisterait à un séisme  de 8,5.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">La confiance du public japonais a toutefois été écornée  après les récents aveux de compagnies d&#8217;électricité  qui ont dissimulé aux autorités plusieurs incidents,  parfois graves, entre 1978 et 2002.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">De plus, en mars 2006 et pour la toute première fois, un  tribunal japonais a ordonné l&#8217;arrêt d&#8217;un réacteur  nucléaire, inauguré quelques jours plus tôt à  Shika (centre), en donnant droit aux riverains qui accusaient la  compagnie électrique exploitante d&#8217;avoir sous-estimé  les <strong>risques</strong> sismiques.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">La compagnie Hokuriku Electric Power a toutefois fait appel, ce qui  lui permet de poursuivre l&#8217;exploitation de sa centrale.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">roc/agr/ai eaf</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><strong>SE</strong> Monde</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><strong>Explication; Les centrales nucléaires face aux risques  sismiques</strong></p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">18 juillet 2007</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;"><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">La  Croix</span></span></span></p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Copyright 2007 Bayard-Presse &#8211; La Croix “All Rights Reserved”</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Le violent séisme intervenu lundi dans la région de  Niigata, au centre du <strong>Japon</strong>, qui a fait neuf victimes et de  nombreux dégâts, rappelle aux Japonais leur  vulnérabilité face au <strong>risque</strong> sismique. Cinquante  dysfonctionnements ont été identifiés dans la <strong>centrale nucléaire</strong> de Kashiwazaki, touchée par  le tremblement de terre, rapportait hier l’agence de presse  Kyodo News citant des responsables de l’entreprise chargée  de la centrale.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Le <strong>Japon</strong> est-il bien protégé contre les séismes  ?</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Cet État, qui subit près de 20 % des plus gros  séismes de la planète, est le pays le plus réactif  face à cette menace. En 1995, le tremblement de terre de Kobe,  d’une magnitude de 7,2 sur l’échelle de Richter,  faisait 6 400 victimes. Cette catastrophe a poussé les  autorités nippones à accélérer le plan  antisismique. Si la maîtrise technique progresse, la  sécurisation des grandes agglomérations reste  problématique. En particulier le <strong>risque</strong> d’incendie,  qui serait responsable de la moitié des victimes en cas de  séisme. Tokyo, mégalopole de 20 millions  d’habitants, est particulièrement soumise à un  tel <strong>risque</strong> car située au cœur d’une zone en  subduction. Le « Big One » nippon, méga-séisme  qui menace la capitale, est susceptible de frapper à tout  instant.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Les centrales japonaises sont-elles garanties contre les <strong>risques </strong>sismiques ?</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">L’incendie survenu lundi dans la centrale de  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa, l’une des plus grandes du monde, n’aurait  provoqué aucune conséquence radioactive sérieuse,  mais un tel incident inquiète l’opinion publique et les  mouvements écologistes, et ravive un débat récurrent  au <strong>Japon</strong>. Composé de 55 centrales, le parc nucléaire  japonais apparaît pourtant relativement sûr. Ainsi lors  du séisme de Kobe, il n’y a eu aucun dommage dans les  centrales nippones ; tous les réacteurs sont censés  résister à une secousse de magnitude 7,75 sur l’échelle  de Richter. Dans certaines régions sensibles, le seuil a été  élevé à 8,25. Un règlement draconien  encadre le choix des sites, les centrales doivent ainsi être  construites sur des sols rocheux, qui minimisent les secousses. Les  centrales situées en bord de mer sont équipées  de murs anti-<strong>tsunami</strong>, menace qui intervient lorsque  l’épicentre du séisme est sous-marin.</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Y a t-il un <strong>risque </strong>sismo-nucléaire  la France ?</p>
<p style="widows:2;orphans:2;">Beaucoup moins aiguë qu’au <strong>Japon</strong>, la menace existe  en France. Le réseau associatif « Sortons du nucléaire  » annonçait ainsi en 2003 que 34 des 54 réacteurs  n’étaient pas adaptés au <strong>risque</strong> sismique.  Mais selon Monique Sené, physicienne nucléaire et  chercheuse au CNRS, le parc nucléaire français est  correctement protégé. Les réacteurs internes ont  été régulièrement renforcés et les  centrales sont auscultées à intervalles réguliers  (tous les dix ans), notamment l’enceinte et la cuve du réacteur  qui ne se remplacent pas. Elle précise que les centrales de  première génération (d’une capacité  de 900 MW), les seules vraiment sensibles à un tel <strong>risque</strong>, pourraient fermer d’ici quelques années  si leur sécurisation posait problème. Le <strong>risque</strong> reste fonction de l’activité sismique. Plusieurs des 19  sites nucléaires français sont situés sur des  zones potentiellement à <strong>risques</strong>, notamment ceux du  centre-ouest (Chinon et Civaux) et ceux situés sur le sillon  rhodanien. Fessenheim, la centrale française la plus ancienne  (1977), a ainsi connu deux séismes. En 2004, une secousse de  magnitude 5,8 n’avait causé aucun dégât.</p>
<p><strong>Japon:  des doutes sur la sûreté nucléaire</strong> <strong>BY</strong> &#8211;par  Eric Talmadge&#8211;</p>
<p class="western">18 juillet 2007</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">AP  French Worldstream</span></span></span></p>
<p>KASHIWAZAKI, Japon  (AP) &#8211; La communauté internationale et la population locale  s&#8217;inquiètent de la situation à Kashiwazaki, dans le  nord de Japon. La centrale nucléaire de la ville a fermé ses portes mercredi, la fuite d&#8217;eau  radioactive constatée après le violent séisme de  lundi s&#8217;étant avérée plus importante qu&#8217;on ne le  pensait initialement.</p>
<p>De plus, environ  400 fûts contenant des déchets faiblement radioactifs se  sont renversés, et une quarantaine d&#8217;entre eux se sont  ouverts, mais aucune radiation n&#8217;a été détectée  à l&#8217;extérieur du site, a affirmé mercredi <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power</span></span></span> (TEPCO),  l&#8217;entreprise chargée des installations. Elle n&#8217;avait fait état  que d&#8217;une centaine de barils la veille, mais le chiffre a été  révisé à la suite de nouvelles inspections, a  expliqué le porte-parole Tsutomu Uehara.</p>
<p class="western">Le maire de la ville a ordonné la fermeture  de la centrale pour des raisons de sécurité, étant  donné les dysfonctionnements signalés après le  tremblement de terre. Elle rouvrira une fois si la sécurité  y est assurée.</p>
<p class="western">L&#8217;Agence internationale de l&#8217;énergie  atomique (AIEA) a demandé au Japon de mener une enquête  transparente et approfondie sur les accidents qui se sont produits  sur le site pour voir si l&#8217;on peut en tirer des leçons pour  les autres centrales, notamment à l&#8217;étranger.</p>
<p class="western">Le président de TEPCO Tsunehisa Katsumata  s&#8217;est rendu sur place mercredi et a relevé le &laquo;&nbsp;désordre&nbsp;&raquo;  régnant dans la centrale, alors que sa société  avait détaillé mardi soir une liste de plusieurs  dizaines de dysfonctionnements constatés après le  séisme d&#8217;une magnitude de 6,8.</p>
<p>Lors d&#8217;une visite  organisée ensuite pour le patron du Parti communiste japonais,  Kazuo Shii, et quelques journalistes, il était possible de  voir des fissures dans les routes menant à la centrale, ainsi  que des barrières renversées. &laquo;&nbsp;C&#8217;est  impardonnable&nbsp;&raquo;, a lancé Kazuo Shii à Masakazu  Minamidate, directeur-adjoint de TEPCO, qui gère la centrale  de Kariwa. &laquo;&nbsp;Vous dites qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas de fuite, avant de savoir  vraiment (&#8230;) Le retard au niveau de l&#8217;information était  particulièrement inexcusable!&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Tsunehisa  Katsumata a présenté ses excuses pour les  dysfonctionnements constatés, tout en soulignant que les  mesures de sécurité avaient été  respectées. &laquo;&nbsp;Nous mènerons une enquête  complète. Mais je pense que nous avons fondamentalement  confirmé que nos mesures de sécurité ont  fonctionné&nbsp;&raquo;, a-t-il déclaré. &laquo;&nbsp;Il  est difficile que tout se passe parfaitement.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p class="western">Par ailleurs, TEPCO a annoncé que la fuite  d&#8217;eau radioactive constatée après le séisme  était 50% plus importante que les premières  estimations, mais toujours sous les niveaux de dangerosité  autorisés. Cette eau s&#8217;est déversée en mer du  Japon. &laquo;&nbsp;Nous avons fait une erreur en calculant le montant qui  s&#8217;est déversé dans l&#8217;océan. Nous nous excusons  et faisons une correction&nbsp;&raquo;, souligne TEPCO dans un communiqué.</p>
<p>Akira <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  directeur-adjoint de l&#8217;organisme gouvernemental de surveillance du nucléaire,  a confirmé que ses inspecteurs n&#8217;avaient pas détecté  d&#8217;anomalies supérieures au niveaux de dangerosité  autorisés sur le site.</p>
<p class="western">Peu convaincu, Hiroshi Aida, le maire de  Kashiwazaki, la ville de 93.500 habitants qui abrite la centrale et  qui se trouve à seulement 19 kilomètres de l&#8217;épicentre  du séisme, a quand même ordonné la fermeture du  site. &laquo;&nbsp;Je suis inquiet&nbsp;&raquo;, a-t-il confié. &laquo;&nbsp;Il  serait difficile de relancer les opérations actuellement (&#8230;)  La sécurité de la centrale doit être assurée  avant sa réouverture&nbsp;&raquo;.</p>
<p class="western">La centrale Kariwa, installée à  Kashiwazaki, est la plus importante au monde en termes de production  électrique. Les 55 centrales nucléaires du Japon  fournissent environ 30% des besoins en électricité du  pays.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__471_323964393"></a> 19 août 2007 :  craintes sur la résistance des centrales japonaises en cas de  tremblement de terre</h2>
<p><strong>Shimane  Nuclear Power Plant Quake Resistance To Be Reassessed-Kyodo</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>NEW YORK (Dow Jones)&#8211; <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Chugoku  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span> is planning to reassess the  quake resistance capability of its shoreline Shimane nuclear Power Station that it says is confirmed to be located close to an  area with 10 active fault lines under the sea, company sources said  Saturday, according to Kyodo.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Chugoku  Electric</span></span></span> had been aware of the existence of the  fault lines ranging from 6 to 51 kilometers in length but had  considered their impact on the nuclear power station would be  insignificant, given their distance from the station and their scale,  the sources said,. according to Kyodo.</p>
<p>The utility, which serves a western  Japan region, has determined that detailed research using undersea  sonar probe devices is now necessary &laquo;&nbsp;in order to retain the  trust of local people,&nbsp;&raquo; a company executive said, following the  unexpected damage done to <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>&#8216;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear Power Station by a powerful earthquake in July.</p>
<p>The move follows an earlier decision  by Tokyo Electric to conduct sonic and structural surveys of undersea  faults near Kashiwazaki-Kariwa as well as <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 and  No. 2 nuclear stations.</p>
<p>The company, based in the city of  Hiroshima, has also decided to conduct research on another active  fault, in the land area, after an expert suggested that it could be  more than twice as long as initially thought.</p>
<p>The nuclear power station &#8211;  the only one located in a prefectural capital &#8211; has two reactors. The  No. 1 reactor with an output capacity of 460,000 kilowatts went  on-stream in March 1974. The No. 2 reactor with an 820,000 kw  capacity started operating in 1989. The third, now under  construction, is scheduled to start running in 2011.</p>
<p>While the two existing reactors are  powered by uranium, the company is planning to use a  plutonium-uranium mix fuel in a new experiment at the No. 2 reactor.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Chugoku  Electric</span></span></span> now believes it would take a lot  longer to complete its quake resilience research for the nuclear power station than the original timeline of finishing its assessment  by the year-end, the sources said. [ 18-08-07  2322GMT ]</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> ASIA  PACIFIC</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__473_323964393"></a> 21 août 2007 : le gouvernement autorise  TEPCO a retarder les vérifications  de sécurité sur son réacteur  n°3</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  postpones work at Fukushima-1 nuclear unit BY</strong> Takeo Kumagai</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Oilgram News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PON</p>
<p>2</p>
<p>Volume 85,  Issue 164</p>
<p>(c) 2007  McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s Ministry of Economy Trade and  Industry has allowed <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Company</span></span></span> to further delay  conducting additional safety checks at its 780 MW No. 3 reactor at  the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 nuclear power plant in northeastern  Japan to August 31, a Tepco official said August 20.</p>
<p>Tepco was originally scheduled to  conduct the safety checks in late July but was allowed to postpone it  to August 20. The latest delay comes as Tepco has moved several of  its technical staff from <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 to the earthquake-hit  8.212 GW Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant, the official  said, adding that the postponement had nothing to do with the heat  wave that has hit the country.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Tepco still plans to shut  the 1.10 GW No. 6 nuclear reactor at <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 for  maintenance starting October 1, the official said. This unit was  originally scheduled for maintenance in early August, but METI  allowed Tepco to delay the maintenance following Kashiwazaki-Kariwa&#8217;s  shutdown in mid-July. The shutdown has knocked out close to half of  the company&#8217;s total nuclear power generation capacity of 17.31  GW.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s summer power demand normally  peaks between July and September. The drop in nuclear power  generation has forced Japan&#8217;s biggest power utility to boost its  thermal power generation using feedstocks including direct-burning  crudes, low sulfur waxy residue, low sulfur fuel oil, LNG and coal.</p>
<p>Separately, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kansai  Electric</span></span></span> August 17 idled the 826 MW No. 2  reactor at its Takahama nuclear power plant for a three-month  maintenance program. <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kansai  Electric</span></span></span> now has eight nuclear units  with a combined capacity of 8.102 GW in operation. This accounts for  83% of its total power generation capacity of 9.768 GW over 11 units  in western Japan.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__475_323964393"></a>20  septembre 2007 : fuites radioactives à la suite d&#8217;un  tremblement de terre de magnitude 6.8</h2>
<p><strong>LEAD:  July quake more powerful than many plants are thought to withstand </strong></p>
<p>Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2007  Kyodo News</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept. 20 &#8212; The devastating  quake that caused leaks of minute amounts of radioactive substances  at Japan&#8217;s biggest nuclear power station in Japan in July was  more powerful than many nuclear power facilities are envisaged  to withstand, reports submitted by the country&#8217;s nuclear power  companies to the government showed Thursday.</p>
<p>The July 16 temblor with a magnitude  of 6.8 is known to have registered larger ground motions than <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span> had anticipated at the time  of designing reactors at the quake-hit Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in Niigata Prefecture on the Sea of Japan shoreline.</p>
<p>The reports to the government show  that the July quake was more powerful than what at least seven nuclear power facilities were envisaged to be able to  withstand at the time of their designing.</p>
<p>The seven are the spent fuel  reprocessing plant in Aomori Prefecture of <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Nuclear Fuel Ltd.</span></span></span>, the Onagawa nuclear power plant in Miyagi Prefecture of <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>, the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1  and No. 2 plants of Tokyo Electric, the Tokai No. 2 plant in Ibaraki  Prefecture and the Tsuruga plant in Fukui Prefecture, both of <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Atomic Power Co.</span></span></span>, and the Monju fast-breeder  reactor in Fukui Prefecture of the state-run Japan Atomic Energy  Agency.</p>
<p>The nuclear power companies,  however, rule out any safety problems, saying their facilities are  actually designed with some leeway to withstand quakes that are  stronger than those anticipated. The ground motions of the July quake  were within the range of anticipations for the designing of those  facilities, they said.</p>
<p>All of the nuclear power  companies said studies are under way to reconfirm safety of their  facilities against quakes.</p>
<p>The country&#8217;s 10 utility firms, Japan nuclear Fuel and the Japan Atomic Energy Agency filed the  reports that compared ground motions from the July quake with their  facilities.</p>
<p>The temblor that struck central  Niigata Prefecture on July 16 left 11 people dead and more than 1,000  people injured.</p>
<p>The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant with an  output capacity of more than 8 million kilowatts has remained shut  down since the quake.</p>
<p>A team of experts from the  International Atomic Energy Agency inspected the damaged  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in early August.</p>
<p>On Aug. 17, the U.N. nuclear watchdog released a report saying there is no visible significant  damage to the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant. The  report suggested, however, that a detailed examination should  continue to be carried out on the power plant&#8217;s reactor vessel, core  and fuel.</p>
<p class="western">==Kyodo</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__477_323964393"></a>4  octobre 2007 : TEPCO améliore sa communication à la  suite du tremblement de terre</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  enhancing communications after quake BY</strong> Ann MacLachlan,  Chicago</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nucleonics  Week</span></span></span></p>
<p>NUC</p>
<p>1</p>
<p>Volume 48,  Issue 40</p>
<p>(c) 2007  McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span> is looking at ways to  improve communications as it sorts through the lessons learned from  the July 16 Niigata Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake that affected the  seven-unit Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power station, a senior  Tepco official said late last month.</p>
<p>The measures to be implemented  include setting up a direct telephone line to a local fire station  from the main control room, said Akira Komori, Tepco executive  officer and general manager of the utility&#8217;s nuclear Quality &amp;  Safety Management Department.</p>
<p>Tepco has also realized the  importance of gathering all available information following a plant  event in the same place as soon as possible, so it can be &laquo;&nbsp;sorted&nbsp;&raquo;  and communicated to the public in a timely manner, he told the World  Association of nuclear Operators&#8217; biennial general meeting in  Chicago September 25.</p>
<p>The company will also set up an  emergency control room in an earthquake-resistant building, he said.</p>
<p>Komori echoed other reports by Tepco  as well as a report to senior regulators in Vienna last month by  Akira <strong>Fukushima</strong> of the nuclear and Industrial Safety  Agency, or NISA. <strong>Fukushima</strong> said the plant had behaved  essentially well during the earthquake and that the event validated  Japan&#8217;s conservative earthquake safety standards (NW, 27 Sept., 4).  Komori noted, in particular, that the largest dynamic force in play —  the maximum acceleration at the unit 1 reactor building basemat —  was 680 gal, 2.5 times the design acceleration response of 273 gal.  However, because of static force requirements, safety-significant  buildings and structures &laquo;&nbsp;are made three times as strong as  general buildings,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>Earthquake surveys are now under way  on the site and surrounding areas to identify active faults to  determine the probability of recurrence of the same magnitude of  earthquake, he said. They will be completed by March. A new design  basis ground motion will be defined and seismic safety of structures,  systems and components will be calculated, and engineering work  reinforced &laquo;&nbsp;if necessary,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>At the same time, &laquo;&nbsp;precise  inspections&nbsp;&raquo; of plant systems, structures and components is to  be completed by January, said Tepco President Tsunehisa Katsumata.</p>
<p>For the moment, all seven  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa BWRs remain down pending investigations, but  experts indicated last month that NISA would likely adopt a staggered  approach to approving restart because the units were differently  affected.</p>
<p>Beyond the technical lessons of the  earthquake, Komori said, the event has driven home the need for  better communication and public information.</p>
<p>The earthquake struck Niigata  prefecture on a national holiday, with an epicenter only 16  kilometers from the plant site. While the four units in operation  scrammed successfully and were brought into cold shutdown by Tepco&#8217;s  &laquo;&nbsp;skilled operators,&nbsp;&raquo; Komori said, three quake-induced  events caused public concern that has led Tepco to rethink how it  handles emergencies.</p>
<p>Kashiwazaki-Kariwa staff experienced  delays in obtaining help from the local fire brigade to put out a  fire in a house-load transformer, and initial actions to put out the  fire didn&#8217;t work because fire protection piping was damaged due the  earthquake, he said. Video footage showing black smoke spewing from  the transformer was shown worldwide, attracting public attention and  concern, Komori said.</p>
<p>As part of countermeasures, besides  the direct phone connection to local firefighters, Tepco has now  deployed a site chemical fire engine and formed its own firefighting  corps that is on &laquo;&nbsp;&#8217;round-the-clock standby,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>In a second event, very slightly  contaminated water leaked from the spent fuel pool at unit 6 through  a cable penetration to the sea. The dose was estimated at 2 x 10-9  milliSievert, well below the authorized limit, but there was a delay  in reporting the leakage to authorities, he said. The delay, he said,  was caused by &laquo;&nbsp;a lack of radiation technicians after the  earthquake.&nbsp;&raquo; In addition, because the water puddle was in an  area that was not radiation-controlled, plant personnel did not  initially realize it was radioactive.</p>
<p>The third event that caught the  public&#8217;s attention was a release of radioactive iodine and  particulate matter from the main turbine condenser of unit 7, due to  a delay by operators in manually stopping the turbine gland steam  ventilator, he said. There again, the dose was estimated at 2 x 10-7  mSv, well below the limit.</p>
<p>Komori said that to prevent  recurrence of delays in reporting radioactive releases, Tepco has now  posted a radiation technician at all stations on a 24-hour basis. It  also has enhanced the performance of its emergency support center,  including installing more reliable communications facilities, and  ordered plant staff to report the possibility of radioactive material  leakage to authorities, even if the leakage is in non-controlled  areas.</p>
<p>Easy reporting</p>
<p>Komori said that after the quake,  operators and engineers were &laquo;&nbsp;focused&nbsp;&raquo; on bringing the  operating units to cold shutdown, as stipulated in procedures, and  not on communicating information to the outside.</p>
<p>Moreover, he said, while &laquo;&nbsp;we had  a lot of information&nbsp;&raquo; on the state of the plant, operators were  not able to access the emergency preparedness room set up to allow  rapid communications between the plant and the local community,  regulators and central government, because of damage from the  earthquake. In addition, he said, &laquo;&nbsp;the public relations person&nbsp;&raquo;  — who was besieged by questions from the media — &laquo;&nbsp;wasn&#8217;t  fully aware of the whole situation.&nbsp;&raquo; Tepco &laquo;&nbsp;wasn&#8217;t able to  sort out all the information to give to the media,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>Komori said that henceforth, Tepco  will attempt to &laquo;&nbsp;gather all the information possible [after an  incident] and sort it so it can be distributed in an easy manner.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>He said plant staff will be  instructed to &laquo;&nbsp;run to the spot, collect all the information and  sort it as soon as possible,&nbsp;&raquo; acknowledging, &laquo;&nbsp;I&#8217;m sure this  will be a big challenge.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Komori echoed introductory remarks to  the WANO gathering by Katsumata, who pledged the utility would keep  international counterparts informed of its &laquo;&nbsp;progress&nbsp;&raquo; in  learning the lessons of the earthquake and upgrading the plant,  through the Japan nuclear Technology Institute and Tepco&#8217;s own  website.</p>
<p>Katsumata said that &laquo;&nbsp;based on  the results&nbsp;&raquo; of all the investigations, Tepco would modify the  station &laquo;&nbsp;to make it more durable.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__479_323964393"></a>12  octobre 2007 : arrêt du réacteur n°2 en raison d&#8217;une  panne sur l&#8217;échangeur</h2>
<p><strong>RIM  BUNKER NO.5658 MARKET NEWS &#8211;TEPCO to shut Fukushima Dai-ichi No.2  reactor on glitch</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Bunker Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMBNK<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2007  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span> (TEPCO) said on Thursday that  it would manually shut</p>
<p>down the 784-MW No.2 nuclear reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Dai-ichi power station</p>
<p>Thursday afternoon for safety checks  after finding a glitch at the heat</p>
<p>exchanger. The details including the  length of the closure were unknown. With</p>
<p>the closure of the reactor, the  number of TEPCO&#8217;s operating reactors would be</p>
<p>down to 5, out of its 17 reactors,  with a combined capacity of 4,868-MW,</p>
<p>accounting for 28.1% of its total.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__481_323964393"></a> 24 mars 2008 : TEPCO demande au gouvernement de  prolonger de 10 ans l&#8217;exploitation du  réacteur n°4, qui fonctionne depuis 29 ans</h2>
<p><strong>Plant  Life Management at the Unit No. 4 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power  Plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Targeted  News Service</span></span></span></p>
<p>TARGNS</p>
<p>Copyright  2008 Targeted News Service ALL Rights Reserved</p>
<p>TOKYO, March 24 &#8212; <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Company</span></span></span> issued the following  news release:</p>
<p>Our Unit No. 4 of <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear Power Plant (Boiling Water Reactor; rated  output of 784,000 kW) began its commercial operation in October, 1978  and has been operating for 29 years as of October 12th, 2007.</p>
<p>On October 11th, 2007, we submitted  reports on &laquo;&nbsp;Plant Life Management*2&#8243; and &laquo;&nbsp;Long-Term  Maintenance Plan*3&#8243; for this Unit to the Ministry of Economy,  Trade and Industry based on the Rules of Installment and Operations  of Commercial nuclear Reactors*1.</p>
<p>Following the on-site inspection by  the central government, we resubmitted the reports with the revision  complying with the inspection notes on March 7th, 2008. Today, the  Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry released the examination  results on &laquo;&nbsp;Plant Life Management&nbsp;&raquo; and &laquo;&nbsp;Long-Term  Maintenance Plan&nbsp;&raquo;.</p>
<p>We will appropriately implement the  Long-Term Maintenance Plan for the next 10 years in addition to the  regular maintenance activities for the maintenance and management of  the mentioned Unit based on the reports reviewed by the central  government.</p>
<p>We will continue with ongoing  improvement efforts, accumulating operating experience and enhancing  the knowledge base so that they can be reflected to the Long-Term  Maintenance Plan.</p>
<p>Appendix: Overview of Plant Life  Management and Long-Term Maintenance Planning for the Unit 4 of <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear Power  Plant(<span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/betu08_e/images/080324e1.pdf</span></span></span>)</p>
<p>*1: Rules of Installment and  Operations of Commercial nuclear Reactors</p>
<p>It is mandated that a technical  assessment on aging effect on important equipment and structures for nuclear safety (Plant Life Management) be completed before the  30th anniversary of the beginning of the commercial operation date of nuclear plants and that a 10-year action plan to maintain the  reactor facilities (Long-Term Maintenance Plan) be drawn up based on  the &laquo;&nbsp;Rules for Installment and Operations of Commercial nuclear Reactors.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>In addition, the &laquo;&nbsp;Guideline for  Implementing Plant Life Management of Commercial nuclear Reactors (June 2007)&nbsp;&raquo; requires utilities to submit the Plant  Life Management report and Long-Term Maintenance Plan to the central  government between the anniversary dates of 28 years and 29 years of  commercial operation date of the nuclear reactor.</p>
<p>*2: Plant Life Management</p>
<p>It identifies potential aging effects  on safety-significant equipment and structures of nuclear power plants and conducts technical assessment of their soundness, as  well as identifying further events to be added and reporting the  results when needed. These assessments need to be revisited within 10  years.</p>
<p>*3: Long-Term Maintenance Plan</p>
<p>A specific plan identifying the  coverage, methods and schedule for the items to be added to the  ongoing maintenance activities in the next 10 years based on the  results of Plant Life Management.</p>
<p class="western">TNS MD66-MD66-080810-1748604 18MASHMaria</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__483_323964393"></a> 31 mars 2008 : les  centrales nucléaires doit être prêtes à  affronter des tremblements de terre plus importants</h2>
<p><strong>Japanese  nuclear plants to be prepared for bigger quakes </strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2008  Kyodo News</p>
<p>TOKYO, March 31 &#8212; Japanese nuclear plants, which have been reviewed under a new government guideline for  seismic design, will all be prepared for bigger earthquakes than  before, power company reports to the government showed Monday.</p>
<p>Power companies have revised upward  their estimates of the most powerful earthquakes that may hit nuclear plants. <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>, for instance, anticipates  that the potential intensity of such quakes at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 and No. 2 plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture could reach up  to 600 gals, compared with the previous 370 gals.</p>
<p>Other utilities, including <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Hokkaido  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kansai  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span> and <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyushu  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>, have also similarly  upgraded their estimates up to 600 gals from around 400 gals at some  of their nuclear plants, including those in Tomari, Mihama and  Genkai, after reviewing faults in their vicinity, according to the  reports.</p>
<p>The interim reports were submitted  Monday to the nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency under the  Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.</p>
<p>The government&#8217;s quake resistance  guideline for nuclear plants was revised in 2006 for the first  time since its creation in 1978. It requires tougher safety analysis  and standards.</p>
<p>The power companies said they did not  find any safety problems in their investigations.</p>
<p>But the latest reports proved that  the companies had underestimated earthquake shocks for many years.</p>
<p>Japan Power Atomic Co., for instance,  said a fault at its Tsuruga plant in Fukui Prefecture is about 25  kilometers long and capable of triggering a quake with a magnitude of  around 6.9.</p>
<p>Japan Power Atomic had not taken into  account this active fault in its previous safety assessment.</p>
<p class="western">==Kyodo</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> EAST  ASIA: Japan</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__485_323964393"></a> 10 avril 2008 : TEPCO envisage une croissance de  1% annuel jusqu&#8217;en 2017. Projet de  construction de deux nouveaux réacteurs à Fukushima</h2>
<p class="western"><strong>Tepco reveals  long-term plans</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Power  in Asia</span></span></span></p>
<p>PWRA</p>
<p>24</p>
<p>Issue 501</p>
<p>(c) 2008  McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>The Tokyo Electric Power Company  (Tepco) has projected that its power sales will grow by an average of  1% a year from 2006 to 2017. The company&#8217;s 2008 business management  plan also said that, to meet the increased demand, it would continue  to &laquo;&nbsp;promote the best mixture of energy sources centered on nuclear power.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>The company said the central role of nuclear power was based on the need to &laquo;&nbsp;ensure stable  power supply and energy security, with overall consideration of  factors such as economics, operability and environmental  compatibility.&nbsp;&raquo; But it acknowledged that, in the nearer term,  the continued closure of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power  station following the July 2007 earthquake would require greater use  of other energy resources.</p>
<p>In the near term Tepco said that it  was projecting summer peak period demand for 2008 of 61,100 megawatts  (MW). To meet this level it noted that it planned to secure 64,700 MW  of capacity through the commissioning of new power stations, the  restart of mothballed plants, the rescheduling of maintenance dates,  and power purchases from captive generators and other electric power  companies.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;In addition, according to the  situation, we may ask our customers to conserve electricity,&nbsp;&raquo;  the company said. It noted that the available peak capacity did not  include any contribution by Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.</p>
<p>The new capacity will include the  planned entry into service in July 2008 of the 500-MW Kawasaki Unit  1-2 and 500-MW Futtsu Unit 4-1 liquefied natural gas-fired plants.  The 500-MW Kawasaki Unit 1-1 set is subsequently scheduled to enter  operation in February 2009.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the mothballed plants  expected to resume operations include two 350-MW fuel oil and crude  oil-fired sets at Yokosuka, and a 350-MW blast furnace gas and fuel  oil-fired set at Kashima Kyoudou.</p>
<p>In the longer term the projected  increase in Tepco electricity sales from 287.8 TWh in the 2006 fiscal  year to 322.3 TWh in the 2017 fiscal year would require the  introduction of more new capacity, including new nuclear reactors, the company said. Given this context, Tepco said that one  of its key goals was &laquo;&nbsp;establishing much safer and securer nuclear power stations that are resistant to disaster and are  based on solid trust with local residents.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>The new nuclear reactors  scheduled to enter operation during the period include the two  1,380-MW generators which will form units seven and eight at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi complex, and the 1,385-MW first and second  units at Higashidori. The four units are all projected to enter  service between October 2014 and the end of 2018.</p>
<p>Also included in the construction  program is 1,600 MW of coal-fired capacity at Hitachinaka and Hirono,  which Tepco said is scheduled for operation in the 2013 fiscal year.  Meanwhile 4,000 MW of LNG-fired plant is scheduled to enter service  between July 2008 and 2018 at the Futtsu-4 and Kawasaki-1 and -2  complexes, while pumped storage facilities with 2,820 MW of capacity  are scheduled to enter operation at Kannagawa by 2018, Tepco said.</p>
<p>Tepco also noted that the wholesale  electricity generator J-Power is planning to put two facilities into  operation within the region. These include the commissioning in July  2009 of the 600-MW Isogo-2 coal-fired plant and the commissioning in  2012 of the 1,383-MW Ohma nuclear reactor.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__487_323964393"></a> 25 mai 2008 : un travailleur de la centrale,  atteint d&#8217;un cancer consécutif à  une irradiation, débouté de sa demande d&#8217;indemnisation</h2>
<p><strong>Court nixes ex-N-plant worker&#8217;s  suit</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Daily  Yomiuri</span></span></span></p>
<p>YOMSHI</p>
<p>2</p>
<p>(c) 2008 The Daily Yomiuri All Rights  Reserved.</p>
<p>The Tokyo District Court has rejected  a damages suit filed by a former worker at a nuclear plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, in which the plaintiff sought about 44  million yen in compensation for developing multiple myeloma, a kind  of blood cancer, due to exposure to radiation.</p>
<p>Mitsuaki Nagao, a former nuclear-related firm employee from Osaka who worked at the <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span>&#8216;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power station, filed the lawsuit against TEPCO.</p>
<p>Handing down the ruling, presiding  Judge Hidetaka Matsui said, &laquo;&nbsp;The plaintiff&#8217;s condition cannot be  recognized as multiple myeloma.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>In the lawsuit, the causal connection  between the exposure to radiation and the condition also became a  point of contention.</p>
<p>While the government accepted a  causal connection and Nagao&#8217;s claim for workers accident  compensation, the ruling rejected the government&#8217;s position, saying,  &laquo;&nbsp;In the case of low-dose exposure, no causal connection between  the disease and such exposure has been proved.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__489_323964393"></a> 4 juin 2008 : des mineurs employés pour effectuer des inspections de centrales  nucléaires</h2>
<p><strong>Toshiba  subcontractor illegally hires teens for nuke plant inspection</strong></p>
<p>Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2008  Kyodo News</p>
<p>SENDAI, June 4 &#8212; <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Toshiba  Corp.</span></span></span> has said eight  people aged below 18 were illegally hired by a subcontractor for  regularly conducted inspections of three nuclear power plants  and six of them worked in restricted areas with risk of exposure to  radiation.</p>
<p>The Tokyo-based electronics giant  said in a news release dated Tuesday it suspects those who were  engaged in hiring the eight may have forged documents to obtain  permits to work in the restricted areas of the plants belonging to <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span> and <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric Power Co.</span></span></span></p>
<p>The Labor Standards Law bans an  employer from hiring workers aged below 18 to work in a place that  exposes them to radiation. Permits issued by designated institutions  are also required for working in a restricted area.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Toshiba</span></span></span> said it has reported the problem to local labor ministry offices as  well as to the power companies. The ministry offices, suspecting law  violations, are investigating the cases.</p>
<p>The six workers performed support  work including transport of supplies at the No. 1 <strong>Fukushima</strong> power plant of Tokyo Electric and <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span>&#8216;s power stations in Miyagi and Aomori  prefectures as part of regular checkups conducted since October 2007.</p>
<p>According to the nuclear Safety Commission of Japan, the <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant had a total of  8,208 people engaged in work at restricted areas in fiscal 2004.</p>
<p>Of them, 923 were <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Toshiba</span></span></span> employees and the other 7,285 subcontracted staffers. The latter was  exposed to a higher risk of radiation than the former.</p>
<p class="western">==Kyodo</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__491_323964393"></a> 4 juin 2008 :  redémarrage du réacteur n°5, arrêté à  la suite de &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes techniques&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s TEPCO to restart nuclear  unit after trouble</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2008 Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, June 4 (Reuters) &#8211; Japan&#8217;s  biggest utility, Tokyo Electric Power Co , said on Wednesday it would  restart the 784-megawatt No.5 nuclear generator at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi plant from later in the day.</p>
<p>The generator had been shut since May  25 due to technical problems. (Reporting by Osamu  Tsukimori)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__493_323964393"></a>10 juin  2008 : arrêt du réacteur n°5 en raison d&#8217;une panne  de turbine</h2>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.3336 MARKET NEWS &#8211;Japan TEPCO manually shuts down Fukushima  Daiichi No5 reactor</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMCRD<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2008  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p>Japanese largest power provider <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>, or TEPCO, manually shut down  the 784-MW No5 reactor at its 4,696-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi nuclear power station at 8:15 hours PM Monday, a company  spokesman said. The move came as TEPCO decided to investigate into  the cause of a turbine trouble. The turbine automatically shut down  on Sunday, as an alarm related to generator protection sounded during  the process of reactivation. Later on, TEPCO switched on the turbine  again for checkup, but the unit shut down by itself on another alert  concerning generator protection. With the unit off line, TEPCO is  running eight out of 17 reactors, or a combined capacity of 7,528-MW  out of 17,308-MW. The utilization rate declined to 43.5%. Besides the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi reactors, TEPCO owns the 4,400-MW <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini and 8,212-MW Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power stations.  All reactors at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa are currently out of operation in  the aftermath of a huge earthquake on Jul 16, 2007.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__495_323964393"></a>14 juin  2008 : fuite radioactive à la suite d&#8217;un tremblement de terre</h2>
<p><strong>At  least 6 dead, 11 missing in Japan&#8217;s 7.2 quake</strong> <strong>BY</strong> By  ERIC TALMADGE</p>
<p>Associated  Press Writer</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Associated  Press Newswires</span></span></span></p>
<p>APRS</p>
<p>(c)  2008. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>KURIHARA, Japan (AP) &#8211; Military  helicopters and fire department rescue squads raced to find 11 people  missing after a deadly earthquake in mountainous northern Japan sent  whole hillsides crashing down Saturday, killing at least six and  injuring more than 140.</p>
<p>The 7.2-magnitude quake triggered  several major landslides, blocking roads and stranding about 100  bathers at a hot spring resort. Eleven people were missing as  darkness fell, further hampering the search crews, who had to hike  through mountain trails and dig their way to the worst-hit areas.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>At a nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, about 60 miles (100 kilometers) away, the jolt  splashed a small amount of radioactive water from two pools storing  spent fuel. Trade and Industry Ministry official Yoshinori Moriyama  said there was no leakage outside the plant.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE  2-Small radioactive water leak within TEPCO plant</strong></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">14 juin  2008</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2008  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>(Adds geothermal, hydro plants  update)</p>
<p>TOKYO, June 14 (Reuters) &#8211; Water  containing a small amount of radiation leaked within a <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>nuclear power plant in  northern Japan, where a strong earthquake hit on Saturday, company  officials said.</p>
<p>The water leaked at TEPCO&#8217;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini plant from a pool in a warehouse which keeps disposal materials  of radioactive waste, an official at <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini said.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;No water has leaked outside of  the warehouse,&nbsp;&raquo; the official said, adding that TEPCO has  confirmed that there was no impact on the environment. TEPCO&#8217;s two nuclear plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong>, including <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daini, were operating normally, Asia&#8217;s top power company said.</p>
<p>The two plants have a combined power  capacity of 9,096 megawatts, enough to supply half of the greater  Tokyo region.</p>
<p>TEPCO&#8217;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant, the world&#8217;s biggest, has been shut down since a major  earthquake last July.</p>
<p>Beside TEPCO, nuclear power  facilities run by <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric Power Co</span></span></span> in northern Japan were also  operating normally after the powerful earthquake.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We haven&#8217;t found any problems  at our Onagawa and Higashidori nuclear plants after the  earthquake,&nbsp;&raquo; an official at <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span> said.</p>
<p>A strong earthquake with a  preliminary magnitude of 7.2 jolted northern Japan at 8:43 a.m. on  Saturday (2343 GMT on Friday), killing three people. As many as 10  people are missing.</p>
<p>Tohoku&#8217;s Onagawa plant in Miyagi  prefecture has three units with a combined capacity of 2,174  megawatts. The official said one unit at Onagawa has been closed for  routine maintenance, while two other units were operating normally.</p>
<p>The official said no problem has been  found at its 1,100 megawatt Higashidori nuclear plant. The  plant is in Aomori prefecture and has been closed for maintenance.</p>
<p>A Japanese oil refining facility  located in northern region were unaffected, but small geothermal and  hydroelectric power facilities were shut down after the earthquake.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s top refiner <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nippon  Oil Corp</span></span></span>&#8216;s 145,000 barrel-per-day Sendai  refinery was not damaged.</p>
<p>The quake had no impact on operations  because the refinery has been shut since earlier this month for  scheduled maintenance, a <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nippon  Oil</span></span></span> official said.</p>
<p>Another official at <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span> said its 28.8-megawatt geothermal  power plant in Akita prefecture resumed operations in the early  afternoon, around five hours after the initial quake.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span>&#8216;s seven hydroelectric power plants in  Iwate, Miyagi and Akita prefectures with a total capacity of 19.64  megawatts have remained shut, and it was unclear when they would  return to operations pending the inspections, the official added.</p>
<p>Electricity wholesaler J-Power&#8217;s 14.6  megawatt hydroelectric plant and prefecture-run 6.8-megawatt hydro  plant in Iwate Prefecture have remained shut after the quake, the  Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry said. (Reporting by Chisa  Fujioka, Osamu Tsukimori and Chikafumi Hodo; editing by David Stamp)</p>
<p class="western"><strong>Japon: Petite  fuite d&#8217;eau radioactive après le séisme (entreprise)</strong></p>
<p class="western">14 juin 2008</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agence  France Presse</span></span></span></p>
<p>AFPFR<strong>NGC</strong> Agence  France Presse (AFP)<strong>GC</strong> CTGAFP<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">Copyright  Agence France-Presse, 2008 All reproduction and presentation rights  reserved.</p>
<p>Une petite  quantité d&#8217;eau radioactive s&#8217;est échappée d&#8217;un  centre de stockage d&#8217;un site nucléaire samedi après un violent séisme dans le nord du Japon,  mais sans présenter de danger pour la population, a annoncé  l&#8217;entreprise gérant la centrale.</p>
<p>La compagnie  d&#8217;électricité japonaise <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power</span></span></span> (Tepco) a  déclaré que 14,8 litres d&#8217;eau avait fui d&#8217;un réservoir  dans lequel du matériel radioactif était entreposé,  à proximité du réacteur deux de la centrale nucléaire de <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  dans la préfecture du même nom (nord).</p>
<p class="western">&laquo;&nbsp;Mais le niveau de radiation de l&#8217;eau est  bien loin du niveau pouvant potentiellement endommager  l&#8217;environnement&nbsp;&raquo;, a assuré un porte-parole de  l&#8217;entreprise, ajoutant que le réacteur continuait de  fonctionner.</p>
<p>Un violent séisme  de 7,2 sur l&#8217;échelle de Richter a frappé samedi le nord  du Japon. Son épicentre était situé au sud de la  préfecture d&#8217;Iwate, proche de celle de <strong>Fukushima</strong>.</p>
<p>La plus puissante  centrale nucléaire du monde, située à Kashiwazaki-Kariwa (centre du  Japon), est arrêtée depuis juillet 2007 à cause  d&#8217;un violent séisme de magnitude 6,8.</p>
<p class="western">si/sct/pn/php</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__497_323964393"></a> 11 juillet 2008 :  ralentissement du réacteur n°5 pour réparation</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  TEPCO to cut nuclear unit output temporarily</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">LBA</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">(c) 2008  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, July 11 (Reuters) &#8211; Japan&#8217;s  Tokyo Electric Power Co said on Friday it would reduce the power  output of the 784,000-kilowatt No.5 nuclear power generator at  its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi plant to 390,000 kw from 11 a.m.  Saturday (0200 GMT) for an unplanned repair. A company spokesman said  the repair is expected to take only about six hours and the power  output will be gradually raised to full capacity from Saturday  evening. (Reporting by Osamu Tsukimori)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__499_323964393"></a>18  juillet 2008 : le gouvernement autorise TEPCO à repousser les  opérations de maintenance sur le réacteur n°3</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  TEPCO granted nuclear maintenance delay</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>LBA</p>
<p>(c) 2008  Reuters Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, July 18 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co (TEPCO) said on Friday it has been granted  permission by the government to delay the start of planned  maintenance on its 1.1 million kilowatt <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daini No.3 nuclear generator.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s biggest utility applied on  Monday to delay the start of scheduled maintenance by 17 days to  Sept. 6 as it prepares to enter the peak summer demand season.  [ID:nT150388]</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s nuclear and Industrial  Safety Agency requires utilities to shut each unit for inspections  every 13 months, but utilities can apply to extend that period  between inspections.</p>
<p>TEPCO has said both of its two nuclear plants in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture would operate  fully from July 21 to early September. [ID:nT332517] (Reporting by  James Topham)</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> PERSPECTIVE</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__501_323964393"></a> 20 juillet 2008 : une  longue liste de procès contre les centrales nucléaires  au Japon</h2>
<p><strong>Nuclear  Litigation in Japan; There is a surprisingly long list of legal  actions involving nuclear power in Japan</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Bangkok  Post</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">BKPOST</p>
<p class="western">8</p>
<p class="western">(c) 2008</p>
<p>Before any decision to go nuclear,  Thailand should study the case histories of countries that have long  been using nuclear energy. Japan has not had as rosy a path on  the way to becoming one of the largest of nuclear operators in  the world as those advocating nuclear power in Thailand would  have us believe.</p>
<p>There is a long list of court cases.  Nishio Baku, a co-director of the Citizen nuclear Information  Centre in Japan explains that some of the lawsuits demanding that  construction or operation of a nuclear facility be stopped.  The lawsuits are administrative cases, where the government is the  defendant and the petitioner demands that the approval for the  facility be annulled.</p>
<p>Others are civil court cases, where  the company is the defendant and the petitioner demands that  construction and/or operations be terminated.</p>
<p>However, there are also a number of  cases in which citizens are the defendants. These might include cases  in which anti-nuclear activists have been charged with illegal  entry or violence at a nuclear site. In the case of criminal  suits, the Public Prosecutor lays the charges.</p>
<p>According to Nishio, some cases are  heard by a Summary Court, but the majority are heard by a District  Court. In either case, if a party is dissatisfied with the decision,  they may appeal to the regional High Court. If there is still  dissatisfaction it is sometimes possible to take the matter to the  Supreme Court, but this is only allowed under certain circumstances.  These are: where there is a constitutional issue involved; where a  particularly important law is involved; or where the decision goes  against a Supreme Court precedent.</p>
<p>Some lawsuits go on for a long time.  The Tokai II case has so far been the longest. It began in 1973 and  reached a final conclusion in 2004, when the Supreme Court rejected  the case.</p>
<p>Civil Cases</p>
<p>Recently civil suits have been the  main type of litigation involving nuclear power plants. Most  of the cases demand the termination of operations of a particular nuclear station, and have different and reasoning behind the  demands. More details could be studied at: <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">http://cnic.jp/english/newsletter/nit104/nit104articles/nit104court.html</span></span></span> and <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">http://cnic.jp/english/news/newsflash/2006/shika30Mar06.html</span></span></span></p>
<p>The latest case is when the Kanazawa  District Court upheld a suit for termination of operation of the  Shika-2 reactor (ABWR 1,358 MW). The suit was filed by 135 plaintiffs  from 16 prefectures in August 1999 and the decision was made on March  24, 2006.</p>
<p>Yukio Yamaguchi, another CNIC  co-director, gave the history behind this case. &laquo;&nbsp;In 1988, 100  plaintiffs lodged a case against the Shika-1 reactor (540 MW BWR).  Their case was rejected by the District Court in 1994. They appealed  and the High Court rejected their demands in 1998. However, although  they lost their case, they extracted an acknowledgement that nuclear power plants are a negative legacy for future generations. They  appealed to the Supreme Court, but their case was rejected in 2000.  The Shika-2 victory therefore came 18 years after the plaintiffs  first lodged a case against the Shika nuclear power plant.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>However, the Hokuriku Electric, the  plant operator, has appealed to the High Court. As long as there is  an appeal pending they can continue to operate the plant.</p>
<p>Another example of the litigation is  the <strong>Fukushima</strong> II-3 case, which followed an accident involving  a recirculation pump in 1989. The case was an attempt to stop the  company from recommencing operations. It was claimed that pieces of  metal had been left in the damaged reactor and components were simply  patched up.</p>
<p>The Takahama action was an attempt to  prevent reactor number 2 from being restarted after a routine  inspection discovered problems in 46% of the pipes in the steam  generator. The generator was subsequently replaced in its entirety.  In the latter of these cases, despite rejecting the petitioners&#8217;  challenge, the court warned of the danger of the pipes bursting. No  appeal was lodged.</p>
<p>Nishio concluded that even in those  cases where the residents/citizens have lost, they have managed to  extract masses of useful documents from the power companies and the  government.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We should also not forget that  the court cases, via the mass media, have drawn attention to the  issues and thus helped to shape public opinion to become more  critical of nuclear energy,&nbsp;&raquo; he wrote in the newsletter  Nuke Info Tokyo No. 104 (Jan-Feb 2005).</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__503_323964393"></a>6 août  2008 : arrêt du réacteur n°3 pour &laquo;&nbsp;réparations&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  TEPCO to shut nuclear unit for repair work</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">AFX  Asia</span></span></span></p>
<p>AFXASI</p>
<p>(c)  2008, AFX Asia. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO, Aug 6 (Reuters) &#8211; Tokyo  Electric Power Co said on Wednesday it plans to shut its  1,100-megawatt <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daini No.3 nuclear generator  for an unplanned inspection. Japan&#8217;s top utility said in a statement  it will start lowering power output from around 6 p.m. on Aug. 8,  with the unit to be shut down around 4 a.m. on Aug. 9. The unit is  scheduled to be restarted around Aug. 16-17 after repair work, a  company spokesman said. (Reporting by Osamu Tsukimori)</p>
<p>MMMM</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__505_323964393"></a> 21 octobre 2008 : des officiels français  participent à un exercice d&#8217;alerte sur le réacteur n°3</h2>
<p><strong>French  government takes part in annual nuclear disaster prevention drill</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-family:SimSun,宋体;">毎日新聞社</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Mainichi  Daily News</span></span></span></p>
<p>Aiwmdm</p>
<p>(c) 2008  THE MAINICHI NEWSPAPERS. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>This year&#8217;s annual nuclear disaster prevention drill was carried out Tuesday with the  participation of the French government, the first ever participation  by a foreign administration, it&#8217;s been announced.</p>
<p>As part of the drill, which was  carried out at the <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>.-owned <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear Power Plant on Tuesday, there was a test emergency  relayed to the 7,500 registered French nationals living in Japan. The  drill will also be held on Wednesday.</p>
<p>Fears of a nuclear accident  among French nuclear industry insiders have grown following  the closure of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear Power Plant  after 2007&#8242;s earthquake in Niigata Prefecture, and the French Embassy  in Japan is calling for a &laquo;&nbsp;robust communication system between  our two governments.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;Information on nuclear accidents is reported to the International Atomic Energy Agency, but  there&#8217;s no network in place for informing foreign embassies in Tokyo,  so we want to make the best use of this experience,&nbsp;&raquo; said the  Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry&#8217;s nuclear and  Industrial Safety Agency.</p>
<p>The drill simulates the breakdown of  the reactor&#8217;s No. 3 cooling unit and a subsequent radioactive  material leak. Various government agencies, including the prime  minister&#8217;s office, about 2,700 local residents and two French nuclear safety experts took part.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__507_323964393"></a> 17 février 2009 :  création de 7 centres de crise à proximité des  centrales nucléaires</h2>
<p><strong>7  command centers for nuclear accidents asked to improve safety.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">JPES</p>
<p class="western">0</p>
<p>Copyright  2009 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO, Feb. 13 Kyodo</p>
<p>The internal affairs ministry Friday  advised seven facilities that are to serve as command centers in the  event of a nuclear accident to improve their safety systems,  citing vulnerability to radiation exposure.</p>
<p>The seven are among 22 command  centers across Japan operated by the industry and science ministries.  Each has been built within 20 kilometers of a nuclear power  plant so that it can expeditiously deal with an emergency.</p>
<p>A recent inspection of 13 centers by  the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications found that seven  of them would have problems preventing radioactive contamination in  the event of an accident, exposing people inside the facilities to  the risk of radiation.</p>
<p>The internal affairs ministry thus  asked the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Ministry of  Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology to improve the  facilities&#8217; safety systems.</p>
<p>The centers in question are located  in seven prefectures &#8212; Hokkaido, Aomori, Miyagi, <strong>Fukushima</strong>,  Shizuoka, Ishikawa and Ehime.</p>
<p>Five of them were found to have a  problem in their ventilation systems. Measures to shield the  buildings from radiation are inadequate at all of them.</p>
<p>The inspection also covered the  information system that is to be used by the command centers for the  evacuation of residents, and found that population and other data on  residents have not been updated in Hokkaido, Aomori, Kanagawa and  Ehime prefectures since fiscal 2005. The internal affairs ministry  asked the science ministry to remedy the situation.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__509_323964393"></a> 24 février 2009 : arrêt du réacteur  n°1 à la suite d&#8217;un &laquo;&nbsp;problème  technique&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  Tepco shuts 460 MW Fukushima1 nuclear reactor on glitch</strong> <strong>BY</strong> kuma</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2009. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)&#8211;24Feb2009/1130 pm  EST/430 GMT</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. shut the 460  MW No. 1 nuclear reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 nuclear power plant in northeastern Japan in the early hours Wednesday after  finding a technical glitch, the company said.</p>
<p>Tepco was forced to shut the No. 1 nuclear reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 nuclear power  plant as reactor was in the process of moving toward normal  operations, following its restart on February 21 after ending its  maintenance, the company said.</p>
<p>It was immediately not clear when the  company will be able to restart the unit as it probes the cause of  glitch, the company added.</p>
<p>With shutdown of the No. 1 reactor,  Tepco has seven units operating with a combined capacity of 6.75 GW,  which accounts for 39% of its total nuclear capacity of 17.31  GW at 17 units across Japan.</p>
<p>Japan is nearing the end of its peak  winter power demand season, which runs over December-February and  during this period, the severity of the cold has a direct impact on  kerosene, fuel oil and LNG consumption in the country.</p>
<p>However, Japan&#8217;s power sector has  seen weakened demand this year, particularly from industrial users,  due to the global economic slowdown, sources said.</p>
<p>Tepco was forced to increase fuel,  crude oil and LNG consumption after an earthquake on July 16, 2007,  led to the shutdown of its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant, which had a  capacity of 8.212 GW over seven units.</p>
<p>Takeo Kumagai,  takeo_kumagai@platts.com</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__511_323964393"></a> 10 mars 2009 : l&#8217;utilisation de plutonium pourrait  enfin être d&#8217;actualité</h2>
<p><strong>Pluthermal  Power Finally In Sight, But Issues Abound</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nikkei  Report</span></span></span></p>
<p>NKRP</p>
<p>©  Copyright 2009. Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Nikkei)&#8211;Japan finally appears  set to launch pluthermal (plutonium-thermal) power generation, with  Kyushu Electric Power Co. slated to commence such operations in  October and several other firms expected to soon follow suit.</p>
<p>However, given major construction  delays and other issues, there is slim chance the industry can  achieve its collective goal of bringing online 16-18 pluthermal  reactors by the end of fiscal 2010.</p>
<p>Pluthermal power generation uses  mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel, which is derived from spent nuclear fuel.</p>
<p>On Monday, Hokkaido Electric Power  Co. (9509) filed for government approval to install a pluthermal  reactor. Meanwhile, Shikoku Electric Power Co. (9507) and Chubu  Electric Power Co. (9502) plan to begin such operations by the end of  fiscal 2010.</p>
<p>For its part, Kansai Electric Power  Co. (9503) is getting its act together after two fiascoes: In 1999, a  scandal involving the falsification of safety data by British nuclear Fuels Plc, which made MOX fuel for Kansai Electric at the time, and  in 2004, a fatal accident involving a burst steam pipe at the No. 3  reactor of the plant in Mihama, Fukui Prefecture.</p>
<p>In January, Melox SA of France began  producing MOX fuel using uranium and plutonium for Kansai Electric;  production is scheduled to be completed by the end of this year. The  fuel will be used for pluthermal power generation at reactor Nos. 3  and 4 of the plant in Takahama, Fukui Prefecture.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric Power Co. (9501),  which aims to launch pluthermal operations at three to four reactors,  has also encountered major delays. The firm had obtained local  approval for pluthermal activity at the No. 3 reactor of the No. 1  plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> and the No. 3 reactor of the  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in Niigata Prefecture. But then it was  discovered that the firm had falsified data in 2002, and local  governments demanded halts.</p>
<p>However, town councils around the <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant subsequently dropped their opposition; Tepco  now only needs to obtain prefectural approval. Regardless, starting  up three to four pluthermal reactors by fiscal 2010 appears to be a  tall order, particularly given that resources are being used to get  the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant back online after an earthquake shut it  down in July 2007.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, construction issues forced  Electric Power Development Co. (9513) to postpone the planned launch  of pluthermal operations in Oma, Aomori Prefecture, to November 2014.</p>
<p>As bothersome as these assorted  delays might be, industry insiders are most troubled by the saga of  the reprocessing plant that Japan nuclear Fuel Ltd. is  building in Rokkasho, Aomori Prefecture. The launch of this facility,  which will turn spent nuclear fuel into MOX fuel, was in early  February postponed by six months until August. This, the 16th delay,  extends the extra wait to 10 years. Meanwhile, construction costs  have tripled to 2.2 trillion yen.</p>
<p>Given the delays and the fact that  candidate sites for the disposal of radioactive waste have yet to be  decided upon, it seems that Japanese pluthermal operations are still  not quite ready for prime time.</p>
<p>&#8211; Translated from an article written  by Nikkei staff writer Ryoichi Emura</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__513_323964393"></a>6 août  2009 : arrêt du réacteur n°3 à la suite de la  découverte d&#8217;une &laquo;&nbsp;anomalie&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>Tepco  to shut No. 3 Fukushima1 nuclear unit briefly Saturday</strong> <strong>BY</strong> kuma</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2009. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)&#8211;6Aug2009/939 pm  EDT/139 GMT</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. plans to shut the 784 MW No.  3 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 nuclear power plant in  northeastern Japan for a brief maintenance Saturday after discovering  an abnormality, a company spokesman said Friday.</p>
<p>The reactor could be restarted as  early as late Sunday, the spokesman said.</p>
<p>Tepco had restarted the No. 3 reactor  July 7 after ending scheduled maintenance which began on February 24.</p>
<p>With the shutdown of the No. 3  reactor, Tepco will briefly have nine units running with a combined  capacity of 8.57 GW, which accounts for 49.5% of its total nuclear capacity of 17.31 GW at 17 units across Japan.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Tepco has yet to receive  consent from local authorities to restart commercial operations of  the No. 7 reactor at its earthquake-hit Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant in northwestern Japan after abnormalities were recently  discovered, the spokesman said.</p>
<p>The company had been poised to  restart commercial operations at the No. 7 reactor last month,  pending approval from the country&#8217;s Ministry of Economy, Trade and  Industry. However, the METI inspection was postponed after  abnormalities at the reactor were found in the early hours of July 23  &#8212; the day of the planned inspection.</p>
<p>On July 31, METI approved Tepco&#8217;s  proposed measures to rectify the abnormalities at the reactor after  the company submitted documents to the ministry and local  authorities, company officials said.</p>
<p>Tepco plans to take the reactor to up  to 100% of capacity from the current 80% after approval from the  authorities, sources close to the matter said.</p>
<p>Tepco would then have to run the  reactor at full rates for at least a week to allow METI to conduct  the previously postponed final inspection, the sources added.</p>
<p>Taking into account the time needed  for the procedure to be completed, the commercial restart of the  reactor now appears unlikely to happen before the second half of  August, the sources added.</p>
<p>The company is also awaiting local  approval for the restart of its 1.356 GW No. 6 reactor, after making  a formal request July 3, following METI approval June 29.</p>
<p>However, local approval for the No. 6  reactor is not likely to come until the company has restarted  commercial output at the No. 7 unit, sources said.</p>
<p>Once approval has been received,  Tepco is due to complete a conditional restart of the No. 6 reactor  and carry out final tests, which are expected to take about 45 days,  enabling it to potentially restart commercial operations in  September.</p>
<p>The No. 6 and the No. 7 reactors  would be the first units to be restarted at the site.</p>
<p>News of nuclear power plant  outages and restarts in Japan are closely watched as they can lead to  an increase or decrease in demand for feedstocks such as fuel oil,  crude and LNG for power generation.</p>
<p>Takeo Kumagai,  takeo_kumagai@platts.com</p>
<p><strong>Power  drops at Fukushima nuclear reactor after malfunction</strong></p>
<p>Kyodo</p>
<p>15  octobre 2009</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2009  Kyodo News</p>
<p>TOKYO, Oct. 15 &#8212; Power output from a nuclear reactor in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture dropped to  about a third of its normal level Thursday after a pump shutdown  caused apparently by an abnormality in electric circuits, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. said, adding there was no  radiation leak during the incident.</p>
<p>One of the two recirculation pumps at  the No. 4 reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 2 nuclear power  plant automatically stopped Thursday afternoon when workers were  checking a device that supplies electricity to the pumps, according  to the utility company.</p>
<p>The incident led power output to fall  from the normal level of 1.1 million kilowatts to 360,000 kilowatts.  Circuits in the electricity supply device appeared to have shorted  out, company officials said.</p>
<p>The company will investigate the  cause of the incident while continuing to operate the reactor using  the remaining pump.</p>
<p>==Kyodo</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> Features</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__515_323964393"></a>23  novembre 2009 : quel avenir pour le nucléaire au Japon ?</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  Back-End Dilemma: Running Out of Time</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Uranium  Intelligence Weekly</span></span></span></p>
<p>URIW</p>
<p>©  2009 Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>Officially, Japan is committed to  closing the nuclear fuel cycle, but as a practical matter it  stubbornly refuses to close. Meanwhile, spent fuel is piling up at  reactor sites and the interim storage site at the Rokkasho  reprocessing plant is almost full, forcing utilities to search for  other alternatives. The search for a permanent high-level waste (HLW)  site is proving elusive.</p>
<p>Closing the fuel cycle requires, of  course, reprocessing, a market for the recovered uranium and  plutonium, such as fast breeder reactors or as mixed-oxide (MOX)  fuel, and long-term storage for spent fuel and HLW. Of these  elements, only the plan to burn MOX fuel in conventional nuclear reactors has made any progress, and after years of delays.</p>
<p>When its Genkai-3 reactor went  critical using a partial load of MOX fuel on Nov. 5, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyushu  Electric Power</span></span></span> hailed the occasion as the  beginning of the pluthermal program. Yet other elements of closing  the fuel cycle are behind schedule or stalled, and the launch of the  MOX program did not go as smoothly as hoped: <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kansai  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. (Kepco) was forced to reject  four of the 16 MOX assemblies that it planned to install at its  Takahama 3 and 4 reactors in Fukui prefecture, for failing to meet  quality control standards (UIW Oct.19 p4).</p>
<p>The delays are beginning to ripple  through Japan&#8217;s nuclear industry as spent fuel from the  country&#8217;s 10 reactors fills up on-site spent fuel pools. Current  estimates put the total on-site storage at 12,320 metric tons versus  total overall capacity of 19,240 metric tons, with at least two sites  very near full capacity. Kepco&#8217;s Takamatsu plant, for example, has  1,130 metric tons in storage versus a capacity of 1,630 metric tons.  Tepco&#8217;s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa facility has 2,140 metric tons in storage  with a capacity of 2,910 metric tons.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Japan nuclear Fuels  Ltd. (JNFL), which operates the planned reprocessing plant at  Rokkasho in northern Japan, recently announced that beginning in 2010  it would not accept additional spent fuel at the facility&#8217;s spent  fuel storage pond, forcing utilities to reconfigure their storage  pools or find locations willing to let them build interim pools.</p>
<p>The Rokkasho storage pond is designed  to hold 3,000 metric tons of spent fuel, evenly divided between waste  from boiling water reactors and from pressurized water reactors. With  test operations suspended at the reprocessing plant, the storage pool  will be at about 95% of capacity by the end of this year. JNFL has  been accepting the spent fuel in anticipation of commercial  reprocessing.</p>
<p>In theory, the Rokkasho plant is  completed and should be operational, but it has been hamstrung by  persistent problems with the vitrification equipment that turns the  separated high-level liquid waste into glass for long-term storage  (UIW Feb.21,p6). This summer JNFL announced another delay &#8212; the  seventeenth, for those counting – in start-up until this time  next year.</p>
<p>The unusually long delay this time is  intended to allow time to fix the problems with the vitrification  technology once and for all, then, allowing for a three-month testing  period, to finally go into operation. Testing began in late 2007, but  the technicians have not been able to solve the problem of platinum  metal elements concentrating at the bottom of the furnace and  blocking the passage of the mixed waste and glass into canisters.</p>
<p>There are some who argue that the  problem is unfixable and that JNFL and relevant government agencies  stubbornly and unwisely stick with Japanese technology developed on a  small scale at the Tokai research station even though it is proving  difficult to scale up. Japan would be better off scrapping the system  entirely and buying a more proven system off the shelf from Europe,  according to this school of thought.</p>
<p>A Permanent Solution?</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Japan is no closer to  finding a permanent HLW waste repository within the four main  islands. Like most countries with nuclear power plants, Japan  proposes to bury its spent fuel deep underground. But while other  countries seek out the most suitable geology and then try to persuade  localities to accept a repository in their neighborhood, Japan has  taken the opposite course.</p>
<p>The industry-funded nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO) was formed in 2000. Its  policy is to quietly solicit local officials to volunteer their  localities as potential storage sites and then investigate to see if  the geology is suitable for permanent storage. So far, though, only  one town has stepped forward &#8212; and then only briefly.</p>
<p>In 2007 the town of Toyo, in Kochi  prefecture on Shikoku Island in western Japan, submitted a petition  to begin exploratory drilling, which NUMO was pleased to accept and  the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) in Tokyo trumpeted  as evidence of progress in solving the nuclear waste issue.  But the excitement was short-lived.</p>
<p>In the face of opposition from  members of the town council, not to mention the prefectural  government, the mayor of Toyo resigned to force an election on the  issue. He was soundly defeated, and the new mayor quickly withdrew  the application. So far, no other towns have come forth to volunteer  as a host HLW site, even though it could mean a billion-yen windfall  just for site surveys.</p>
<p>Other Options</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s electric power utilities are  also pressing localities to host interim spent fuel storage  facilities, but with only a mixed degree of success. For example, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. (Tepco), which operates  seven boiling water reactors at Kashiwazaki and six at <strong>Fukushima</strong> in northern Japan, is planning to build a 5,000 metric ton interim  spent fuel storage pool at Mutsu City in Aomori prefecture.</p>
<p>By all accounts Mutsu is eager to  host the planned facility, although prefectural officials are more  skeptical, worried that what is billed as &laquo;&nbsp;interim&nbsp;&raquo; will  turn into &laquo;&nbsp;permanent.&nbsp;&raquo; Aomori prefecture already boasts  considerable nuclear power infrastructure, including, of  course, the Rokkasho reprocessing plant. The Mutsu storage facility  is still undergoing safety assessments.</p>
<p>Although Mutsu is the only Japanese  city so far to endorse an interim storage pool, several other smaller  cities have expressed interest in hosting such facilities as a means  of helping boost stagnating economies. So far none has passed beyond  the interest stage, however.</p>
<p>Just before the new Japanese  government took office in September, the influential national  newspaper the Yomiuri Shimbun took note of the lack of progress,  saying in an editorial that the country&#8217;s nuclear fuel cycle  policy must be reviewed with fresh eyes. &laquo;&nbsp;The new administration  that will be led by Yukio Hatoyama of the Democratic Party of Japan  should take the situation into account and drastically review current  policy and put together its own agenda.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>In its election manifesto, the DPJ  said there should be a strong central government role in back-end  fuel cycle matters. &laquo;&nbsp;Reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel  and disposal of radioactive waste from nuclear power plants  are long-term projects so the government should take final  responsibility for establishing the technology and for the project.&nbsp;&raquo;  Although it is still early days, so far the DPJ has not formulated an  agenda on this or other matters relating to nuclear power.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__517_323964393"></a> 16 février 2010 :  la préfecture de Fukushima est disposée à  accepter l&#8217;utilisation du plutonium</h2>
<p><strong>Fukushima  Pref. ready to accept &#8216;pluthermal&#8217; power generation</strong></p>
<p class="western">Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2010  Kyodo News</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Feb. 16 &#8212; <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Yuhei Sato said Tuesday he is willing to accept  a &nbsp;&raquo;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; power-generation project by <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. at a power plant in the  prefecture if certain conditions are met.</p>
<p>Speaking at a prefectural assembly  session, Sato said the international trend is for nuclear power and that there have been improvements in safety measures by the  government, along with Tokyo Electric which was forced to delay its  plan after a coverup of nuclear reactor faults came to light  in 2002.</p>
<p>But for the plan to go ahead, Sato  said the No. 3 reactor at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant should be protected against both earthquakes and aging,  while adding that the safety of plutonium-uranium mixed oxide fuel,  which has been stored at the plant since 1999, should be confirmed.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric is expected to start  loading MOX fuel as early as June when it conducts a regular check up  at the plant, and could begin pluthermal power generation in  September. Pluthermal is a term used in Japan combining &nbsp;&raquo;plutonium&nbsp;&raquo;  and &nbsp;&raquo;thermal&nbsp;&raquo; to mean the burning of MOX fuel.</p>
<p>Pluthermal power generation is seen  as a pillar of Japan&#8217;s nuclear fuel recycling initiative. But  Tokyo Electric&#8217;s plan hit a snag after former <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov.  Eisaku Sato withdrew his approval due to the coverup scandal.</p>
<p>In November, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyushu  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. began Japan&#8217;s first  pluthermal power generation at its Genkai nuclear power plant  in Saga Prefecture. <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Shikoku  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. is scheduled to begin  pluthermal power generation in March, while <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Chubu  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. plans to start it by the end  of fiscal 2010.</p>
<p>==Kyodo</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__519_323964393"></a> 28 février 2010 :  les centrales japonaises n&#8217;ont pas souffert du tsunami</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-Japan nuke plants, refineries unhurt by tsunami</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>(c)  2010 Reuters Limited</p>
<p>* Some oil shipments disrupted, but  refineries running</p>
<p>* nuclear plants continue  operating as usual (Adds details)</p>
<p>By Osamu Tsukimori</p>
<p>TOKYO, Feb 28 (Reuters) &#8211; Japanese  power companies operated their plants and refiners processed oil as  usual on Sunday, despite tsunami waves washing in on the country&#8217;s  northeast Pacific coast in the wake of a massive earthquake in Chile.</p>
<p>Some oil product shipments were  disrupted, but the waves caused no other damage to the plants,  officials said.</p>
<p>Tsunami waves of up to 1.5 metres (5  ft) hit far-flung Pacific regions from the Russian far east and Japan  to New Zealand&#8217;s Chatham Islands on Sunday after the quake struck  Chile, killing more than 300 people. [ID:nTOE61R014]</p>
<p>The Japan Meteorological Agency had  warned that waves of more than 3 metres (10 ft) could batter the  northeast Pacific coast. As of Sunday evening, waves of up to 1.2  metres (4 ft) had hit the coast in Iwate.</p>
<p>The trade ministry said there had  been no impact on nuclear operations as of 0800 GMT, including  at <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power</span></span></span>&#8216;s <strong>Fukushima</strong> plants, Japan  Atomic Power&#8217;s Tokai Daini plant, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Chubu  Electric</span></span></span>&#8216;s Hamaoka plant and <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyushu  Electric</span></span></span>&#8216;s Sendai plant, all in the region.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nippon  Oil Corp</span></span></span> said its 145,000 barrels per day  Sendai refinery and 180,000 bpd Muroran refinery have been operating  as usual, while <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Idemitsu  Kosan Co</span></span></span> officials said there was no impact on  its 140,000 bpd Hokkaido plant.</p>
<p>Marine oil product shipments from the  three refineries, however, were suspended earlier in the day due to  the tsunami warnings, the officials added.</p>
<p>The utility and refiner officials  said they had taken precautionary measures well before the first  waves hit and that they did not expect major disruptions to their  business. (Reporting by Osamu Tsukimori and Yoko Kubota)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__521_323964393"></a> 3 mars 2010 : arrêt du réacteur n°6 en raison d&#8217;une canalisation défectueuse</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  Tepco to idle No.6 Fukushima1 reactor by Fri on glitch</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2010. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)&#8211;3Mar2010/447 am  EST/947 GMT</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Company</span></span></span> said Wednesday that it  plans to shut the 1.10 GW No.6 reactor by Friday at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 nuclear power plant in northeastern Japan after finding a  glitch.</p>
<p>Tepco&#8217;s decision comes after it has  detected irregularity in a pipe inside of its turbine building, the  company said.</p>
<p>The utility plans to start shutting  down the reactor at around 10 am (01:00 GMT) local time Thursday to  shut the reactor at around midnight on Friday, the company said.</p>
<p>Tepco has not said how long its  inspection would last.</p>
<p>News of nuclear power plant  outages and restarts in Japan are closely watched as they can lead to  a rise or fall in demand for feedstocks such as fuel oil, crude and  LNG for power generation.</p>
<p>Takeo Kumagai,  takeo_kumagai@platts.com</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__523_323964393"></a> 2 juin 2010 : arrêt  du réacteur n°1 à la suite d&#8217;une panne du circuit  de refroidissement</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-TEPCO to shut Fukushima-Daini reactor for inspection</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">LBA</p>
<p class="western">(c) 2010 Reuters  Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, June 2 (Reuters) &#8211; Japan&#8217;s <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span> (TEPCO) said on Wednesday it  has begun shutting down the 1,100 megawatt No.1 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daini nuclear plant for an unplanned  inspection after finding a problem with the unit&#8217;s cooling system.</p>
<p>A timetable for the restart of the  unit has not been set and will depend on the results of the  inspection, a company spokesman said on Wednesday. (Reporting by  James Topham)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__525_323964393"></a>13 juin  2010 : le tremblement de terre n&#8217;a pas affecté la centrale</h2>
<p><strong>Japan  Tepco maintains Fukushima nuclear operations despite quake</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2010. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)&#8211;13Jun2010/1254 am  EDT/454 GMT</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Company</span></span></span> has maintained normal nuclear operations at its <strong>Fukushima nuclear</strong> power plant  in northeastern Japan in spite of a significant earthquake that hit  the region early Sunday afternoon, a company spokesman said.</p>
<p>A magnitude 6.2 earthquake hit  northern Japan at 1233 local time (0333 GMT) Sunday off the coast of <strong>Fukushima</strong> prefecture at a depth of 40 km, according to the  Japan Meteorological Agency.</p>
<p>Tepco has a total of nine reactors in  operation with a combined capacity of 8.89 GW. They account for 51.4%  of Tepco&#8217;s total capacity of 17.31 GW at 17 nuclear power  plants across Japan.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span> has also maintained normal operations  at its Onagawa nuclear power plant in northeastern Japan in  spite of the large earthquake, a company spokesman said.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span> has three nuclear plants in  operation with a combined capacity of 2.79 GW, or 85.2% of its total nuclear capacity of 3.274 GW across four units in north and  northeastern Japan.</p>
<p>News of nuclear power plant  outages and restarts are watched closely as they can lead to a change  in demand for feedstocks such as fuel oil, crude and LNG for power  generation.</p>
<p>Takeo Kumagai,  takeo_kumagai@platts.com</p>
<p>Jonty Rushforth,  jonty_rushforth@platts.com</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__527_323964393"></a> 17 juin 2010 : arrêt du réacteur n°2  à la suite d&#8217;une &laquo;&nbsp;anomalie&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>Emergency  system nearly activated at Fukushima nuke reactor</strong></p>
<p>Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2010  Kyodo News</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, June 17 &#8212; A  reactor at a nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture automatically shut down Thursday after detecting  abnormality and nearly activated the emergency core cooling system,  the last line of keeping nuclear safety, its operator Tokyo  electric Power Co. said.</p>
<p>While there was no radiation leak in  the incident that occurred at the No. 2 reactor of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear plant around 3 p.m., the water level of the  reactor fell nearly 2 meters below the normal level as the water  supply pump also came to a halt.</p>
<p>The water level was just 40  centimeters above the level in which the emergency system is set to  kick in, when a substitute pump started up to refill the water,  according to <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>.</p>
<p>When the reactor is automatically  shut down, its internal power source is designed to stop and an  external power source will instead be activated. But this transition  was not made in the latest incident somehow, the nation&#8217;s largest  utility said.</p>
<p>A defect in equipment around the  power generator is suspected to have triggered the shutdown, the  company said, adding it is investigating what exactly caused the  problem.</p>
<p>The nuclear and Industrial  Safety Agency said such a power switch problem is assumed in the  reactor&#8217;s safety plan, and while it is necessary to find the cause of  the incident, there was no problem in the way <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power</span></span></span> dealt with it by activating  another pump.</p>
<p>==Kyodo</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__529_323964393"></a> 9 août 2010 : introduction d&#8217;un recours  judiciaire pour interdire l&#8217;usage du  plutonium</h2>
<p><strong>Suit  filed to stop use of MOX fuel.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Energy Scan</span></span></span></p>
<p>JPES</p>
<p>0</p>
<p>Copyright  2010 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>SAGA, Japan, Aug. 9 Kyodo</p>
<p>A group of 130 people filed a lawsuit  Monday, demanding a halt to &nbsp;&raquo;pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; operations at <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyushu  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>.&#8217;s Genkai nuclear plant in Saga Prefecture.</p>
<p>The suit, filed with the Saga  District Court, is the first in Japan to seek the suspension of the  use of plutonium-uranium mixed oxide, or MOX, fuel.</p>
<p>The plaintiffs, led by Matsumi  Ishimaru, 59, argued in their complaint that its use could lead to a  major accident, jeopardizing local residents&#8217; rights and the  environment. &nbsp;&raquo;Pluthermal would harm generations of our descendants  so we just have to say &#8216;no&#8217; to it,&nbsp;&raquo; Ishimaru said.</p>
<p>Other than Genkai plant, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Shikoku  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>.&#8217;s Ikata power plant in Ehime  Prefecture is also involved in pluthermal operations, while <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. is due to commence using MOX  fuel in September in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<p>MOX fuel is a mixture of uranium and  plutonium reprocessed from spent uranium. Pluthermal is a Japanese  word that combines &nbsp;&raquo;plutonium&nbsp;&raquo; and &nbsp;&raquo;thermal.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__531_323964393"></a> 18 août 2010 : le réacteur n°1  doit être arrêté à  la suite de la découverte d&#8217;une fuite radioactive</h2>
<p><strong>RIM  CRUDE NO.3856 Market News &#8211;TEPCO plans to shut down No1 reactor at  Fukushima No1 nuclear power plant</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Rim  Crude Intelligence Daily</span></span></span></p>
<p>RIMCRD<strong>NGC</strong> Rim  Intelligence (English)<strong>GC</strong> CTGRME</p>
<p>(c) 2010  RIM INTELLIGENCE CO.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. (TEPCO) plans to halt  operations of the 460-MW No. 1 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi (No. 1) nuclear power station as water containing  radioactive material has been leaked in the turbine facility, it was  announced Friday. It is still unknown how long TEPCO will shut down  the reactor. A company spokesman said the leak does not immediately  affect the operations of the plant.</p>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  Tepco to idle 460 MW Fukushima1 reactor on glitch Saturday</strong></p>
<p>20 août  2010</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2010. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Tokyo (Platts)&#8211;20Aug2010/159 am  EDT/559 GMT</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Company</span></span></span> will idle Saturday the  460 MW No. 1 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-1 power plant in  northeastern Japan after finding a glitch, the company said Friday.</p>
<p>Tepco did not say how long its  unplanned maintenance of the 460 MW reactor would last. The unit was  on a conditional run since it was restarted on July 21 after a  scheduled turnaround.</p>
<p>After idling the No. 1 reactor, Tepco  will have nine reactors in operation with a combined capacity of 9.46  GW. They account for 54.7% of Tepco&#8217;s total capacity of 17.31 GW at  17 nuclear power plants across Japan.</p>
<p>Japan is in the midst of the  country&#8217;s peak summer demand season, which typically spans  July-September.</p>
<p>High temperatures have a direct  impact on air-conditioning demand from industrial, commercial and  household users. The weather also has an impact on crude, fuel oil  and LNG used for thermal power generation.</p>
<p>News of nuclear power plant  outages and restarts is closely watched as it can lead to change in  demand for feedstock such as fuel oil, crude and LNG for power  generation.</p>
<p>Takeo Kumagai,  takeo_kumagai@platts.com</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__533_323964393"></a>23 août  2010 : l&#8217;énergie nucléaire est une opportunité  pour le Japon</h2>
<p><strong>Nuclear  power offers Japan opportunity to grow economy, contribute to world</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Nikkei  Weekly</span></span></span></p>
<p>JEJ</p>
<p>(c) 2010  Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>Panelists who exchanged views on  Japan&#8217;s nuclear power technology were: Yoichi Kaya, professor  emeritus of the University of Tokyo; Ichiro Takekuro, then-executive  vice president (now fellow) of Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco);  Yasuharu Igarashi, executive officer, corporate senior vice  president, president and CEO of Power Systems Company, Toshiba Corp.;  and Hidehiro Yokoo, director-general, electricity and gas industry  department, Agency for Natural Resources and Energy in the Ministry  of Economy, Trade and Industry. Tadashi Maeda, head of the corporate  planning department, Japan Bank for International Cooperation,  moderated.</p>
<p>Maeda: nuclear power  generation is getting another look around the world, and plans for nuclear power plant construction are advancing not just in  countries that have introduced nuclear power in the past but  also in emerging nations. Behind this &laquo;&nbsp;nuclear power  renaissance&nbsp;&raquo; lies the problem of climate change and the issue of  ensuring safe energy.</p>
<p>Japan, which has advanced technology  in the field of nuclear power, could make enormous  international contributions by supplying that technology. In  addition, this is a wonderful opportunity for economic growth in  Japan. A consortium of Japanese and U.S. companies and a coalition of  French companies were the leading candidates to win the bidding to  build a nuclear plant in the United Arab Emirates. However,  last December the contract went to a consortium of South Korean  firms. Let&#8217;s begin our discussion on this point.</p>
<p>Takekuro: The analysis is that there  were three major factors that led to South Korea winning the order.  The first is that President Lee Myung-bak stood out front and led the  nation in putting its all into winning the order. The second is that  Korea Electric Power Corp. became a centralized response institution,  submitting proposals and undertaking contracts. The third is that the  South Korean bid was significantly cheaper than those of the French  or U.S.-Japan groups.</p>
<p>Igarashi: We should also make the  point that South Korea met the UAE&#8217;s needs. South Korea won an order  not just to build the nuclear power plant but to handle  operation and maintenance as well. Moreover, it provided a 60-year  guarantee. It is very difficult for a private-sector company to offer  guarantees over a 60-year period. We are at a point where it would be  nice in Japan for the country to come together to tackle such  problems.</p>
<p>Maeda: I have also heard that  President Lee was not just the leading diplomat but also gave  instructions regarding costs. On the other hand, Japan did not really  emphasize the cost aspect, thinking that Abu Dhabi had abundant cash.  Its awareness of the situation was overly optimistic.</p>
<p>Yokoo: The government also recognizes  the importance of high-level diplomacy. However, for effective  high-level diplomacy, straightforward negotiations and concrete  proposals are vital. In addition, what the UAE was looking for was to  outsource the entire system &#8211; from construction to operation of the nuclear power plant. However, a structure that could meet  those needs in a unified fashion has not been prepared in Japan.  Taking a lesson from this, a new company has been established by the  government and private sector in a bid to win a nuclear power  plant order in Vietnam.</p>
<p>Maeda: It has been mentioned that  South Korea guaranteed operation, maintenance and management of the  plant for 60 years, but this is a field in which Japan is strong.  Japan also has practical experience of operating nuclear reactors safely over many years. It would seem that being  insufficiently appealing on that front is one of the regrets. Some  insiders cited the low operating rates of Japan&#8217;s nuclear power plants as a reason the order was not awarded to the U.S.-Japan  consortium.</p>
<p>Kaya: Certainly, the operating rate  has been low at Japan&#8217;s nuclear power plants since 2000 and  fell to 60% last year. This was caused in part by stoppages resulting  from the Chuetsu earthquake in Niigata Prefecture. The real operating  rate from 1995 through 2000 was in excess of 80%. When one considers  that maintenance inspections are conducted every 13 months, this is a  very high number and speaks to how advanced Japan&#8217;s technology is.</p>
<p>Takekuro: It is a fact that a variety  of problems played into the low operating rate, and as one player in  the industry, we take that very seriously. As a company entrusted  with nuclear power plants, we know that safety is more  important than anything else, and to that end we strive for safe  operation. The lower operating rate since 2007 is the result of the  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant being shut down due to  the Chuetsu earthquake. This is understandable when you realize that  the operating rate is 80-84% if you look just at the 10 nuclear reactors in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<p>In the future, we want to steadily  raise operating rates by implementing improvements and advances in  inspection and maintenance programs and improving diagnostic  technology.</p>
<p>In addition, through last year&#8217;s  system revisions, the time between nuclear plant inspections  will go from a standard 13 months to being based on the  characteristics of the individual plants and their equipment. In the  midst of that, we hope to improve operating rates while maintaining  equipment safety. We aim to be at the top level in the world in  around five years.</p>
<p>Yokoo: In the past, Japan&#8217;s operating  rate has reached 84%, and I think the goal set under the government&#8217;s nuclear power promotion plan of 85% in 2020 is appropriate.  Aiming for 90% in 2030 is ambitious, but it is an attainable figure  if nuclear power plants operate for 18 months on average and  are shut down for two months for regular inspections.</p>
<p>Maeda: If you increase operating  rates, this will not only be a major factor in boosting nuclear power plant exports but will also help reduce carbon dioxide  emissions and use of fossil fuels. We hope to achieve these goals  soon.</p>
<p>However, going back to the issue of  stopping the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant because of  the earthquake, viewed another way this is a testament that Japan&#8217;s nuclear power plants are earthquake resistant and extremely  safe. There are many earthquake-prone countries in the world. Perhaps  this could become an appealing point for them.</p>
<p>Igarashi: When the Chuetsu earthquake  struck, safety functions including &laquo;&nbsp;stop,&nbsp;&raquo; &laquo;&nbsp;cool&nbsp;&raquo;  and &laquo;&nbsp;close&nbsp;&raquo; worked properly. Toshiba is involved in the  construction of state-of-the-art nuclear reactors known as  advanced boiling water reactors at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant&#8217;s No. 6 and No. 7 units, and when it participated in the  U.S. South Texas Project, customers visited and toured  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa. I think the understanding that this engendered  led to contracts being signed.</p>
<p>Maeda: Tepco, Toshiba and the Japan  Bank for International Cooperation last year invested in Canada&#8217;s  Uranium One Inc., which produces and sells uranium. What do you think  about strengthening front-end operations such as fuel procurement?</p>
<p>Takekuro: Japan has an extremely  superior equipment supply chain and has also created comprehensive  construction systems. In addition, a safety culture, or safety  regulations, cultivated over more than 40 years of operation along  with operations personnel who can accurately respond to a variety of  situations have been nurtured. And this is one of Japan&#8217;s major  strengths.</p>
<p>This know-how is put to use in  exporting plant systems to new countries and in supporting  operations. Accordingly, in order to utilize this strength to the  utmost, with the nation&#8217;s cooperation, it is vital that systems be  created so that uranium, which is indispensable for operation, can be  stably supplied by Japanese businesses involved in uranium  development both at home and abroad.</p>
<p>Kaya: In order for consortiums of  Japanese companies to win nuclear power plant orders in  countries just introducing this technology, a structure is needed  that can take on the entire system. It is important to leave the  impression that Japan is comprehensively strong in technology, from  the front end to the back end. In fact, small and midsize companies  in Japan that make peripheral equipment have been well-received  worldwide, to say nothing of our heavy equipment manufacturers and  plant makers.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, it is difficult to say  that we have perfectly grasped the front end and the back end. In  particular the back end, such as reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel, has been difficult to realize.</p>
<p>Emerging nations look at the  operating status of nuclear power plants in Japan as  showcases. Japan needs to establish this technology as soon as  possible.</p>
<p>Maeda: In order to systematically  export power plants, supplying enriched uranium as a fuel and  reprocessing fuel will likely be necessary. Regardless, in the case  of the nuclear power field, a bird&#8217;s-eye view must be taken of  the value chain as a whole, including not just the plant itself but  also such things as nuclear nonproliferation structures.</p>
<p>However, for the UAE order, there is  the view that South Korea also supplied things not related to power  generation, such as interchange on military technology. Would such a  development as adding these &laquo;&nbsp;extras&nbsp;&raquo; be possible in Japan?</p>
<p>Yokoo: In the case of countries just  introducing nuclear power, even if a power plant is built  there is no system for training technicians to operate it. Nor is  there a legal or regulatory framework in place. I think it is  possible to support the building of such programs. Besides this,  there could probably be the approach of supplying the power grid  infrastructure surrounding the nuclear power plant as a  package deal with it.</p>
<p>Maeda: The idea would be to provide  not just the power plant but to ascertain the needs of other  countries in the electric power field as a whole and propose a  packaged, all-Japan solution. With Japanese technology, that should  be possible.</p>
<p>(The Nikkei Weekly 08/23/2010  Edition)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__535_323964393"></a> 14 septembre 2010 : le  réacteur n°3 va être redémarré et  utilisera du MOX pour le première fois</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  to restart reactor using MOX fuel for first time</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">LBA</p>
<p class="western">(c) 2010 Reuters  Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Sept 14 (Reuters) &#8211; <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span> (TEPCO) said it was preparing  to restart the 784 megawatt No.3 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi nuclear plant on Friday, at which it is set to burn so-called  mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel for the first time.</p>
<p>Asia&#8217;s biggest utility said if all  goes as planned, the reactor will start generating power on Sept. 22  and begin commercial operations on Oct. 26.</p>
<p>It had shut the reactor at the  northern Japan plant for planned maintenance on June 19.</p>
<p>During the shutdown, TEPCO prepared  for uranium dioxide as well as MOX fuel to be burned at the reactor,  making it the first time the company will use the recycled fuel.</p>
<p>Other power companies have started  using the recycled fuel as part of Japan&#8217;s goal to move towards a  closed cycle where it recycles its own spent fuel and then burns  recovered uranium and plutonium as MOX fuel. (Reporting by Risa  Maeda; Editing by Chris Gallagher)</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> Asia/Pacific  Rim</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__537_323964393"></a> 16 septembre 2010 : TEPCO  souhaite augmenter la part du nucléaire et des énergies  renouvelables</h2>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  TEPCO wants to increase share of nuclear and renewable energy</strong> <strong>BY</strong> ANURADHA SUBRAMANYAN</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Global  Power Report</span></span></span></p>
<p>COG</p>
<p>ISSN:  1095-6441</p>
<p>(c) 2010  McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. wants nuclear and  renewable energy plants to contribute 50% of its projected domestic  generation by 2020.</p>
<p>In a September 13 news release, the  company said it plans to invest $30 billion to achieve this target.</p>
<p>TEPCO said nuclear power would  comprise the bulk of the targeted capacity but did not mention the  exact capacities. It also did not mention how much total power it  planned to generate by 2020. It only mentioned that it planned to  generate 400 MW of renewable energy by 2020 by developing wind,  solar, biomass and hydropower plants.</p>
<p>TEPCO currently owns power plants  totaling 64 GW, of which gas-fired plants represent 26 GW, oil and  coal-fired plants 12 GW, nuclear plants 17 GW, and hydropower  plants 9 GW. It has no renewable energy capacity.</p>
<p>TEPCO also said it plans to expand  its overseas electricity business to compensate for the low domestic  demand. The company plans to spend $9.6 billion to develop power  plants totaling 10,000 MW outside Japan by 2020.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;nuclear power generation  is central to producing zero-emission power supply. We will make  steady efforts to develop and utilize renewable energy sources while  also promoting high efficiency, low carbon thermal power generation,&nbsp;&raquo;  the company said.</p>
<p>TEPCO said it plans to develop new nuclear units at its existing <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi and  Higashidori power stations. However, the company did not provide  details on the size of the units.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s seven-unit 8.21-GW  Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant was shut down in 2007  following an earthquake and only a couple of units were re-opened in  2009.</p>
<p>In the renewable energy sector, the  company said, &laquo;&nbsp;We will boost renewable energy use in the  Hokkaido and Tohoku regions by developing wind power projects.&nbsp;&raquo;  The company also said it plans to invest in the research and  development of offshore wind power projects.</p>
<p>In the thermal power sector, the  company plans to develop higher efficiency and lower carbon emission  plants. TEPCO said the development of such plants was crucial  because, &laquo;&nbsp;thermal power generation, with its capability to  respond to fluctuations in electricity demand, is an important source  of power that could provide stable supplies of electricity even in a  low-carbon era.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>TEPCO said the new nuclear and  renewable energy projects would reduce its CO2 emissions by 25% in  2020 compared with 1990 levels.</p>
<p>On its overseas ventures, TEPCO said  it plans to open an office in Beijing to expand its power business in  China. At present TEPCO&#8217;s overseas power developments are limited to  Australia, Indonesia and the Philippines. —</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__539_323964393"></a>18  septembre 2010 : démarrage de l&#8217;exploitation du MOX</h2>
<p><strong>2ND  LD: MOX fuel power generation commences at Fukushima nuclear plant</strong></p>
<p>Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p>KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2010  Kyodo News</p>
<p><strong>FUKUSHIMA</strong>, Japan, Sept. 18 &#8212; <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. started its first power  generation operation using plutonium-uranium mixed oxide fuel at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear power plant in northeastern  Japan on Saturday morning, the utility company said.</p>
<p>The No. 3 reactor at the power plant  in the town of Okuma, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, achieved a  self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction in the early afternoon  and actual power generation is expected to begin in several days,  according to the company.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric delayed the start of  the operation, initially scheduled for late Friday, after the  reactor&#8217;s alarm light indicating the condition of the pipe valve for  the emergency core cooling system did not function properly Friday  night.</p>
<p>There were no problems with the pipe  or valve and the circuit connecting the lamp was fixed, according to  the company.</p>
<p>The reactor is the third in Japan for  MOX fuel power generation, with the others located at <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyushu  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>.&#8217;s Genkai plant in Saga  Prefecture and <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Shikoku  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>.&#8217;s Ikata plant in Ehime  Prefecture.</p>
<p>It is the only one of the three to  have undergone anti-aging treatment, more than 30 years after its  launch, and also the only boiling water reactor to undertake such  operations.</p>
<p>Masao Yoshida, head of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> plant, apologized for the delay in the start of operations, saying,  &nbsp;&raquo;It was a betrayal of local residents who gave us permission to  carry out pluthermal&nbsp;&raquo; power generation.</p>
<p>Pluthermal, a Japanese word that  combines &nbsp;&raquo;plutonium&nbsp;&raquo; and &nbsp;&raquo;thermal,&nbsp;&raquo; involves the use of MOX fuel,  a mixture of uranium and plutonium reprocessed from spent uranium, to  produce electricity.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric plans to gradually  increase the power output of the reactor and start commercial  operations after completing a final state inspection scheduled for  Oct. 26.</p>
<p>The utility company had initially  intended to commence pluthermal operations in 2000, but the plan was  suspended in the wake of the mismanagement of MOX fuel data by some  power companies.</p>
<p>After other delays, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Gov. Yuhei Sato finally approved pluthermal power generation at the  plant in August.</p>
<p>==Kyodo</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__541_323964393"></a> 25 octobre 2010 : Areva estime que l&#8217;utilisation  de MOX ne présente pas de danger  pour les populations</h2>
<p><strong>Areva  Japan: Focusing on MHI and Other New Opportunities</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Uranium  Intelligence Weekly</span></span></span></p>
<p>URIW</p>
<p>©  2010 Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>For 40 years or more Areva&#8217;s  operations in Japan (and those of its predecessors) have centered on  promoting reprocessing, with many well-documented disappointments  along the way and, only recently, some success in getting a  mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel program launched. Now, however, the French  company&#8217;s focus is expanding to include partnerships aimed at  supporting Areva&#8217;s reactor vendor business.</p>
<p>The state-owned concern formed in  2001 with the merger of French nuclear fuel company <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Cogema</span></span></span> and reactor manufacturer Framatome has partnered with <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Mitsubishi  Heavy Industries (MHI) </span></span></span>and moved to more  closely cooperate with other Japanese nuclear equipment  suppliers such as <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Steel Works</span></span></span> (JSW). Recently, UIW sat down with  Areva Japan President Remy Autebert and Managing Director Erwan  Hinault to discuss his company’s current projects, plans and  frustrations.</p>
<p>Long-Term Partnerships</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<p>While Rokkasho disappointed, Japanese  reactor operators continued sending spent fuel to France for  reprocessing, a practice that began back in the 1970s. Now with  plenty of plutonium sitting at Areva&#8217;s La Hague plant, some of it is  being turned into MOX fuel for shipment back to Japan. Happily for  Areva, that program appears to be running smoothly after a few  hiccups (UIW Oct.19&#8217;09,p4). Currently, three Japanese utilities are  using MOX: <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyushu  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>., the <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Shikoku  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. and, most recently, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. (at one of its <strong>Fukushima</strong> reactors). “Local people are being very cautious, but we  believe that MOX provides no extra risk and that one-by-one other  utilities will follow,” said Autebert.</p>
<p>[…]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__543_323964393"></a> 5 novembre 2010 : arrêt d&#8217;urgence du  réacteur n°5 en raison de  &laquo;&nbsp;problèmes&nbsp;&raquo;</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  Urgently Stops Unit 5 At Fukushima No.1 Nuclear Power Plant; Likely  to revise up its contract volume of fuel &amp; crude oils if shutdown  is prolonged</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tex  Energy Report</span></span></span></p>
<p>TEXERE</p>
<p>Copyright  2010. The TEX Report Ltd.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Company</span></span></span>, or TEPCO, urgently  halted a nuclear reactor because troubles occurred at unit 5,  of which rating output is 784,000 KW, of <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1 nuclear Power Plant in Okuma Town, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture. Neither the cause of the troubles has been yet known nor  the schedule to resume operations also has still been fixed.</p>
<p>At unit 6, having rating output of  1.1 million KW, of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No.1 nuclear Plant,  failures were also found. The unit had been shut down for periodical  maintenance since August 14th.</p>
<p>Therefore, TEPCO has been unable to  develop its forecast of operations even now, although completion of  the turnaround was slated for October 13th.</p>
<p>TEPCO has so far suspended operations  of its nuclear power plants due to troubles beyond its  assumption other than planned regular inspections. However, excepting  the unusual fact pattern when all its 7 units of Kashiwazaki Kariwa nuclear Power Plant were stopped after directly being hit by  the earthquake, which broke out in the offshore of central part of  Niigata, the case, where two units were halted simultaneously, is  extremely rare. A start-up test for Unit 5, with rating output of 1.1  million KW, of which restoration work was already finished, is  several months behind schedule because procedures for its approval is  not going smoothly.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__545_323964393"></a>13  décembre 2010 : projets et difficultés de TEPCO</h2>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB"><strong>Tepco  Back in the Black</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Uranium  Intelligence Weekly</span></span></span></p>
<p>URIW</p>
<p>©  2010 Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
<p>Three-and-a-half years after an  earthquake knocked out the world&#8217;s largest nuclear power  plant, the <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. (Tepco) is back in the black  &#8212; but with power demand falling in Japan, it has become increasingly  dependent on overseas projects to offset declining earnings at home.</p>
<p>In just a few minutes after the  Chuetsu-Oki earthquake struck on Jul. 16, 2007, Tepco lost output  from seven reactors, representing more than 8 gigawatts of marketable  electricity. The extended outage at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa complex on  the coast of the Sea of Japan forced the utility to scramble for  replacement power and move up thermal projects &#8212; and the result was  two years of red ink.</p>
<p>Tepco is not only Japan’s  largest utility, serving the capital and its surrounding metropolis,  but is also one of the world&#8217;s largest private nuclear power  plant operators. It has 17 reactors divided between the Kashiwazaki  site and <strong>Fukushima</strong> in the northern half of Honshu.</p>
<p>A successful stock offering this past  summer netted 450 billion yen ($5.45 billion), most of which will be  set aside for construction of the first unit of the planned (albeit  delayed) new Higashidori nuclear plant as well as additional  thermal power plants and other projects.</p>
<p>Tepco’s president, Masataka  Shimizu, in early fall announced that his company plans to spend as  much as one trillion yen over the next 10 years to expand into  overseas markets. The plans call for helping to develop nuclear power plants in the United States (where it has a stake in the South  Texas Project), and Vietnam. The utility also intends to invest in  thermal projects and some other “new energy” sources in  other developing countries.</p>
<p>Milestone at KK</p>
<p>A major milestone in the utility’s  recovery took place Nov. 18 when technicians began bringing KK&#8217;s  Unit-5 back to full power; it will be the fourth of the seven KK  reactors to resume commercial operation, along with Units 1, 6 and 7.  Though the power and revenue is certainly welcome, the success may be  as much psychological as it is material. For the first time since the  earthquake, a majority of the units are now in operation instead of  the other way around (UIW Jul.12,p7).</p>
<p>Indeed, Tepco is rapidly closing in  on something close to normal operations at the site considering  routine shutdowns for refueling and maintenance often take plants  offline. “It was rare [before the earthquake] for us to have  all seven units operating at the same time,” says Hiro  Hasegawa, manager of corporate communications. In fact, Unit 6, the  second of the plants to be brought back, is currently out of  commission for these routine operations.</p>
<p>Events have confirmed the wisdom of  initially concentrating on restoring Units 6 and 7 since their return  to commercial operation helped put Tepco back in the black. Net  income for fiscal year 2009 was a positive 133.7 billion yen compared  with an 84.5 billion yen loss the previous year. Through fiscal 2009,  the outage cost in total 285 yen billion for increased fuel and  electrical energy expenditures less 35 billion yen in nuclear-fuel  cost savings and other back-end expenses, according to the latest  financial statement.</p>
<p>The continuing outages at Kashiwazaki  contributed to Tepco’s 53.3% nuclear power plant  capacity factor for fiscal 2009, which helped depress the overall  national capacity of 65.7%. (In addition to Tepco, the Chubu Power  Co’s Hamaoka 5 unit is still down a year and a half after the  Shizuoka Bay Earthquake, as geologists puzzle over the high movement  it recorded compared with nearby units).</p>
<p>Japan’s anemic capacity factor  in recent years weighs heavily on Japan’s nuclear industry. It lags well behind that of other nations, including South  Korea, which regularly boasts plant capacity factors of 90% or  higher. (Tepco’s best year in 1999 was 84%; it was running at  74% just prior to the quake).</p>
<p>There has been much talk in the  industry about steps to improve working efficiency, such as  stretching out the normal 13-month period between safety inspections.  The government now allows utilities to take longer periods between  inspections, but many are reluctant to move aggressively on this  while the public continues to harbor safety concerns stemming from  earthquakes and the beginning of the long-delayed mixed-oxide fuel  program.</p>
<p>Tepco is fully committed to the  so-called “pluthermal” program and for closing the nuclear fuel cycle. One of its <strong>Fukushima</strong> boiling-water  reactors this summer became the third in Japan to load MOX fuel. In  September, Tepco announced that it would invest 130.4 billion yen in  Japan nuclear Fuel Ltd. to help maintain the troubled Rokkasho  reprocessing plant and other fuel-cycle projects.</p>
<p>The nuclear fuel company,  which recently announced another two-year delay due to difficulties  surrounding the last stage of the process, put out a call for a 400  billion yen capital increase for its projects. Tepco’s  investment boosts its stake in JNFL to 28.6 percent. The three  power-plant constructors, <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Toshiba</span></span></span>,  Hitachi and Mitsubishi Heavy industries, are expected to kick in a  billion yen each.</p>
<p>Four New Reactors?</p>
<p>Tepco has four new nuclear plants on the drawing boards, two at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi  site and two more at Higashidori in the northern Aomori prefecture.  However, with starting dates being continually postponed, it is  anybody’s guess when work will begin on any of these. The  official dates for <strong>Fukushima</strong> 7 and 8 are 2016 and 2017  respectively; for Higashidori 1, 2017, and for Unit 2 “2020 or  later.&nbsp;&raquo; However, Tepco tells UIW that the next plant to start,  early next year, will be Higashidori 1, pending a final government  sign-off.</p>
<p>The main reason for the postponements  is persistent stagnation in electric power demand. “Ten to 20  years ago Japanese were hungry for power,” says Hasegawa. “But  our demand is falling, has been falling, and will continue to fall.”  So not surprisingly, Tepco is turning to foreign markets.</p>
<p>Its investment this year in the South  Texas Project Units 3 and 4 was the first time a Japanese electric  power utility, as opposed to a builder, had invested in an overseas nuclear power project (UIW May10,p3). The next obvious target  is Vietnam, where Japan has a leg up on Units 3 and 4 at the Ninh  Thuan site. For Tepco, success depends a lot on the design that is  ultimately selected. Says the Tepco spokesman: “We’re  sure the ABWR is most suitable for Vietnam, but they may choose a  PWR.”</p>
<p>Beyond Vietnam, the utility is unsure  of its next market, but it is clear on the need for more  private-sector and governmental aid in securing nuclear plant  orders in developing nations. Tepco has been active in this year&#8217;s  formation of “Team Japan,&nbsp;&raquo; the alliance of government,  constructors and operators more formally known as JINED, Japan  International nuclear Development Co., formally started in  October (UIW Jun.7,p6). One of Tepco&#8217;s vice presidents, Ichiro  Takekuro, heads the new organization.</p>
<p>Todd Crowell, Tokyo</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__547_323964393"></a> 24 décembre 2010 : redémarrage du réacteur n°5, arrêté  à la suite d&#8217;une panne sur une pompe</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  Fukushima-Daiichi unit restarted after 7-wk halt</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">LBA</p>
<p class="western">(c) 2010 Reuters  Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Dec 24 (Reuters) &#8211; <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span> (TEPCO) said it restarted the  784-megawatt No.5 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daiichi nuclear plant at 6:00 p.m. (0900 GMT) on Dec. 22 after a seven-week shutdown.</p>
<p>The No.5 reactor automatically  stopped on Nov. 2 as its water level became unusually high while  adjusting control rods. [ID:nTOE6A107L]</p>
<p>TEPCO found that a problem in a pump  caused the stoppage, made repair work and changed maintenance  procedures, the company said in a statement. (Reporting by Risa  Maeda; Editing by Chris Gallagher)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__549_323964393"></a> 12 janvier 2011 : TEPCO  décide d&#8217;allonger de trois mois le délai entre deux  inspections du réacteur n°3, pour produire davantage</h2>
<p><strong>TEPCO  seeks fewer reactor checks, higher run rate</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">LBA</p>
<p class="western">(c) 2011 Reuters  Limited</p>
<p>TOKYO, Jan 12 (Reuters) &#8211; <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span> (TEPCO) , Japan&#8217;s biggest  utility, will extend the interval between inspections at one of its nuclear reactors to 16 months, making it three months longer  than now, to help raise power generation from nuclear operations, it said on Wednesday.</p>
<p>Comparatively frequent shutdowns for  inspections are seen as a reason for Japan&#8217;s nuclear plant  utilisation rate being lower than those of some other countries. The  rate was 68.3 percent last year compared with 90 percent in the  United States.</p>
<p>A higher run rate also leads to lower  greenhouse emissions and helps to curb thermal fuel consumption.</p>
<p>The Tokyo-based utility said the  1,100-megawatt No.3 reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong>-Daini nuclear plant will start extended operations pending government approval and  following the completion of its next inspection, scheduled to start  around May.</p>
<p>A similar move was announced in  October by <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric Power</span></span></span> . [ID:nTOE69E02Y]</p>
<p>TEPCO is likely to eventually apply  the longer interval to other nulcear reactors, which generate about  30 percent of its total power output.</p>
<p>To support higher nuclear run  rates, the government eased inspection rules in 2009 to let plants  run continuously for up to two years instead of 13 months, in line  with practices overseas.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s 54 nuclear generators  all currently undergo inspections within 13 months of the last check.</p>
<p>The government also aims to cut the  duration of each checkup from nearly five months now. Checks of U.S.  reactors take just over a month.</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s trade ministry drafted a plan  in April to boost the average nuclear plant run rate to about  85 percent by 2020. (Reporting by Osamu Tsukimori)</p>
<p><strong>Japan&#8217;s  Tepco to extend No.3 Fukushima2 nuclear unit outage cycle</strong></p>
<p>12  janvier 2011</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Platts  Commodity News</span></span></span></p>
<p>PLATT</p>
<p>Copyright  2011. Platts. All Rights Reserved.</p>
<p>Singapore (Platts)&#8211;12Jan2011/614 am  EST/1114 GMT</p>
<p>Japan&#8217;s <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Company</span></span></span> has decided to extend  its scheduled maintenance cycle at its 1.1 GW No.3 <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 nuclear reactor in northeastern Japan to &laquo;&nbsp;up to 16  months&nbsp;&raquo; from &laquo;&nbsp;up to 13 months,&nbsp;&raquo; the company said  Wednesday.</p>
<p>Following the decision, the company  plans to submit its plan for approval to the Ministry of Economy,  Trade and Industry in early February, it said.</p>
<p>The change would be one of the first  applications of new nuclear regulations that came into force  in January 2009. Tohoku was the first utility to make use of the  rules when it decided to extend maintenance cycles at its 1.1 GW No.1  Higashidori nuclear reactor in northeastern Japan in October  last year.</p>
<p>The new rules allow companies to  operate nuclear facilities for 18 months without an inspection  beyond the previous 13-month cycle. And after 2014, companies can  apply for a 24-month inspection cycle.</p>
<p>When it announced the changes in  2009, METI said it would base its decisions on extensions, which  could take up to six months, on reports from the utilities.</p>
<p>But in June 2010, the ministry said  that at that time no companies had applied for extensions. That meant  that all Japanese nuclear power plants were still running on  13-month inspection cycles.</p>
<p>A shift in nuclear inspection  cycles could lower utilities&#8217; consumption of oil and LNG in Japan, as  Japan&#8217;s power companies typically boost thermal power generation &#8212;  when they lose nuclear power capacity &#8212; by using feedstocks  such as direct-burning crudes, low sulfur waxy residue, low sulfur  fuel oil, high sulfur fuel oil and LNG.</p>
<p>Jonty Rushforth,  jonty_rushforth@platts.com</p>
<p>Takeo Kumagai,  takeo_kumagai@platts.com</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> Japan</p>
<p><strong>Kyushu  submits nuclear proposal</strong> <strong>BY</strong> Staff</p>
<p>20  janvier 2011</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Power  in Asia</span></span></span></p>
<p>PWRA</p>
<p>ISSN:  0965–9609, Issue 570</p>
<p>(c) 2011  McGraw-Hill, Inc.</p>
<p>The <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyushu  Electric Power Company</span></span></span> has sought permission  from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (Meti) to build a  1,590-megawatt nuclear power plant on Kyushu Island in western  Japan. The company said on January 12 that it had already completed  its environmental assessment, and the local government had given  approval to the project&#8217;s construction.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyushu  Electric Power</span></span></span> said that, if it gets Meti  approval, it plans to start construction of the plant in March 2014.  On that timetable, the project would then be scheduled to start  commercial operation in December 2019.</p>
<p>Meanwhile in a separate nuclear development the <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Company</span></span></span> (Tepco) is seeking to  extend the scheduled maintenance cycle at its 1,100-MW No.3 reactor  at the <strong>Fukushima</strong>-2 nuclear plant in northeastern Japan  up to 16 months. The company had previously anticipated that the  cycle would run for up to 13 months.</p>
<p>Following the company-level decision,  which was announced on January 12, Tepco said that it would submit  the plan to Meti for approval in early February.</p>
<p>If agreed, the change would be one of  the first applications of revised nuclear regulations first  introduced in January 2009. The pioneering change had seen <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric Power</span></span></span> decide in October 2010 to seek  to extend the maintenance cycle at its 1,100-MW Higashidori No.1  reactor.</p>
<p>The new rules allow power generators  to operate nuclear facilities for up to 18 months without an  inspection, extending the previous 13-month cycle. After 2014, the  companies can apply for a 24-month inspection cycle.</p>
<p>Staff</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__551_323964393"></a> 7 février 2011 :  la NISA autorise TEPCO à utiliser le réacteur n°1  (40 ans) pendant 10 ans de plus</h2>
<p><strong>Tokyo  Electric allowed to keep using Fukushima reactor for over 40 yrs</strong></p>
<p class="western">Kyodo</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kyodo  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">KYODO</p>
<p>(c) 2011  Kyodo News</p>
<p>TOKYO, Feb. 7 &#8212; The nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency authorized <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. on Monday to use the No. 1  reactor at its <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture for another 10 years after it marks the 40th anniversary  of its start of operation in March.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric said it has yet to  decide how much longer it will continue using the 460,000-kilowatt  boiling light-water reactor, which began the operation on March 26,  1971.</p>
<p>It will be the third reactor older  than 40 years in Japan after the No. 1 reactor at <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Japan  Atomic Power Co</span></span></span>.&#8217;s Tsuruga plant and the No. 1  reactor at <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Kansai  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>.&#8217;s Mihama plant, both in  Fukui Prefecture.</p>
<p>The agency issued the authorization  based on Tokyo Electric&#8217;s maintenance plan for the coming 10 years  and its own inspection of the reactor.</p>
<p class="western">==Kyodo</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__553_323964393"></a> 7 mars 2011 : les  projets de TEPCO pour augmenter la production nucléaire</h2>
<p><strong>Tokyo  Electric: Long-Term LNG Deals Sufficient; More Nuclear Power</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Dow  Jones International News</span></span></span></p>
<p>DJI</p>
<p>(c) 2011  Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</p>
<p>TOKYO (Dow Jones)&#8211;<span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power Co</span></span></span>. (9501.TO) will not have to  increase the volume of liquefied natural gas committed under  long-term contracts for several years, or even longer, as it plans to  boost electricity generation from nuclear power to cut carbon  dioxide emissions, a company executive said.</p>
<p>Many LNG projects are seeking  committed buyers in an oversupplied market to justify the huge  investment, and Japanese utilities are favored for their  more-than-two-decade record of taking contracted deliveries  regardless of market conditions. Tokyo Electric, also known as Tepco,  is among the most desirable because it&#8217;s Japan&#8217;s largest LNG buyer,  using roughly 20 million metric tons of LNG a year.</p>
<p>However, Tepco has already committed  to purchases of more than enough LNG for its future use under  long-term contracts, said Takao Arai, a managing director responsible  for purchases of fossil fuels, without specifying a time frame.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;We have the target to produce  more than 50% of our electricity from non-fossil fuel sources&nbsp;&raquo;  by 2020, and to live up to the target, &laquo;&nbsp;we will have no choice  but to hike our nuclear power operating rates,&nbsp;&raquo; he said.</p>
<p>Arai said he&#8217;s even a little  concerned that the company won&#8217;t need all the LNG cargoes it&#8217;s  committed to take once its nuclear operating rates rise.</p>
<p>The company currently produces  roughly 30% of its total power output from nuclear fuel and  another 30% from LNG.</p>
<p>Tepco has said it plans to build four  new nuclear power reactors in northern Japan, with the  1.38-gigawatt <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi No. 7 reactor slated to start  commercial operations in October 2016, followed by the 1.385-GW  Higashidori No. 1 and the 1.38-GW <strong>Fukushima</strong> Daiichi No. 8 in  March and October 2017, respectively. The 1.385-GW Higashidori No. 2  is expected to commence commercial operations as early as 2020.</p>
<p>-By Mari Iwata, Dow Jones Newswires;  813-6269-2798; mari.iwata@dowjones.com [ 07-03-11 0331GMT ]</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__555_323964393"></a> 9 mars 2011 : à suite du tremblement de  terre, TEPCO &laquo;&nbsp;confirme&nbsp;&raquo; que la  centrale de Fukushima n&#8217;a pas été endommagée</h2>
<p><strong>Strong  quake hits Northeast Japan, tsunami warning issued</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Agency  Tunis Afrique Press</span></span></span></p>
<p>AGETAP</p>
<p>©  2011 TAP. All Rights Reserved. Provided by Syndigate.info, an  Albawaba.com company</p>
<p>TOKYO, March. 9, 2011 (TAP) &#8211; A major  7.2-magnitude quake has hit Japan, swaying buildings in Tokyo and  triggering a tsunami warning, but causing no reported casualties or  damage.</p>
<p>The quake struck late on Wednesday  morning, about 10km below the Pacific seafloor. The epicentre was  about 160km offshore and 430km Northeast of Tokyo.</p>
<p>The Japan Meteorological Agency  issued a tsunami warning for the East coast of the main Honshu  island, where a 24-inch wave was first reported at Ofunato port half  an hour after the quake.</p>
<p>Tokyo Electric and <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric</span></span></span>, nuclear power operators,  confirmed that the quake did not damage their atomic plants and  prefectures in Aomori, Miyagi and <strong>Fukushima</strong>.&nbsp;&raquo;</p>
<p>Local residents in the rural seaside  areas where the quake was felt most strongly reported no immediate  damage from the quake.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__557_323964393"></a>11 mars  2011 : une &laquo;&nbsp;anomalie&nbsp;&raquo; signalée sur les réacteurs  1 et 2</h2>
<p><strong>Urgent:  &laquo;&nbsp;Abnormality state&nbsp;&raquo; reported at Fukushima nuclear plant:  Kyodo</strong> <strong>BY</strong> GaoLi</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Xinhua  News Agency</span></span></span></p>
<p>XNEWS</p>
<p>(c) 2011  Xinhua News Agency</p>
<p>TOKYO, March 11 (Xinhua) &#8212; Japan&#8217;s  Industry Ministry said the operator of the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No. 1 nuclear plant reported an abnormality Friday following an 8.8  powerful earthquake which hit a wide area in northeastern Japan  including <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture.</p>
<p>The system to cool reactor cores in  case of emergency stopped at the No. 1 and No. 2 reactors of the  plant operated by Tokyo Electric Power Co., Kyodo News quoted the  ministry as saying.</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__559_323964393"></a> 11 mars 2011 : l&#8217;IAEA  déclare que les réacteurs ont été arrêtés  en toute sécurité lors du tremblement de terre</h2>
<p><strong>UPDATE  1-Nuclear plants near Japan quake safely shut&#8211;IAEA</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Reuters  News</span></span></span></p>
<p class="western">LBA</p>
<p class="western">(c) 2011 Reuters  Limited</p>
<p>(Adds quotes, detail)</p>
<p>VIENNA, March 11 (Reuters) &#8211; The four  Japanese nuclear power plants closest to Friday&#8217;s major  earthquake in Japan have been safely shut down, the International  Atomic Energy Agency said.</p>
<p>The IAEA, the Vienna-based U.N. nuclear watchdog, said it was seeking more information on  which countries and nuclear facilities might be at risk from  the tsunami unleashed by the quake.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The four Japanese nuclear power plants closest to the quake have been safely shut down,&nbsp;&raquo;  the agency said in a statement, adding it was liaising with the  Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry on further details  of the situation.</p>
<p>&laquo;&nbsp;The agency has sent an offer of  good offices to Japan, should the country request support,&nbsp;&raquo; the  statement added.</p>
<p>Japanese media said the government  had decided to declare a nuclear power emergency situation,  which occurs if there is confirmation of radioactivity leaks from a nuclear power plant or a reactor cooling system breaks down.</p>
<p>Kyodo news agency said a fire broke  out at <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric Power Company</span></span></span>&#8216;s Onagawa nuclear plant in northeastern Japan following the earthquake.</p>
<p>Separately, <strong>Fukushima</strong> Prefecture, the site of a <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power</span></span></span>nuclear power plant, said  on Friday the plant&#8217;s reactor cooling system was functioning, denying  an earlier report that it was malfunctioning.</p>
<p>(Reporting by Fredrik Dahl and  Michael Shields; editing by Mark Heinrich)</p>
<h2 class="western"><a name="__RefHeading__561_323964393"></a>11 mars  2011 : état d&#8217;urgence déclaré à Fukushima</h2>
<p><strong>Authorites  declare emergency at nuclear plant after quake</strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">The  Irish Examiner</span></span></span></p>
<p>IRISEX</p>
<p>©  Irish Examiner, 2011. Thomas Crosbie Media, TCH</p>
<p>Japan has declared a state of  emergency at a nuclear power plant when its cooling system  failed after the massive earthquake struck.</p>
<p>There was no radiation leak.</p>
<p>Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano  says the nuclear power plant in <strong>Fukushima</strong> developed a  mechanical failure in the system needed to cool the reactor after it  was shut down in the earthquake.</p>
<p>He said the measure was a precaution  and there was no radiation leak at the <strong>Fukushima</strong> No 1 power  plant. He said the facility was not in immediate danger.</p>
<p>The quake also started a fire in a  turbine building at nuclear power plant in north-eastern  Japan, but the reactor building was reported to be secure.</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tohoku  Electric Power</span></span></span> said smoke was observed coming  out of the building, which is separate from the reactor, and the  cause was under investigation. The plant is in Miyagi prefecture.</p>
<p>The company said there have been no  reports of radioactive leaks or injuries.</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> actu-match</p>
<p class="western"><strong>Le Japon en direct  : Alerte au Tsunami</strong></p>
<p class="western">11 mars 2011</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Parismatch.com</span></span></span></p>
<p>PARISM<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">Copyright  2011 Parismatch.com All Rights Reserved</p>
<p class="western">Dernière minute</p>
<p class="western">Au moins 44 morts. Le séisme et le tsunami  qui ont dévasté vendredi la côte nord-est du  Japon ont fait 44 morts et de nombreux disparus, rapporte la chaîne  publique NHK. Aucun bilan officiel n&#8217;a toutefois été  émis par les autorités.</p>
<p class="western">[…]</p>
<p>Etat d&#8217;urgence nucléaire.  Le gouvernement japonais a déclaré à titre de  précaution une situation d&#8217;urgence nucléaire à la suite du puissant séisme qui a frappé  l&#8217;archipel, a déclaré vendredi Yukio Edano, secrétaire  général du gouvernement. Il a précisé que  des tentatives étaient en cours pour tenter de recourir à  une alimentation de secours après l&#8217;arrêt d&#8217;un système  de refroidissement de la centrale <strong>nucléaire  Fukushima</strong> Daiichi, gérée  par <span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Tokyo  Electric Power</span></span></span> et située  dans la préfecture de <strong>Fukushima</strong>.  Cette centrale a été arrêtée. A ce stade,  aucune fuite radioactive n&#8217;a été décelée  et le problème de refroidissement ne devrait pas entraîner  de dégâts, a précisé Yukio Edano.</p>
<p class="western">[…]</p>
<p><strong>SE</strong> international</p>
<p class="western"><strong>Japon: évacuation près d&#8217;une  centrale nucléaire</strong></p>
<p class="western">11 mars 2011</p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span class="western">Lejdd.fr</span></span></span></p>
<p>LEJD<strong>LA</strong> Français</p>
<p class="western" lang="en-GB">Copyright 2011 JDD.fr All Rights  Reserved</p>
<p>Deux mille  habitants des environs d&#8217;une centrale nucléaire ont été appelés à évacuer dans la  préfecture de <strong>Fukushima</strong> (nord-est) quelques heures après le violent tremblement de  terre qui a frappé la région, ont annoncé  vendredi les autorités locales. Un séisme de magnitude  8,9, le plus fort jamais enregistré au Japon depuis 140 ans, a  frappé vendredi le nord-est de l&#8217;archipel, déclenchant  un tsunami de plusieurs mètres de haut sur les côtes  Pacifique et faisant 40 morts et 39 disparus, selon un premier bilan  de la police japonaise.</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><a href="http://fukushimaleaks.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/fukushima.pdf">Télécharger le PDF</a></p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/14/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com&amp;blog=21364062&amp;post=14&amp;subd=fukushimaleaks&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fukushimaleaks.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/fukushima-leaks-revue-de-presse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/a6c79be62cc9088fbba2df7b260c6d2e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">fukushimleaks</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
